logo
North Korea Taking Down Loudspeakers From Border, Says South Korea

North Korea Taking Down Loudspeakers From Border, Says South Korea

NDTV3 days ago
South Korea:
South Korea's military said Saturday it detected North Korea removing some of its loudspeakers from the inter-Korean border, days after the South dismantled its front-line speakers used for anti-North Korean propaganda broadcasts, in a bid to ease tensions.
South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff didn't disclose the sites where the North Koreans were removing speakers and said it wasn't immediately clear whether the North would take all of them down.
In recent months, South Korean border residents have complained that North Korean speakers blasted irritating sounds, including howling animals and pounding gongs, in a tit-for-tat response to South Korean propaganda broadcasts.
The South Korean military said the North stopped its broadcasts in June after Seoul's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, halted the South's broadcasts in his government's first concrete step toward easing tensions between the war-divided rivals. South Korea's military began removing its speakers from border areas on Monday but didn't specify how they would be stored or whether they could be quickly redeployed if tensions flared again.
North Korea, which is extremely sensitive to any outside criticism of its authoritarian leadership and its third-generation ruler, Kim Jong Un, didn't immediately confirm it was taking down its speakers.
South Korea's previous conservative government resumed daily loudspeaker broadcasts in June last year, following a years-long pause, in retaliation for North Korea flying trash-laden balloons toward the South.
The speakers blasted propaganda messages and K-pop songs, a playlist designed to strike a nerve in Pyongyang, where Kim has been pushing an intense campaign to eliminate the influence of South Korean pop culture and language among the population in a bid to strengthen his family's dynastic rule.
The Cold War-style psychological warfare campaigns further heightened tensions already inflamed by North Korea's advancing nuclear program and South Korean efforts to expand joint military exercises with the United States and their trilateral security cooperation with Japan.
Lee, who took office in June after winning an early election to replace ousted conservative Yoon Suk Yeol, wants to improve relations with Pyongyang, which reacted furiously to Yoon's hard-line policies and shunned dialogue.
But Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of the North Korean leader, rebuffed overtures by Lee's government in late July, saying that Seoul's "blind trust" in the country's alliance with the United States makes it no different from its conservative predecessor.
She later issued a separate statement dismissing the Trump administration's intent to resume diplomacy on North Korea's denuclearisation, suggesting that Pyongyang, now focused on expanding ties with Russia over the war in Ukraine, sees little urgency in resuming talks with Seoul or Washington.
Tensions between the Koreas can rise again later this month, when South Korea and the United States proceed with their annual large-scale combined military exercises, which begin on Aug. 18. North Korea labels the allies' joint drills as invasion rehearsals and often uses them as a pretext to dial up military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear program.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Jayalalithaa insisted on retaining the casteist term ‘pappathi' in Tamil Nadu Assembly records
When Jayalalithaa insisted on retaining the casteist term ‘pappathi' in Tamil Nadu Assembly records

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

When Jayalalithaa insisted on retaining the casteist term ‘pappathi' in Tamil Nadu Assembly records

Former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa's caste has become a subject matter of discussion, almost nine years after her passing. Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) leader Thol. Thirumavalavan recently triggered a row by alluding that All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) founder M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) was instrumental in facilitating the 'intrusion' of a Brahmin (Jayalalithaa) into the Dravidian movement and laid the path for her leadership of a Dravidian party. In her early years of heading the AIADMK after MGR's death and later becoming the Chief Minister in 1991, Jayalalitha (as she spelt her name then) had endured strong criticism from her political opponents, notably the DMK, on account of her upper caste origins. Responding to taunts on her Brahmin roots, she once declared in the Legislative Assembly, 'Naan pappathi thaan (I am a Brahmin woman).' This was sometime in 1991. However, records indicating when and in what context she made this statement are not readily available. Nonetheless, a perusal of The Hindu's archives show that in September 1991, political discourse in Tamil Nadu was dominated by what was perceived an anti-Brahmin campaign by the DMK. Under former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi's leadership, the DMK had announced its intention to expose the 'group' in power then. Karunanidhi had clarified his statement (on the 'group') should not be misconstrued to mean another anti-Brahmin movement would be launched. Notwithstanding his claim, on September 23, 1991, several members in the Assembly condemned the 'anti-Brahmin campaign unleashed by the DMK recently.' Law Minister K.A. Krishnaswami referred to one such campaign in the DMK mouthpiece Murasoli and asked was it not an attack on a particular community and would it not amount to inciting violence. 'The anti-Brahmin attitude prevalent now is only followed by the DMK, which is a casteist organisation,' he charged. Labour Minister C. Aranganayagam contended the AIADMK was following DMK founder C.N. Annadurai's policy of not discriminating against any community. But, it was the DMK, which professed to follow the path shown by Annadurai, that was following a wrong policy. 'Buttressing the AIADMK stand, the Law Minister argued that there was a question whether the DMK, at the time of its formation, should be an organisation of Dravidians or for the welfare of Dravidians. It was Annadurai who decided that persons belonging to any single community should not be discriminated against because of their birth and said anyone could become a member of the organisation,' a report in The Hindu said. Congress (I) MLA S. Peter Alphonse had then charged that a sustained and planned anti-Brahmin campaign had been going on for the last 15 days. It was undertaken to threaten the Chief Minister, frighten her and unseat her at a time she embarked on a programme of wiping out anti-national forces. It was aimed at creating an atmosphere of hatred in the State, he said, adding raising the issue in the House that day was the next stage of the campaign. Interestingly, the then Finance Minister V.R. Nedunchezhian said five or six Brahmins were working in Murasoli but what the DMK was now indulging in was for 'political reasons.' The issue dominated the proceedings in the Assembly on the following day too. Chief Minister Jayalalitha said, 'The anti-Brahmin campaign of the DMK deserves to be dismissed with contempt.' She said the members need not have any apprehension that the DMK would succeed in its designs to whip up communal passions for unseating the government. She charged the DMK had 'miserably failed' when it sought to brand MGR a Malayali. 'None would have forgotten the vicious campaign unleashed by the DMK and how people rejected it with scorn. Such intimidation tactics did not affect the MGR Government,' The Hindu reported on her speech. 'In her case too, the DMK had adopted a similar strategy of labelling her as Brahmin in the hope of turning the rest of the communities against her. Ms. Jayalalitha said that right from the day she entered active politics in 1982, the DMK had been deriding her as a Brahmin woman. This cut no ice. The DMK attacked her in the same vein, at meeting after meeting, when she contested the election to the Assembly from Bodinaickanur in 1989. But the people returned her with a massive margin,' the report said. She asserted the caste factor had become irrelevant in politics. During the proceedings, Mr. Alphonse, had urged that the word 'pappathi' be expunged from the Assembly records as it might be considered derogatory and hurt the feelings of a community. However, Jayalalitha did not agree with him. 'It should very much be on record so that posterity will know to what extent a particular community has been ridiculed,' she said. In a report 'Jayalalitha's 100 days: A positive balance-sheet', published on October 6, 1991, The Hindu correspondent wrote: 'The DMK which had given six months to the AIADMK Government to demonstrate its worth appears already in jitters. It has made Ms. Jayalalitha its prime target and started a sustained campaign portraying her as 'papathi' (Brahmin woman) and a symbol of Aryan domination over the Dravidian Tamils, thereby taking politics back to the pre-lndependence days. All that, however, has not deterred Ms. Jayalalitha from going ahead with her programmes with the AIADMK solidly behind her.'

Trump administration to internally review Smithsonian museums
Trump administration to internally review Smithsonian museums

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Trump administration to internally review Smithsonian museums

The White House announced on Tuesday it will conduct an internal review of certain Smithsonian museums and exhibitions in preparation for the 250th anniversary of the US Declaration of Independence. The move follows President Donald Trump's earlier accusation that the institution spreads 'anti-American ideology,' a charge that has drawn concern from civil rights a letter to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch, three senior White House officials said the review's purpose is to ensure 'historically accurate' and 'inclusive portrayals' of the nation's initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the letter stated. The correspondence referenced Trump's March executive order, Restoring Truth And Sanity To American History, in which the Republican president singled out the Smithsonian, alleging it had come under the sway of a 'divisive, race-centered ideology' in recent order is consistent with the Trump administration's broader push to eliminate diversity and inclusion programs across government, universities, and corporations. Critics have warned that the measure risks political interference in the vast museum and research complex, as well as undermining decades of social progress and the acknowledgement of pivotal chapters in American to its website, the Smithsonian Institution encompasses 21 museums and galleries, plus the National Zoo. The institution has not yet responded to requests for White House said the review will examine the tone and historical framing of exhibition texts, websites, educational resources, and digital content, with particular attention to displays planned for the 250th anniversary. Within 120 days, the museums are expected to begin replacing 'divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions' where deemed necessary, the letter added.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters Tune InMust Watch

Delhi High Court Rules Victim Compensation Scheme Not Applicable Retrospectively; 1984 Riot Claim Rejected
Delhi High Court Rules Victim Compensation Scheme Not Applicable Retrospectively; 1984 Riot Claim Rejected

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Delhi High Court Rules Victim Compensation Scheme Not Applicable Retrospectively; 1984 Riot Claim Rejected

New Delhi: In a significant ruling, Delhi High Court has said the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme (DVCS) can't be applied retrospectively, rejecting a plea for compensation by a victim of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Clarifying the legal position, a bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar also noted that DVCS compensation can be paid only in cases where victims have not already received money under other govt compensation schemes. The court was hearing a plea by a family that lost its breadwinner in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots following Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination. Avtar Singh, a Sikh, was killed by a rampaging mob in the Raj Nagar area of Palam. The men accused were later acquitted in 1986. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi The HC traced the DVCS's origin to Section 357A of the erstwhile CrPC, which dealt with victim compensation. It opined that since the scheme owes its existence to Section 357A, it should apply prospectively. It added that "retrospective application of either the provisions of Section 357A of the CrPC or the DVCS would open the floodgates for all and sundry to rake up old and stale claims seeking compensation, be it for an incident occurring just before the introduction of the scheme or three decades prior, like in the present case." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What does it take to be an air traffic controller in Singapore? CNA Read More Undo While rejecting the compensation claim, HC noted that the complainant, Baljeet Kaur, disclosed in an affidavit that her family had already received a total of Rs 11,90,000 from the govt for the death of her father, Avtar Singh, in the 1984 Sikh riots. "Clause 4 (of DVCS) restricts eligibility for compensation to victims or their dependents who have not been compensated for the loss or injury under any other scheme of the Central Govt or State Govt. This clarifies that the DVCS was formed as an umbrella scheme to provide relief to those victims who have been deprived of compensation through any other scheme or Act," HC noted, after amicus curiae appointed in the matter, Senior Advocate Sumeet Verma, argued that Singh's family is entitled to additional compensation under DVCS. The bench noted that the "incident in question took place in the year 1984, and since then, multiple schemes have been introduced by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India, and later adopted and implemented by state govts, including the Delhi govt. A review of these schemes shows that the total monetary benefit, without indexation, would surpass the upper limit of compensation prescribed under the DVCS. The govt has taken additional initiatives to reimburse the victims for property damage and loss, and skill development as well. " While this case was one of five reopened in 2017 due to a botched investigation into the 1984 riots, the verdict narrowed down on the issue of compensation payable, after it emerged that accused Mahender Singh Manan, also known as Mahender Sharabi, and Ram Kumar, are now dead. However, HC made it clear that its ruling won't exclude any victims affected by the riots who have not received compensation under any schemes from lodging their claims under other existing schemes. The bench directed that such claims be verified by authorities within a period of sixteen weeks of receipt and, if approved, payments be made within a period of eight weeks. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store