The US cities people are moving to and from which states
New York primarily attracts movers from the Northeast, with Pennsylvania and New Jersey being key feeder states, and Philadelphia topping the list of sending cities.
Los Angeles sees an influx from nearby states like Arizona and Nevada, with Las Vegas, Seattle, Portland, and Denver being major origins for new residents.
Chicago 's new inhabitants largely come from the Midwest, including Indiana and Michigan, while Houston draws significantly from Southern states and notably from California.
Phoenix is a popular destination for movers from various states, including California, Texas, and Colorado, with Los Angeles and Las Vegas among the top sending metropolitan areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration canceled a $4.9B loan guarantee for a line to deliver green power
The Trump administration on Wednesday canceled a $4.9 billion federal loan guarantee for a new high-voltage transmission line for delivering solar and wind-generated electricity from the Midwest to the eastern U.S., but the company indicated that project would go forward anyway. The U.S. Department of Energy declared that it is "not critical for the federal government to have a role' in the first phase of Chicago-based Invenergy's planned Grain Belt Express. The department also questioned whether the $11 billion project could meet the financial conditions required for a loan guarantee. President Donald Trump has repeatedly derided wind and solar energy as unreliable and opposed efforts to combat climate change by moving away from fossil fuels. The Department of Energy also said Wednesday that the conditional commitment to Invenergy in November was among billions of dollars' worth of commitments "rushed out the doors" by former President Joe Biden 's administration after Biden lost the election. Two prominent Missouri Republicans, U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley and state Attorney General Andrew Bailey, have been vocal critics of the project, describing it as a threat to farmland and landowners' property rights. Hawley said on July 10 that he had secured a pledge from U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright to cancel the loan guarantee in a conversation with him and Trump. 'To ensure more responsible stewardship of taxpayer resources, DOE has terminated its conditional commitment,' the agency said in a statement. A federal loan guarantee generally makes borrowing money less costly. A statement issued for the Grain Belt Express expressed disappointment, calling the new transmission line 'America's largest power pipeline.' Construction has been set to start next year. The statement added: 'A privately financed Grain Belt Express transmission superhighway will advance President Trump's agenda of American energy and technology dominance while delivering billions of dollars in energy cost savings, strengthening grid reliability and resiliency, and creating thousands of American jobs.' Invenergy has said its project would create 4,000 jobs and new efficiencies in delivering power, and that it would save consumers $52 billion over 15 years. The line would deliver electricity from western Kansas about 800 miles (1,287 kilometers), across Missouri and Illinois and into Indiana, connecting there to the power grid for the eastern U.S. It could deliver up to 5,000 megawatts of electricity. "When electricity demand and consumer power bills are soaring, it's hard to imagine a more backward move,' said Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, a nonpartisan, Washington-based group supporting renewable energy. The decision to cancel the loan guarantee came the same day Trump unveiled a plan for U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence that includes speeding up the permitting of new data centers and factories that will boost the demand for electricity. 'This gross mismanagement of our country's energy needs will increase power bills for hundreds of millions of people while making the electricity grid less reliable,' said Laurie Williams, director of a campaign against fossil fuels for the Sierra Club environmental group. Jigar Shah, who headed the Department of Energy office handling loan guarantees under Biden, said that if an applicant meets the requirements of a conditional commitment, the department is obligated to follow through. 'This decision is illegal,' he said in a post on the LinkedIn social media platform. Hawley and Bailey have called the Grain Belt Express a 'scam." Critics object to what Hawley labels an "elitist land grab,' the company's ability to use lawsuits against individual landowners along the line's route to compel them to sell their property. Online court records show that the company filed dozens of such lawsuits in Missouri circuit courts in recent years. The Missouri Farm Bureau's president posted on the social platform X Wednesday that the project threatened to 'sacrifice rural America in the name of progress.' 'We've won a major battle in the war for Missouri's private property rights and farmers," Bailey said. 'At our urging, the DOE saw this boondoggle for what it was.' Bailey acknowledged in his comments that the project still could go forward with private funding and no loan guarantee but added, 'If Invenergy still intends to force this project on unwilling landowners, we will continue to fight every step of the way.'
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Publisher McGraw Hill raises $415 million in US IPO
July 23 (Reuters) - U.S. publisher McGraw Hill (MH.N), opens new tab, backed by investment firm Platinum Equity, said on Wednesday it had raised $414.63 million in its initial public offering in the United States. The company sold 24,390,000 shares, priced at $17 each, below its marketed range of $19 to $22. The offering valued McGraw at $3.25 billion. The IPO market is gaining momentum on the back of a rally in equities and some stellar debuts in recent months. Private equity sponsors, who have been sitting on a massive backlog of portfolio companies waiting to go public, are looking to capitalize on this window. McGraw Hill will debut on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday, nearly 13 years after it was taken private by Apollo (APO.N), opens new tab. The private-equity giant had also attempted to re-list the company in 2015. It was then sold to Platinum Equity, which will continue to hold 84.6% of McGraw's total outstanding shares after the offering. McGraw Hill is one of the most recognized names in the publishing industry, known for its textbooks and other learning resources, with 82% of U.S. higher education institutions using its products, according to company filings. The company revealed in its IPO filing that revenue rose 7% to over $2 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31. It aims to trade on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "MH".
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Insurance claims from LA fires could ‘fully exhaust' $21bn state fund
Insurance claims from the Eaton wildfire could 'fully exhaust' a state fund that was set up to protect customers when a wildfire is caused by a utility company. The devastating wildfire in Los Angeles killed 17 people and destroyed more than 9,000 structures in January. One leading theory is that ageing equipment belonging to Southern California Edison, the primary electricity provider in the region, ignited the fire. If the utility company is found to have been responsible for igniting the devastating January blaze, then the 'financial health of the fund could be strained', according to documents published by California's Catastrophe Response Council, a group of lawmakers and members of the public who oversee the state's wildfire fund. California lawmakers established the state's $21bn wildfire fund in 2019 in an effort to prevent the state's largest utility companies from declaring bankruptcy if their equipment caused a fire. The fund is made up of money the utility companies contribute and a surcharge on customers' utility bills. Power lines and other utility equipment are a top cause of wildfires in drought-ridden California – and have sparked some of the state's most devastating blazes including the 2018 Camp fire that killed more than 80 people. Although investigators are still determining the cause of the Eaton fire, the utility company has been under scrutiny since the blaze broke out. The wildfire fund is overseen by a seven-member council that includes the governor, insurance commissioner, treasurer and secretary for natural resources, members of the public and lawmakers. Before the council's scheduled 24 July meeting, the group published minutes from its 1 May meeting and a draft annual report to the legislature. Those documents suggest that insurance claims from the Eaton fire could drain its resources entirely. Insured losses for both wildfires that devastated southern California in January – the Eaton and the Palisades fires – range from $20bn to $45bn, according to estimates from financial services companies, such as Moody's and Milliman, and the University of California at Los Angeles Anderson School of Management. The risk management firm Verisk estimates that insured losses from the Eaton fire alone could reach $15.2bn. Those estimates have prompted the fund council to warn that, if it is determined that the Eaton fire was sparked by utility equipment, 'the resulting claims may be substantial enough to fully exhaust the Fund'. The losses could far exceed the fund pending ongoing lawsuits. Dozens of families who lost homes in the Eaton fire have sued Southern California Edison. If investigators determine the blaze was sparked by utility equipment, the state fund would also be responsible for paying any settlements in those lawsuits. The documents published before the council's meeting include strategies its members are considering in consultation with experts to ensure the financial durability of the fund. The committee also drafted a letter stating that 'they want to make sure most of the Fund is going to wildfire recovery experts and not third-party actors', such as hedge funds or attorneys. The council documents note that hedge funds are purchasing insurance industry subrogation rights, or the right to the insurance claim, in an attempt to profit from the wildfires. By doing so, hedge funds are agreeing to pay the insurance claim, but would take home any winnings from a legal settlement if Southern California Edison is found liable. The California Earthquake Authority, which administers the fund under the oversight of the council, also told the Los Angeles Times that it worries attorney fees could shrink the fund further (up to half of settlement amounts can go to legal fees). Another tactic may include paying out 'only reasonable claims'. In notes to the fund administrator, one council member asks their colleagues to consider requiring utility companies to 'settle claims with diligence' – since the fund, not the utilities, ultimately pay those settlements.
