logo
Can States Handle Disasters Without FEMA? The Legal Gaps Business Leaders Should Know

Can States Handle Disasters Without FEMA? The Legal Gaps Business Leaders Should Know

Forbes3 days ago
HUNT, TEXAS - JULY 6: Vehicles sit submerged as a search and rescue worker looks through debris for ... More any survivors or remains of people swept up in the flash flooding on July 6, 2025 in Hunt, Texas. Heavy rainfall caused flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas with multiple fatalities reported. (Photo by)
A year already marked by record-smashing heatwaves, catastrophic storms, and deadly flash floods is forcing business leaders to reckon with an unsettling question: What happens if the federal government pulls back from disaster response? The idea of handling disasters without FEMA is not an abstract worry.
In recent weeks, political debates have intensified over proposals to reduce federal spending on disaster relief or even eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) after the 2025 hurricane season, as reported by NBC News. Former President Trump and some congressional leaders have floated plans to shift primary responsibility for disaster recovery to state governments—a move that could leave businesses navigating a patchwork of legal systems without the backstop they've come to rely on for decades.
This uncertainty comes as disasters batter communities from coast to coast. In the first half of 2025 alone, the U.S. suffered at least 15 billion-dollar weather disasters, including historic flooding, tornado outbreaks, and prolonged heat waves, according to Yale Climate Connections. Just this past weekend, flash floods devastated Kerr County, Texas, forcing rescues and shutting down businesses in a region still recovering from earlier storms.
For business owners, investors, and insurers, this brewing shift raises urgent questions: If FEMA disappears, can state laws and budgets fill the gap? Will private enterprises have to shoulder more responsibility for disaster planning and recovery? And which states are prepared—or dangerously unprepared—to protect their residents and economic lifelines in a post-FEMA landscape?
A Federal Safety Net Under ThreatALTADENA, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 30: People walk past a FEMA sign following a press conference at the ... More Altadena Disaster Recovery Center on January 30, 2025 in Altadena, California. House Democratic leaders and local officials held the press conference near the Eaton Fire burn zone to call for federal disaster assistance following the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles County. (Photo by)
Since its founding in 1979, FEMA has been the cornerstone of America's disaster response. It funds emergency shelters, debris removal, rebuilding grants, and cash assistance for displaced families. Critically for businesses, FEMA programs like the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant fund projects that reduce future risks, a crucial buffer as extreme weather grows more frequent.
Yet the agency has long faced political crossfire, with critics labeling it bloated or inefficient. Earlier this year, a lawsuit was filed against the Trump administration's previous halt to BRIC funding for certain states, highlighting how political swings can upend even well-established federal programs.
If proposals to wind down FEMA proceed, business leaders would be left relying on a fragmented patchwork of state disaster laws—many of which, my research suggests, lack the resources or legal frameworks to handle large-scale crises.
State Disaster Laws Are A Patchwork of Authority
Every U.S. state has laws empowering governors and local officials to declare emergencies and coordinate response efforts. Yet those powers vary widely in scope, funding, and legal protections for vulnerable communities.
Despite these structures, most states still rely heavily on FEMA for funding, specialized teams, and logistical support. Without FEMA, states would have to cover enormous costs themselves. For example, after Hurricane Harvey, Texas received over $13 billion in FEMA aid, money that state coffers alone could not match.
The Business Risks Of A FEMA Void
Businesses have more skin in this game than ever. Beyond humanitarian concerns, legal and financial risks loom if federal safety nets vanish.
Federal aid often helps cover costs insurers won't, such as temporary housing, debris removal, and infrastructure repair. Without that aid, insurance companies may face larger payouts or withdraw entirely from high-risk markets. In Florida, for example, multiple insurers have already exited the market due to hurricane risks, leaving businesses scrambling for coverage. A weakened federal role could mean higher premiums, stricter underwriting, or outright denial of coverage in disaster-prone regions, especially for small and midsize enterprises without deep cash reserves.
If state laws differ significantly on evacuation orders, business owners may be caught between conflicting mandates. For instance, if local officials order an evacuation, but state law vests that authority only in the governor, businesses face legal ambiguity about when to close operations, protect staff, or move inventory.
Disaster response gaps also raise potential civil rights issues. Federal laws like the Stafford Act prohibit discrimination in disaster aid based on race, disability, or language. Many states lack comparable mandates, meaning vulnerable communities—and businesses serving them—could fall through the cracks if federal oversight disappears.
Companies with operations across multiple states face a regulatory minefield if FEMA's uniform national standards vanish. Without coordinated federal logistics, restoring supply chains and reopening businesses could take longer, increasing downtime and losses.
Which States Are Ready? Which Aren't?
Few states are fully prepared to absorb FEMA's responsibilities. According to my analysis of disaster laws across the South and Mid-Atlantic, only a handful—like Virginia and Texas—have begun integrating equity planning, vulnerable population registries, and robust local emergency powers into state statutes.
Other states, particularly smaller ones with limited budgets, may lack:
That leaves gaps businesses can't ignore. A company operating in Virginia might navigate disaster recovery relatively smoothly, while the same company in Mississippi or Georgia could face a chaotic patchwork of legal obligations, prolonged closures, and community backlash.
What Business Leaders Should Do Now
While FEMA's fate remains uncertain, businesses should:
FEMA's potential dismantling would represent the biggest shift in American disaster management in generations. Businesses that fail to prepare for handling disasters without FEMA amidst a state-led disaster regime risk higher costs, legal headaches, and reputational damage. Disasters don't respect state lines, but the laws governing them increasingly do. For business leaders, understanding those legal boundaries might be the key to survival in a future where the federal safety net is no longer guaranteed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'South Park' mocking naked Trump = NOT FUNNY. Fake Obama arrest video = FUNNY!
'South Park' mocking naked Trump = NOT FUNNY. Fake Obama arrest video = FUNNY!

USA Today

time4 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'South Park' mocking naked Trump = NOT FUNNY. Fake Obama arrest video = FUNNY!

The bar for presidents should be set slightly higher than a cartoon famous for a singing piece of poop. Thanks to 'South Park' and its hilariously graphic AI depiction of President Donald Trump walking the desert naked, complete with talking genitalia, we're learning how our thin-skinned commander in chief defines comedy. White House officials were outraged by the show's unflattering artificial intelligence depiction of Trump, which is funny in itself, since the easily triggered president is no stranger to making fake video "jokes." On July 20, the actual president of the United States of America posted an AI-generated video of former Democratic President Barack Obama being arrested, handcuffed and hauled away. That bit of dark, authoritarian humor is apparently a real hoot, and totally acceptable, given that Trump has not apologized or threatened to sue himself for $80 bazillion, or whatever the going rate is for things that violate the Man-Child of Mar-a-Lago's sense of decency. (As I typed 'sense of decency,' my laptop crashed because the machine's processor rolled its eyes too hard.) Envisioning the arrest of your political rivals is fine comedy, but apparently, the 'South Park' bit went too far. White House calls 'South Park' a 'fourth-rate show' Trump was reportedly big mad about a cartoon version of nude Trump hopping in bed with Satan and the Comedy Central show's unflattering AI-generated desert scene. A White House spokesperson said: 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' Opinion: Insecure Trump knows he'll never measure up to Obama. And it kills him. The 'fourth-rate show' that 'is hanging on by a thread' just got a five-year deal worth $1.5 billion from Paramount. To put that in perspective, 'South Park' creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone got about 94 times more from Paramount than Trump did when the company paid him $16 million to settle a ludicrous lawsuit against '60 Minutes.' 'South Park' is way more popular than Donald Trump is And the same day the White House boasted about Trump delivering on promises, Gallup released a poll showing the president's approval rating hitting 37%, the lowest of his second term, and a majority of Americans disapproving of his handling of virtually everything, from immigration to the economy to the federal budget. Opinion: Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate But who cares about numbers or facts or whether the bar for presidents should be set slightly higher than a cartoon famous for a singing piece of poop? The bottom line is that in Trump's America, we have a new way to define comedy: A show mocking naked Trump = NOT FUNNY! A fake Obama arrest video = FUNNY! I'm going to distill that definition a bit more, since the picture seems crystal clear: Anything making fun of Trump = NOT FUNNY! Colbert canceled, Behar threatened and 'South Park' condemned We've recently seen late-night host and relentless-Trump-skewerer Stephen Colbert have his show suspiciously canceled by Paramount. After comedian Joy Behar mocked Trump's transparent jealousy of former President Barack Obama on 'The View,' the White House released a statement saying Behar "should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off air.' Only Trump can decide which jokes are funny, America Do you get it, comedians and satirists of America? You shall dispense only Trump-approved humor-jokes or face the wrath of the guy 'South Park' showed stumbling naked across a desert with a teeny talking penis. You may create videos fetishizing the arrest and detention of Democrats; you may, as Trump often does, disparagingly pretend you're a transgender weightlifter; you may make jokes about alligators eating migrants. That is all hilarious. Pure comedy in Trump's MAGAmerica. But if you joke about the president or criticize him in any humorous way – NOT FUNNY!! And you will be held accountable. Particularly if you point out that President Trump is so thin-skinned he got mad at a cartoon. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

USDA to vacate several Washington buildings, relocate staff to regional hubs
USDA to vacate several Washington buildings, relocate staff to regional hubs

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

USDA to vacate several Washington buildings, relocate staff to regional hubs

The US Department of Agriculture announced Thursday it will relocate much of its staff in the Washington, D.C., area to five regional hubs and vacate several buildings in the nation's capital, including its flagship research center. No more than 2,000 USDA employees will remain in the Washington area at the conclusion of the reorganization effort, the agency said in a news release. Advertisement The remaining 2,600 people will be relocated to hubs in Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Salt Lake City. The USDA also said it will vacate several locations in the Washington area, including its flagship research center, the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in Maryland, and one of its headquarters buildings on the National Mall. 'American agriculture feeds, clothes and fuels this nation and the world, and it is long past time the department better serve the great and patriotic farmers, ranchers and producers we are mandated to support,' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement. 'President Trump was elected to make real change in Washington, and we are doing just that by moving our key services outside the beltway and into great American cities across the country. 'We will do so through a transparent and commonsense process that preserves USDA's critical health and public safety services the American public relies on,' she continued. 'We will do right by the great American people who we serve and with respect to the thousands of hardworking USDA employees who so nobly serve their country.' Advertisement 4 The USDA is relocating thousands of staffers based in Washington, D.C. JHVEPhoto – In a video to staff, Rollins said the plan to relocate workers was made to bring the agency's staff closer to its 'core constituents.' The USDA's plan is the latest effort by the Trump administration to reorganize and downsize the federal workforce. The agency is not making widespread cuts to its staff, although the relocation plan is part of the USDA's process of reducing its workforce, it said in the release. Advertisement 4 USDA employees will be sent to five regional hubs across the US. Wangkun Jia – It said much of its reduction was through voluntary retirements and the agency's Deferred Retirement Program. More than 15,000 workers, about 15% of its total workforce, voluntarily chose one of the two financial incentive offers to resign. The Senate Agriculture Committee's chair, Arkansas Republican Sen. John Boozman; the ranking member, Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar; and the ranking member on the House Agriculture Committee, Minnesota Democrat Rep. Angie Craig, said in statements they were not consulted on the plan and called for hearings on the reorganization effort. Advertisement 4 The US Department of Agriculture is led by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. AP 'The best way to serve our agriculture community is by working together, so it's disappointing USDA didn't share its plans in advance of this announcement,' Boozman said. Craig said the 'planned reorganization announced by the agriculture secretary without notice or input from Congress or key stakeholders and constituencies demonstrates that this administration failed to learn the lessons from previous similar efforts and is willfully risking the effectiveness of the agencies and programs that support America's family farmers.' The USDA also plans to reduce or close some regional offices, including consolidating the National Agricultural Statistics Service, which publishes agricultural market data, from twelve offices to five, according to a memo from the agency. 4 The staff relocations are part of the Trump administration's plan to organize and downsize the federal workforce. AP Additionally, the Forest Service will close its nine regional offices over the next year in a plan that 'will take into consideration the ongoing fire season,' the memo noted. The Agricultural Research Service's staff have already struggled with its workload after the voluntary resignations, according to employee Ethan Roberts. 'Many will not take the [relocation] offer, and we will lose even more administrative employees that are critical to the everyday functioning of the USDA and ARS,' he said. Reuters contributed to this report.

Minnesota courts Canadian travelers as U.S. visits drop
Minnesota courts Canadian travelers as U.S. visits drop

Axios

time4 minutes ago

  • Axios

Minnesota courts Canadian travelers as U.S. visits drop

Gov. Tim Walz is reminding Canadian travelers the state is open for business amid a sharp drop in visitors from north of the border. The big picture: Canadians have been avoiding the U.S. amid tensions between their government and the Trump administration. By the numbers: Year-to-date, 28% fewer Canadian residents have crossed the U.S. border by car than by this point in 2024. Zoom in: While those figures from Canada's government span the whole border, U.S. government data show crossings at Minnesota's border stations are down by similar amounts. After a post-pandemic rebound in international ground travel, Minnesota's Canadian border posts saw marked year-over-year declines in crossings in each of the first five months of 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store