Illegal immigration hit a record-high of 14 million in the US in 2023, Pew report finds
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
While the findings are unlikely to settle debate, Pew's report is one of the most complete attempts to measure illegal immigration. Nearly all the increase came from countries other than Mexico. Guatemala, El Salvador and India accounted for the largest numbers after Mexico. Totals from Venezuela, Cuba, Colombia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Ukraine and Peru each more than doubled in two years.
Advertisement
Trump said in an address to Congress in March that 21 million people 'poured into the United States' during the previous four years, far exceeding estimates from Pew and what figures on border arrests suggest. The Federation for American Immigration Reform, a group largely aligned with his policies, estimated 18.6 million in March.
Advertisement
The Center for Immigration Studies, a group that favors immigration restrictions, reported that there were 14.2 million people in the US illegally last month, down from a peak of 15.8 million in January. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem touted the reported drop of 1.6 million in six months. 'This is massive,' she said in a press release last week.
Noem's own department, through its Office of Homeland Security Statistics, estimates there were 11 million people in the US illegally in 2022, its most recent count. The Center for Migration Studies, author of another closely watched survey, most recently pegged the number at 12.2 million in 2022, topping its previous high of 12 million in 2008.
Pew's findings, based on data from the US Census Bureau survey and Department of Homeland Security, reflect an increase in people crossing the border illegally to exercise rights to seek asylum and Biden-era policies to grant temporary legal status. Those policies included a border appointment system called CBP One and permits for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.
Trump has ended those policies and also sought to reverse Biden's expansion of Temporary Protected Status for people already in the United States whose countries are deemed unsafe to return to.
Mexicans were the largest nationality among people in the country illegally, a number that grew slightly to 4.3 million in 2023. The increase came almost entirely from other countries, totaling 9.7 million, up from 6.4 million two years earlier.
States with the largest numbers of people in the country illegally were, in order, California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois, though Texas sharply narrowed its gap with California. Even with the increases in recent years, six states had smaller numbers in 2023 than in the previous peak in 2007: Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Oregon.
Advertisement
Pew estimated that a record 9.7 million people without legal status were in the workforce, or about 5.6% of the U.S. labor force in 2023, with Nevada, Florida, New Jersey and Texas having the largest shares.
The overall US immigrant population, regardless of legal status, reached an all-time high of more than 53 million in January 2025, accounting for a record 15.8% of the U.S. population. The number has since dropped, which Pew said would be the first time it has shrunk since the 1960s.
___
Associated Press writer Elliot Spagat contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge tells Trump admin to pack up Alligator Alcatraz, leave the Everglades, Big Cypress
A federal judge says the Trump administration must halt construction, stop bringing new detainees, and begin winding down operations at the mass detention center in the Big Cypress National Preserve known as Alligator Alcatraz. 'This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,' said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades. 'It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government — and there are consequences for ignoring them.' U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued a temporary restraining order on Aug, 7, which put a stop to new construction and any additional infrastructure at Alligator Alcatraz for two weeks. Late in the evening on Aug. 21 she doubled-down on the restraining order, saying the state and federal government should pack everything up at Alligator Alcatraz and prepare to shut down the facility. This preliminary injunction will last until the trial is complete. The ruling stems from a June 27 lawsuit filed by Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity, and joined by the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 'This ruling affirms what we argued in court — that the government can't just build something in the middle of the Everglades and the Big Cypress preserve with no environmental review, and no public input,' said Tania Galloni, managing attorney for the Florida office of Earthjustice. 'This is why we have environmental laws — to protect the wetlands and ecosystems we all depend on from illegal development.' Others said the detainment facility is a clear violation of major federal laws put in place to protect wildernesses like the Big Cypress and Everglades National Park. 'The state and federal government paved over 20 acres of open land, built a parking lot for 1,200 cars and 3,000 detainees, placed miles of fencing and high-intensity lighting on site and moved thousands of detainees and contractors onto land in the heart of the Big Cypress National Preserve, all in flagrant violation of environmental law,' said Paul Schwiep, counsel for Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity. More: Naples Daily News reporter Chad Gillis describing the scene outside Alligator Alcatraz Alligator Alcatraz sprang to existence early this year, after Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced on social media that a detention facility would be constructed at the old jetport in rural eastern Collier County. That facility has been managed and maintained by Miami-Dade County for decades but was taken over by the state when Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a state of emergency, which allowed the construction of the center to bypass staff review, public comment and permitting. Typically a facility proposed within the boundaries of a National Park Service preserve must go through extensive federal review, a process that can take years. Alligator Alcatraz was up and running in a matter of days, by July 2. More: Hundreds flock to Clyde Butcher's gallery to hear him speak on Alligator Alcatraz The defendants in the case include the Florida Division of Emergency Management, the Department of Homeland Security, ICE and Miami-Dade County. In another case focusing on plaintiffs legal and civil rights, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz ruled Aug. 18 the matter should move to a different court while also declaring part of the lawsuit moot. At the heart of the case was whether the government had violated detainees' rights to due process and legal counsel. Civil rights attorneys had said the remote Everglades facility made it nearly impossible for immigrants to speak confidentially with lawyers or even find out which immigration court can hear their cases. The plaintiffs' attorneys filed suit in the Southern District of Florida, which includes Miami-Dade County, though state and federal officials argued that it should have been filed in the Middle District of Florida, which includes Collier County. In his 47-page order, Ruiz agreed, transferring the case to the middle district. He also dismissed the immigration-court allegations in the lawsuit, saying they were moot after a federal decision that judges at Krome North Processing Service Center would handle the detainees' cases. The case now heads to 'a sister court in the Middle District of Florida to reach the merits of plaintiffs' remaining claims under the First Amendment,' Ruiz wrote. Amy Bennett Williams contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Fort Myers News-Press: Alligator Alcatraz: Judge moves to shut down Florida detention center Play Farm Merge Valley
Chicago Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Here's where all the legal cases against President Donald Trump stand since his return to the White House
Before he battled his way back to the White House, President Donald Trump was in court battling a slew of civil lawsuits and criminal charges that threatened to upend his finances and take away his freedom. Those cases have mostly abated since his return to office, albeit with some loose ends. On Thursday, Trump declared 'total victory' after an appeals court threw out a massive financial penalty in New York Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit alleging that he exaggerated his wealth and the value of marquee assets like Trump Tower and Mar-a-Lago. Other punishments affecting Trump's business still apply, but they can be paused pending further appeals. Since Trump's reelection in November, four separate criminal cases — including his hush money conviction and allegations of election interference and illegally hoarding classified documents — have either been dropped, resolved or put aside. On the civil side, several high-profile lawsuits against Trump have been quietly working their way through the appeals process. Here's a look at some of Trump's criminal and civil cases and where they stand now: Trump became the first former U.S. president convicted of felonies when a New York jury found him guilty in May 2024 of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to a porn actor who said the two had sex. Though Trump could have faced jail time, Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan in January sentenced him instead to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him any punishment. Trump is appealing the conviction. Trump was set to take office just days later, and Merchan said he had to respect Trump's upcoming legal protections as president, even wishing him 'Godspeed as you assume your second term in office.' In August 2023, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis charged Trump and 18 others with participating in a scheme to illegally try to overturn his narrow loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. Willis cited Trump's January 2021 phone call to Georgia's secretary of state, an effort to replace Georgia's Democratic presidential electors with ones who would vote for Trump, harassment of a Fulton County election worker and the unauthorized copying of data and software from elections equipment. But the case stalled over revelations Willis had been in a relationship with the man she appointed to prosecute it. A state appeals court in December removed Willis from the case. She has appealed that decision to the Georgia Supreme Court, but even if the high court takes the case and decides in her favor, it's unlikely she can pursue criminal charges against Trump while he's in office. Special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump in August 2023 with conspiring to overturn the results of his election loss to President Joe Biden in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Prosecutors allege Trump and his allies knowingly pushed election fraud lies to push state officials to overturn Biden's win and pressured Vice President Mike Pence to disrupt the ceremonial counting of electoral votes. But Smith moved to drop the case after Trump won reelection in November. Longstanding Justice Department policy says sitting presidents cannot face criminal prosecution. In a separate prosecution, Smith charged Trump in June 2023 with illegally retaining classified documents he took from the White House to Mar-a-Lago after he left office in January 2021, and then obstructing government demands to give them back. Prosecutors filed additional charges the following month, accusing Trump of showing a Pentagon 'plan of attack' to visitors at his golf club in New Jersey. Smith also moved to drop that case after Trump's election victory. In May 2023, a federal jury found that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million. In January 2024, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages for comments Trump had made about her while he was president, finding that they were defamatory. Trump is appealing that decision. He also appealed the first jury decision, but a federal appeals court in December upheld it and then declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. On Thursday, a five-judge panel of New York's mid-level Appellate Division overturned Trump's whopping monetary penalty in James' lawsuit while narrowly endorsing a lower court's finding that he engaged in fraud by padding his wealth on financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. The judges ruled that the penalty — which soared to $515 million with interest tacked on each day — violated the U.S. Constitution's ban on excessive fines. At the same time, they left in place other punishments, including a bans on Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. The decision will almost certainly be appealed to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals, and the upheld punishments can be paused until that court rules.
Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Florida ordered to undo Alligator Alcatraz due to environmental risks
A federal judge in a ruling Thursday night prohibited state and federal officials from bringing new detainees to Alligator Alcatraz, the hastily built immigration detention site in the Everglades. The ruling also demanded the state begin dismantling elements of the facility — including temporary fencing, lighting fixtures and generators, among other equipment — within 60 days. Why it matters: U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams' 82-page ruling delivers a blow to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and President Trump, who applauded the facility and encouraged other states to replicate it. Catch up quick: Shortly after DeSantis administration officials announced plans for the facility, environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued, arguing it violated the National Environmental Policy Act. The law requires that environmental studies be conducted before any "major" federal action or construction project. The groups had requested that the site be temporarily shut down while the lawsuit played out. Construction was paused earlier this month, following a judge's order. Both the DeSantis and Trump administrations have said the facility has had zero impact on the environment, citing the airstrip that was already on the site before they built the facility. Yes, but: The court cited expert testimony that repurposing the site has resulted in "a myriad of risks" to its sensitive surroundings, including runoff and wastewater discharge that could harm the Everglades. She noted testimony indicating the new lighting alone had reduced the habitat for the protected Florida panther by 2,000 acres. Williams also noted that testimony from the Miccosukee Tribe indicated that its members lost access to trails they'd previously used for hunting and harvesting ceremonial and medicinal plants. The bottom line: Williams concluded the state failed to evaluate the impact of expanding that airstrip into a detention facility and "consulted with no stakeholders or experts and did no evaluation of the environmental risks." "Here, there weren't 'deficiencies' in the agency's process," Williams wrote. "There was no process." What they're saying: "This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. "It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government — and there are consequences for ignoring them." The other side: Shortly after the ruling was issued, Florida's Division of Emergency Management executive director Kevin Guthrie appealed.
