Police hold meeting with Hindu temple leaders
Northamptonshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner (PFCC) Danielle Stone held the discussions alongside Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet and Deputy Chief Constable Ash Tuckley.
It was part of a series of meetings with different communities and faiths that the PFCC and the police have held.
Ms Stone said: "The roundtable was essential to building a new strong relationship with the community."
The office of the PFCC said the meeting last week focused on the issue of representation and diversity within policing.
Attendees had questions and suggestions on how Hindu people could be more attracted to the recruitment process and be encouraged to apply for positions in Northamptonshire Police.
'Attracting people from all backgrounds'
The Labour PFCC said: "Our workforce must be representative of our communities.
"I was pleased to hear directly from the community leaders how we can ensure we take the right approach in our recruitment.
"Our emergency services must be inclusive and shaped by the voices of those they serve."
Northamptonshire Police said ethnic diversity representation in the force was just below 5%, which is the highest it has ever been, but added it wanted that to increase.
Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet said: "We are committed to making Northamptonshire Police truly reflective of the communities we serve, and that means attracting, recruiting and retaining people from all backgrounds."
Raj Ladwa, a volunteer from BAPS Hindu Temple in Wellingborough, attended the roundtable and said: "It was a highly productive discussion with the commissioner and chief constable, focusing on stronger engagement between the police and the Hindu community and improving representation within the force."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Talks with Muslim leaders will build trust - police
Related internet links
Northamptonshire Police
Office of the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My criticism of university sparked a backlash. I stand by it – young people deserve better
My article last week arguing that too many youngsters go to university stirred up a hornets' nest. I had a large amount of correspondence, most of which was supportive, although some was critical. This raised many fundamental issues, for which I am grateful. One line of criticism was that many prospective employers advertise jobs as graduate-only. Accordingly, even if many students would rather not do another three years of full-time study, they may feel that they are compelled to do it. This point is well taken. What is going on here is a system of mutual re-enforcement. More graduates are produced so employers can supposedly raise the status of their jobs by advertising them as 'graduate only'. This then leads to an increased appetite for degrees. And so on. One of the effects is to propel many students into undertaking post-graduate courses in order to mark them out from the hordes of mere graduates. This is a sort of arms race. Admittedly, degrees aren't all about money. The attitudes of students and parents are critical. It took decades for an attitude to develop on the part of both teenagers and parents that it was natural for everyone to go to university. Given this, some of my respondents were sceptical that anything could be done to change the system. The answer, as so often, lies with the funding. At the moment, most government funding for university courses comes in the form of support for the student loan agency, which provides funds to pay for tuition and, in some cases, living expenses. These loans are guaranteed by the state. If and when they are not repaid, the state bears the loss. Accordingly, herein lies a route through which the state can influence matters. There are three aspects of the over-expansion of higher education: individuals ill-suited to higher education; next-to-useless courses; and poorly performing universities. A blanket reduction in the amount of loan funding would be a crude and inefficient way of proceeding. It would be better for the Department for Education to vet university courses according to content, excellence of teaching and the subsequent success of students who take them. The majority of university courses would pass this test. But those that failed it would cease to be eligible for student loans. That would surely cause the number of students applying for these courses to plummet. Moreover, some of these courses would cease to be offered and some universities might cease to exist. That would be no bad thing. Another of the strands of criticism that I encountered was about equity. Isn't it important, some respondents said, that everybody should have access to higher education? I do think it is important that students who are capable of benefiting from a university education should have that opportunity, whatever background they come from. But being at an institution for which you are not properly suited, wasting three years to acquire a useless qualification and then emerging with a heavy burden of debt (which averages more than £53,000) is not an opportunity. It's a curse. We do young people no favours by encouraging them into such a position. Moreover, one of the consequences of the preponderance of graduate-only jobs is that some teenagers whose parents could not afford to top up a student loan, or do not think themselves suited to three more years of full-time study (perhaps because they are neuro-diverse), are locked out of a whole range of jobs which have been 'elevated' to graduate-only status. How on earth is that equitable? Some of my respondents argued that I was sounding the death knell for arts subjects in favour of Stem (science, technology, engineering and maths). They are wrong, I have long recognised that a number of non-Stem subjects provide a marvellous training for the mind and an excellent perspective that helps people with degrees in those subjects to make a wonderful contribution to the economy, while enriching their lives. Nor do I accept that the AI revolution means that there should be a wholesale culling of the humanities at universities in favour of Stem subjects only. As I argued in my book, The AI Economy, the impact of the AI revolution will be to release human beings from all sorts of humdrum mind-based employment. The effect will be to increase the human realm, where many new jobs will be created. However capable AI becomes, there is one thing that it will never be better at than human beings, namely being human. It is entirely appropriate that some students should spend time studying the humanities. Another strand of criticism is the argument that we shouldn't judge the benefit of universities solely by reference to the effect that degrees have on employability and future earnings. I have always agreed with this. Again, this partly comes down to funding. If a young person wants to spend three years studying Chinese medieval wall coverings, or media studies, or whatever – or indeed to get into university and then do nothing at all – that is a legitimate life choice. But it is not legitimate to expect the taxpayer to fund it. I am a particular fan of sandwich courses, which combine university study with a form of employment, usually in the student's third year. I have seen on many occasions how the exposure to the world of work broadens and enlightens young people, both benefitting their studies and enabling them to make better career choices later. Our system of higher education needs radical change. We have sleepwalked into the current situation through a mixture of delusion, wishful thinking and the unenlightened self-interest of some educational institutions and their administrators. This comes at enormous financial cost. Student debt is currently estimated to total about £270bn, or about 10pc of GDP. More importantly, this charade brings a terrific human cost in wasted time. Our young people deserve much better. Roger Bootle is senior independent adviser to Capital Economics and a senior fellow at Policy Exchange
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Scottish grandmother's case dropped after arrest for holding sign in abortion buffer zone
Charges against a 75-year-old grandmother have been dropped after she was arrested for holding a sign offering conversation in an abortion buffer zone, according to a press release from Alliance Defending Freedom International. In February, Rose Docherty was arrested outside the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow for holding a sign that read, "Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want." She stood within 200 meters of the hospital campus— which was designated a "safe access zone" under Scotland's abortion law. Docherty was the first person to be arrested and charged under the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act, which went into effect in September 2024, according to the BBC. The law criminalizes protests or vigils within 200 meters, or 656 feet, of 30 clinics offering abortion services in Scotland. A similar law exists in England and Wales that makes it illegal to "influence someone's decision to access an abortion within 500 feet of any abortion facility." Alliance Defending Freedom International, which supported Docherty's legal case, announced Thursday that Scotland's public prosecutor, the Procurator fiscal, had dropped her case and the formal warning against her. "This is a victory not just for me, but for everyone in Scotland who believes we should be free to hold a peaceful conversation," Docherty said in a statement. "I stood with love and compassion, ready to listen to anyone who wanted to talk. Criminalizing kindness has no place in a free society." ADF International spokeswoman Lois McLatchie Miller hailed the "free speech win" in a post on X. "No one should fear arrest for offering a consensual conversation. Rose's case is a stark example of how 'buffer zone' laws can be weaponised to silence peaceful expression," Lorcan Price, legal counsel for ADF International, said in a press release. At the time of Docherty's arrest, the U.S. State Department weighed in, calling for freedom of expression to be protected. "We call on governments, whether in Scotland or around the world, to respect freedom of expression for all," the department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor (DRL) posted to X. The bureau supports individual liberty and democratic freedoms across the world. The Procurator Fiscal Service told Fox News Digital it could not provide information on Docherty's case.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Gen Z embraces the Bible in unexpected global spiritual awakening
The Bible is having a moment. It's true: Younger generations are showing an unmistakable but surprising openness to the Bible. They are driving a sizable increase in Americans who have seemingly rediscovered the Bible and made a personal commitment to Jesus, according to many sources, including a recent Barna study. It's happening across the globe, as well. The UK's Quiet Revival Report showed a 16% increase in church attendance among 18–24-year-olds — findings that "completely reverse the widely held assumption that the Church in England and Wales is in terminal decline," according to the report's coauthor. Bible sales grew 50% in Russia in 2024, following two straight years of record-breaking increases. The trend features a myriad of other Gen Z trends that confound older generations, such as their sharp decline in partying and teen drinking. There is a "Catholic boom" in France, the U.S. and the UK, where Catholics are on track to surpass Anglicans for the first time ever. Monasteries and convents are reporting wait lists with younger guests booking silent stays to escape technology. CHARLIE KIRK SAYS 'WOODSTOCK IN REVERSE' PHENOMENON IS SWEEPING AMERICA AS YOUNG PEOPLE EMBRACE CONSERVATISM But that's not to say that they've abandoned technology. Indeed, the rise in Bible engagement is likely linked to the plethora of Bible apps and viral videos from new sources. Many of those who are encountering the Bible are doing so through new media of videos and podcasts, as we've seen with the work of the Bible Project and others. The causes of these complex social patterns do not lend themselves to easy explanations. But, as the former president of Ashland University, I witnessed the stirrings of these trends firsthand. Students were earnestly praying for one another and engaging in a way that we had not experienced previously on our campus; faith-forward student groups surged to new heights, and recruiters affirmed that many students were attracted to our Christian ethos. I continue to see the same desire for the truth held in these ancient words at Museum of the Bible. Scores of new seekers are flocking to the timelessness of the world's most read book in history. Young people seem dissatisfied with the materially focused status quo, and crave, even actively seek real meaning in their lives. Gen Z is not a generation satisfied with half-measures. CATHOLICISM SEES MAJOR RESURGENCE AMONG GEN Z, WITH YOUNG MEN LEADING THE REVIVAL Thankfully, our God — and His Word — are not half-measures. "Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good. Be devoted to one another in love. Honor one another above yourselves." (Romans 12:9-10 NIV) Simple, powerful verses like these have become Gen Z favorites as a new generation has seemingly discovered the Bible again. The book of Nehemiah tells how the Israelites worshiped and wept when they "rediscovered" the Scriptures in the temple after the Babylonian exile. These were people seeking God with intense earnestness, intention and openness. These were people who'd confronted existential loss, confusion and suffering while living in a foreign land. Unearthing this power — and the ability to be deeply moved by it — is essential if we want to understand younger generations' unexpected draw to the Bible, and to Jesus. AMERICA IS REDISCOVERING ITS SOUL AND REVIVING THE SACRED We should also listen to those young adults who prayed at the Asbury Revival two years ago, which at its peak featured an estimated 50,000 visitors from nearly 300 colleges and universities. Firsthand accounts described participants rejecting "hollow words and hypocrisy," desiring "values embodied in action," and exhausted with "the spiritual diseases of modern life." CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION All too often, discussions about the Bible can be filled with a certainty that can feel like smugness and border on hubris. Some apologists can act like they have something privileged and invaluable that audiences will miss out on if they don't embrace the message right then and there regardless of their current beliefs. The book of Nehemiah tells how the Israelites worshiped and wept when they "rediscovered" the Scriptures in the temple after the Babylonian exile. At the Museum of the Bible, I've seen firsthand the appreciation from young visitors that we aren't trying to convince them of anything. We give them space to explore the Bible and its impact throughout the centuries and come to their own conclusions. Our trust in the Holy Spirit's work supersedes our urge to control the outcome. As Charles Spurgeon said: "The Word of God is like a lion. You don't have to defend a lion. All you have to do is let the lion loose, and it will defend itself." JOE ROGAN STARTS GOING TO CHURCH AS FAITH RESURGENCE GAINS MOMENTUM, CHRISTIAN APOLOGIST CLAIMS The fact is that we're daily seeing a desire for a genuine encounter with God. It's clear that younger generations are hungry for existential and spiritual meaning, and value authenticity and virtues that lead to lives modeled on truth. It's an honest search which demands a genuine invitation to dialogue and encounter – not soundbites, crafty answers, or facile, textbook responses. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP As we lean into this generation's spiritual quest, educational institutions, churches and ministries focused on the Bible need to provide rigorous and respectful guidance to a curious generation that will otherwise end up with a BYO faith comprised of a patchwork of spiritual influences. An authentic and relevant movement for Bible literacy and relevance must build on an intellectual, emotional and spiritual transformation driven by the Bible's timeless truth, historical context, its inherent narrative and tangible impact on society and personal lives. Only then will a seeking generation discover in the Bible more than just a book, but sustenance for our longing souls.
