Turkey says Ukraine, Russia want ceasefire ahead of possible talks
Turkey's foreign minister said Friday that both Russia and Ukraine wanted a ceasefire, as he visited Kyiv ahead of a potential second round of direct negotiations between the sides next week in Istanbul.
NATO member Turkey, which has strove to maintain relations with both Kyiv and Moscow, has become a key mediator amid US President Donald Trump's push for a deal to end the over three-year war.
Kyiv was yet to confirm whether it would send a delegation to the talks, which Russia proposed to hold on Monday.
Ukraine first wants Russia to share its vision of a roadmap to peace -- a so-called "memorandum" that Moscow said it will only hand over to the Ukrainian delegation in person at the next talks.
"I observe that the issue is beginning to take a more optimistic turn as negotiations start. Both parties want a ceasefire. No one says they don't want it," Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on the train taking him to Kyiv, according to news agency Anadolu.
Fidan earlier this week held talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
Arriving in Kyiv on Friday, he met Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga and visited a memorial for killed soldiers.
He was expected to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky later in the day.
Ukraine has for more than two months been calling for Russia to agree to a full, unconditional and immediate 30-day ceasefire -- an idea first proposed by Trump.
Putin has repeatedly rejected those calls, despite pressure from Washington and Europe, while the Russian army has intensified its advances in eastern Ukraine.
He has said that a ceasefire is possible as a result of negotiations, but that talks should focus on the "root causes" of the war.
Moscow typically uses that language to refer to a mix of sweeping demands that have at times included limiting Ukraine's military, banning it from joining NATO, massive territorial concessions and the toppling of Zelensky.
- US threat to step back -
Kyiv and the West have rejected those calls and cast Russia's assault as nothing but an imperial-style land grab.
Russia's invasion in February 2022 triggered the biggest European conflict since World War II.
Tens of thousands have been killed, swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed and millions forced to flee their homes.
Trump has been growing increasingly frustrated at both Zelensky and Putin for not having struck a deal yet.
At a UN Security Council meeting Thursday a US diplomat reaffirmed that Washington could pull back from peace efforts.
"If Russia makes the wrong decision to continue this catastrophic war, the United States will have to consider stepping back from our negotiation efforts to end this conflict," John Kelley told the meeting, which included Russian and Ukrainian envoys.
Despite the sides having held their first peace talks in more than three years, there has been little sign of movement towards a possible compromise agreement.
At negotiations in Istanbul on May 16, Ukraine said Russia threatened to accelerate its ground offensive into new regions and made a host of hardline demands, including that Kyiv cede territory still under its control.
Kyiv wants to first agree to halt the fighting to allow for discussions on a long-term settlement.
Along with its European allies, Ukraine has also been ramping up pressure on Trump to hit Moscow with fresh sanctions -- a step he has so far not taken.
French President Emmanuel Macron said Friday that if Russia gives "confirmation that it is not ready to make peace" Washington must then confirm its "commitment" to impose sanctions on Moscow, stressing it was a "credibility test for the Americans".
"I spoke 48 hours ago to President Trump who showed his impatience. The question now is what do we do? We (Europeans) are ready," Macron said during a visit to Singapore.
On the battlefield, both sides launched dozens of drones at each other in the latest overnight barrage and Russia has this week claimed to have captured a string of Ukrainian settlements.
bur-jc/jm
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
28 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Turkish authorities escalate crackdown on opposition-run Istanbul municipality
Istanbul — Turkish authorities escalated their crackdown on the opposition-run Istanbul municipality Saturday over alleged corruption charges, detaining 30 people. Those held include a former MP of the main opposition Republican People's Party, or CHP, and the mayors of three CHP-run districts of Istanbul. State-run Anadolu Agency reported that the detentions were part of four separate corruption investigations involving the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality. Saturday's detentions are the fifth wave of a legal crackdown against the Istanbul administration since March 19, when Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu was arrested on corruption charges. The arrest of Imamoglu, who is seen as the most viable challenger to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's 22-year rule, sparked widespread demonstrations calling for his release and an end to Turkey's democratic backsliding under Erdogan. The opposition and its supporters claim his arrest, and the subsequent arrest of dozens more from the CHP, are politically motivated. 'This time the coup didn't come with boots and tanks, but with prosecutor's robes,' said CHP chairman Ozgur Ozel on Saturday before a crowd of supporters in the northwestern city of Duzce. However, the government insists Turkey's judiciary is independent and free of political influence. The second crackdown on CHP-run municipalities and districts occurred in late April, and the third and fourth waves were in late May, resulting in dozens of detentions.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine orders evacuation of villages as Russia prepares fresh assault
Credit: Scopal Ukraine has ordered the evacuation of 11 more villages in its Sumy region as fears grow that Moscow is gearing up for a new ground assault. Russia claims to have captured several villages in the north-eastern region in recent weeks, and has amassed more than 50,000 soldiers on the other side of the border, according to Kyiv. The evacuations come just two days before possible talks between the two sides in Istanbul, as Washington called on both to end the three-year war. Russia has confirmed that it will send a delegation to the Turkish city but Ukraine has yet to accept the proposal, warning that the talks would not yield results unless the Kremlin provided its peace terms in advance. On Friday, Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, accused Moscow of doing 'everything' it could to sabotage the potential meeting by withholding its peace terms. On Saturday, it was announced that Russian drone and missile attacks killed at least two people, including a 9-year-old girl. The child was killed in a strike on the front line village of Dolynka, in the Zaporizhzhia region, and a 16-year-old was injured, Ivan Fedorov, Zaporizhzhia's governor, said. A man was killed by Russian shelling in Ukraine's Kherson region, governor Oleksandr Prokudin wrote on Telegram. Authorities in the Sumy region said on Saturday they were evacuating 11 villages within roughly 19 miles of the Russian border. 'The decision was made in view of the constant threat to civilian life as a result of shelling of border communities,' the regional administration said on social media. A spokesman for Ukraine's border guard service, Andriy Demchenko, said Russia was poised to 'attempt an attack' on Sumy. In total, 213 settlements in the region have been ordered to evacuate. Russia's defence ministry said on Saturday that its forces had taken another Sumy region village, Vodolagy. Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and the destruction of towns and villages across parts of the east and south of the country. The Kremlin's army now controls around a fifth of the country and has a foothold in five regions including Crimea, which it seized in 2014. On Monday, Jonathan Powell, Britain's national security adviser, is expected to attend the next round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul. He will join counterparts from the US, France and Germany. Moscow and Kyiv held their first direct negotiations in more than three years in Istanbul earlier this month, though they yielded little more than a large prisoner of war exchange. On Friday, the Kremlin said it would only discuss the conditions of a ceasefire at the new talks after Kyiv demanded to see a peace memorandum prior to negotiations. Ukraine said it wanted to see a document setting out Russia's peace proposal before committing to sending officials to Turkey. Russia said it would provide its peace memorandum in person on Monday. But Ukraine suspects it will contain unrealistic demands that Kyiv has already rejected, including that Ukraine cedes territory still under its control and abandons its Nato ambitions. In a statement to the United Nations on Friday, Vassily Nebenzia, Russia's UN ambassador, suggested the memorandum might call for Western countries to halt arm supplies to Kyiv and for Ukraine to abandon its military mobilisation. Turkey has offered to host a summit between Putin, Zelensky and Trump, but the Kremlin has turned down the offer. Putin has consistently rebuffed calls for a 30-day, unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Western hesitation continues to undermine Ukraine
On May 28, President Volodymyr Zelensky visited Germany and met with the country's new Chancellor, Friedrich Merz. There were high expectations that Berlin would finally authorize the delivery of Taurus long-range missiles — a long-standing request from Kyiv since the beginning of the Russian invasion. However, this demand had been systematically rejected by former Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who feared dragging Germany into a direct confrontation with Moscow. Instead of Taurus missiles, Merz announced a new 5 billion euro aid package and a commitment that Germany would support the production of long-range weapons on Ukrainian territory. Although these systems are not as sophisticated as the Taurus — whose operation would require months of training — the models to be co-produced by Berlin and Kyiv have the advantage of being easier to use, which could accelerate their integration into the Ukrainian Armed Forces. While investing in Ukraine's defense industry is necessary — something President Zelensky himself has emphasized in urging allies to strengthen the country's defensive capabilities — the fact that he returned from Germany without a Taurus delivery promise reveals a deeper issue. These missiles represent not only a powerful symbolic gesture, demonstrating that the West is truly committed to Ukraine's defense, but also an immediate and tangible impact on the battlefield. As recently highlighted by the Kyiv Independent, the Taurus missile can be programmed to detonate only after penetrating multiple layers of protection, making it especially effective against strategic targets like the Crimean Bridge. Beyond being an important symbol for Russian President Vladimir Putin, that bridge is a crucial logistical link between mainland Russia and the occupied peninsula — a target of both symbolic and operational significance. The absence of the Taurus in this package highlights a familiar blind spot: many Western governments still underestimate how much timing matters. In a war, it's not just about how much support is given, but how quickly it comes. Delays in key decisions don't just slow progress — they quietly erode Ukraine's position on the ground. Has the West become so focused on the latest headlines, diplomatic theater, and talks in Istanbul that it has forgotten to reflect on its own recent history and the decisions made over the past three years? Read also: If Germany sends Taurus missiles to Ukraine, Russia has a major Crimean Bridge problem The truth is that the West sabotages itself by delaying the release of essential resources — a hesitation systematically exploited by Russia. That was the case with the F-16 fighter jets: the U.S. and European countries, initially fearful of escalation, delayed their delivery by more than a year — only relenting after intense Ukrainian pressure and decisive support from countries like the Netherlands and Denmark. The same pattern occurred with the Leopard 2 tanks, delivered only in early 2023; with the UK's Challenger 2 tanks, which arrived in March 2023; and with the U.S. M1 Abrams, delivered only in September that year — a year and a half after the invasion. Even Patriot air defense systems, vital for intercepting Russian missiles, faced initial resistance due to escalation fears and were only delivered in early 2023. Storm Shadow cruise missiles likewise only began arriving in May 2023. Given all this, the inevitable question is: why so much hesitation, if in the end they give in anyway? Russia, unlike its Western counterparts, has shown no hesitation when it comes to speed — whether in advancing troops or manipulating diplomacy. Every so-called negotiation is just another stalling tactic, with the Kremlin expertly layering new steps, new demands, and new distractions to stretch the clock. After the first Istanbul round, came the promise of a 'memorandum', only to be followed by yet another 'new phase.' It's a script they've used repeatedly: feign interest, pretend flexibility, and use the time gained to recalibrate offensives. U.S. President Donald Trump, for his part, appears to have started losing patience with Putin — but that frustration hasn't translated into any concrete action. Instead, he ends up playing straight into Moscow's hands, a convenient figure in a Kremlin-scripted performance designed to drain Western resolve and dress delay up as diplomacy. The race faced by Ukraine and its European allies is, above all, a race against time — and many still don't seem to realize it. For Europeans, this race involves rebuilding strategic autonomy in defense — a process that should have begun over a decade ago, with the annexation of Crimea. At the very latest, the alarm bells should have rung in 2017, when Trump, then president, openly threatened to pull the U.S. out of NATO and, on one occasion when asked about Russian election interference, said he trusted Putin over his own intelligence agencies. The signs were there, flashing red — but Europe chose to look away. Now, the cost of that complacency is becoming impossible to ignore. For Ukrainians, this race against time is even more literal: every day counts, and every delay can mean a new Russian offensive. At this very moment, Russia is mobilizing around 50,000 troops near the border with Sumy — potentially signaling not just an attempt to create the 'buffer zone' Putin has demanded, but preparations for a new large-scale military advance. None of this is to downplay the support Europe has already provided — it's been essential. But that doesn't mean it's been enough, or delivered with the urgency the moment demands. While Putin takes advantage of U.S. ambiguity, Europe often falls into the trap of responding with long-term commitments that, although important, have little immediate effect on the battlefield. Trump, despite his recent tough rhetoric, continues to offer Moscow concessions before they're even requested. In February 2025, he stated, 'I'd love to have them back. I think it was a mistake to throw them out,' referring to Russia's expulsion from the G8 after the annexation of Crimea. It's exactly the kind of signal that undermines Western unity and hands the Kremlin an unearned diplomatic win — no pressure needed. Meanwhile, Europe's delayed promises may look good on paper, but they don't change the reality on the ground, where time and resolve are the most decisive weapons. Gestures like promising Ukraine EU membership by 2030 are certainly meaningful. They send the right message — that Ukraine belongs in the European family and that a future of integration and reconstruction lies ahead. But these are not messages that deter the Kremlin. Because 2030 is five years away — and in a war where every month can redraw the front lines, that's a long time. Ukraine has stunned the world with its resilience, determination, and ability to adapt under extraordinary pressure. But even under U.S. President Joe Biden — a president who, despite his caution and delays, remained firmly committed to Kyiv — 20% of Ukraine's territory remains under illegal Russian occupation. The question now is: what will Ukraine's map look like in five years? Europe, out of fear of escalation, has too often treated Ukraine as a burden. But the truth is that Ukraine should be seen as an opportunity — for integration, for strengthening collective security, and for renewing the European project. Its Armed Forces, forged in the most demanding conditions, have accumulated real combat experience, developed homegrown technologies, created new drone models, and demonstrated a level of adaptability that many European militaries lack. More than that: Ukraine has kept its institutions functioning and its government operating under the pressure of war — something most European countries would struggle to do. Read also: Russia 'testing' Europe's capacity to help Ukraine by intensifying air attacks Ukraine is not just a country in need of help; it's a partner with valuable capabilities to offer. Europe must also understand that not every show of strength leads to escalation. The recent use of the Russian Oreshnik missile against Ukrainian territory — following the U.S. decision in November 2024, under Biden, to authorize Ukraine's use of ATACMS inside Russia — was a calculated, demonstrative move, not the start of a broader escalation. In contrast, the unprecedented attacks on Kyiv and other regions in recent days were deliberate Russian actions that didn't follow any 'Ukrainian provocation.' They were likely triggered by something else entirely: the West's visible hesitation to act more decisively. When deterrence is delayed or watered down, it doesn't prevent escalation — it invites it. The message Moscow will understand is not the one about promises for 2030 — but the one about deliveries tomorrow. Submit an Opinion Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
