Big Ten College Football Playoff plan would make season worse
Regular-season television ratings peak in November. It's the rest of the season that could use a boost.
That's where Petitti's controversial 4+4+2+2+1+3 playoff plan falls flat.
Big Ten playoff plan would devalue non-conference games
Petitti claims to want a playoff model that would improve the regular season, but his plan wouldn't achieve that goal.
The surest way to improve the season would be to incentivizing teams to play tough non-conference games and reduce the feast of cupcake games that shackle the season's early weeks. Petitti, though, aims to devalue non-conference games.
November would stay great in his plan, and play-in Saturday would generate buzz, but his idea to award more than 80% of the playoff bids based on conference standings and play-in games would diminish September and, to a lesser extent, even October.
"Fans will gravitate to" play-in games, Petitti said Tuesday at Big Ten media days.
At what cost?
One play-in Saturday is not worth deflating September.
If the playoff became a Petitti production based mostly on conference results, interconference games like Ohio State-Texas, LSU-Clemson and Michigan-Oklahoma would become glorified exhibitions.
ABSOLUTE POWER: Big Ten, SEC fight to shape College Football Playoff
HOME FIELDS: Our ranking of toughest Big Ten college football stadiums
Play-in Saturday could prop up average teams
Petitti admits to wanting to prolong the playoff hopes of average teams. He sees the chance for an 8-4 Big Ten team winning a play-in game and cracking the playoff as an asset, not a detriment. I see a structure that would make the season's first two months less relevant.
I'm envisioning a scenario in which Iowa loses to Iowa State in a September non-conference matchup, and the Hawkeyes slog to 8-4 before winning a play-in game to reach the playoff, while the Cyclones go 10-2, lose a play-in game and miss the playoff.
That's how a playoff becomes a farce.
Fortunately, Petitti's playoff plan is going nowhere fast. He's failed to gain support from other conferences. The playoff format for 2026 and beyond remains undecided.
Petitti would like to diminish the selection committee's role and, as he puts it, allow playoff spots to be decided on the field and not in a boardroom. In practice, his plan not only would diminish the selection committee, but it also could dilute the influence of some November results.
Alabama, Mississippi and Miami lost to unranked opponents late last November, results that bounced them from the playoff. If Petitti's model had been in place, the losing teams would have retained a playoff path through play-in games.
I don't see how college football's season improves if Syracuse upsetting Miami on the final day of November carries no weight on the playoff picture.
How to actually improve college football's regular season
Petitti's playoff plan would earmark four automatic bids for the Big Ten and four more for the SEC - that's half of a 16-team field - while the Big 12 and ACC received only two automatic bids apiece.
Is it any wonder why the Big Ten hatched this plan, and the Big 12 and ACC detest it?
If Petitti wants to get serious about improving the regular season, then he's going about this backward by focusing on conference standings and propping up mediocre teams.
Here's how you improve the regular season: Preserve automatic bids for conference champions, but keep most of the playoff bracket open to at-large bids, and devise a system in which the playoff committee values meaningful non-conference results while evaluating bubble teams.
As it is now, Big Ten teams like Indiana and Nebraska are canceling their toughest non-conference games in favor of weaker schedules, and SEC teams cling to their Championship Subdivision games like a child hugs a security blanket.
These gimme games bog down the schedule, particularly early in the season.
To rectify that, task the selection committee to reward teams that schedule - and win - tough non-conference games and hold accountable bubble teams that beefed up their record purely by blasting patsies.
Do this, and you'd spur more Big Ten vs. SEC games, of which there are only three this season. Likewise, only three SEC teams will play a Big 12 opponent. Generating more high-stakes non-conference clashes between Power Four opponents not only would become a boon for September audience, those games also would help the committee separate the wheat from the chaff come selection time.
Imagine if Oklahoma played Oklahoma State this October, instead of Kent State, or if Texas played Texas Tech in September, instead of Sam Houston, or if Southern California opened the season against Missouri, instead of Missouri State.
That's how you improve the season.
College football needs a play-in Saturday in December less than it needs more significant non-conference games, some of which could restore rivalries that conference realignment interrupted.
College basketball figured this out. The NCAA men's tournament selection committee values victories against opponents within the top quadrants and thereby rewards teams that schedule tough. Qualifying for March Madness isn't purely an exercise of assembling a fine record. Who you played, and who you beat, matters. Teams that avoid tough games are held accountable in bubble debates.
Petitti claims he's got college football's regular season at heart in his playoff plan. He's wrong. His playoff plan would diminish and neglect the non-conference portion of the schedule that needs enhancement.
Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 hours ago
- Reuters
Antonio Gates' path to Canton is one of a kind
August 2 - It's hard to be the first of anything when it comes to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. But when tight end Antonio Gates was inducted on Saturday afternoon, he became the first Hall of Famer who didn't play college football. Gates certainly took the odd route to football stardom, but he was immortalized along with wide receiver Sterling Sharpe, defensive end Jared Allen, and cornerback Eric Allen at Tom Benson Hall of Fame Stadium in Canton, Ohio. Gates, 45, first made a name of himself by being a star college basketball player at Kent State, helping the team reach the Elite Eight of the 2002 NCAA Tournament and putting up even bigger numbers the following season. But NBA franchises weren't too fond of 6-foot-4 power forwards. Earlier in his college career, Gates was at Michigan State and hoping to play basketball for Tom Izzo and football for Nick Saban. But the latter coach wanted Gates to focus on football, which turned out to be a good deal for Kent State. When his college hoops career ended, NFL teams were interested in Gates as a tight end, and he eventually signed as an undrafted free agent with the San Diego Chargers. "Tim Brewster, at the time, was the tight ends coach for the San Diego Chargers," Gates said during his speech. "Tim Brewster saw something in me. He would come and watch me play basketball, but he was confident I'd be an All-Pro tight end in three years." "Switching sports can be a life-changing experience," he continued. "The unexpected opportunities are often the most powerful ones, because they can completely redirect your life -- if you're ready to take advantage of the opportunity." The switch certainly paid off for Gates as he earned the first of eight straight Pro Bowl selections in his second season when he caught 13 touchdown passes. He had 955 receptions for 11,841 yards and 116 touchdowns in 236 games in 16 seasons (2003-18) with the Chargers -- the first 14 played in San Diego and the last two in Los Angeles. The 116 touchdown catches are the most by a tight end and rank seventh overall. Sharpe, whose career was ended by a serious neck injury at age 29, is the second football playing brother of his own family to earn induction. Younger brother Shannon Sharpe, a stellar tight end, was inducted in 2011. During his speech 14 years ago, Shannon Sharpe said he was only the second-best player in his family. So naturally, Sterling Sharpe asked his brother to join him at the podium on Saturday. "The last time I was here, you said you were the only pro football player in the Hall of Fame that could say this, that you were the second-best player in your own family," Sterling Sharpe said, before cracking up the crowd with the finishing comment. "Well, I agree with that statement." Sterling Sharpe, now 60, entered the Hall in his 26th year of eligibility. Sharpe was a force for the Green Bay Packers from 1988-94, topping 1,100 receiving yards five times. He caught 18 touchdown passes in his final season and had 65 in 112 regular-season games to go with 595 catches and 8,134 yards. Jared Allen also took the hard route to the NFL. He played at small-college program Idaho State and was a terror at that level, winning the Buck Buchanan Defensive Player of the Year Award in 2003. That helped prompt the Kansas City Chiefs to select Allen in the fourth round of the 2004 NFL Draft. Allen, 43, was a pass-rushing force and had 10 or more sacks on eight occasions during 12 NFL seasons with the Chiefs (2004-07), Minnesota Vikings (2008-13), Chicago Bears (2014-15) and Carolina Panthers (2015). He had a career-high 22 sacks in 2011 and finished his career with 136. "My definition of fear is a healthy fear of failure," Allen said. "It motivates you to do whatever you can to succeed. It's about getting knocked down, learning why it happened and working towards making sure it doesn't happen again." "The pursuit of greatness -- I had the NFL sack leaders taped up in my locker so I could see greatness every day I came in," he remarked. "Seeing that picture looking back at me meant that I never got complacent." Eric Allen finally received the call in his 19th year of eligibility. Allen, 59, played 14 NFL seasons with the Philadelphia Eagles (1988-94), New Orleans Saints (1995-97) and then-Oakland Raiders (1998-2001). Allen had 54 interceptions, returning eight for touchdowns. He set a then-NFL record with four interception returns for touchdowns in 1993 for the Eagles and later had three for the Raiders in 2000. The six-time Pro Bowler was often considered one of the best all-around defensive players in the entire NFL during his tenure with the Eagles. "Thank you to the legend, Buddy Ryan, for drafting me in 1988," Allen said of the late defensive-minded Philadelphia coach. "It was an honor to wear those Kelly Greens and represent the City of Brotherly Love. Whether it was Buddy's Boys or Bud Carson's Gang Green, we did so much damage on the football field." --Field Level Media
Reuters
5 days ago
- Reuters
EA forecasts quarterly bookings below expectations on cautious gamer spending
July 29 (Reuters) - Electronic Arts (EA.O), opens new tab forecast net bookings below Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, pressured by uncertain consumer spending on its core sports portfolio amid a challenging economic environment. With shifting U.S. trade policies threatening to push inflation higher, gamers have become more cautious with discretionary spending. EA said the second-quarter bookings forecast includes a four percentage point year-over-year headwind , due to changes in recognizing returns from the Ultimate Edition of "FC 26", which will now be booked in the third quarter. Earlier this month, the videogame publisher launched "College Football 26", hoping to build on the success of last year's edition, which became one of the best-selling titles of 2024. However, analysts warned that growth comparisons for "College Football 26" may be challenging, given the breakout success of its predecessor, which revived the franchise after a more than 10-year hiatus. The company said it expects a more "normalized curve" for College Football sales, partially offset by the launch of "Madden NFL 26". EA last week unveiled the first trailer for "Battlefield 6, placing a big bet on the title to reinvigorate the franchise after the previous installment fell short of fan expectations. The title is set to launch in EA's current fiscal year with analysts expecting the game to sell millions of copies. EA forecast second-quarter bookings of between $1.80 billion and $1.90 billion, below analysts' expectations of $2.01 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. For the first quarter, EA reported bookings of $1.30 billion beating estimates of $1.29 billion. The Redwood city, California-based company reaffirmed its full-year bookings forecast.
The Herald Scotland
5 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Indiana's weak schedule won't con College Football Playoff committee
By ducking Virginia, and flaunting its scheduling choice at Big Ten media days, Indiana is begging the selection committee to treat it like gimcrack the next time it builds something resembling a playoff resume - if there is a next time. And for what? Virginia last tasted a winning season six years ago. Curt Cignetti's upstart Hoosiers could beat Virginia when they were scheduled to play in 2027 and 2028. He just doesn't see the point in trying. "We figured we would just adopt SEC scheduling philosophy," quipped Cignetti, who fancies himself the cleverest man in the North. By swapping Virginia for chum opponents, Indiana will join the many SEC teams that schedule only nine Power Four opponents. SEC schools protect Championship Subdivision games like they're gold doubloons. Unlike SEC teams, though, Indiana won't play a single Power Four non-conference opponent this season, or the next, or the next, and so on. The Hoosiers, like some other Big Ten schools, decided the surest path to contention is scheduling the easiest possible collection of non-conference opponents. Washington coach Jedd Fisch said Cignetti's strategy to avoid Power Four non-conference opponents is "dead-on right." Herein lies the great pitfall of the committee's selection of Indiana to the playoff last season as the No. 10 seed, despite its flimsy strength of schedule. Coaches saw Indiana's strategy work, and now they wonder if they should mimic it, at the expense of playing compelling games. BAD PLAN: Big Ten's push for auto berths will make season worse DOUBLING DOWN: Oregon following plan even after Rose Bowl debacle The 2024 Hoosiers capitalized on a soft schedule draw from the Big Ten, and they avoided any opponents from the SEC, ACC or Big 12. They reached 11-1 without a signature victory, but no bad losses. The committee did not err by admitting Indiana. It lacked superior alternatives. Never mind the nonsense that Alabama, with its 9-3 resume including two losses to 6-6 teams, built more deserving qualifications than the Hoosiers. If you believe that, you must have "It Just Means More" tattooed on your bicep. The committee judiciously chose the Hoosiers, but, this being a copycat sport, now we've got teams from Indiana to Nebraska trying to game theory their way into the playoff by ducking any non-conference opponent with a pulse. The issue isn't confined to the Big Ten, either. The SEC won't dare add another conference game to its schedule, because why welcome another tussle when you could cream some flotsam from the MAC? Programs that knew they'd never sniff a four-team playoff wonder if they can emulate Indiana and qualify for this expanded playoff by following a Hoosiers recipe that calls for construction of the feeblest schedule possible. The twist of it is, if a few bubble teams with superior schedule strength had not gotten upset in the season's final two weeks, the committee might have rejected Indiana from the field. Because, contrary to what the SEC's propaganda campaign would have you believe, the committee cares about strength of schedule. Enough bubble teams lost, though, so the Hoosiers slipped in, and the industry accepted Indiana's scheduling method as foolproof, rather than foolish - until the committee reverses course, or the bubble strengthens in a future season. Cignetti jabbed at the SEC at media days, but his quip and scheduling moves also mock the committee and its selection of the Hoosiers. He's acting as if he outwitted the committee. Beware, because the committee is an evolving organism, unbound by past selection strategies. The committee never barred an undefeated Power Four team from the four-team playoff - until it shunned 13-0 Florida State to make room for the SEC's one-loss champion. What's to stop the committee from rejecting the next 11-1 team that slinks into Selection Sunday touting three triumphs against non-conference lackeys that can't spell football, and not a single win against a ranked opponent? Nothing. Committee membership changes. Its chairperson changes. Situations change. No two seasons unfold the same way. If the committee believes it's being played for a fool by Cignetti and others like him, perhaps it will stiffen its spine against a team that uses a weak schedule as a catapult to a strong record. The persistent reluctance to schedule tough non-conference games remains an anchor preventing college football from ascending to a higher perch. The committee wields power to spur some evolution on that non-conference scheduling strategy. If the committee starts rejecting bubble teams that play nothing but slappies in September, I suspect we'll begin to see fewer schedules devoid of Power Four non-conference opponents. Until then, if Cignetti fears a game against Virginia, then he must not believe he's built one of the nation's top 12 teams. Maybe, the committee will learn to trust his judgment. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
