
China's Fast-Fashion Capital Slows Down Under Trump's Trade War
'The whole industry is struggling, and now there is a high tariff on Chinese goods because of the trade war. Many foreign clients have decreased their orders from China,' she says, declining to give her first name.
Guangzhou, China's southern metropolis and the capital of Guangdong province, is home to nearly 20 million people. It is also the humming, whirring and buzzing heart of the global fast fashion industry. In its urban villages, ramshackle settlements that have been absorbed into the city's sprawl, millions of workers toil day and night in informal workshops to produce cheap garments. In one small, crowded factory, women sit behind sewing machines next to teetering mountains of starched black tutus. In another, pink denim jeans destined to be sold on fast fashion website Shein are piled high on every available worktop.
Every morning, workers gather in informal labour markets like the one in Panyu to see if they can find work for the day sewing on hundreds of buttons, or ironing hundreds of collars. Depending on the complexity of the task, workers earn between one and 10 yuan per item, toiling for long hours in cramped conditions.
'This is hard-earned money,' says a worker in his 60s in Datang, another urban village about ten miles north of Panyu. Ironing jackets at 8am, before packaging them up to be exported, the man, who declined to give his name, was part-way through a shift that had started at 11pm the night before. He earned two yuan per jacket, he said. More than a dozen garment workers interviewed by the Guardian all said that a normal working day was 10 to 12 hours, with some saying they only took one rest day each month. 'Little Room for Profit'
While China's domestic e-commerce market has boomed in recent years, it is overseas orders that keep the factory lights on. Around one-quarter of the more than $100bn of textiles and apparel imported to the US came from China last year. Guangdong alone exported more than $7bn, according to data from the Global Trade & Industry Growth Lab by Sinoimex, a commercial data firm.
But in April, Donald Trump, the US president, launched a trade war with China, which sent shockwaves through the global economy. Tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145 percent, with China responding with similar duties and trade restrictions, before the two countries agreed to a 90-day pause in May. With a 12 August deadline looming to reach a deal, workers in Guangzhou are wondering whether or not they'll be able to keep selling clothes to Americans.
In Panyu, Yang Ruiping has run his small clothes factory, which specialises in tops and employs about 20 people, for two decades. About 30 percent of his orders are exported, mostly to Shein and Amazon, down from more than 50 percent before the pandemic. Although the pause in the trade war has eased the pressure on his business slightly, he still has 'little confidence in the US'.
'In the recent US-China trade war, if the tariffs go up, we need to lower the production costs to combat it,' he says. 'It leaves little room for profit'. With no room to cut wages any lower, Yang says he is already losing money on every top he sells. He keeps accepting the orders in order to keep the factory open, but with the domestic market becoming increasingly competitive, he is aware he might not be able to operate much longer.
Shein is everywhere in Panyu. The China-founded, Singapore-headquartered company revolutionised the garment industry in Guangzhou, allowing small manufacturers like Yang to sell directly to western customers, and offering shoppers rock-bottom prices. While big high street brands operate larger, dedicated factories, Shein places small batch orders directly with independent manufacturers, ramping up production for the designs that sell well online. The flexibility of this model has fuelled the company's meteoric rise. Shein accounts for about 50 percent of the US fast fashion industry, according to Bloomberg Second Measure, a data analytics firm.
The company's growth has also been thanks to a loopholes in the US customs regime, which allowed low-value goods to be imported free. In 2022, over 30 percent of all the small packages imported under the so-called 'de minimis' exemption came from Shein and Temu, another Chinese e-commerce company. On 2 May, Trump closed that loophole for goods from China and Hong Kong. This week, he expanded that ban to goods from all countries, meaning that suppliers can't avoid tariffs by shipping via third countries. A recent analysis by Reuters found that prices on Shein increased by an average of 23 percent between 24 April and 22 July.
The US market is 'volatile and risky,' says Peng Jianshen, the boss of a medium-sized denim clothes factory in Zengcheng, another of Guangzhou's urban villages. 'When tariffs were suddenly increased, the entire US-focused production stopped. No one dared to continue'.
Experts say that the uncertainty of the trade war could have a negative impact on working conditions, encouraging workers to add hours to their already punishingly long shifts.
'Generally, when we're talking about the garment industry in China, workers don't have rest days,' says Li Qiang, the founder of China Labor Watch, a US-based NGO. 'They're paid by piece rate. So they work as much as possible when the orders are still there.'
But factory bosses in Guangzhou say the trade war is only the latest in a series of problems facing their industry. Global conflicts and low consumer spending in China mean that it's hard to pivot away from the US and towards other markets.
Li Jun, a chain-smoking factory boss, runs a denim clothing factory that sells jeans to Russia. He says the economic impact of the war in Ukraine, plus the fact that many of his would-be customers have been drafted to fight in the conflict, have been bad for business. 'The economy is not doing well anywhere,' he says. 'A lot of factories are shutting down.' At his peak he was exporting 100,000 pairs of jeans per month, with more than half going to Russia, but now it's 30,000 to 40,000 pairs each month, meaning that he just about breaks even.
Manufacturers in places like Guangzhou have long been the engine room of China's growth. But in recent years, keen to shed the label of being the world's factory, Beijing has been pouring all its political and economic support into hi-tech industries, such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. 'The Chinese government no longer supports these kinds of light industries or small individual businesses,' Li says. 'It's really hard to keep things going'.
By Amy Hawkins
Learn more:
Trump to Levy 25% Tariffs on Japan, South Korea in August
The 25 percent rates do not include any sectoral-specific tariffs that the Trump administration would separately implement on goods imported in key industries.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump plans drug tariffs of up to 250%
President Donald Trump threatened to levy tariffs of up to 250% on pharmaceuticals imported into the United States. The president told CNBC on Aug. 5 that he plans to announce new tariffs "within the next week or so" on imports of pharmaceutical and semiconductor imports. He said he plans to launch a smaller tariff on drug imports before increasing the duties over 12 to 18 months to a maximum amount. Trump would start with an "initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals," he said. "But in one year, one-and-a-half years maximum, it's going to go to 150%, and then it's going to go to 250%, because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." He said other nations "make a fortune" on pharmaceuticals, citing drugs imported from China and Ireland. Trump has said several times in recent months that there could be trade actions for the pharmaceutical industry, which has globalized since the 1990s with a drug supply chain that stretches from Europe to China and India. In July, Trump said his administration planned pharmaceutical-specific tariffs of up to 200%, though drug companies would have time to establish U.S.-based drug manufacturing. In April, Trump said he planned to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals made overseas, a move he said would prompt drug companies to move their operations to the U.S. On July 31, Trump sent letters to 17 drug companies urging them to lower U.S. drug prices by Sept. 29 to "most favored nation" amounts paid by other nations. In the letters, Trump urged drug companies to adopt such pricing on drug for Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for low-income residents. He also requested drug companies lower U.S. prices to the same levels charged in Europe and elsewhere for newly-launched drugs for people on Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance plans. Trump also urged drug companies to lower pharmaceutical prices for U.S. consumers and businesses that directly purchase from drug companies. "Make no mistake: a collaborative effort towards achieving global pricing parity would be the most effective path for companies, the government and American patients," Trump said in the letters. "But if you refuse to step up, we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices."


CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
Nvidia says its AI chips do not have a 'kill switch' after Chinese accusation
Nvidia on Tuesday rejected Chinese accusations that its data center GPUs for artificial intelligence include a hardware function that could remotely deactivate the chips, which is commonly called a "kill switch." "NVIDIA GPUs do not and should not have kill switches and backdoors," wrote Nvidia's Chief Security Officer David Reber in a blog post on Tuesday. The blog post comes after the Cyberspace Administration of China said last week that it needed Nvidia to provide documents about what it called security vulnerabilities in the H20, Nvidia's data center AI chip intended for the Chinese market. The regulator specifically mentioned "backdoor" security risks, according to the New York Times. The statement is an example of how Nvidia is navigating geopolitical conflict as its AI chips remain in high demand by countries and companies around the world. U.S. lawmakers have proposed legislation that would require AI chips under export regulations to be equipped with location-tracking systems. The U.S. has placed export controls on some Nvidia chips to China because of national security reasons, saying that the country could use the chips to gain an advantage in AI or for military purposes. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that it is better for the U.S. if Nvidia's chips become the global standard for AI computers, especially among Chinese developers. The H20 generates billions in revenue per quarter for Nvidia in sales, although the company does not typically break out its revenue specifically. The chip was briefly banned from export to China in April. The company said its guidance would have been about $8 billion higher except for lost sales from a recent export restriction on its China-bound H20 chips. The Trump administration said in July that it would grant a waiver for the chips to resume sales. Silicon Valley technologists and security experts generally believe that backdoors — when a device has a hidden function that would allow a government or attacker to secretly take data from a computer or otherwise control it — are untenable in products. Apple, in particular, has publicly fought off government requests for what it calls "backdoors" in the past as well. Nvidia declined to comment further on its blog post. Reber argued in the blog post that secret backdoors are dangerous vulnerabilities that could be used by hackers, not just officials, and that they "violate the fundamental principles of cybersecurity." He also said that if a kill switch or backdoor were to be put in products like Nvidia GPUs, that they would harm U.S. national security interests. "Hardwiring a kill switch into a chip is something entirely different: a permanent flaw beyond user control, and an open invitation for disaster," Reber wrote. "It's like buying a car where the dealership keeps a remote control for the parking brake — just in case they decide you shouldn't be driving."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canada's trade deficit widened in June to second largest on record
By Promit Mukherjee OTTAWA (Reuters) -Canada's merchandise trade deficit widened in June to C$5.9 billion ($4.24 billion) as imports grew faster than exports due to a one-time high-value oil equipment import, data showed on Tuesday. The deficit observed in June is the second highest on record after the deficit expanded to its largest in history in April to C$7.6 billion, when the impact of U.S. tariffs first started to weigh. Canada's exports to the U.S. as a share of total exports shrank to 70% in June from 83% in the same period a year ago while its surplus with the U.S. contracted by a half in the same period, data showed. Analysts polled by Reuters had predicted the trade deficit to increase to C$6.3 billion in June from a downwardly revised C$5.5 billion in May. Total imports were up 1.4% in June to C$67.6 billion from a drop of 1.6% in the prior month, Statistics Canada said, the first increase in imports after three consecutive monthly decreases. Excluding the one-time oil product import, total imports were down 1.9% in June. Canada's total exports grew 0.9% in June to C$61.74 billion following an increase of 2% in May, its second consecutive increase, Statscan said, led primarily by an increase in crude oil exports. In volume terms, however, exports were down 0.4% in June. The U.S. President Donald Trump cranked up the tariffs on Canada to 35% from this month from 25% on goods which were non-compliant with a free trade deal. Canada is also struggling with a slew of sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. This has chewed into its massive trade surplus with the U.S. as exporters drove away from what the world's biggest market to other regions from Europe and Middle East to as far as the Indo-Pacific. Exports to the U.S. in June, however, increased by 3.1% in June, mainly led by higher crude oil prices due to tensions in the Middle East. But on a year-over-year basis, exports to the U.S. were still 12.5% lower when compared with the same period a year ago. Overall exports of aluminum were down 11.3% and iron and steel products by 11.4% in June, coinciding with higher tariffs on these products from the U.S., data from StatsCan showed. After reaching a record high in May, exports to countries other than the United States were down 4.1% in June, representing the first decline since February, Statscan said, but still hovered around near record levels. "The headline story really is the impacts of the tariffs," said Stuart Bergman, chief economist at Export Development Canada. The Canadian dollar slightly weakened further after the data and was trading down 0.2% to 1.3804 against the U.S. dollar, or 72.44 U.S. cents. Yields on the two-year government bonds were up 0.6 basis points to 2.703%. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data