
Unacceptable to have Epping migrant hotel near schools, court told
11:49AM
Case against Epping hotel 'overwhelming', court hears
The High Court has heard that the case against the Epping hotel is 'overwhelming'.
'Collectively, this is an overwhelming case for an injunction to restrain the breach of planning control that is taking place at the Bell Hotel,' said Philip Coppel KC, for Epping Forest District Council.
'There is nothing on the other side of the balance that goes anywhere to displace that. The defendant has not been upfront with the local planning authority in relation to the use being made of the Bell Hotel, and this goes back a long way.
'The defendant did not advise or notify the local planning authority to seek their views on whether this would be a lawful use in their view. It was not until two months later, when Epping Forest received a complaint about the use, that the matter came to the planning department's attention.'
Mr Coppel continued that the change of use by the owner of the Bell Hotel, Somani Hotels Limited, was 'surreptitious' and that there was a 'strength' and 'universality' of feeling against the hotel's current use.
11:44AM
Pupils at five schools 'at risk' because of Epping migrant hotel
Pupils at five schools within 'easy walking distance' of the Bell Hotel are at risk because migrants are housed there, the council has said.
Legal documents submitted by Epping Forest District Council also describe how a residential care home, where many residents have 'dementia, Parkinson's disease, or a range of mental or physical disabilities', is just 300 metres away from the site.
Epping St John's School, a Church of England co-educational school with approximately 1,050 students of both sexes between 11 and 18-years-old, is an 11-minute walk from the Bell Hotel, the documents detail.
Meanwhile Ivy Chimneys Primary School – attended by 315 boys and girls – is a 13-minute walk from the Bell Hotel.
Referring to the five closest schools, Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'The continued placement of asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel represents a risk to those students which is unacceptable.'
Mr Coppel added that the 'enhanced risk' results from 'a fundamentally different use of The Bell Hotel from that which is lawful'.
11:40AM
Epping hotel is 'feeding ground for unrest', court told
The council's barrister has told the High Court that the hotel had become a 'feeding ground for unrest'.
In written submissions, Philip Coppel KC said the hotel's closure was necessary for 'restoring the safety of nearby residents' and removing 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'.
'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest and protest, a danger to school age students about to start the new school year, a valid source of anxiety for their parents and teachers and disfigurement for the local environment,' he wrote.
Speaking in court, Mr Coppel added: 'It is not the asylum seekers who are acting unlawfully. It is the defendant, by allowing the hotel to be used to house asylum seekers.'
11:36AM
Housing migrants at hotel 'breaches planning rules'
The High Court has heard that housing migrants at the Bell Hotel is a breach of planning rules.
Philip Coppel KC, for Epping Forest district council, told the court there had been a 'material change of use' without the appropriate planning permissions being sought.
'The sole lawful planning use of the hotel is a hotel use, but that is not what the Bell Hotel is currently being used for,' he said. 'It is not being used as a hotel; it has been used to place asylum seekers.
'They do not choose to go to the Bell Hotel as a person might choose to patronise a hotel, or stay at a hotel. There is no agreement between them and the hotel, they do not choose the duration of their stay... they do not choose the type of room.
'For them, the Bell Hotel is no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender.'
11:34AM
Asylum hotel is 'very serious problem', court hears
Opening the hearing in London, Philip Coppel KC, for the local authority, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem.
'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district.
'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant. The defendant owns what is called the Bell Hotel.'
11:33AM
Asylum seekers 'should not be housed near schools'
The court has heard that the hotel must close because there are schools nearby.
Philip Coppel KC, for the authority, argued that sexual assault charges against two of its residents made its closure necessary.
He told the court: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable.'
Hadush Kebatu, 38, last month appeared in court charged with sexual assault against a 14-year-old girl.
On Wednesday, resident Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, appeared in court on sexual assault and common assault charges.
11:31AM
Council sues Epping hotel owner to end use for asylum seekers
Epping Forest District Council has brought legal action at the High Court against Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel chain which owns The Bell, claiming it should not be used to house migrants.
The authority has applied for a temporary injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been the centre of protests in recent weeks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC
A lawyer representing the online message board 4chan says it won't pay a proposed fine by the UK's media regulator as it enforces the Online Safety to Preston Byrne, managing partner of law firm Byrne & Storm, Ofcom has provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for as long as the site fails to comply with its request."Ofcom's notices create no legal obligations in the United States," he told the BBC, adding he believed the regulator's investigation was part of an "illegal campaign of harassment" against US tech has declined to comment while its investigation continues. "4chan has broken no laws in the United States - my client will not pay any penalty," Mr Byrne began investigating 4chan over whether it was complying with its obligations under the UK's Online Safety in August, it said it had issued 4chan with "a provisional notice of contravention" for failing to comply with two requests for said its investigation would examine whether the message board was complying with the act, including requirements to protect its users from illegal content.4chan has often been at the heart of online controversies in its 22 years, including misogynistic campaigns and conspiracy are anonymous, which can often lead to extreme content being posted. 'First Amendment rights' In a statement posted on X, law firms Byrne & Storm and Coleman Law said 4chan was a US company incorporated in the US, and therefore protected against the UK law."American businesses do not surrender their First Amendment rights because a foreign bureaucrat sends them an email," they wrote."Under settled principles of US law, American courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship codes. "If necessary, we will seek appropriate relief in US federal court to confirm these principles."They said authorities in the US had been "briefed" on their response to Ofcom's statement concludes by calling on the Trump administration to invoke all diplomatic and legal levers to protect American businesses from "extraterritorial censorship mandates".Ofcom has previously said the Online Safety Act only requires services to take action to protect users based in the UK. UK backs down Some American politicians - particularly the Trump administration, its allies and officials - have pushed back against what they regard as overreach in the regulation of US tech firms by the UK and EU. A perceived impact of the Online Safety Act on free speech has been a particular concern, but other laws have also been the source of 19 August, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the UK had withdrawn its controversial demand for a "backdoor" in an Apple data protection system - saying she worked with the President and Vice President to get the UK to abandon its days later, US Federal Trade Commission chairman Andrew Ferguson warned big tech firms they could be violating US law if they weakened privacy and data security requirements by complying with international laws such as the Online Safety Act."Foreign governments seeking to limit free expression or weaken data security in the United States might count on the fact that companies have an incentive to simplify their operations and legal compliance measures by applying uniform policies across jurisdictions," he 4chan does successfully fight the fine in the US courts, Ofcom may have other options."Enforcing against an offshore provider is tricky," Emma Drake, partner of online safety and privacy at law firm Bird and Bird, told the BBC. "Ofcom can instead ask a court to order other services to disrupt a provider's UK business, such as requiring a service's removal from search results or blocking of UK payments."If Ofcom doesn't think this will be enough to prevent significant harm, it can even ask that ISPs be ordered to block UK access." Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Lucy Connolly to speak out for first time since being released from prison
Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for stirring up racial hatred against asylum seekers online on the day of the Southport murders, is expected to speak out on Friday for the first time since being released from prison. The 42-year-old, wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, left HMP Peterborough on Thursday morning and it is understood she will be doing limited media interviews a day after walking free. She spent time with her husband, daughter and parents on the day of her release and was pictured walking her dogs in the evening, the Daily Mail reported. Ms Connolly was handed a 31-month sentence after she posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. The former childminder, from Northampton, was ordered to serve 40% of her sentence in prison before being released on licence. It is understood that Ms Connolly was a passenger in a white taxi which left HMP Peterborough via the vehicle airlock, a set of two gates exiting the prison, shortly after 10am on Thursday. Her case has sparked debate, with some criticising her sentence as excessive. Reacting to her release, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Connolly's sentence was 'harsher than the sentences handed down for bricks thrown at police or actual rioting'. In a post on X, Ms Badenoch compared Ms Connolly's case with that of Ricky Jones, a suspended Labour councillor who was found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. Writing on X, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Juries are a cornerstone of justice, but we shouldn't have to rely on them to protect basic freedoms. 'Protecting people from words should not be given greater weight in law than public safety. If the law does this, then the law itself is broken – and it's time Parliament looked again at the Public Order Act.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described Ms Connolly's case as a 'symbol of Keir Starmer's authoritarian, broken, two-tier Britain'. A bid to challenge her sentence at the Court of Appeal was dismissed in May, which was described by Mr Connolly as 'shocking and unfair'. The Northampton town councillor, and former West Northamptonshire district councillor, said his wife had 'paid a very high price for making a mistake'. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. He was asked in May about Ms Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Ms Connolly was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The post was viewed 310,000 times in three and a half hours before she deleted it.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Teenager who planned mosque attack in Scotland detained for 10 years
A teenager who listed Hitler, Mussolini and the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik as his inspirations and who planned a terrorist attack on a mosque has been sentenced to 10 years in custody. The 17-year-old, who cannot be named because of his age, had intended to set fire to an Islamic centre in Greenock, Inverclyde, after befriending the imam and mapping out the building's interior on his phone. The teenager was arrested at the door of the centre in January this year. He was carrying a military-style rucksack that contained a German-manufactured Glock-type air pistol, ammunition, ball bearings, gas cartridges and aerosol cans, according to prosecutors. He was sentenced at the high court in Glasgow on Thursday after pleading guilty to two terrorism charges, with a further eight years of supervision on licence upon release. In his sentencing statement, Lord Arthurson said: 'What you had in mind was what can properly be characterised as a quite diabolical atrocity involving extreme violence and multiple deaths. You even requested that your attack be livestreamed. Your conduct was only stopped by your arrest, when you were quite literally at the very door of the centre.' Prosecutors said the teenager, who became radicalised online, began plotting the attack in December 2024 and joined the mosque's WhatsApp group saying he was 'looking for guidance', later winning the trust of the imam during several visits. Meanwhile he was boasting of his plans to set the centre on fire on the social media platform Telegram and later filmed himself wandering the corridors, including footage showing him superimposing a hand carrying a semi-automatic pistol. Sineidin Corrins, deputy procurator fiscal for specialist casework at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, said: 'This heinous plan to attack those within his own local community was prepared and driven by racial and religiously motivated hatred, and showed that he not only held neo-Nazi beliefs but was about to act on them to cause pain and suffering'.