logo
Special Ogdensburg City Council meeting moved up

Special Ogdensburg City Council meeting moved up

Yahoo25-03-2025

OGDENSBURG, N.Y. (WWTI) – A special meeting to discuss filling a vacancy on the Ogdensburg City Council has been moved up.
The special meeting was originally slated for Monday, April 7. However, it has pushed forward to Thursday, April 3 in order for all members to attend the meeting.
The meeting is to hopefully fill the vacancy left after Michael Weaver resigned his position. Weaver stepped down because he moved outside of the city limits because of family obligations.
The city's charter requires council members to live in the city.
One person dead from Cortland County fire
Amazon's Big Spring Sale 2025: Shop the hottest deals of the season
Special Ogdensburg City Council meeting moved up
Trump defends Waltz after Signal breach
St. Lawrence County Sheriff's Office starts Blue Envelope Program
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos
Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos

Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos originally appeared on TheStreet. The future of space transportation is looking increasingly complicated, as the falling-out between SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump drags on. After Musk levied strong accusations against Trump and publicly stated he would not have been elected without his support, the president struck back with threats to cancel several SpaceX contracts. This leaves the company's short-term future in a precarious position, jeopardizing Musk's ambitions of colonizing Mars. 💵💰💰💵 Multiple space stocks responded to news of this conflict by surging, as investors looked to capitalize on SpaceX's questionable future. But one of Musk's primary rivals, a fellow privately held space exploration company, also recently revealed some less-than-positive news. Blue Origin, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, recently made an announcement regarding its plans for the future, which could be regarded as good news for SpaceX and Musk. While they both rose to fame founding companies that aren't direct competitors, Musk and Bezos are clear rivals in the space race. SpaceX and Blue Origin are both privately held and focused on space exploration and rocket is intended to be Musk's vehicle for colonizing Mars, while Bezos seems intent on cornering the space tourism market, which also includes rivals such as Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic. However, the two private companies are considered the leaders in the space exploration field. Blue Origin, though, recently reported what seems to be a setback. The company had been targeting Spring 2025 for the launch of its New Glenn rocket, a 320-foot-tall (98 meters) spacecraft with a reusable first stage, but now it has announced that the new launch will be held no earlier than (NET) August 15, 2025. CEO David Limp posted about to the delayed launch on X, revealing that one of the mission's key objectives would be to land and recover its booster. 'This will take a little bit of luck and a lot of excellent execution,' he states, adding that the company is on track to produce GS2s, referring to the second stage of the rocket. Following New Glenn's mostly successful January 2025 mission, the company hasn't indicated more progress toward further launches, even after its leaders initially set high expectations for its rocket launches. Now, as Ars Technica speculates, the August launch may be the only one Blue Origin completes this year. 'It is telling that Limp commented on the company tracking toward producing eight second stages, which would match the original launch cadence planned for this year,' the outlet notes. 'This likely is a fig leaf offered to Bezos, who, two sources said, was rather upset that Blue Origin would not meet (or even approach) its original target of eight launches this year.' More Elon Musk News: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good news Elon Musk's DOGE made huge mistakes with veterans' programs While Bezos may not be happy about this launch delay, it is excellent news for Musk, whose own company has seen three rockets explode so far this year. Even before the company's third mission spiraled out of control mid-flight, regulators had expressed concern about possible safety risks for people on the ground. There's no denying that both companies have faced challenges this year, as both race to outmaneuver each other and establish themselves as the leader of the space exploration market. Recent projections show that the space economy is expected to reach a $944 billion valuation by 2033, revealing a lot of room to run for problems plaguing both companies, though, raise the question of which one is better positioned to keep growing. SpaceX has launched several rockets this year, but its track record hasn't been encouraging, given the trend of explosions. And while Blue Origin has delayed its launch, that doesn't mean it will go well when it happens. On top of that, SpaceX still faces the possibility that it may lose out on lucrative federal contracts, unless Musk and Trump's feud is resolved soon. The zero-sum nature of financial markets means that for as long as its prospects appear uncertain, rivals will likely continue to gain. In this case, the list of companies that may benefit from SpaceX's uncertain future includes Blue Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 11, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Amazon's Return-to-Office Mandate Sparks Disability Complaints
Amazon's Return-to-Office Mandate Sparks Disability Complaints

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's Return-to-Office Mandate Sparks Disability Complaints

(Bloomberg) -- Inc.'s hard-line stance on getting disabled employees to return to the office has sparked a backlash, with workers alleging the company is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act as well as their rights to collectively bargain. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire At least two employees have filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the National Labor Relations Board, federal agencies that regulate working conditions. One of the workers said they provided the EEOC with a list of 18 'similarly situated' employees to emphasize that their experience isn't isolated and to help federal regulators with a possible investigation. Disabled workers frustrated with how Amazon is handling their requests for accommodations — including exemptions to a mandate that they report to the office five days a week — are also venting their displeasure on internal chat rooms and have encouraged colleagues to answer surveys about the policies. Amazon has been deleting such posts and warning that they violate rules governing internal communications. One employee said they were terminated and another said they were told to find a different position after advocating for disabled workers on employee message boards. Both filed complaints with the EEOC and NLRB. The company's use of artificial intelligence to help it manage employee requests for disability accommodations has also stirred internal opposition and could open the company to legal challenges. Company spokesperson Zoe Hoffmann said Amazon's Disability and Leave Services team ensures employees have access to the accommodations and adjustments they need to be effective and advance their careers. The process is empathetic, and the interactions aren't automated, she said. 'Amazon respects employees' rights to organize and doesn't interfere with these rights. We don't discriminate or retaliate against employees for engaging in organizing activities,' Hoffmann said in an emailed statement. 'We're committed to supporting our employees by providing effective accommodations that meet their individual needs and the needs of the business.' Bloomberg reported in November that Amazon was making it more difficult for staff with disabilities to win approval to work from home. The company implemented a more rigorous vetting process, both for new requests to work remotely and applications to extend existing arrangements. Affected employees had to participate in a 'multilevel leader review' and some were told monthlong trials would be used to determine if accommodations met their needs. Several employees told Bloomberg then that they believed the system was designed to deny work-from-home accommodations and prompt employees with disabilities to quit, which some have done. Amazon denied the system was designed to encourage people to resign. Since then, workers have mobilized against the policy. One employee repeatedly posted an online survey seeking colleagues' reactions, defying the company's demands to stop. The survey ultimately generated feedback from more than 200 workers even though Amazon kept deleting it, and the results reflected strong opposition to Amazon's treatment of disabled workers. More than 71% of disabled Amazon employees surveyed said the company had denied or failed to meet most of their accommodation requests, while half indicated they faced 'hostile' work environments after disclosing their disabilities and requesting accommodations. One respondent said they sought permission to work from home after suffering multiple strokes that prevented them from driving. Amazon suggested moving closer to the office and taking mass transit, the person said in the survey. Another respondent said they couldn't drive for longer than 15-minute intervals due to chronic pain. Amazon's recommendation was to pull over and stretch during their commute, which the employee said was unsafe since they drive on a busy freeway. Bloomberg couldn't verify the responses to the anonymous employee survey. Amazon didn't dispute the accounts and said it considered a range of solutions to disability accommodations, including changes to an employee's commute. Hoffmann, the spokesperson, said that when appropriate, Amazon adjusts schedules, lighting and desk assignments. It also offers job coaching. If warranted, the company might provide commuting adjustments. In rare circumstances, she said, employees with disabilities are allowed to work from home full time or part time. AI Risks Using AI to parse accommodation requests, read doctors' notes and make recommendations based on keywords has also generated internal opposition. Bloomberg reviewed screenshots from an in-house coding tool showing what appeared to be prompts designed to guide AI software through the process of evaluating and pulling data from documents filled out by employees and their physicians. The bots are given context — such as the fact that injuries can occur on one or both arms — suggestions of follow-up questions and a lengthy list of potential accommodations for employees with low vision. There's also extensive guidance that may be intended to keep the software from asking unnecessary questions or generating irrelevant data. Amazon has long used automation to more efficiently manage its enormous workforce. But deploying such tools for sensitive personnel matters risks missing nuances about an employee's situation that a human might spot and take into consideration. Doing so also could lead to legal complications should employees claim the software introduced errors into the process. And the use of AI risks further alienating employees, who are already expected to engage with chatbots and automated systems, rather than colleagues, for a wide range of workplace tasks. 'It's impossible to imagine that companies will not be using AI for any number of needs, including this one,' said Chai Feldblum, a former commissioner with the EEOC. But in the event of a legal challenge, she said, Amazon would have to prove that providing an accommodation to an employee placed an unreasonable burden on the company. 'I would not leave that final judgment to AI,' Feldblum said. Amazon's partly automated accommodation and internal job transfer processes are key elements of the employee complaints to the EEOC, with workers arguing that it is insufficiently interactive to provide a complete picture of a person's physical limitations and whether reasonable accommodations could help them do their jobs. 'If there's an indication that Amazon is using some rote artificial intelligence process to manage these requests, that's not interactive,' said David Hutt, legal director of the National Disability Rights Network. 'Courts are pretty skeptical of these kind of boilerplate accommodations that aren't specifically tailored around the person's disability and their job function.' Two employees said Amazon cited its 'solicitation' policy when deleting their posts from employee communication channels. The policy prohibits personnel from asking others for financial contributions, disseminating advertising materials or gathering signatures on petitions unless they have permission from the company, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. Preventing employees from discussing the workplace could backfire if the NLRB determines that doing so interferes with their protected rights to organize and debate working conditions, said Kate Bronfenbrenner, the director of labor education research at Cornell University. 'If two or more people are in any way penalized or coerced against exercising their rights, it's a violation,' Bronfenbrenner said. 'Whether this gets enforced is another question,' she added, citing budget cuts to various federal agencies. With internal communication channels being scrutinized, Amazon employees posted a petition to calling on the company to reform its policies. The dispute could affect thousands of Amazon workers. An internal Slack channel for employees with disabilities has 13,000 members, one of the people said. Amazon said it doesn't track the total number of disabled workers since employee disclosure is voluntary. The rise of remote work during the pandemic helped boost the number of disabled people with jobs to almost 23% last year, close to a record high since the US Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking the metric in 2008. Working from home can benefit people with a range of disabilities, including chronic allergies, limited mobility and anxiety disorders. Amazon employees have lodged complaints about workplace conditions in the past. The EEOC as recently as last year was investigating allegations that the company discriminated against pregnant warehouse workers in California, Connecticut, New Jersey and North Carolina by denying their accommodation requests. An agency spokesperson declined to provide an update regarding the status of the investigation. In 2021, Amazon settled a dispute with two workers at its Seattle headquarters who alleged they were fired in retaliation for their workplace activism regarding climate change and working conditions, which included inviting colleagues to a virtual event meant to connect tech employees with warehouse employees. Their allegations led to a labor board complaint accusing Amazon of unfair labor practices. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Tech giants including Oracle, Lockheed Martin quietly fund Trump's military parade
Tech giants including Oracle, Lockheed Martin quietly fund Trump's military parade

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

Tech giants including Oracle, Lockheed Martin quietly fund Trump's military parade

President Trump's military parade this weekend is expected to be a costly display of pomp and circumstance – and it's being bankrolled by some major Big Tech giants. Oracle, Lockheed Martin, Palantir, Coinbase and Amazon have recently donated to Amrica250, the nonprofit raising funds for the nation's semiquincentennial anniversary, the organization said. 'Many of these sponsors will support the upcoming grand military parade being held in Washington, DC, on Saturday, June 14, to celebrate the US Army's 250th birthday,' America250 said in a press release this week. Advertisement 5 On Saturday, President Trump will host a military parade in honor of the 250th anniversary of the US armed forces. Getty Images Oracle confirmed it is sponsoring Saturday's parade, as did Exiger, an AI-powered supply chain management company, and Lockheed Martin, which called it a 'momentous occasion.' Palantir, Coinbase and Amazon did not respond to The Post's requests for comment. Advertisement The nonprofit has listed several other sponsors on its website, including Coca-Cola; Phorm Energy, an energy drink from Anheuser-Busch; UFC; Scott's Miracle Gro; and Stellantis auto brands Chrysler, Jeep, Ram and Dodge. The parade marks 250 years since the Continental Army was formed to take on the British – but it's faced substantial heat from critics who argue it's an over-the-top party for Trump's 79th birthday, which also falls on Saturday. 5 Amazon is among several companies that have recently donated to the nonprofit raising funds for the nation's 250th anniversary. Sundry Photography – With flyovers, fireworks, rows of tanks and military bands, it's expected to cost tens of millions of dollars, which Trump dismissed as 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' Advertisement Several America250 sponsors appeared to distance themselves from the parade, instead focusing on next year's events celebrating 250 years of US independence. FedEx confirmed it is sponsoring America250's other events. A source close to the matter told The Post this does not include Saturday's parade. Walmart donated a whopping $500,000 to America250, but clarified those funds are not backing the parade. 5 With flyovers, fireworks, rows of tanks and military bands, it's expected to cost tens of millions of dollars, which Trump dismissed as 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' AP Advertisement 'This funding will support the US Army's National Museum Revolutionary War Exhibit and celebrations honoring youth who have signed up to serve in the Navy and Marine Corps,' a Walmart spokesperson told The Post. 'While we are not sponsors of the Army's parade, we are providing water for attendees.' Meta was listed as a sponsor in an America250 press release in May, though the Facebook owner confirmed it cut ties with the nonprofit in 2022. 5 Oracle confirmed it is sponsoring Saturday's parade. REUTERS 'While we are not currently a sponsor, we have had a historical relationship with America250, and we are actively exploring potential partnership opportunities with them in the future,' a Meta spokesperson told The Post. That same year, four female employees at the nonprofit filed a lawsuit alleging 'cronyism, self-dealing, mismanagement of funds, potentially unlawful contracting practices and wasteful spending,' as well as a toxic, sexist work environment. One of the plaintiffs said she expressed concerns about a 'potentially unlawful quid-pro-quio' in which Meta would give a $10 million donation in exchange for rights to map national parks with drones for its 'own business purposes,' the Washington Post reported at the time. 5 AI software firm Palantir is also a sponsor. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement The plaintiffs settled with America250 in 2024, according to court filings. The nonprofit did not respond to The Post's requests for comment. A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment on the allegations in the suit and did not respond to an inquiry about whether a donation was made to America250 before the contract was killed. Advertisement America250 was created as a bipartisan initiative by Congress after the passage of the US Semiquincentennial Commission Act of 2016. Its members include Attorney General Pam Bondi, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, as well as Republican and Democratic senators – including Sen. Alex Padilla (D – Calif.), who was recently removed and handcuffed after interrupting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store