Anti-MPRP group considering legal response to PSEG court order filing for land access
Stop MPRP, a nonprofit group dedicated to stopping the creation of a regional transmission line across Maryland, is looking at potential legal responses to a planned court order filing requesting temporary access to properties along the project's route.
The Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), an energy company based in New Jersey, announced Wednesday its intention to file a court order asking for access to properties on or near the route of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP).
The MPRP is a proposed 500,000-volt transmission line that could cut through northern Baltimore County, central Carroll County and southern Frederick County, ending at the Doubs substation.
PSEG has a contract with PJM Interconnection, the company that coordinates the movement of electricity in 13 states and Washington, D.C., to build the MPRP to address anticipated power demand on the regional grid.
PJM has predicted a significant increase in power demand partially due to new data centers to be sited in Maryland and Virginia, which could require up to 7,500 megawatts of power.
Additionally, more than 11,000 megawatts of power generation have been recently deactivated, meaning less power is being created as the demand rises.
PSEG said it needs access to the hundreds of properties along the route to conduct environmental studies and field surveys to move the MPRP forward.
In order to obtain a certificate from Maryland authorizing the company to build the MPRP, the state is requiring PSEG to conduct these studies to verify the scope of the project's environmental and socioeconomic impacts.
PSEG plans to file a court order on Tuesday asking for temporary access to about 90 properties to conduct these surveys. This could be the first of many filings if PSEG can't successfully negotiate voluntary rights-of-entry with other property owners.
Jason Kalwa, the project's director, said in an interview that gaining temporary access to properties through a court order would not be the same as PSEG using eminent domain.
Eminent domain is a governmental power to seize private property for public use with just compensation.
PSEG will not have access to the properties anymore after completing the field surveys. A judge would decide how much time to grant the company access.
"The property owners are not giving up any other rights. This is temporary access. This is effectively to allow our experts, environmental and otherwise, to walk on the property, take an assessment of what they see there,' Kalwa said.
"... It's not eminent domain. It gives us no permanent rights to the property. It merely gives us access to the property to conduct surveys, which are necessary for many types of permits out there."
PJM has set a deadline of June 1, 2027, for PSEG to finish the MPRP and start operating it.
'We're going to stand together'
Since the project was announced in June, thousands of residents have joined to form a fierce wave of opposition to the project.
At public meetings, they've yelled at PSEG representatives and expressed frustration and fear of how the MPRP cutting through private properties could destroy businesses or drive people out of their homes.
Stop MPRP, which has members from all three counties the MPRP would be in, was formed for the purpose of stopping the project and advocating on behalf of people who will be affected by the transmission line.
Its website, stopmprp.com, includes resources like how to access the proposed route map and what actions people can take to oppose the project.
It also sells items like shirts, bumper stickers and yard signs so people can show their opposition to the project.
When cars drive on areas where the MPRP would go in Frederick County, several properties may have yard signs stuck at the edge of their properties.
They say "No eminent domain for corporate gain" and "Stop Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project," next to a picture of a power line tower being crossed out.
Stop MPRP also has a Facebook group, which had about 10,300 members as of Wednesday afternoon.
After PSEG announced the MPRP's final path in October, it sent out about 800 letters in the fall to the owners of about 600 tracts of property who will be impacted by the route. Some of the land parcels have multiple owners.
Joanne Frederick, president of Stop MPRP's Board of Directors, sent a statement after the final route announcement that said the organization's members are committed to stopping the project completely, regardless of the proposed route.
Land agents on behalf of PSEG have been reaching out to affected property owners to discuss rights-of-entry to properties.
Some owners have been offered compensation of $1,000 for a temporary right-of-entry. Most people have either not responded or denied PSEG's requests.
When Frederick learned about the news of the requested court order Wednesday morning, she said, she wasn't surprised.
Although Stop MPRP doesn't know yet what specific legal response it may pursue — they need to see PSEG's court order filing first — she said the organization "won't sit idly by" and does plan to respond.
She questioned a court's ability to compel people to give up land rights and said PSEG has acted aggressively, now "threatening to take land owners to court," she said.
"These people are scared," Frederick said. "... We're going to stand together."
Frederick County spokesperson Vivian Laxton said the county's stance on the MPRP is still the same in light of news of the court order filing, such as that PSEG should've had a more transparent public engagement process before moving forward with the project.
In September, County Executive Jessica Fitzwater and the Frederick County Council signed a letter urging the state to reject any certificate application from PSEG for the MPRP.
The letter criticized PSEG and PJM for not providing enough information or prior notice of the project to the public. It also said the MPRP "will directly and negatively impact current homes, businesses and farms ... historical preservation sites, and will diminish the property values of thousands of Frederick County residents.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 days ago
To avoid blackouts, Trump admin keeps another aging power plant online through summer
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- The U.S. Department of Energy has ordered another power plant, this time an oil and gas plant in Pennsylvania, to keep its turbines running through the hottest summer months as a precaution against electricity shortfalls in the 13-state mid-Atlantic grid. The department's order to the grid operator, PJM Interconnection, regarding the Eddystone power plant just south of Philadelphia on the Delaware River, is the department's second use of federal power under President Donald Trump to require a power plant to keep operating on the mainland United States. Constellation Energy had planned to shut down Eddystone's units 3 and 4 on Saturday, but Trump's Department of Energy ordered the company to continue operating the units until at least Aug. 28. The units can produce a combined 760 megawatts. The department, in its order, cited PJM's growing concerns about power shortfalls amid the shutdown of aging power plants and rising electricity demand. PJM last year approved Constellation's request to shut down the units, but it welcomed the department's order to keep them operating, saying it's a 'prudent, term-limited step' that allows PJM, the department and Constellation to study the longer-term need and viability of Eddystone's units. The department took a similar step last week, ordering Consumers Energy to keep the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant open in Michigan past its Saturday retirement. The grid operator there, the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, said the order was unnecessary, that there was no energy emergency there and that there should be enough energy in the region through the summer. An environmental advocacy group, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, criticized the move to keep Eddystone operating as an "environmental injustice." Shutting down the units would reduce hazardous pollution and carbon emissions from the decades-old facility and help the region meet federal clean air standards for smog, it said.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
N.J. Dem senators call for probe of grid operator as electric prices surge
Democratic senators want grid operator PJM investigated. Republicans say the Murphy administration is to blame for high electric prices. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor) State senators sparred on the chamber's floor Monday over a resolution directing New Jersey energy regulators to launch an investigation of the state's grid operator, one day after steep electricity price hikes took effect. The resolution, which passed in a 25-12 vote along party lines and must still be approved by the Assembly, calls on the Board of Public Utilities to investigate PJM Interconnection's capacity market auction, a price-setting auction that saw a nearly tenfold increase over the previous sale last July. Democrats have sought to pin the blame on the rise in electricity bills on PJM, arguing it was too slow to connect renewable projects to its grid, thereby depressing supply and pushing prices upward. In some cases, they've outright claimed PJM's process was corrupt. 'The problem begins and ends with a grid that doesn't work. We are not investing enough money in this grid. The grid is held together by chewing gum, toothpicks, and bobby pins,' said Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex), who chairs the chamber's energy panel. 'So now anyone who wants to enter the grid has to get an approval for a connection, and in the case of New Jersey, for the last two-and-a-half years, we've had 79 projects in the queue that PJM would not approve.' Industry officials and experts have said electricity prices are rising because of an imbalance between supply and demand. Demand, which had been roughly stable for decades, is surging amid growing electrification and the rise of power-hungry artificial intelligence data centers. Meanwhile, New Jersey's own supply of electricity has fallen as the state shuttered fossil plants and renewable projects — chiefly offshore wind — struggled to get off the ground, leaving it more reliant on power imported through PJM's grid. Republican members have charged Gov. Phil Murphy's renewable-heavy energy agenda and reliance on offshore wind projects are responsible for the price surge. The offshore wind projects have stalled because of rising costs and opposition by the Trump administration. 'Experts pointed to a whole host of sources and culprits that have brought us here today, a place that was foreseeable and predictable. And now we want to limit the investigation to PJM?' said Sen. Tony Bucco (R-Morris), the chamber's minority leader. Some GOP members argued the Board of Public Utilities, which they charge is partly to blame for rising energy prices, was an inappropriate pick to conduct the probe. Sen. Bob Singer (R-Ocean) said there is some support for sunsetting the board. 'You've got to put the problem at the foot of those who created it. You've got to investigate those who created it, and you have to replace them if necessary,' Singer said. The Board of Public Utilities is the regulatory body charged with approving utilities' requests for rate increases. New Jersey's regulated utilities do not profit from the sale of electricity itself, but they are permitted to recoup the costs of their investments and some other costs at a markup, typically around 9.6%. PJM itself declined to comment on the resolution but said the current price spike was driven by a divergence between supply and demand. 'These higher prices are the result of a loss in electricity supply caused primarily by decarbonization policies that have led to an uptick in generator retirements, coupled with an unprecedented spike in electricity demand due largely to the advancement of data centers to power artificial intelligence, the electrification of vehicles and heating systems, and the onshoring of U.S. manufacturing,' said Dan Lockwood, a spokesperson for PJM. The Republicans said a special committee that held hearings on rising energy prices earlier in the spring should conduct the investigation, which they said should include a probe of the Board of Public Utilities. Democratic members argued the board has institutional and subject matter knowledge that would lend expertise to an investigation that might be absent under the special committee, though some said the panel should continue to play a role. Still, Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), the chamber's budget chairman, questioned the regulatory agency's future. 'We ultimately should be part of the long-term solution, and I'm not sure if BPU should be part of the long-term solution under the next governor,' Sarlo said. Murphy leaves office in January. The Senate approved separate legislation Monday that would require the Board of Public Utilities to study data centers' impact on electricity prices after tabling a Republican attempt to amend it. That bill, which passed the Senate unanimously, now goes to Murphy's desk.
Politico
3 days ago
- Politico
New rates, same blame game
Presented by National Fuel Good morning and welcome to the weekly Monday edition of the New York & New Jersey Energy newsletter. We'll take a look at the week ahead and look back on what you may have missed last week. RATE BLAME GAME — Electric rates for New Jersey power customers went up nearly 20 percent on June 1, and lawmakers and state utility regulators are still trying to figure out what to do. Despite several months of legislative hearings, committee work and floor votes, no new legislation to tackle the issue has reached Gov. Phil Murphy's desk. The Board of Public Utilities has asked for, but has yet to formally consider, plans by utilities to help cushion the blow and it seems likely that additional rate relief could come in the budget. Meanwhile, the blame game continues. The latest salvos came when environmental activists protested outside PJM's headquarters last week with signs like, 'Bills too high? PJM is why,' to which PJM responded that the groups were 'protesting the results of their own actions' and said the protest was an exercise in 'blame shifting.' So, FWIW, a quick recap of who is blaming who: PJM: The grid operator whose auction last summer was responsible for the bulk of the rate increases cited a supply-demand crunch it's long warned about, state clean energy policies that haven't panned out with new generation and local permitting challenges that keep projects from getting built. Gov. Phil Murphy and most Democrats have attacked PJM, largely citing the backlog of energy projects PJM has been unable to handle, delaying the construction of new power plants by years. 'In New Jersey, we're doing our part by bringing new resources to the market and making electricity more affordable for families and businesses as we look to a clean and resilient energy future,' the governor said in a statement last fall. 'However, our grid operator must work in lockstep with the states and recognize that the market isn't responding quickly enough due to current conditions of slow interconnection.' Some Democrats have also attacked utility companies, which are not responsible for generation costs in New Jersey, and the BPU itself. 'The BPU has become a dumping ground for politicians,' Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop said during a recent gubernatorial primary debate. Republicans have criticized the BPU and the Murphy administration generally, in particular the governor's focus on offshore wind — a bet that didn't pan out, leaving the state starved of major new generation sources. Some Republicans have also criticized Murphy administration efforts to cushion the blow of cost increases, calling the timing of ideas to defer and spread out the rate hikes a political stunt, since it would keep bills from spiking before the election even though it would not actually save money for customers. Utilities have tried to distance themselves from the rate increases, which are beyond their control in New Jersey, but that is an uphill battle, since the higher bills will come with their names on them. They have also raised their hands to build new power plants, if lawmakers felt inclined to undo the 1999 law that broke up vertically integrated utilities. Merchant power companies who sell the power that is costing more argue that bills have been rising due to transmission and distribution costs, which utility companies do control. — Ry Rivard SAA WHAT — POLITICO's Ry Rivard: Jersey Central Power & Light is about to spend $380 million on transmission projects meant to bring offshore wind power ashore — but first the company is asking the Board of Public Utilities whether the state is sure it wants the work done. In 2022, the BPU approved $1 billion in onshore grid upgrades meant to accommodate future wind farms. (For those following closely, these are the State Agreement Approach projects PJM keeps talking about, also known as SAA.) But now the offshore wind industry is in turmoil, with every project that New Jersey had been planning for dead or delayed. In a May 23 regulatory filing made public on Wednesday, JCP&L is curious whether it still has the green light to build projects to support the industry given 'new facts and circumstances.' The company said it needs this guidance primarily because of the Trump administration's opposition to offshore wind in the state, but also because of delays in getting necessary local permits and a pause in the approval process for a low-interest federal loan worth up to $716 million. The company is currently supposed to begin construction on hundreds of millions of dollars in projects this summer. HAPPY MONDAY MORNING: Let us know if you have tips, story ideas or life advice. We're always here at mfrench@ and rrivard@ And if you like this letter, please tell a friend and/or loved one to sign up. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Here's what we're watching: TUESDAY— The Department of Environmental Conservation holds a hearing on 'cap and invest' reporting rules, 1 p.m., DEC Region 7 Headquarters, 5786 Widewaters Parkway, Syracuse. Environmental advocates will hold a press conference before the hearing at noon. WEDNESDAY— The Department of Environmental Conservation holds a hearing on 'cap and invest' reporting rules, 1 p.m., DEC Central Office, 625 Broadway, Albany. Environmental groups hold a press conference beforehand, noon. THURSDAY— Environmental groups hold a rally in support of NY HEAT, 10 a.m., Albany. AROUND NEW YORK — Sen. Liz Krueger floats a regional approach to transitioning the gas system. TBD if this trial balloon sinks or rises. — DEMS: FUND BOEM: Democrats, including Reps. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), are pushing for 'robust funding' so the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management can do 'timely review and permitting of offshore wind projects,' despite the Trump administration efforts to halt offshore wind development. In a recent letter to the chair and ranking members of the House's Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Subcommittee, 17 Democrats said 'supporting offshore wind is a national security imperative.' — Ry Rivard Around New Jersey — The Sierra Club endorsed Rep. Mikie Sherrill's campaign for governor on Friday. Ben Jealous, the Sierra Club's executive director, called the Democrat 'a critical voice for protecting public health and lowering costs.' — Flooding could lead to migration. AROUND THE NATION DOE STOPS SECOND PLANT FROM CLOSING: The federal Energy Department invoked emergency powers Friday to again keep a power plant operating ahead of its planned closure. The department's emergency order directs the region's grid operator, PJM Interconnection, to ensure units at the Eddystone generating station stay running in order to minimize the risk of power outages. The plant, located south of Philadelphia, had been slated to close Saturday. The order points to statements from PJM that its system faces 'growing resource adequacy concern,' in part due to load growth and the retirement of dispatchable resources. The planned retirement of Unit 3 and Unit 4 — each with 380 MW capacity — 'will exacerbate these resource adequacy issues,' the order said. The units can run on either natural gas or oil, depending on market conditions, according to operator Constellation Energy. PJM said in a statement that it supported the move, calling it a 'prudent, term-limited step that will retain the covered generators for a 90-day period' and allow further analysis on the longer-term need and viability of the generators. The order comes days after the department similarly invoked an emergency to keep a coal plant in Michigan running this summer. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, speaking at the Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday, touted that action and pointed to recent blackouts in Louisiana. 'That's why we don't want to just go around closing firm, reliable power plants because it's fashionable,' he said. Kit Kennedy, power sector managing director at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the actions 'to keep these zombie plants online' were about 'a power grab; not a power emergency.' — Kelsey Tamborrino ICYMI: The Conversation kicked off with Dr. Oz In the premiere episode of The Conversation, Dasha Burns sat down with Dr. Mehmet Oz — now leading the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — for a candid talk on drug prices, potential Medicaid cuts and why he's getting early morning calls from President Donald Trump. Plus, POLITICO's Jonathan Martin dished on the Ohio governor's race (featuring Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy and former Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel), and Kyle Cheney unpacked Trump's legal battle over 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Watch the full episode on YouTube. And don't miss a moment — subscribe now on Apple Podcasts or Spotify to get new episodes when they drop. What you may have missed PIPELINE PROJECTS RELAUNCHED — POLITICO's Marie J. French: Two major interstate pipelines to boost gas supply in the Northeast have been resurrected, setting up a test of New York's climate law. Pipeline developer Williams Companies announced Thursday that it's moving forward with both the Constitution and Northeast Supply Enhancement pipeline projects, which were previously rejected by former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The pipelines have been a major priority for President Donald Trump. Gov. Kathy Hochul has signaled openness to new gas pipelines, including during talks with Trump about restarting construction of an offshore wind project. 'My message is what I told the president: it's that I will make sure that any applicant for a pipeline — or any energy project — follows all state, local and federal law,' Hochul told reporters Thursday. 'That being said, we can look at this expansively — also consider the benefits at a time when energy costs are through the roof.' 'I have to look at this in a different lens and I'll continue being committed to our climate goals — I believe in them — but also the realization that we have to be more open-minded and expansive,' she added. 'They will have to follow our laws.' Her office has said there was no agreement on a pipeline linked to the Empire Wind restart. New York's climate law requires major emissions reductions that rest on electrifying buildings and cutting the use of natural gas. Environmental groups argue any new gas supply flies in the face of those requirements. Hochul, just after she became governor, blocked permits for two natural gas power plants and cited the state's climate law. But she's become more focused on affordability and reliability issues as those concerns have grown in recent years. Last year, she approved increased gas supply via an existing pipeline that state experts found was needed for reliability. — Phil DeCicco, National Grid's general counsel for New York, said, 'We understand Williams has submitted a permit application for the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project. We will continue to work closely with our regulator as well as state and federal partners to evaluate all options to address the region's growing and critical energy needs.' — FROM THE NOTEBOOK: The governor said she 'went to the mat' on Empire Wind over concerns about energy needs in New York City. 'I have said I'm open to nuclear,' she said on Thursday. 'That may be a radical thought to people but I need to power this state, take the economic burden and the cost off my citizens and my residents, but also be able to prepare for the innovation and the jobs that are coming here.' CLEAN FUEL STANDARD PUSH — POLITICO's Marie J. French: Democratic state lawmakers and environmental advocates are pushing a controversial policy to promote low-carbon fuels in the waning days of the Albany legislative session. The concept has been kicking around Albany for years, and the debate over it remains contentious. The renewed push behind a low-carbon fuel standard is facing an uphill battle in the Assembly, but supporters are now pressing for the market-based policy as the Trump administration moves to erase California's clean car rules, which New York adopted. 'New York has to lead,' said Julie Tighe, president of the New York League of Conservation Voters, at an Albany press conference this week. 'We cannot let four years go by without taking real action to transition away from fossil fuels and Washington, D.C. is not going to help.' The state's climate law requires a dramatic ratcheting down of greenhouse gas emissions, including an 85 percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2050. New York is not expected to meet the near-term 40 percent reduction target by 2030. Transportation is one of the largest sources of emissions in New York, but the Legislature has implemented few policies to address the sector in recent years. The state did adopt regulations — enshrined in law — to mandate an increasing level of electric vehicle sales. Those clean car rules face an uncertain future though, after Congress voted earlier this month to overturn the ability of California and other states to implement the program. ICYMI: BUS TERMINAL — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy met in Hell's Kitchen Thursday afternoon for a ceremonial groundbreaking to replace the Port Authority bus terminal. There was no love lost for the 70-year-old building that Hochul called 'basically a hellhole' and Rick Cotton, executive director of the Port Authority, said is 'one of the most reviled buildings in America.' For decades, there has been talk about replacing the bus terminal but plans went nowhere. Now, though, the two states are on the same page — thanks largely to a functional Port Authority with former New Jersey state Sen. Kevin O'Toole as chair and Cotton at the helm. (Amazing aside: O'Toole said every Port Authority vote in the past eight years has been unanimous.) Plus, the money for the $10 billion, decade-long project seems to be there — $6 billion from the Port Authority, nearly $2 billion from the federal government and another $2 billion expected from city payment in lieu of taxes. 'This will be a transportation hub that welcomes travelers,' Murphy said. Roughly 200,000 NJ Transit commuters — far more than take the agency's trains — use the bus terminal each weekday. The first phase of construction is a staging area for construction and buses that, when the new terminal is built, will be turned into a playground. Spotted at the announcement: Rep. Jerry Nadler, state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, City Council Member Erik Bottcher, building trades leader Gary LaBarbera and First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro — but not his boss, Mayor Eric Adams. — Ry Rivard SENATE TAKES ON PLASTICS: The Senate passed a sweeping measure to reduce plastics and packaging waste on Wednesday evening. The measure, which would also eventually ban certain toxic chemicals from packaging, faces intense opposition from the chemicals and packaged foods industry. Opponents say the bill will raise consumer costs and make some convenient packaged foods unavailable on store shelves in New York. Those concerns are gaining traction with some Assembly Democrats, who worry about affordability. The Senate passed the packaging bill last year — but it did not get to a vote in the Assembly, where it faces a tougher path. Assemblymember Deborah Glick, who sponsors the bill, last week said she remained 'guardedly optimistic' it would pass this session. She said the study circulated by business groups showing higher consumer costs included products that aren't covered in the bill. Consumer Reports found there's no evidence it will result in cost increases and a Columbia University report found a potential $4 monthly increase, a point Sen. Pete Harckham raised during the Senate debate. He also cited savings for local governments by shifting recycling costs onto producers, although there's nothing requiring municipalities to cut taxes. 'This bill is not designed to put direct cash in people's pockets, but there are also going to be health saving costs,' Harckham said. Republican lawmakers raised concerns about companies being unable to comply with some of the bans on specific chemicals in packaging. Harckham said there's a waiver process available. 'They're saying the technology doesn't exist for a lot of the mandates that are in this legislation,' said Republican state Sen. Dan Stec. 'This is going to cost our residents.' Business groups have pushed an alternative bill that would give companies more control over reduction efforts and doesn't ban any chemicals from packaging. 'The problem with some of their packaging is that it's got toxic substances that are going to leach into our food,' Glick said. The ban on specific chemicals doesn't take full effect for five years, when DEC will set a limit that is the lowest achievable level. 'We understand we're up against big money but I think that we either have to do something to protect the public in a very minor way or just fold up the tent and let the industry do whatever it wants,' she added. — Marie J. French STATE FINALLY PLANS FOR EV CHARGING: New York is setting up an interagency working group to supercharge the state's efforts to electrify vehicles. The group will be tasked with developing a coordinated strategy to deploy EV charging infrastructure, including fast chargers on highways by leveraging new funding approved in the state budget. The working group will try to maximize usage of state-owned property for charging stations. The new working group comes after federal action to roll back California's sales mandates for electric cars and trucks that New York has adopted. The Department of Environmental Conservation is offering a two-year delay of any penalties under the program, which California plans to sue to uphold. The group will also consider how to address grid reliability as EV adoption increases and support commercial fleets creating transition plans — issues the Department of Public Service has been working on for years. Gov. Kathy Hochul last year vetoed a measure requiring the state to craft a fast charging station plan. — Marie J. French CONGESTION PRICING GETS MORE GOOD NEWS — The federal judge who issued a temporary order on Tuesday preventing the Trump administration from killing New York's congestion pricing went one step further on Wednesday. In a second ruling this week, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Liman issued an order that keeps congestion pricing alive until he rules on broader issues in the case. Those issues — largely whether Trump Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has the authority to unilaterally cancel the program — will not be teed up for him until fall and Liman expects to rule 'before the end of the year.' To be clear: The injunction is a major victory for the MTA and congestion pricing supporters and an indication that Liman is persuaded by New York's arguments against the Trump administration. Duffy's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. — Ry Rivard
