Trump hails Putin summit but no specifics on Ukraine
ANCHORAGE : US President Donald Trump on Friday hailed what he said were wide areas of agreement with Russian leader Vladimir Putin but offered no specifics on how the strikingly friendly meeting would affect the war in Ukraine.
At an air base in Alaska, Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin, who stepped foot on Western soil for the first time since ordering the invasion of Ukraine, and the US president entertained going soon to Moscow as the two leaders declared themselves partners again.
But Trump and Putin did not take questions in a short appearance before hundreds of reporters, with the US leader – usually fond of wide-ranging press conferences – only vaguely speaking of progress.
'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to,' Trump said.
'There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant,' he said without elaborating.
'But we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.'
Putin spoke of the need for the US and Russia to cooperate and also spoke in general terms of progress.
As he left the stage and Trump spoke of a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: 'Next time in Moscow.'
The red-carpet treatment was a stark contrast to Trump's berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky when he met him at the White House in February.
But Trump said he would soon consult Zelensky as well as Nato leaders on his talks with the Russian leader, which went on for about three hours.
Trump invited Putin just a week ago and ensured there was some carefully choreographed drama for their first in-person meeting since 2019.
The two leaders arrived in their respective presidential jets and descended on the tarmac of an air base, with Trump clapping as Putin appeared.
US military might was on display with a B-2 stealth bomber flying overhead, as a reporter shouted audibly to Putin, 'Will you stop killing civilians?'
Putin, undaunted, grinned widely as Trump took the unusual step of escorting him into 'The Beast,' the secure US presidential limousine, before a meeting in a room before a screen that said – in English only – 'Pursuing Peace'.
Putin smiled and joked with Russian reporters on the visit, a breakthrough for a leader who is facing an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court related to the Ukraine war, which has killed tens of thousands of people.
Russia presses advantage
Russia in recent days has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations, although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages.
Trump had insisted he would be firm with Putin, after coming under heated criticism for appearing cowed during a 2018 summit in Helsinki.
While he was in the air, the White House abruptly announced that Trump had scrapped a plan to see Putin alone and he instead held the talks with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his roving envoy Steve Witkoff.
The meeting will be closely scrutinized by European leaders and Zelensky, who was not included and has refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia.
'It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America,' Zelensky said in a social media post.
Trump has said that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to 'divvy up' territory.
Return to Putin flattery
Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war, and vowed before his return to the White House in January that he would be able to bring peace within 24 hours.
Putin, in language sure to please Trump, told him that he agreed that the Ukraine war, which Putin ordered, would not have happened if Trump were president.
Trump for his part again complained of a 'hoax' that Russia intervened to help him the 2016 election – a finding backed by US intelligence.
The talks took place at Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War facility for surveillance of the former Soviet Union.
Adding to the historical significance, the US bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia – a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
China's top diplomat Wang to visit India for border talks
Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India on Delhi's invitation from Monday (Aug 18) until Wednesday. - Photo: AP BEIJING (AFP): China's top diplomat will visit India next week for talks about their shared boundary, Beijing's foreign ministry said on Saturday, as the two countries consider resuming border trade after a five-year halt. Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India on Delhi's invitation from Monday (Aug 18) until Wednesday for "the 24th special representatives meeting on the China-India border issue", a spokesperson said in a statement. Past trade between the neighbours across icy, high-altitude Himalayan border passes was usually small in volume, but any resumption is significant for its symbolism. It stopped following a deadly 2020 clash between border troops. Indian media reported this week that Wang was expected for talks in New Delhi on Monday. He will meet Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval, New Delhi's foreign ministry confirmed in a statement on Saturday. Wang will also hold talks with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, who visited Beijing in July, the statement said. The two major economic powers have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia. However, they have moved to mend ties after being caught up in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump's tariff blitz. Chinese and Indian officials have said in recent weeks that the two countries were discussing the resumption of border trade. Agreements to resume direct flights and issue tourist visas have also been seen as part of an effort to rebuild their relationship. - AFP
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Failed plastics negotiations in Geneva leave the world few options to confront growing pollution crisis
GENEVA (AP): Negotiations to reach a major treaty to end growing plastic pollution around the world fell apart on Friday, with delegates in Switzerland adjourning with no immediate plans to resume. The consequence of the failed talks is devastating, as it leaves no clear path for nations to collectively address the mountains of plastic that are filling landfills, clogging oceans and showing up in chunks on beaches and other public places. "Consensus is dead,' Bjorn Beeler, international coordinator for the International Pollutants Elimination Network, upon adjournment. Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and that could grow by about 70% by 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to limit production. Many have said it's also essential to address toxic chemicals used to make plastics. The final decision, or lack there of, underscored the influence of the United States and other oil-producing countries such as Saudi Arabia, which opposed any limit on the productions of plastics, made mostly from fuels like oil and gas. Nations had worked for 11 days at the United Nations office in Geneva. But they were deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. Environmentalists, waste pickers and Indigenous leaders and many business executives traveled to the talks to make their voices heard. Indigenous leaders sought a treaty that recognizes their rights and knowledge. The Youth Plastic Action Network was the only organization that spoke at the closing meeting Friday. Comments from observers were cut off at the request of the U.S. and Kuwait after 24 hours of meetings and negotiating. After the adjornment, some delegates tried to put a good face on the negotiations and expressed hope for future talks. Delegates did agree they would meet again at some point in the future. Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme, said despite challenges, despite the disappointment, "we have to accept that significant progress was made.' This process won't stop, she said, but it's too soon to say how long it will take to get a treaty now. The negotiations were supposed to be the last round and produce the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution, including in the oceans. But just like at the meeting in South Korea last year, the talks ended with no agreement. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by the nations. The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall that no further action was being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. After a three-hour meeting, he banged a gavel made of recycled plastic bottle tops from a Nairobi landfill, one of many symbols of the plastic problem that were visible during the talks. European Commissioner Jessika Roswall said the European Union and its member states had higher expectations for this meeting and while the draft falls short on their demands, it's a good basis for another negotiating session. "The Earth is not ours only. We are stewards for those who come after us. Let us fulfill that duty,' she said. Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and others nations said they were "deeply disappointed' to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. Madagascar's representative said the world is "expecting action, not reports from us.' China's delegation said the fight against plastic pollution is a long marathon and that this temporary setback is a new starting point to forge consensus. For any proposal to make it into the treaty, every nation must agree. India, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Vietnam and others have said that consensus is vital to an effective treaty. Some countries want to change the process so decisions may be made by a vote if necessary. Graham Forbes, head of the Greenpeace delegation in Geneva, urged delegates in that direction. "We are going in circles. We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result,' he said as Friday's meeting ended. The biggest issue of the talks has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the US opposed cutting plastic production or banning chemical additives in the treaty. The US supported provisions to improve waste collection and management, improve product design and drive recycling, reuse and other efforts to cut the plastic dumped into the environment. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal gave more weight to the views of other nations. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production, but recognized that current levels of production and consumption are "unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceeded current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, "thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' The objective of the treaty was revamped to state that the accord would be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics. It talked about reducing plastic products containing "a chemical or chemicals of concern to human health or the environment,' as well as reducing of single-use or short-lived plastic products. It was a much better, more ambitious text, though not perfect. Each country came to Geneva with a lot of "red lines,' said Magnus Heunicke, the Danish environment minister. Denmark holds the rotating presidency of the Council of Europe. "To be very clear, a compromise means that we have to bend our red lines,' he said. - AP .
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
The Philippines and Australia kick off major military drills near South China Sea in a big way
In this photo provided by the Armed Forces of the Philippines, Maj. Gen. Francisco F Lorenzo Jr., left, commander of the AFP Education, Training and Doctrine Command, pins the ALON Exercise 2025 patch on Deputy Chief of Joint Operations Maj. Gen. Hugh McAslan during the opening ceremony of joint military drills between Australia and the Philippines in Palawan province, Philippines on Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. -- Armed Forces of the Philippines via AP MANILA (Bloomberg): The Philippines and Australia have started their largest ever joint military exercises as tensions continue in the South China Sea. The joint exercises, which includes drills in Palawan province facing the South China Sea, will run from Aug. 15 to 29, the Philippine military said on Friday night. It will involve 3,600 military personnel from the Philippines and Australia, with additional participation from the Royal Canadian Navy and the United States Marine Corps, it added. "This marks the beginning of the most extensive and complex iteration of the bilateral defense exercise since its inception in 2023,' the military said. Manila has increasingly turned to like-minded nations to counter Beijing's aggression and claims of sovereignty in large swathes of the South China Sea. China's territorial claims to the strategic waterway overlap with those of neighboring nations, and was invalidated by a landmark ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. -- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
