New US visa rules will force foreign students to unlock social media profiles
The new guidance, unveiled by the state department on Wednesday, directs US diplomats to conduct an online presence review to look for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States'.
A cable separately obtained by Politico also instructs diplomats to flag any 'advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to US national security' and 'support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence'.
The screening for 'antisemitic' activity matches similar guidance given at US Citizenship and Immigration Services under the Department of Homeland Security and has been criticised as an effort to crack down on opposition to the conduct of Israel's war in Gaza.
The new state department checks are directed at students and other applicants for visas in the F, M and J categories, which refer to academic and vocational education, as well as cultural exchanges.
'It is an expectation from American citizens that their government will make every effort to make our country safer, and that is exactly what the Trump administration is doing every single day,' said a senior state department official, adding that Marco Rubio was 'helping to make America and its universities safer while bringing the state Department into the 21st century'.
Related: US issues broad order to consulates to vet student visas over 'terrorist activity'
The Trump administration paused the issuance of new education visas late last month as it mulled new social media vetting strategies. The US had also targeted Chinese students for special scrutiny amid a tense negotiation over tariffs and the supply of rare-earth metals and minerals to the United States.
The state department directive allowed diplomatic posts to resume the scheduling of interviews for educational and exchange visas, but added that consular officers would conduct a 'comprehensive and thorough vetting' of all applicants applying for F, M and J visas.
'To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M and J non-immigrant visas will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public'', the official said. 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising
Another day, another confused Trump voter! On today's edition, we've got a MAGA supporter who supposedly understands tariffs but can't imagine why costs are rising. In a social media screenshot posted to r/LeopardsAteMyFace, this person wrote, "Trump i voted for him,now that being said I understand the tarrifs,but what good are they doing to help us? Everything is going up i thought one reason to elect him as president was for things to be cheaper I haven't seen it,Everything is going up i know the government is making more money but its us I'm worried PLEASE!" The Trump voter seemingly edited the post with an update, writing, "OK I understand now just last time he was in office it seemed like right a way fuel was cheaper. Thanks all of you!" Related: Economists widely agree that Donald Trump's tariffs will likely result in rising costs, with many companies such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble already confirming the reasons behind their recent price hikes. Sooo I'm not sure if this Trump supporter really does understand now! Naturally, people had a lot to say in the comments: "Here let me explain using cookies: You voted for a fascist because you thought he would give other people's cookies to you, but now he's taking your cookies and telling you to go fuck yourself. Hope this helps." —u/Apple-Dust Related: "These fools will never get that tariffs are just a type of tax." —u/Gadshill "It's a sales tax with extra steps." —u/GoodDog_GoodBook123 "Why is water wet? Trump said water was dry, but every time I take a shower, I get wet? Is this something the transgender Democrats are doing? Can we arrest them? Is this from the Deep State?" —u/rwblue4u "Any Trumper who tells you they 'get' or 'understand' tariffs is lying." —u/Glenn-Sturgis Related: "This reads like a satirical cartoon. 'I understand exactly how an extra tax works, but why am I suddenly paying more?? And I could've sworn prices were cheaper last time he was in power and was working with Obama's economy… explain please??'" —u/Revolutionary-Ad5695 "The bizarre disconnect we're all going to continue to see from Trump voters on the tariffs issue is so frustrating. These bozos believed that foreign governments pay our tariffs because Trump told them this. They argued with Kamala Harris supporters at the time, despite the fact that this is Econ 101. They never believe they have ANY responsibility at all. They don't believe they're expected to research the issues, learn anything new, or verify any of the information they're being given, before they adopt it as their new mantra." "The biggest frustration is the fact that they're being continually misled and never, ever learn from it. There'll be a new lie tomorrow to cover up yesterday's lie, and they'll regurgitate it perfectly, without ever feeling any embarrassment or personal responsibility." —u/Longstroke_Machine "'Last time he was in office seemed like right away fuel was cheaper.' There was a pandemic, everything was closed, and demand for fuel cratered. I'm not sure why they all have amnesia about that part while remembering the cheap gas. They sure made enough noise about it at the time." —u/WintersChild79 Related: "'I understand now.' Lord knows what Rumpelstiltskin gold was spun on that thread with those geniuses." —u/ThatsRobToYou And finally, "Yeah. We tried to explain this beforehand, but he didn't understand since he only speaks Republican." —u/Jocelyn-1973 What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and EU frame the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidify some commitments
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and the European Union on Thursday issued a joint statement that frames the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidifies some trade commitments. 'This Framework Agreement will put our trade and investment relationship — one of the largest in the world — on a solid footing and will reinvigorate our economies' reindustrialization,' the document reads. Together, the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. Key points in the letter include a 15% U.S. tariff rate on most European goods, with specifics on auto tariffs tied to EU legislative actions. In addition, the EU agrees to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods and many agricultural products, while the U.S. will reduce tariffs accordingly. The agreement also covers $750 billion in energy purchases and $600 billion in EU investments by 2028. The agreement also addresses non-tariff barriers, digital trade and environmental regulations. In July, President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland and announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. Before the Republican U.S. president returned to office for his second term, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with about $2 trillion, around 1.7 trillion euros, in annual trade. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Redistricting Map Clears Legislature, Heads To Abbott
The Texas House approved a new congressional map that could give Republicans five additional U.S. House seats, shifting the balance from 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats to 30 Republicans and 7 Democrats. The vote followed the end of a two-week Democratic walkout that had stalled the redistricting process during a special legislative session. As previously reported by The Dallas Express, Democrats have used quorum-breaking walkouts in past sessions to block legislation, including during high-profile battles over voting and redistricting. The tactic carries significant political stakes. It temporarily halts lawmaking but often sets the stage for partisan standoffs when lawmakers eventually return. Democrats argued the plan diminishes minority voting strength and pledged to challenge it in court. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' State Rep. Todd Hunter, who authored the map, said during floor debate. Republican leaders at both state and national levels pushed for quick action. President Donald Trump urged lawmakers to act, posting a message that read 'ASAP!' Gov. Greg Abbott also called on legislators to advance the proposal during the special session. Democrats returned to Austin after their failed walkout strategy. Their return restored the quorum needed for the House to conduct business. That move cleared the way for Republicans to move forward with the redistricting plan, which passed along a strict 88-52 party line after nearly eight hours of debate and a procedural standoff. House Democratic Caucus Chair Chris Turner said his party will fight the plan in court. 'In a democracy, people choose their representatives. This bill flips that on its head and lets politicians in Washington, D.C., choose their voters,' Turner said. The plan concentrates Democratic voters in urban districts while expanding Republican representation in previously competitive areas, according to critics. Under the new map, no Republican incumbents would see their districts become more competitive. Hunter defended the effort by citing court precedent. He noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. With both chambers now approving the map, it heads to Gov. Greg Abbott, who is expected to sign it into law. If enacted, Texas's congressional delegation could shift from 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats to a projected 30 Republicans and 7 Democrats.
