logo
Colman Noctor: Is AI in the classroom a welcome revolution or a shortcut to nowhere?

Colman Noctor: Is AI in the classroom a welcome revolution or a shortcut to nowhere?

As artificial intelligence threatens to reshape how children learn, we must balance its promise of personalised teaching with the risk of losing what lies at the heart of education — learning through human connection. With ChatGPT-5 and other AI programmes freely available, our understanding of teaching and learning could be transformed.
Many parents are fascinated by, and uneasy about, AI's impact on their children's education. While AI offers efficiency and personalisation, it also raises concerns about fairness and human interaction.
Educators and parents need to understand this change because our goal must be to ensure that children learn effectively, not just quickly.
AI's greatest strength is its ability to adapt to each user. Adaptive learning systems can recognise a learner's struggles, motivations, and pace. A 2020 review of 37 studies by researcher Shuai Wang, at the University of Illinois, found that 86% were positive about learning from AI technologies. Many learning platforms are adopting personalised AI approaches, and tools like language education app Duolingo can tailor lessons to individual needs.
Teachers also benefit from the rapid technological changes. AI promises to handle repetitive tasks, such as grading quizzes, creating assignments, and monitoring attendance, freeing them to provide one-to-one support and relational teaching.
The potential of AI to support children with learning needs is of particular interest to me as my teenage daughter is dyslexic. I am interested in exploring how word-prediction software and voice-enabled interfaces can help students with dyslexia or speech difficulties keep pace with their peers.
Risks of AI in education
Every benefit has a corresponding risk, and when it comes to AI in education, the main one is over-reliance and the erosion of real-life connections. Screens and algorithms cannot replace the warmth, empathy, and spontaneity of teachers, who are crucial for social-emotional development.
Bias is another concern. AI often inherits or amplifies biases from its training data, which could potentially disadvantage minorities and reinforce stereotypes. We have already seen this happen with social media algorithms, which have contributed to the fragmentation and polarisation of societal views.
Academic integrity is also under threat. Universities report widespread use of generative AI, raising fears about the loss of independent thinking. AI detection tools were once seen as a safeguard, but newer systems can now 'humanise' text to evade detection.
The capacity for AI to write essays and complete assignments undetected is particularly troubling in professional training programmes, such as medicine or nursing. To be safe practitioners, these students must fully understand the course content. If AI undermines academic standards and evades detection, the consequences could be significant. Suppose a student submits an AI-generated essay on which medications should not be taken together, but does not know what it contains; this lack of understanding poses risks for competency in the clinical field.
While there are established safeguards to ensure clinical competency through practice placements, concerns persist regarding students' comprehensive knowledge of the course content.
AI could also deepen digital inequality. Without access to high-speed internet or the latest tools, some students risk falling even further behind.
Growing use among students
Many third-level students are aware of AI's limitations. A 2025 University of Florida survey found that students value AI's instant feedback and study support, but worry about accuracy, the loss of critical thinking, data privacy, and bias.
Regardless, the use of ChatGPT among students is on the rise, particularly in secondary schools. In the US, 26% of teens (13–17 years old) reported using ChatGPT for schoolwork in 2024, which is double the 2023 figure. They found that older secondary students were most likely to use it, and when asked what they deemed 'acceptable use', 54% said for research purposes, dropping to 29% for solving maths problems.
So how can parents help children learn in a world increasingly being driven by AI?
1. Encourage discernment: Let children use AI tools like ChatGPT or personalised tutoring, but teach them to question: Where did this answer come from? Could it be wrong? How would you explain it yourself? These questions are essential to developing critical-thinking skills.
2. Champion human connection: Young people need to see teachers, mentors, and parents who model empathy, resilience, and humour. These are essential life qualities that AI cannot replicate.
3. Prioritise AI literacy: Teach children that AI can be wrong, biased, or unclear. Discussions about privacy, data, and ethics have never been more critical, and they need to take place at home, not just be left to teachers in school. To raise the issue of ethical and responsible use, you could say: 'AI can give quick answers, but it doesn't always get things right. How do you check whether the information is true before using it?' Or, 'It's fine to use AI to brainstorm ideas, but your teachers will want to see your thinking. How do you decide when to stop relying on the tool and write in your own words?'
4. Value effort alongside efficiency: In a world where AI can write essays or instantly solve difficult maths questions, we should at least require that students produce their own initial draft. If AI provides a solution to a problem, we could ask the student to explain the process to confirm they genuinely grasp the concept.
5. Keep learning yourself: The more you understand AI's strengths and weaknesses, the better you can guide children through this fast-changing world.
Keeping humans at the centre
The Higher Education Policy Institute recently concluded that while AI can support teachers, it cannot, and must not, replace them. Critical thinking, creativity, and emotional connection are essential human qualities.
UNESCO, the UN agency that promotes education, science, culture, and communication, also acknowledges AI's potential to make education more inclusive and equitable, but only if we remain vigilant about its ethical implications, privacy, and fairness. The agency argues that AI should not be used as an answer generator, but as a tutor. Rather than prompting it to 'give me the answer to this question', attempt the problem and tell ChatGPT to 'show me where I went wrong'.
The next two years will be transformative for the education sector. While a change to the current system is needed, we must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to educational progress and hoped-for efficiency.
We could learn from Estonia, which has historically invested heavily in digital infrastructure and is the highest PISA-ranked country for global recognition of technological learning.
The Estonian Department of Education has partnered with OpenAI and other platforms to provide training for teachers and establish guardrails for data protection, as well as strategies to encourage critical thinking.
The Estonian government seems to see the value of AI in education, but understands the necessity to be prepared, so that it can be integrated in a manner that optimises its benefits and minimises the risks.
From an Irish perspective, the Department of Education committed to developing guidelines for schools regarding the integration of AI in April 2024, but this is still in development.
AI promises significant benefits, and can positively transform our future. However, we need to engage with it in a way that considers the benefits and the risks. If we allow AI to dominate our educational interactions, we risk creating a superficial education system where efficiency takes precedence over understanding.
As we approach the return to school, let's consider how we leverage AI's benefits without losing sight of the human heart of learning.
Dr Colman Noctor is a child psychotherapist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keychain raises $30m in funding as it plans further expansion
Keychain raises $30m in funding as it plans further expansion

Irish Times

time10 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Keychain raises $30m in funding as it plans further expansion

AI powered supply chain platform Keychain, cofounded by Irish entrepreneur Oisin Hanrahan, has raised $30 million (€25.6 million) in funding as the company expands its product line and plans to grow its staff numbers. The Series B round was led by Wellington Management and existing investor BoxGroup, with other existing investors also taking part. The funding will support roll-out plans for the company's AI based operating system KeychainOS, which is designed to helps manufacturers manage their production cycle. The new product is taking on the established players in the system, Mr Hanrahan said, such as Oracle, Redzone, QAD and others. READ MORE 'This an AI enabled operating system for manufacturers to better run their facilities,' he said. 'They all have little bits of the product but no one has put it together into one unified system. We think it's going to build a better way for manufacturers to run their business. We think it will help them get product to market faster and take waste out of the system.' Keychain has raised a total of $68 million to date, 18 months after it first launched with its core product, which puts brands, retailers and manufacturers in touch with manufacturing partners, cutting out brokers and making the process more efficient and cost-effective. 'That product has a lot of room to expand,' Mr Hanrahan said. 'It's already expanded into packaging, into health, beauty and supplements. We are very excited about where it is going.' Mr Hanrahan said the company has significant cash on its balance sheet to support its expansion, with plans to double the size of its engineering team to around 70 people. It currently counts eight of the 10 top US retailers among its customers, with seven of the top 10 CPG brands, including General Mills also using the platform. 'Keychain has demonstrated a strong ability to bring new products to market quickly while scaling their operations effectively,' said Molly Breiner, sector lead for private climate investing at Wellington Management. 'Their approach addresses clear gaps in the CPG supply chain by offering a more streamlined and connected alternative to traditional ERP systems to create a more efficient, resilient, and connected ecosystem for manufacturers.'

Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

RTÉ News​

time13 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Americans are deeply concerned over the prospect that advances in artificial intelligence could put swaths of the country out of work permanently, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll. The six-day poll, which concluded on Monday, showed 71% of respondents said they were concerned that AI will be "putting too many people out of work permanently." The new technology burst into the national conversation in late 2022 when OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot launched and became the fastest-growing application of all time, with tech heavyweights like Facebook owner Meta Platforms, Google owner Alphabet and Microsoft offering their own AI products. While at present there are few signs of mass unemployment - the US jobless rate was just 4.2% in July - artificial intelligence is stirring concerns as it reshapes jobs, industries and day-to-day life. Some 77% of respondents to the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried the technology could be used to stir up political chaos, a sign of unease over the now-common use of AI technology to create realistic videos of imaginary events. President Donald Trump last month posted on social media an AI-generated video of former Democratic president Barack Obama being arrested, an event that never happened. Americans are also leery about military applications for AI, the Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. Some 48% of respondents said the government should never use AI to determine the target of a military strike, compared with 24% who said the government should allow that sort of use of the technology. Another 28% said they were not sure. The general enthusiasm for AI shown by many people and companies has fueled further investments, such as Foxconn and SoftBank's planned data centre equipment factory in Ohio. It has also upended national security policies as the US and China vie for AI dominance. More than half of Americans - some 61% - said they were concerned about the amount of electricity needed to power the fast-growing technology. Google said earlier this month it had signed agreements with two US electric utilities to reduce its AI data centre power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. The new technology has also come under criticism for applications that have let AI bots hold romantic conversations with children, generate false medical information and help people make racist arguments. Two-thirds of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried that people would ditch relationships with other people in favor of AI companions. People were split on whether AI technology will improve education. Some 36% of respondents thought it would help, while 40% disagreed and the rest were not sure. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses online from 4,446 US adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points.

SoftBank makes surprise $2bn bet on Intel's AI revival
SoftBank makes surprise $2bn bet on Intel's AI revival

Irish Times

time20 hours ago

  • Irish Times

SoftBank makes surprise $2bn bet on Intel's AI revival

SoftBank agreed to buy $2 billion of Intel stock, a surprise deal to shore up a struggling US name while boosting its own chip ambitions. The Japanese company, which is adding Intel to an investment portfolio that includes AI linchpins Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, will pay $23 a share – a small discount to Intel's last close. Shares of the US chipmaker, which will issue new stock to SoftBank, surged more than 5 per cent in after-hours trading. SoftBank's stock fell as much as 5.4 per cent Tuesday in Tokyo, its most since April. SoftBank, which owns Arm Holdings, has for decades tried to be a central player in AI, but has been largely a bystander to a global spending boom in hardware. Progress has been slower than expected at Stargate, a $500 billion endeavour with OpenAI, Oracle and Abu Dhabi fund MGX to build data centres in the US. Masayoshi Son's plan to design an energy-efficient chip to better compete alongside Nvidia through the 'Izanagi' project has also yet to translate into a marketable product. 'It's hard to see how much this investment contributes to either SoftBank's value or short-term earnings,' said Tomoaki Kawasaki, senior analyst at Iwaicosmo Securities. For Intel, the Tokyo-based company's move delivers a strong vote of confidence in a storied US chipmaker that's struggled to remain relevant in the AI sphere. Intel aims to prove it can be a technology leader again after falling behind TSMC in contract chipmaking and Nvidia in chip design. Chief executive Lip-Bu Tan met US President Donald Trump at the White House last week, helping lay the groundwork for discussions around ways to rescue Intel. The company held talks with the Trump administration about a deal that would potentially turn the US into its biggest backer. Officials have discussed taking a stake of about 10 per cent in the chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported Monday. For SoftBank, buying Intel stock expands its US footprint at a time Tokyo is pressing Washington to cut tariffs in exchange for investments in the US. SoftBank recently inked a deal to buy Foxconn Technology Group's electric vehicle plant in Ohio in a move that could kick-start Stargate. That's as some of Asia's biggest companies including TSMC and Samsung Electronics reiterate plans to spend billions of dollars on factories in the US. But the timing of the deal – days after Mr Trump and Mr Tan's meeting – is spurring fears that politics may have played a part. 'If it's political, then it's not profit-motivated,' said Amir Anvarzadeh, Japan equity strategist at Asymmetric Advisors. 'Investing in Intel to appease Trump is perhaps not seen as good business.' In announcing its investment in Intel, SoftBank paid tribute to the chip pioneer's history. 'For more than 50 years, Intel has been a trusted leader in innovation,' Mr Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role.' Intel CEO Tan, a chip industry veteran who took the helm this year, has invested in start-ups alongside Mr Son and spent years on SoftBank's board as an independent director before resigning in 2022. 'I appreciate the confidence he has placed in Intel with this investment,' Mr Tan said. – Bloomberg

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store