Abortion a matter for states, territories: Liberal senator Anne Ruston
A senior Liberal senator has not confirmed if the Coalition's position on abortion could change, as the opposition rethinks its national platform in the wake of its election decimation.
Labor's landslide win on May 3 left the Liberals leaderless and exposed severe tensions within the Coalition, with the Nationals faring far better than their blue colleagues and therefore demanding more power.
The Liberal and National party leaders have been hashing out a Coalition agreement, which includes a review of policies.
Anne Ruston — who was opposition health spokeswoman under Peter Dutton — on Sunday kept tight-lipped about whether abortion was up for debate after a push from some in her party.
'As far as I'm concerned, the issue of abortion is something that's well and truly in the domain of the states and territories and should stay there,' Senator Ruston told the ABC.
'But my understanding is that there is no proposal to make any changes in relation to the small amount of responsibility that the federal parliament has for this.'
Nationals senator Matt Canavan and Liberals senator Alex Antic co-sponsored a bill last year that aimed to force doctors to save a child born alive after an abortion.
A parliamentary inquiry found no basis for the bill and Mr Dutton had ordered the Coalition senators to withdraw it — an order they refused.
The bill would be an unprecedented use of federal powers on the issue.
Abortion access is legal in all states and territories, but it is not federally or constitutionally protected.
Senior Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie has described abortion as a 'moral dilemma', while Jacinta Nampijinpa Price — whose shock defection to the Liberal party room added greatly to the Coalition's internal tensions — tried to put abortion on the national agenda after a vote to wind back access narrowly failed in South Australia last year.
It also popped up in the Queensland state election.
Senator Ruston played down commentary the Liberal Party has shifted too far to the right, saying her party was a 'broad church'.
'That's where we work best, when we're tolerant of the broad range of views that we have, but our values are all the same,' she said.
'I don't think anybody in my party doesn't believe that aspiration is the most important thing we should strive to be able to enable every Australian to be able to achieve.'
Senator Ruston added she was 'very happy to be re-elected and looking forward to being part of the broader team nationally to rebuild our party in the interests of a party that reflects modern Australia'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
42 minutes ago
- ABC News
Queensland government to begin social housing rent reviews to free up spaces for those in 'most need'
Social housing recipients in Queensland earning more than they should will soon be evicted from their homes to make way for new tenants. The state government claims there are some recipients earning well above the income limit that determines who is eligible for social housing. This includes a couple in Brisbane taking home more than $200,000 a year while paying less than $200 a week to live in their social housing unit. The government says another family in Townsville is paying less than $190 per week in rent despite earning an annual income of more than $160,000. From July 1, the government will launch annual rent reviews to determine if social housing recipients are still within the income limit. In Queensland, the income limit for a single person with no children is $609 per week, while for a couple it is set at $755. Tenants pay 25 per cent of their income. Those who are found to earn more than the limit will be charged at market rental rates, before they are evicted and transitioned to other housing options. Tenants who are within the housing limit but not paying 25 per cent of their income will have their rent increased, but the increase will be capped at $15 per week. Housing Minister Sam O'Connor said the government wants to make social housing available for vulnerable people and families. "We're empowering our housing officers to do what they do best — support the Queenslanders who most need a roof over their heads," he said. "These are long overdue changes to fix the system so it's better targeted to help the people who need housing most." In a bid to free up properties that are underoccupied, the government will also introduce a scheme to incentivise tenants to downsize to smaller social homes. The government hopes this will allow more families to move into social housing. The incentives will include rent free periods, as well covering the costs of removalists. The government estimates thousands of bedrooms in the state's social housing stock are vacant. About 50,000 people were on Queensland's social housing register as of December last year.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.
