RFK Jr Slammed For Swimming In Sewage-Filled Rock Creek With Grandchildren
The creek, known for its sewage runoff and unsafe water conditions, has been banned for swimming for over 50 years due to high levels of E coli, bacteria, faecal contamination and other pathogens.
Mr Kennedy shared photos on social media showing himself and his grandchildren taking dips and swimming in the creek. One image showed him submerged in the water.
This tributary receives about 40 million gallons of untreated sewage and stormwater overflow annually, according to the DC Water and Sewer Authority.
Mother's Day hike in Dumbarton Oaks Park with Amaryllis, Bobby, Kick, and Jackson, and a swim with my grandchildren, Bobcat and Cassius in Rock Creek. pic.twitter.com/TXowaSMTFY
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) May 11, 2025
The US health secretary soon came under fire online.
A user wrote on X, "With all due respect, swimming in Rock Creek is prohibited because the water is contaminated with [poop emoji]."
With all due respect, swimming in Rock Creek is prohibited because the water is contaminated with ????
— Akio (@realAkioSato) May 11, 2025
"Enjoy the E. coli," a comment read.
Enjoy the E. coli! ????
— ???????????????????? ✨????✨ ???????????????????? (@holly__heart) May 12, 2025
Someone asked to call "Child Protection Services."
Someone should call Child protection services! If they haven't been dismantled!
— Susan Randol (@suzee85144) May 12, 2025
The National Park Service has repeatedly issued warnings against swimming in Rock Creek because of the hazardous water. "Rock Creek has high levels of bacteria and other infectious pathogens that make swimming, wading, and other contact with the water a hazard to human (and pet) health," the agency advisory says. The city's swimming ban extends across all local waterways.
City authorities have plans to address the contamination by constructing a tunnel to reduce sewage flow into Piney Branch and Rock Creek.
Robert F Kennedy Jr is often known for engaging in risky wildlife adventures. As a young man, he hunted bushmeat and survived tropical diseases during expeditions in South America and Africa. Mr Kennedy once claimed that a parasitic worm entered his brain, ate a portion of it, and then died. He has also handled the carcasses of dead animals, including a baby bear and a whale, earning a reputation for reckless outdoor adventures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
RFK Jr.'s Dangerous Attack on mRNA Research
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has halted nearly half a billion dollars in funding for mRNA-based respiratory vaccines—and thereby ended America's leadership research into one of modern medicine's most promising frontiers. That verdict runs counter to the evidence. I've spent more than three decades advancing mRNA research. Testing proves it both safe and transformative in the way we fight disease. My work began in the days of basic RNA biology, and it has reached to seeing my graduate student help design the Moderna Covid vaccine. I've watched these discoveries save millions of lives worldwide. Mr. Kennedy's decision must be reversed. The skepticism many Americans have toward mRNA vaccines is easy to understand. The Covid vaccine rollout came with overconfident and misleading assurances that the shots were entirely without risk and that they would prevent infection and transmission. Those claims, delivered with certainty that wasn't backed up by science, proved false. Worse, public-health authorities and employers coupled those messages with sweeping mandates: Take an experimental vaccine or lose your job, your education and access to public spaces. Rather than seeking informed consent, public leaders deployed misinformation and coercive tactics. Being told one thing, then living through another, left a sense of betrayal that damaged the public's trust in health authorities. Acknowledging those errors is mandatory for restoring our credibility. We need to hold two truths at once: The benefits of the Covid vaccine were oversold and the uncertainties understated—and yet, when the data came in, the mRNA vaccines still proved effective at reducing severe illness and death. Here, the evidence is clear. In large, randomized clinical trials reviewed by the FDA, the first mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna reduced the risk of symptomatic Covid by about 95%. Real-world data from later surges, including the Delta and Omicron waves, confirmed that vaccinated people were far less likely to be hospitalized or die of the virus. The most-discussed adverse event, myocarditis in young men, was real but extremely rare. In the highest-risk group, males age 12 to 17 after a second dose, the risk was roughly 0.006% to 0.011%, about the same as lifetime odds of being struck by lightning. The vaccines were highly effective, and the benefits outweighed the risks by orders of magnitude. That doesn't diminish the experience of anyone who suffered a complication, but it matters when setting national policy. The mRNA vaccines are among the most promising tools in modern medicine. They offer unmatched speed and adaptability, allowing scientists to design and produce targeted vaccines in weeks instead of years. Their potential extends far beyond respiratory diseases. Researchers are now using mRNA to tackle rare genetic disorders, autoimmune diseases, heart disease and cancers. Early trials of customized mRNA vaccines for pancreatic cancer have shown success rates of 50%, echoing the mid-20th-century leukemia breakthroughs that lifted five-year survival from just 10% to 94%. That leap from near-certain death to near-certain survival shows what sustained investment in medical research can achieve. For more than six decades, the U.S. has led the world in biomedical innovation, thanks in large part to sustained federal investment in basic research. That lead is now at risk, as global rivals are moving aggressively to surpass us. Chinese researchers, along with rapidly advancing biotech hubs in other countries, are shortening clinical trial approvals, boosting investment, and attracting record levels of global capital. If we step back, they will seize this field—forcing the U.S. to depend on foreign-made medicines. Once lost, American leadership may never return. American leadership need not, and should not, embrace mRNA technology uncritically. But the government has a responsibility to drive safe, groundbreaking innovation forward. As a scientist whose education was funded by National Institutes of Health grants, I see this as a social contract with the American people. With strong federal backing and a commitment to rapid, responsible progress, mRNA vaccines can realize their full potential. Mr. Coller is a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University, founder of the Alliance for mRNA Medicines and a co-founder of Tevard Biosciences.
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Who won the Pentagon's fitness face-off? Pete Hegseth outshines RFK Jr in epic push-up challenge
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were seen squaring off in a pull-up and push-up challenge at the Pentagon. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Pete Hegseth participated in a fitness challenge at the Pentagon.(U.S. Department of Defense) The 'Pete and Bobby challenge' was set up as part of the Trump administration's broader push to encourage Americans to ditch 'fat' and embrace 'fit' under the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement. Surrounded by Navy and Marine service members, the two officials attempted to complete 50 pullups and 100 pushups in under five minutes. 'We had our big Pete and Bobby challenge today, 50 pull-ups. 100 push-ups. You try to get under five minutes,' Kennedy said in a video shared with Fox News Digital. ALSO READ| Harvey Milk: Pete Hegseth says naval ship to be renamed after Oscar V. Peterson, here's why Both put in a strong showing, though neither cracked the five-minute mark. Hegseth crossed the finish line just over the limit, but managed to edge out the 71-year-old Kennedy. 'We got close. I was about 5:25,' Hegseth said, before turning to RFK JR. with a nod: 'You were right behind me.' Hegseth, Kennedy launch tour to reinstate military fitness standards Several Marines who were watching joined in, with a few finishing in under four minutes. One service member even managed to complete the challenge in less than three minutes, Hegseth claimed. 'It was President Trump who inspired us to do this,' Kennedy said. 'This is the beginning of our tour, challenging Americans to get back in shape, eat better, but also, you need to get out and exercise.' Sharing a recent headline about rising obesity rates among service members, Hegseth wrote on X: 'Completely unacceptable. This is what happens when standards are IGNORED — and this is what we are changing. REAL fitness & weight standards are here. We will be FIT, not FAT.' 'Secretary Duffy, you're invited to do the Pete and Bobby challenge. Can you do it in under five minutes? 50 pull-ups, 100 push-ups. What do you think?' Hegseth asked. ALSO READ| 'Good chance of ending Russia-Ukraine war': What Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky said after key meeting 'Thank you, President Trump, for setting the example. Presidential physical fitness. Make America Healthy Again. Fit, not fat. We're going to have a war-fighting force, young men and women who are prepared to defend the nation. We're doing it as a team. Join us.'
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Why the Trump administration excites some personal-injury lawyers
Robert F. Kennedy junior once worked as a personal-injury lawyer. That Donald Trump made him America's health secretary was odd considering the president despises such lawyers and derisively calls them the 'lawyer lobby'. More consequential for public health is the fact that Mr Kennedy now intends to make some of his old cohort very happy. Mr Kennedy wants to make it easier for people who say they were hurt by vaccines to sue for damages. He would like to overhaul the Vaccine Injury Compensation Programme (VICP), a legal regime covering more than a dozen mostly childhood jabs. The scheme routes claimants to a special vaccine court, where they get faster and easier payouts than in regular civil court since they do not have to prove fault by vaccine-makers, a higher legal bar. Damages for pain and suffering are capped at $250,000, plus medical expenses and lost wages. Vaccine-makers fund the scheme through an excise tax of 75 cents per jab. In return they are largely shielded from liability in the normal tort system. This arrangement underpins public health by ensuring that supply stays cheap. A separate liability protection covered the covid-19 shot. Preventive vaccines are low-margin; the risk of huge jury awards would drive firms from the market. That is precisely what happened to the vaccine for pertussis, or whooping cough, in the early 1980s and why Congress created the VICP. Adverse effects from vaccines are statistically rare. Roughly 30,000 are reported to the government annually. About 15% of these are serious. Meanwhile tens of millions of jabs are given to children a year. The rate of injury—even assuming that each was caused by a vaccine—is a fraction of 1%. About half the cases in the VICP are dismissed. In 60% of the compensated claims, the government does not accept that the shot caused the injury but pays to resolve the case anyway. Mr Kennedy says the VICP 'routinely dismisses meritorious cases' and that it is a 'morass of inefficiency, favouritism and outright corruption'. He dislikes that it takes between two and three years to adjudicate a claim on average, a consequence of the fact that just eight 'special masters' (ie, judges) oversee more than 3,500 cases. Mr Kennedy is right that a programme designed for efficiency has gummed up. But the number of special masters is inscribed in law and only Congress can increase it. What the health secretary can do is open the litigation floodgates, by making more claims eligible for damages. The VICP automatically compensates people for certain injuries if they appear within a set period from the time of the shot. People with other 'off-table' injuries can prevail if they show that the vaccine caused theirs. Mr Kennedy has long pushed the debunked theory that vaccines cause autism. Everyone thought this battle was over at the VICP, which long ago dismissed autism cases. Through the rulemaking process, however, the health secretary can add autism to the table or loosen the definition of existing injuries. Attacking that scheme is not the only way Mr Kennedy is upsetting the market. He has terminated funding worth $500m for mRNA-related research—which yielded some of the covid jabs—while publicly questioning the safety of that platform. The pandemic scrambled the politics around vaccine injury. Plaintiffs' lawyers once aligned neatly with Democrats, who saw themselves as consumer advocates, while industry backed Republicans, who tried to limit lawsuits. When it comes to vaccines, however, MAGA types are now the biggest bashers of pharma. One Republican congressman has proposed a piece of legislation (which is unlikely to pass) to end the liability shield. Of course anyone who believes that vaccines cause injuries ought to be glad for the ease of the VICP, which is enabled by the shield, notes Michael Saks of Arizona State University. Eliminating it would hobble vaccine infrastructure. It would also benefit Mr Kennedy. He held a financial stake in ongoing litigation against Merck over allegations that its HPV vaccine caused autoimmune disorders. He transferred this interest—a 10% cut of some plaintiff lawyers' potential winnings—to one of his sons. But the presiding federal judge has gutted those lawsuits, citing the liability shield. Stay on top of American politics with The US in brief, our daily newsletter with fast analysis of the most important political news, and Checks and Balance, a weekly note from our Lexington columnist that examines the state of American democracy and the issues that matter to voters.
