
Uncertainty lingers over land rights on forest fringe settlements despite interventions
Interventions at the highest levels notwithstanding, the dark cloud of uncertainty that is hovering over families living along the fringes of the Periyar Tiger Reserve (PTR) and the Thattekkadu Bird Sanctuary refuses to part — in the absence of a definitive solution regarding their land rights.
Acting on the State Wildlife Board's recommendation to redraw the boundaries of the PTR and the bird sanctuary, a committee constituted by the National Board for Wildlife visited Pampavalley and Thattekkadu villages in April this year. Based on these visits, the committee recommended that the State government formulate and implement appropriate guidelines and an action plan in alignment with the Zonal Master Plan mandated for Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZ) ''to promote sustainable development practices'' in the Thattekkadu and Pampavalley settlement areas.
The proposal also requires the State to transfer 502 hectares of forestland from the Goodrical range in Pathanamthitta to the PTR to compensate for the exclusion of Pampavalley. Similarly, 1,016.94 hectares from the Neriamangalam range under the Munnar forest division must be transferred to offset the reduction in the Thattekkadu sanctuary.
Having accepted the inspection team's recommendations, the National Board for Wildlife has deferred a final decision until the State government submits the necessary guidelines, action plan and details of the compensatory land to be included in the reserve.
While the board has expressed concern that the excluded areas may be vulnerable to future encroachments without clear guidelines, residents fear that any new guidelines may end up imposing further forest regulations on their land.
'We are apprehensive about the proposed recommendations, especially the action plan to be drawn up by the Forest department. Even if the land is technically excluded from forest limits, ESZ restrictions could still apply. What we want is the freedom to exercise our rights over our land,' said Fr. Mathew Nirappel, vicar of St. Thomas Church, Kanamala.
Sijumon Francis, general secretary of the Farmers Awareness Revival Movement (FARM), which leads the protests in Thattekkadu, has urged the State government to step in and ensure that the redrawing of boundaries doesn't get entangled in bureaucratic delays.
'As per the current notification, buffer zones of protected areas would still cover these excluded regions. To address this, the government must issue a separate notification declaring a zero-buffer zone in densely populated areas,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Uncertainty lingers over land rights on forest fringe settlements despite interventions
Interventions at the highest levels notwithstanding, the dark cloud of uncertainty that is hovering over families living along the fringes of the Periyar Tiger Reserve (PTR) and the Thattekkadu Bird Sanctuary refuses to part — in the absence of a definitive solution regarding their land rights. Acting on the State Wildlife Board's recommendation to redraw the boundaries of the PTR and the bird sanctuary, a committee constituted by the National Board for Wildlife visited Pampavalley and Thattekkadu villages in April this year. Based on these visits, the committee recommended that the State government formulate and implement appropriate guidelines and an action plan in alignment with the Zonal Master Plan mandated for Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZ) ''to promote sustainable development practices'' in the Thattekkadu and Pampavalley settlement areas. The proposal also requires the State to transfer 502 hectares of forestland from the Goodrical range in Pathanamthitta to the PTR to compensate for the exclusion of Pampavalley. Similarly, 1,016.94 hectares from the Neriamangalam range under the Munnar forest division must be transferred to offset the reduction in the Thattekkadu sanctuary. Having accepted the inspection team's recommendations, the National Board for Wildlife has deferred a final decision until the State government submits the necessary guidelines, action plan and details of the compensatory land to be included in the reserve. While the board has expressed concern that the excluded areas may be vulnerable to future encroachments without clear guidelines, residents fear that any new guidelines may end up imposing further forest regulations on their land. 'We are apprehensive about the proposed recommendations, especially the action plan to be drawn up by the Forest department. Even if the land is technically excluded from forest limits, ESZ restrictions could still apply. What we want is the freedom to exercise our rights over our land,' said Fr. Mathew Nirappel, vicar of St. Thomas Church, Kanamala. Sijumon Francis, general secretary of the Farmers Awareness Revival Movement (FARM), which leads the protests in Thattekkadu, has urged the State government to step in and ensure that the redrawing of boundaries doesn't get entangled in bureaucratic delays. 'As per the current notification, buffer zones of protected areas would still cover these excluded regions. To address this, the government must issue a separate notification declaring a zero-buffer zone in densely populated areas,' he said.


Time of India
03-06-2025
- Time of India
Navegaon-Nagzira Tiger Reserve faces ESZ-buffer zone discrepancy, MLC urges revision
Nagpur: BJP MLC Parinay Fuke has requested state forest minister Ganesh Naik to revise the Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) boundary at Navegaon-Nagzira Tiger Reserve (NNTR), claiming that it is hampering infrastructure and village development work in Gondia and Bhandara. Fuke pointed out that in most tiger reserves in India the buffer zone is either larger than or equal to the ESZ. However, in NNTR, ESZ spans a larger area than the buffer zone. This discrepancy, he argued, is creating challenges in planning, development activities, and local administration. The buffer zone, intended to act as a protective layer around the core tiger habitat, typically allows for controlled human activities while safeguarding wildlife. However, the larger ESZ imposes stricter regulations over a broader area, leading to confusion and administrative inefficiencies, said Fuke. Fuke emphasized that aligning the ESZ with the buffer zone boundaries would ensure clarity for both administration and local citizens, fostering a balance between conservation and human needs. The MLC urged the state govt to review the existing ESZ notification and revise its boundaries to match or unify with the buffer zone. This move, he believes, will support sustainable development while protecting the region's rich biodiversity.


Time of India
03-06-2025
- Time of India
Massive rally in Belagavi against Kalasa-Bhandura project of K'taka
Keri: Social and environmental activists, religious leaders, and students from Belagavi and the surrounding areas staged a rally on Tuesday to strongly oppose the Kalasa-Bhandura project of Karnataka. The rally ended with the protesters submitting a memorandum to the Belagavi deputy commissioner, which sought immediate intervention and conveyed stern opposition to the proposed river diversion project. The protesters said activities are under way for executing the project despite no clear directives. However, they said, permissions have been given by the authorities concerned. The memorandum said, 'The project, which seeks to divert substantial volumes of water from the ecologically sensitive Mhadei basin, poses a grave and irreversible threat to the Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary, the Western Ghats forest belt, and the perennial river systems that sustain the biodiverse forests that regulate rainfall patterns of the region.' It raised apprehension against the project that is being executed without obtaining environmental and wildlife clearances. 'The project, we understand, is located barely a few kilometres from the boundary of the Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary, and in certain stretches, is skirted by the notified eco-sensitive zone around the sanctuary,' the memorandum said. It added, 'As per the directions of the Supreme Court and guidelines issued by the ministry of environment, any activity proposed within 10km of a sanctuary boundary mandates prior scrutiny and approval from the standing committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL).' In addition, the memorandum said, a thorough environmental impact assessment is needed. 'The absence of these clearances renders the project patently illegal and liable to be immediately halted,' the memorandum added. In 2006, JDS-BJP coalition govt in Karnataka with chief minister H D Kumaraswamy initiated the building of two canals at a cost of Rs 400 crore. The project is currently under review by the NBWL and the National Tiger Conservation Authority. The proposal for the Bandura nullah project that was submitted in Aug 2024 speaks of acquiring 28 hectares of forest land. Various Kannada and Marathi notables unitedly participated in the rally.