AST SpaceMobile: A High-Risk, High-Reward Play on the Future of Connectivity
AST SpaceMobile is pioneering a space-based network to connect directly with standard smartphones, targeting a massive global market of underserved users.
Recent landmark agreements for spectrum access and over half a billion dollars in potential new financing have significantly strengthened the company's competitive moat and financial standing.
Backed by major telecom partners and validated by U.S. government contracts, the company is poised for its first Block 2 BlueBird satellite launch next month.
10 stocks we like better than AST SpaceMobile ›
Forget what you thought you knew about satellite phones. While market attention remains fixed on artificial intelligence and quantum computing, a Texas-based company is making significant strides in its mission to revolutionize global internet access.
AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ: ASTS) is on the verge of launching a commercial space-based cellular network that communicates directly with the smartphone in your pocket. After a volatile journey since its 2021 public debut, a series of critical developments in 2025 are bringing its ambitious vision into sharp focus. Here's what you need to know about this high-profile space stock.
AST SpaceMobile's first-quarter 2025 results underscored the capital demands of its ambitious mission, reporting a $63 million operating loss driven by heavy research and development (R&D) and manufacturing investments. But that figure now comes with important context.
In a pivotal breakthrough, the company secured a term sheet granting it long-term (80-plus years) access to 45 megahertz (MHz) of premium lower mid-band spectrum in North America through a settlement with Ligado. To fund the deal, AST also lined up $550 million in non-recourse financing.
This is a game-changing development. It locks in a vital strategic asset and injects substantial capital without shareholder dilution, resolving a major financial overhang and providing the company with a much clearer path forward.
Armed with this backing, AST's projections look increasingly credible: gateway equipment bookings of roughly $10 million per quarter and its first major revenue surge, estimated at $50 million to $75 million, in the second half of 2025. The transition from R&D to commercial deployment is no longer theoretical. It's in motion.
The global mobile connectivity market is a behemoth, generating over $135 billion in 2024. Yet, vast swathes of the planet and billions of people remain disconnected due to the economic and geographical limitations of terrestrial cell towers.
AST SpaceMobile aims to close this digital divide by transforming space into the ultimate cell tower. The company's next-generation Block 2 BlueBird satellites, featuring massive 2,400-square-foot communications arrays, are engineered to deliver up to 10 times the bandwidth of their predecessors.
This technological leap represents a fundamental reimagining of telecommunications infrastructure, offering solutions to challenges such as rural tower maintenance, the high cost of 5G densification, and network outages caused by natural disasters.
AST SpaceMobile's core advantage is its ability to deliver broadband directly to standard, unmodified smartphones -- eliminating the need for specialized terminals. Unlike traditional satellite internet providers, AST enables seamless roaming between terrestrial and space-based networks, creating a user experience that mirrors existing mobile coverage.
That advantage just became more defensible. The company's new long-term agreement for premium L-Band spectrum is a strategic coup, establishing a regulatory and resource barrier that few can match. Combined with a growing patent portfolio and spectrum-sharing deals with major carriers like AT&T and Verizon, AST is locking in a lead that's increasingly hard to close.
But urgency is rising. SpaceX's Starlink may be limited to text messaging in its Direct-to-Cell beta, yet it has already completed its first-generation satellite constellation -- proof of its rapid deployment capability. To rival AST's broadband ambitions, Starlink must still secure new spectrum access and enhance its hardware. However, its momentum highlights the importance of AST's early mover edge.
Other players are also closing in. Lynk Global, backed by SES, is advancing commercial operations, signaling that the race for direct-to-device dominance is well underway.
As of mid-June 2025, AST SpaceMobile has surged 81% year to date, lifting its market cap above $12.5 billion. For a company just beginning to generate revenue, this valuation is undeniably priced for the future.
Traditional satellite operators, such as Iridium, offer limited benchmarks. A better comparison might be early-stage biotech or deep-tech firms -- businesses where value hinges on scalability and binary execution milestones. If AST succeeds in launching its commercial service and captures even a modest share of its massive addressable market, today's valuation may prove conservative.
The upcoming launch cadence is pivotal. AST plans five orbital launches over the next six to nine months, beginning in July 2025. The goal is to enable continuous cellular broadband coverage across the U.S., Europe, and Japan by 2026. Execution on that timeline could mark the company's transition from promise to reality, thereby justifying the market's confidence.
The bullish case for AST SpaceMobile has sharpened. With financing secured and spectrum access locked in, the investment thesis now rests squarely on operational execution.
The biggest risks are no longer financial -- they're physical. Satellite manufacturing is complex, and any launch failure could derail the rollout timeline. Regulatory headwinds may also emerge, particularly as astronomers raise concerns about light pollution and radio interference from growing satellite constellations.
Still, for investors with high risk tolerance and a long-term horizon, AST offers a rare asymmetric opportunity. The company has cleared major technical, strategic, and financial hurdles. Now comes the hardest part: executing at scale.
Success would mean not just delivering broadband from space, but reshaping the entire architecture of global connectivity. That's a transformation worth watching closely.
Before you buy stock in AST SpaceMobile, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and AST SpaceMobile wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
George Budwell has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AST SpaceMobile: A High-Risk, High-Reward Play on the Future of Connectivity was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Fenway concession workers vote to authorize strike over stalled contract negotiations
Workers who staff the concession stands at Boston's Fenway Park have voted to authorize a strike, but are continuing to work for now. What the vote means Local 26 said it has been trying to negotiate a deal with Fenway's food contractor - Aramark - since the first of the year. The union's contract expired on December 31, 2024. According to the union, 95% of workers voted to authorise a strike during Sunday's vote. However, the workers have not yet walked out. The workers include about 700 cashiers, cooks, beer sellers and souvenir vendors. What do workers want? The union said key issues in the negotiations include wages, technology and scheduling. The workers contend they make less than $20 per hour, which is less than the major league standard. "We love working at Fenway. My co-workers and regular Red Sox fans are like my second family. But workers are underpaid, and increased automation is taking away jobs and cutting into our earnings," said Natalie Greening, a beer seller who started at Fenway when she was in high school and has worked at the stadium for 20 years. The union cited Marlins Park in Miami as an example, claiming that workers at the stadium earn $2.73 more per hour while a beer at the Florida ballpark costs $5.65 less than at Fenway. "Boston is a union town, and it's time to bring all Fenway workers' wages up to standard," said Carlos Aramayo, president of UNITE HERE Local 26, which represents the Fenway workers. "Local 26 hotel workers fought for, and won, $10-an-hour raises last year, and Local 26 university dining workers will be making a minimum of $30 an hour by 2028. There's no reason for Fenway workers to be left behind. They deserve raises and respect!"


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Nippon Steel's Investors Begin to Count the Cost of its US Win
After a year and a half of government talks, countless regulatory hiccups and last-minute negotiations, Nippon Steel Corp. secured its much-wanted prize late last week when President Donald Trump approved the $14.1 billion purchase of United States Steel Corp. Now the Japanese giant's shareholders will begin to weigh up the benefits of its biggest ever overseas bet. But they'll also be keeping a watchful eye on the costs, which include the promise to invest $14 billion over the coming years and significant concessions to the US government that will leave Washington with a say in major decisions and control over some board seats.


Digital Trends
41 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
These are the 4 best alternatives to the Google Pixel 9a
The best cheap phone race has been reignited by the Google Pixel 9a, which brings the Google Pixel 9 series experience at a significantly lower price. Starting at $449, Google's latest Pixel offers the flagship processor of its siblings for flagship-level performance, an excellent camera, and long-term software support. Yet, Google's software experience won't be for everyone; there are obvious tradeoffs in the specs sheet to enable the low price; the camera bar design is somewhat polarizing for long-term fans, and there's no telephoto camera. Recommended Videos If you are looking for the best cheap phone, but don't fancy the Pixel 9a, here are four alternatives that you should consider instead, and why. Samsung Galaxy A56 The best alternative to the Pixel 9a is undoubtedly the Samsung Galaxy A56. Samsung announced its new affordable challenger just weeks before Google, and the Galaxy A56 features a few key benefits over the Galaxy A56. Although the 5,060 mAh battery is slightly smaller than the 5,100 mAh battery in the Pixel 9a, the Galaxy A56 charges at the same 45W speeds as the Galaxy S25 Ultra. In comparison, the Pixel 9a is much slower at 23W, and while I haven't fully tested the charging speeds yet, I expect it to be much slower based on the 37W charging in the Pixel 9 series. Samsung has also committed to offering six years of software and security updates, which is one shy of the seven years provided by Google. The Pixel 9a features a 48MP main camera and a 13MP ultrawide secondary lens. While the Galaxy A56 closely matches this with its 50MP and 12MP combination, it also features a dedicated 5MP camera for macro photography. One particularly strong argument for the Galaxy A56 is its price, which starts at just $350 on Amazon, $100 cheaper than the Pixel 9a. Nothing Phone 3a (Pro) If you don't mind the price of the Pixel 9a, you should consider the Nothing Phone 3a (Pro). Priced $10 higher than the Pixel 9a at $459, it's only available via the London-based company's beta program in the US, and there isn't official carrier support. Get past these quirks and you'll get a phenomenal phone at an excellent price. The design is certainly polarizing, but it also features the beeps and lights that made Nothing phones so unique. Around the unique camera is a set of lights that can be programmed to highlight notifications, remaining timers, alarms, and more. There's a 50MP main camera that takes great photos, an 8MP ultrawide that is somewhat inconsistent, and a 50MP periscope telephoto offering 3x optical zoom. It's extremely rare to see a telephoto on a phone at this price, and if you want a good all-around camera system for not a lot of money, the Phone 3a (Pro) is a great pick. OnePlus 13R If your budget can stretch further, consider the OnePlus 13R. Like the Phone 3a (Pro), it features a triple camera setup complete with a telephoto lens. It starts at $599 and features a more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor, compared to the 7s Gen 3 in the Phone 3a (Pro). It offers flagship-level performance, similar to the Tensor G4 in the Pixel 9a, as it powered the best Android phones before the release of the Snapdragon 8 Elite. I love using OnePlus's software, and the 13R offers a strong all-around experience. The display features flat sides, which is ideal if you dislike the curved displays that have become the norm. The 6,000mAh battery lasts for multiple days, and with 80W charging, it can charge to 50% in just 20 minutes. If you want a flagship-like experience at a more affordable price and your budget can stretch there, the OnePlus 13R is an excellent choice at this price. Apple iPhone 16e If you want the best Android phone at this price, the list has many options, but if you want an iPhone, your options are far more limited. This is especially true when you consider Apple Intelligence and the hardware inside each device. Around this price, there are two options if you want something running the new iOS 26 software: the iPhone 15 or the iPhone 16e. The former features two cameras, but the latter has several things that make it the better pick, as long as you don't mind dropping the ultrawide camera. First, the A18 processor in the iPhone 16e is identical to the one in the iPhone 16. It will be supported for years, can play the latest games, and can run Apple Intelligence. The iPhone 15 can't run Apple's AI suite, so it limits the long-term capabilities of your phone. The iPhone 15 and iPhone 16e share the same 48MP fusion camera, including the detailed 2x telephoto mode, but the former also has a 12MP ultrawide camera. If you don't mind dropping this, the iPhone 16e offers the battery life of any iPhone I've used, excellent network coverage thanks to Apple's new modem, fantastic performance, and a vivid screen that's a joy to use.