logo
2025 Volkswagen Amarok Life TDI500 review

2025 Volkswagen Amarok Life TDI500 review

7NEWS05-07-2025
The Volkswagen Amarok continues to be an underdog in Australia's huge ute market, even if it shares its DNA with the country's current head honcho.
Its twin-under-the-skin is, of course, the Ford Ranger, which not only continues to be Australia's top-selling ute, but also the country's favourite new vehicle bar none, with no fewer than 22,000 examples sold so far in 2025.
The Amarok, meantime, has found 2434 new homes in the same period, making it the lowest-selling established ute nameplate locally. Of course, unlike almost all of its rivals, the second-generation Amarok is available in Australia exclusively in dual-cab 4×4 ute form, meaning there's no single-cab or extended cab versions, and no manual or 4×2 options, so there's a smaller range with higher prices and more equipment to reflect its premium positioning.
But there's also increasing competition in the ute market, including from new rivals like the BYD Shark 6 and other cheaper Chinese dual-cabs, as well as overhauls for popular models like the Mitsubishi Triton and range expansions for utes like the Ranger, with the addition of four plug-in hybrid (PHEV) variants. And there's still no concrete word on a similar powertrain for the Amarok.
Volkswagen's ute did bring a recent MY25 update that shifted some pricing and specifications, and added a tray option to several variants to create the first double-cab/chassis versions. Hardly groundbreaking updates, but did they need to be?
The Amarok already offered one of the more diverse powertrain lineups of any ute in Australia, even without electrification. There are three turbo-diesel powertrains including a V6, and turbo-petrol engine that not even the Ranger offers here, despite the fact it traces its roots to high-performance Fords like the Focus ST and Mustang EcoBoost.
On test here, however, is the 2025 Volkswagen Amarok Life TDI500 double-cab pickup. That sounds like a mouthful, but it's almost as simple as the Amarok gets and it's positioned second from the bottom of the range.
The Life TDI500 is powered by a four-cylinder biturbo-diesel, has cloth seat trim and 17-inch wheels, along with an unlined tub and other such stripped-back amenities. The only way the Life can get more barebones is by fitting an aluminium tray, but that adds $4000 to the $62,000 drive-away price as tested here.
Is this the sweet spot in the Amarok range? Do other variants do it better, or should you just go for a Ranger?
How much does the Volkswagen Amarok cost?
The Life sits one rung above the bottom of the Amarok range, and costs $61,990 drive-away. That's $6000 up on the base Core, and a whopping $10,750 less than the next permanent variant above it, the Style TDI500 with the same engine.
The Amarok Life is most comparable to either the Ranger XLS or XLT biturbo 4×4 dual-cabs – even if the model lineups aren't quite in sync. These utes cost $57,630 and $63,640 before on-roads respectively.
Outside of that duo, the dual-can 4×4 ute crowd is as large as ever. There are still the usual names – Toyota HiLux, Mitsubishi Triton, Isuzu D-Max, Mazda BT-50, and Nissan Navara – competing against the Amarok.
There's also a handful of rivals from China that continue to put pressure on these stalwarts. The GWM Cannon and LDV T60 aren't brand-new but continue to sell well, while the JAC T9 is working to establish an Australian following.
Volkswagen's ute is still pricier than all of the above.
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
What is the Volkswagen Amarok like on the inside?
Unremarkable, especially by Volkswagen standards.
Of course, the Ford roots are obvious, yet it doesn't feel as refined. The rounded air vents of the Ranger have been sharpened, and there are a fair few uninspiring shapes and surfaces dominating the dash and centre console.
Unlike the D-Max/BT-50 sister models, in which the interiors are practically identical apart from nicer seats in the latter, the Amarok feels like an attempt to inject edgier Volkswagen styling into a ute it wasn't designed for.
That said, most of the practical benefits that come with cheaper Rangers have been carried through here. There's a similar phone-sized cubby ahead of the gear selector, a pair of cupholders, a cut-out on top of the dash, and a lidded cubby above the glovebox – all very useful for tradies.
The seats in the Life are also work-friendly, with hardy cloth upholstery and enough bolstering to keep front passengers comfortable in bends. Those hard surfaces will withstand wear and tear better than any more premium materials, while the leather steering wheel trim is a worthwhile luxury.
Fitted to this variant is a 10.1-inch touchscreen infotainment system, a smaller unit than the 12.3-inch alternative found from Style level. It sits awkwardly on the dashboard with thick glossy bezels, but was responsive and snappy during our testing.
You still get wireless smartphone mirroring as standard, which worked reliably during our time with the car. Climate control is – unfortunately – tucked away in this screen, bar the sole shortcut button below it to open the climate menu.
This is in stark contrast to the Ranger, which has a series of knobs and buttons below. The Amarok's array of buttons may look cleaner, but the practicality of physical climate controls is far preferable.
Otherwise, you'll find a USB-A and -C ports, a 12V outlet, a trailer brake controller, and even a wireless charging pad in the cubby below.
The steering wheel is a classic Volkswagen design, and we like that all the buttons are finished in durable plastic. They're all physical too, which means they're easy to use – especially compared to the glossy haptic controls in other modern VWs.
Behind the wheel is an 8.0-inch digital instrument display, flanked by simple meters for temperature and fuel. It's by no means flashy, but as with the Ranger it's functional and simple, which means it's easy to live with. Like the infotainment screen though, it's the smaller of the two screens seen across the range.
The few menus available to scroll through are navigated using the buttons on the right of the wheel. This area is where you'll find most of the Amarok's physical controls, with those few buttons and off-road controls on the centre console making up the rest.
That makes for a cabin that's intuitive enough to be comfortable, but in any ute we'd still like to see a more traditional approach with more buttons. At least the armrests are soft, and the centre storage bin is big enough for a range of odds and ends.
Stepping into the back is a small hike, but the side running boards make it easy to step up and in. These are similar to other Amaroks, though they're made of black plastic instead of metal.
The door opening is square but not as large as we'd like, which means – when combined with the high floor – loading larger items like a child seat may be difficult. Once you're in though, there's plenty of space for passengers and their cargo.
If you need to fit a child seat, there are two ISOFIX and two top-tether anchor points to utilise. There's a fold-down centre armrest in the middle and a 12V outlet on the back of the centre console, but there are no USB outlets to break up the swathes of scratchy plastic.
The rear bench seat itself is upholstered in the same cloth as up front, and can fold up or down to reveal small spots to store things. Headroom is appropriate, and legroom should be fine for people less than two metres tall.
As expected for a base-spec ute, the tub lacks any protective plastic lining. This isn't the end of the world, but the paint will quickly scratch through normal use. The Amarok can be optioned with a 'Modular Bedliner' though.
Disappointingly, there are also no power outlets in the tub, as they're reserved for higher-spec Amaroks, but tailgate assist makes it easier to close without a motorised function. You'll notice our tester is fitted with Volkswagen's 'Premium Stylish Canopy', one of the many genuine accessories on offer.
The versatility here is excellent as a result. You can opt for the side windows in three combinations of lifting or sliding, while there's electric opening for all three panels, standard central locking, and built-in LEDs inside, keeping everything secure but accessible when needed.
That all makes the Amarok Life a solid workhorse, but its interior falls short of justifying the $60,000-plus price tag.
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
What's under the bonnet?
The TDI500 engine fitted to the Life and Style is a 2.0-litre four-cylinder biturbo diesel shared with the Ranger. It produces 154kW of power and 500Nm of torque, with drive sent to all four wheels through a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Our week with the ute comprised several highway commutes, and multiple trips throughout Melbourne's inner suburbs. The stop-start driving of the latter contributed to our higher fuel economy figure, although there was no load in the back.
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
How does the Volkswagen Amarok drive?
Ford's twin-turbo diesel four-pot feels entirely appropriate in the Ranger, and it's no different in the Amarok.
NOTE: Volkswagen Amarok Style pictured throughout this section.
You need to put a physical key into the ignition to start the Life, which I often prefer to a push-button, but it takes a moment to adjust your brain behind the wheel of such a modern (and expensive) vehicle.
Firing it up reveals a relatively smooth diesel idle that soon quietens down as things warm up. It's perfectly liveable and slots into Drive using a chunky gear selector, just as it does in most other Rangers and Amaroks.
Setting off from a standstill provides a decent push in the back, and the engine feels quite happy under load, which is exactly what you want from a powertrain in a ute.
We maintain that 10 gears are far too many for a vehicle like this, as the most significant feedback it provides is constant shifting under acceleration.
Still, it's a solid powertrain setup, and the base-spec leanings of the interior tie in well with the utilitarian characteristics of the diesel up front.
On the move, the Amarok Life exhibits a typically bouncy ride. This is especially evident unladen, as the rear of the vehicle will clatter over bumps even if road noise is acceptably subdued.
We don't mind this tendency, since it's still far more compliant than the ride you get on the larger 18- or 21-inch wheels fitted to the more expensive grades.
The chunkier rubber here also means you have more leeway when tackling rough roads – sealed or not.
Like the Australian-developed Ranger it's based on, which remains the ute benchmark when it comes to ride/handling, the Amarok confidently keeps itself in check in bends thanks to a well-sorted front-end in a solid ladder-frame chassis design.
You'll notice a bit of body roll, but the steering is nicely weighted and pointy enough to keep you on track. Forcing it to turn at speed will induce some tyre squeal, but the Life's on-road performance still stands up well against the more lifestyle-oriented Aventura.
Despite sporting large 4Motion stickers, the Amarok actually runs in two-wheel drive most of the time. That's because the TDI500's four-wheel drive system is designed for unsealed surfaces, and prolonged use on paved roads can cause driveline damage.
Rear-wheel drive translates to lower fuel consumption on the road, and the biturbo diesel doesn't have the guts to properly break traction unless the roads are greasy anyway, and the well-sorted traction/stability control system takes good care of that.
It's a different story with the Amarok's more powerful engines, though adding weight to the tub dulls things down a bit.
Once you're off-road, the Amarok is more than capable of getting you to almost any campsite. There are several off-road modes to choose from, along with a locking rear differential, low-range gearing, and plenty of ground clearance to help keep things moving along over the rough stuff.
We didn't get the chance to properly test the Amarok's off-road capabilities during our week with the car, but you can check out our video review of the Aventura for a better idea.
When the speed picks up, the Life stays comfortable and offers plenty of overtaking power, but it's not as effortless as a V6 Amarok, while will walk up snottier inclines and tow a large van or boat with much more ease.
However, there's still a comprehensive suite of safety gear, even if a lot of it is simplified for entry-level Amaroks.
You get adaptive cruise control for one, albeit without any stop/go function. It's reliable in practice, and makes long-distance commuting a breeze with its ability to appropriately follow lanes and keep up with traffic around you.
We've had few hiccups with these systems in the real world previously, although the higher-spec Aventura did throw up false distraction warnings during a previous test. Rangers also tend to do this, mostly if they deem your hands to be off the wheel, but the Amarok Life stayed quiet.
Unfortunately, you don't get a surround-view or even a front-facing camera, which would vastly improve manoeuvrability when off-roading or navigating carparks.
Visibility is still good, though the optional canopy does create a letterbox in the rear-view mirror.
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
What do you get?
The Life sits above only the base Core in Volkswagen's Amarok range as a mildly more premium variant, but a long way below the grades above in terms of standard equipment.
2025 Volkswagen Amarok Core equipment highlights:
17-inch 'Cobra' alloy wheels
Front disc, rear drum brakes
Locking rear differential
Power-folding side mirrors
Side steps
Mud flaps
2 x front tow hooks
Steel underbody protection
Plastic fuel tank protection
Tow bar
12-pin trailer plug
Black side mirrors, door handles
Manual locking tailgate
6 x tie-down points in tub (pickup only)
Exterior tie-down rails
Cargo box LED lighting (pickup only)
Automatic LED headlights
Rain-sensing wipers
Automatic high-beam
Halogen tail lights
Vinyl flooring
Grey headliner
Fabric upholstery
6-way manual driver seat
4-way manual front passenger seat
8.0-inch digital instrument cluster
10.1-inch touchscreen infotainment system
Four-speaker sound system
Wired and wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto
DAB+ digital radio
Wireless charger
Single-zone air-conditioning
Auto-dimming rear-view mirror
Trailer brake controller
ABOVE: Volkswagen Amarok Style
Amarok Life adds:
Rear disc brakes
LED front fog lights
Body colour side mirrors and door handles
Heated, power-folding side mirrors with puddle lamps
Locking wheel nuts
Tailgate lift assist (pickup only)
Power tailgate lock (pickup only)
Privacy glass
Six-speaker sound system
E-shifter
Electric park brake
Leather-wrapped steering wheel
Carpet flooring
Eight-way manual front seats
Adaptive cruise control with stop/go
Amarok 10 Deserts Edition adds:
17-inch black 'Cobra' alloy wheels
Continental CrossContact all-terrain tyres
40mm suspension lift (275mm total ground clearance)
Composite underbody protection
Black tonneau cover
10 Deserts badging
All-weather floor mats
Amarok Style adds:
18-inch 'Amadora' alloy wheels
Chrome side mirrors and door handles
Plastic tub liner (pickup only)
Stainless steel sports bar (pickup only)
12V socket in tub (pickup only)
230V sockets in tub (pickup only)
400W inverter
Matrix LED headlights
LED tail lights
Leather-look dashboard and door inserts
ArtVelour microfibre upholstery
Heated front seats
10-way power driver's seat
12.3-inch digital instrument cluster
12.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system
Dual-zone climate control
Rear air vents
Insulated windshield
Proximity entry and push-button start
Alarm system
ABOVE: Volkswagen Amarok Aventura
Amarok PanAmericana adds:
18-inch black 'Amadora' alloy wheels
All-terrain tyres
Dynamic suspension
Black side mirrors and door handles
PanAmericana decal
Black sports bar and steps
Soft tonneau cover
Roof rails
Spray-in tub liner
Leather upholstery
Power passenger seat
Eight-speaker Harman Kardon sound system
Black headliner
Amarok Aventura adds:
21-inch 'Varberg' alloy wheels
Chrome bumpers, mirrors, handles
Rear sailplane
Electric roller cover
Leather seats (Savona)
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
Is the Volkswagen Amarok safe?
The Volkswagen Amarok has a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on testing conducted in 2022. This result was drawn from testing of the closely related Ranger, with additional frontal offset and side impact tests conducted on the Amarok by Euro NCAP, which has harmonised testing protocols with ANCAP.
Standard safety equipment across the range includes:
9 airbags
Adaptive cruise control
Autonomous emergency braking
Blind-spot monitoring
Front, rear parking sensors
Intelligent Speed Limiter
Lane-keep assist
Rear cross-traffic alert
Reversing camera
Swerve Steer assist
Speed sign recognition
Tyre pressure monitoring
Amarok Life adds:
Adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go
Amarok Style adds:
Park Assist semi-autonomous parking
Surround-view camera
Trailer assist
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
How much does the Volkswagen Amarok cost to run?
Like the wider Volkswagen Australia range, the Amarok is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
Service pricing, accurate as of July 1, 2025, is detailed below:
Alternatively, customers can purchase a five-year 'Care Plan' for $2200.
To see how the Amarok stacks up against its rivals, use our comparison tool
CarExpert's Take on the Volkswagen Amarok Life TDI500
Where other Amaroks cater to lifestyle buyers, the Life is pitched more towards tradies, which is a task it doesn't take on convincingly.
The MkII Amarok has always been a more premium version of the Ranger. It's more expensive, but for your money you generally also get nicer materials and the best tech available, even if it comes at the expense of the 'lifestyle ute' tag.
But the Life strips things back without a price cut in equal measure. Don't get us wrong – it's still a well-built and reliable dual-cab 4×4 pickup, but if you're going to go for an Amarok at this price you may as well flip a coin with a Ranger XLT, or even an XLS and pay a little less.
It's not accident there are just four work-oriented variants in the Amarok's 12-grade lineup.
The Amarok is at its best from the Style level up. Its interior is a much more cohesive package, and it's generally a little sharper in most areas without compromising too much on its utility.
The bones you get with the Life are undoubtedly solid. It may not be available with the meatier diesel V6, but the biturbo four is still a quality engine with plenty of punch.
That means it can still tow comfortably and offer a very decent payload in the tub. The optional canopy fitted to our tester also improves both storage space and security, offering added peace of mind and turning the Amarok somewhat into the Everest wagon for which Volkswagen has no answer.
The Life TDI500's interior is also comfortable enough, even if it occupies a weird space between the ruggedness of the Ranger and the SUV-ness of the Amarok PanAmericana, let alone the Aventura.
All that makes the Amarok Life a great ute, but we think tradies are better off saving their cash and buying something else.
Interested in buying a Volkswagen Amarok? Let CarExpert find you the best deal here
MORE: Explore the Volkswagen Amarok showroom
Pros
Can be put to work
Capable diesel engine
Proven underpinnings
Cons
Too expensive as a work vehicle
Uninspiring interior
Ranger may make more sense
Top Line Specs
Power: 154kW
Fuel Type: Diesel
Economy: 7.2L/100km
CO2 Emissions: 189g/km
ANCAP Safety Rating: 5
This article was originally published from CarExpert and appears with permission.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 Kia Tasman ute review
2025 Kia Tasman ute review

Daily Telegraph

time2 days ago

  • Daily Telegraph

2025 Kia Tasman ute review

Don't miss out on the headlines from New Cars. Followed categories will be added to My News. In a divided world, it's a rare and wonderful thing when people on the internet reach a consensus. Unfortunately for Kia, that consensus is its much-awaited ute – the Tasman – is very, very ugly. On any forum, video or article talking about the car, it's the first thing people mention. It's been described as a Lego car, a Ram bought from Temu, a Korean Mahindra, and a half-eaten cabbage. But like every parent of an ugly baby, Kia doesn't see the problem. MORE: First impressions of Kia's Tasman ute The Kia Tasman has divisive styling. Picture: Supplied 'Road presence will dilute the angst surrounding how it looks,' Australian chief executive Damien Meredith said at the launch press conference. They'd better hope so. Kia has big ambitions for the Tasman, they want it to be the fourth best-selling ute in Australia, behind the Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux, and the Isuzu D-Max. To pull that off, they'll need to sell around 20,000 units and outperform the BYD's critically acclaimed plug-in hybrid ute, the Shark. MORE: Why sports stars went into bat for Kia Kia's pick-up borrows its engine from the Carnival and Sorento. Picture: Supplied It's a big ask for a car that's late to the game, entering a crowded market, and made by a brand better known for family-friendly SUVs. To succeed, Kia need to quickly build credibility as a maker of rugged, blokey vehicles. That's why their ads are packed with sporting legends pretending to be tradies. Kia are also heavily promoting the Tasman's origin story: that it's a ute designed specifically for Australian roads and drivers. MORE: Full prices and specifications for the Kia Tasman The Tasman's cabin is practical and impressive. Picture: Supplied But in reality, the Australian team didn't have total free range. The original name of 'Tanami' was scuppered in Korea, and the controversial final design, I'm told, was a captain's call from inside the head office. Internal politics and smashed-crab aesthetics aside, the Tasman is a reasonably competitive, somewhat unimaginative car that stands up to its rivals. There are 10 Tasman variants coming into the market, starting with a paired-down 2x4 single cab chassis. At the top of the line is the 4x4 X-Pro, which is $75,000 before on-road costs. If you're considering any trail driving, this is Kia's most-compelling option. MORE: Kia defends Tasman ute styling The Tasman shines off-road. Picture: Supplied The Tasman is a big car – marginally wider, taller and longer than its Ranger and Hilux rivals, giving it considerable presence on the road. But it's a different story under the bonnet. All variants are powered by a 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine. That's fairly modest, especially compared to the larger V6 options offered by the likes of Ford and Volkswagen. To Kia's credit, the Tasman doesn't feel particularly underpowered on the road. With an empty tray, it was responsive and comfortable, with enough guts to easily overtake slower cars. While the Tasman was smooth on the highway, it is worth noting the ride was noticeably harder at slower speeds. MORE: The ute war set to erupt Kia worked hard on the Tasman's off-road performance. Picture: Supplied But the X-Pro really shines when it gets off the tarmac. The top-of-the-line Tasman has a full suite of off-road technology, including ground view cameras, terrain options, low-range modes, rear diff-lock, and an 'X-Trek' setting which crawls the car at a slow, constant speed in both drive and reverse. It's the traction control which sets this car apart, though. Even an inexperienced off-roader will have a good chance of managing hostile conditions, thanks to technology which does a lot of the thinking for you. But how many owners are actually going take the Tasman off road? Only about 15-20 per cent, according to Kia's market research. Sophisticated electronics shine on slippery surfaces. Picture: Supplied But, for the people who are more likely to use their utes for shopping trips and school runs, the Tasman is well-suited there, too. The cabin is impressively quiet and comfortable. In the X-Pro, the seats are supportive, heated, and offer generous recline in both the front and rear rows. It also has the kinds of features you'd expect to see in a family sedan, including a large infotainment screen, sunroof, wireless charging dual climate zones, and a heated steering wheel. The back row particularly stands out for its design and ride quality. The Kia Tasman is on sale now. Picture: Supplied It feels much more like a regular passenger vehicle than most dual-cab utes on the market. But this car doesn't answer the fundamental question of whether Australia needs, or can support, another pretty-good diesel ute. It's hard to shake the feeling that the Tasman would have been a hit three or four years ago, but now it might be too little, too late. It's lucky the Tasman does well off-road, because it's facing a big uphill battle. Originally published as 2025 Kia Tasman ute review

Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models
Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models

7NEWS

time2 days ago

  • 7NEWS

Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models

Some of Australia's best-selling models used as much as one-third more than their official claimed fuel consumption figures – and several breach their regulatory CO2 emissions limits – according to the results of the latest real-world test carried out by the Australian Automobile Association (AAA). The AAA tested the fuel economy claims across 30 of the most popular models sold in Australia, including the Ford Ranger, Mazda 3, Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. It compared the on-road fuel use and emissions during physical testing with the figures produced by automakers in legally mandated laboratory testing. It found 25 of the 30 evaluated vehicles exceeded their claimed fuel-efficiency figures, while six vehicles (20 per cent of those tested) breached current Australian lab-tested regulatory emissions limits. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. That's despite more accurate testing for cars from Europe, where the Worldwide Harmonised Testing Procedure (WLTP) – designed with input from vehicle manufacturers – intends to produce official fuel-use claims that are closer to real-world results. The Hyundai Kona Hybrid was the worst offender when it came to fuel consumption, using 33 per cent more fuel than its official 3.9L/100km combined economy figure, with AAA achieving 5.2L/100km. Yet Hyundai was at the positive end of the results, too, with its Staria van being one of the best-performing vehicles alongside the Mercedes-Benz GLB 200 mid-size luxury SUV. Both models came within one per cent of their official fuel claims. Vehicles to achieve better than expected fuel economy results include the Ford Transit Custom van, which led with a nine per cent better-than-claimed result. The Lexus NX350h mid-size luxury SUV was the next best at seven per cent, and the Mercedes-Benz GLB 250 and the smaller GLA at three and two per cent better respectively. While the Transit shone, the Ford Ranger – Australia's best-selling vehicle for the past two years and leading the sales charts so far in 2025 – produced excessively high emissions, with results showing 552mg/km of nitrous oxide emissions. The test was for the Ranger XLT with the 3.0-litre V6, which makes 184kW/600Nm. Ford Australia has detuned the same engine for the 2026 Ranger Super Duty, lowering power by 30kW to meet tougher emissions Euro 6d emissions laws coming into effect in Australia from December 1, 2025. The Toyota Fortuner – which uses the underpinnings and engine from the Toyota HiLux – also exceeded emissions limits, as did the Toyota HiAce SLWB and HiAce LWB vans, and the Suzuki Vitara and BMW X1 small SUVs. Yet the Ford Ranger was commendable in its fuel use, posting a result of 8.9L/100km in testing to come within six per cent of Ford's official 8.4L/100km claim. The AAA says it has now tested 114 popular models in Australia, with 77 per cent of vehicles tested using more fuel than advertised. 'Some vehicles perform as advertised, but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings,' said Michael Bradley, managing director of the AAA, in a statement. The testing comes as the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) comes into effect in 2025, surrounded by strong debate across automakers about its effectiveness. Introduced on January 1, 2025, the NVES is designed to lower carbon dioxide emissions at the tailpipe of new vehicles through an annual reduction of legal CO2 limits. Each brand's emissions are measured across all models its sells to establish a fleet-average figure; those in breach are fined, while those below are eligible for regulatory credits. Car companies can buy credits from others to reduce their overall average emissions figure and avoid or lower the cost of fines, which became enforceable on July 1, 2025. While most car companies are in favour of reducing tailpipe emissions from vehicles, debate remains ongoing about the effectiveness of the way NVES has been rolled out. Several auto executives have been publicly critical, most recently including Suzuki Queensland boss Paul Dillion. His comments were made at the launch of the Suzuki Fronx, a light-sized 1.5-litre hybrid hatchback, which will be liable for financial penalties under NVES from 2026. Other automakers, such as electric vehicle (EV) brand Polestar, are in favour of even tougher regulations, with the brand leaving the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) in protest of the public criticism of NVES. Polestar was joined by fellow EV-maker Tesla in quitting the industry body in 2024 over the issue. Below are the fuel consumption results from the latest round of the AAA's real-world testing.

Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models
Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models

Perth Now

time2 days ago

  • Perth Now

Real-world testing shows Ford Ranger among emissions-breaching models

Some of Australia's best-selling models used as much as one-third more than their official claimed fuel consumption figures – and several breach their regulatory CO2 emissions limits – according to the results of the latest real-world test carried out by the Australian Automobile Association (AAA). The AAA tested the fuel economy claims across 30 of the most popular models sold in Australia, including the Ford Ranger, Mazda 3, Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. It compared the on-road fuel use and emissions during physical testing with the figures produced by automakers in legally mandated laboratory testing. It found 25 of the 30 evaluated vehicles exceeded their claimed fuel-efficiency figures, while six vehicles (20 per cent of those tested) breached current Australian lab-tested regulatory emissions limits. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Supplied Credit: CarExpert That's despite more accurate testing for cars from Europe, where the Worldwide Harmonised Testing Procedure (WLTP) – designed with input from vehicle manufacturers – intends to produce official fuel-use claims that are closer to real-world results. The Hyundai Kona Hybrid was the worst offender when it came to fuel consumption, using 33 per cent more fuel than its official 3.9L/100km combined economy figure, with AAA achieving 5.2L/100km. Yet Hyundai was at the positive end of the results, too, with its Staria van being one of the best-performing vehicles alongside the Mercedes-Benz GLB 200 mid-size luxury SUV. Both models came within one per cent of their official fuel claims. Vehicles to achieve better than expected fuel economy results include the Ford Transit Custom van, which led with a nine per cent better-than-claimed result. Supplied Credit: CarExpert The Lexus NX350h mid-size luxury SUV was the next best at seven per cent, and the Mercedes-Benz GLB 250 and the smaller GLA at three and two per cent better respectively. While the Transit shone, the Ford Ranger – Australia's best-selling vehicle for the past two years and leading the sales charts so far in 2025 – produced excessively high emissions, with results showing 552mg/km of nitrous oxide emissions. The test was for the Ranger XLT with the 3.0-litre V6, which makes 184kW/600Nm. Ford Australia has detuned the same engine for the 2026 Ranger Super Duty, lowering power by 30kW to meet tougher emissions Euro 6d emissions laws coming into effect in Australia from December 1, 2025. Supplied Credit: CarExpert The Toyota Fortuner – which uses the underpinnings and engine from the Toyota HiLux – also exceeded emissions limits, as did the Toyota HiAce SLWB and HiAce LWB vans, and the Suzuki Vitara and BMW X1 small SUVs. Yet the Ford Ranger was commendable in its fuel use, posting a result of 8.9L/100km in testing to come within six per cent of Ford's official 8.4L/100km claim. The AAA says it has now tested 114 popular models in Australia, with 77 per cent of vehicles tested using more fuel than advertised. 'Some vehicles perform as advertised, but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings,' said Michael Bradley, managing director of the AAA, in a statement. Supplied Credit: CarExpert The testing comes as the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) comes into effect in 2025, surrounded by strong debate across automakers about its effectiveness. Introduced on January 1, 2025, the NVES is designed to lower carbon dioxide emissions at the tailpipe of new vehicles through an annual reduction of legal CO2 limits. Each brand's emissions are measured across all models its sells to establish a fleet-average figure; those in breach are fined, while those below are eligible for regulatory credits. Car companies can buy credits from others to reduce their overall average emissions figure and avoid or lower the cost of fines, which became enforceable on July 1, 2025. Supplied Credit: CarExpert While most car companies are in favour of reducing tailpipe emissions from vehicles, debate remains ongoing about the effectiveness of the way NVES has been rolled out. Several auto executives have been publicly critical, most recently including Suzuki Queensland boss Paul Dillion. His comments were made at the launch of the Suzuki Fronx, a light-sized 1.5-litre hybrid hatchback, which will be liable for financial penalties under NVES from 2026. Other automakers, such as electric vehicle (EV) brand Polestar, are in favour of even tougher regulations, with the brand leaving the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) in protest of the public criticism of NVES. Polestar was joined by fellow EV-maker Tesla in quitting the industry body in 2024 over the issue. Below are the fuel consumption results from the latest round of the AAA's real-world testing. MORE: What the first federal emissions standard means for Aussie car buyersMORE: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store