Investors (and Trump) are about to find out if Fed still wants rate cuts in 2025
The Federal Reserve is widely expected to hold interest rates steady at its meeting this week, but investors will be watching for something else — whether central bank policymakers are still committed to two rate cuts this year.
The Fed's latest round of projections, released Wednesday, will include the much-studied "dot plot," a chart updated quarterly that shows each Fed official's prediction about the direction of the central bank's benchmark interest rate.
The last dot plot, released in March, revealed a consensus among Fed officials for two cuts this year as some were already factoring the uncertainties of President Trump's economic policies into their projections. They made the same prediction last December.
Many Fed watchers expect central bank officials to stick with what they have already signaled as they weigh numerous unknowns. The latest curveball came late last week as Israel's airstrikes across Iran stoked fears that a protracted war could lead to higher oil prices and inflation this summer.
'This meeting will be all about the dot plot,' former Kansas City Fed president Esther George said. Due to how fluid things are at the moment, she predicts that 'they will be reluctant to signal changes from where they were earlier.'
Wilmington Trust chief economist Luke Tilley said he isn't expecting many changes, either.
'I don't think that the dots will change very much, and I don't think the narrative will change very much either. Right now, it's two cuts, and I imagine it will stay pretty much the same.'
Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments
The Fed and its chair, Jerome Powell, are under an extreme amount of political pressure to speed up the timetable for any cuts, as President Trump continues to hammer Powell publicly for not easing policy sooner.
The president last Thursday said he "may have to force something" as part of his ongoing push for the central bank to lower rates by a full percentage point, but he noted that he would not fire Powell before his term is up in 2026 — a move that would almost certainly be challenged legally.
He also referred to Powell as a 'numbskull,' adding to a string of insults coined by Trump in recent months.
Trump has been citing lower inflation as a reason for the central bank to cut. But Powell and many of his fellow policymakers have made it clear in recent weeks they are still more worried about the risks of higher prices from Trump's tariffs than any rise in unemployment as they weigh both sides of their dual mandate.
EY-Parthenon chief economist Gregory Daco expects Powell on Wednesday to stress the risk of longer-lasting inflation because of tariffs and acknowledge that difficult trade-offs may emerge if inflation stays elevated while growth and employment soften.
He said Powell will likely emphasize that with inflation still above the Fed's 2% target and the job market consistent with full employment, the bar for cutting rates remains high.
'Chair Powell will likely strike a tone of cautious patience, reiterating that policy remains data dependent and that the Fed is prepared to recalibrate policy over time,' Daco said.
The latest measures of inflation have, in fact, shown milder increases in prices even as tariffs were turned on full blast — a trend highlighted last week by Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who told lawmakers last Thursday that 'there is no tariff inflation.'
Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet
Bessent's pronouncement came one day after a report showing the "core" measure of the Consumer Price Index that excludes volatile food and energy costs rose 2.8% over the past year in May, holding steady from April.
The Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the "core" Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index, rose 2.5% in April, down from 2.7% in March. The Fed's goal is to get this number down to 2%.
'There hasn't been a whole lot of inflation pressure other than the shelter index, which continues to drift down,' Tilley said.
Fed watchers note that the job market is cooling but not cracking as the unemployment rate holds at 4.2% and wages are still rising at a nearly 4% clip.
Thus, the job market is not giving Powell and the Fed many reasons to consider a cut in the near term. Investors are currently betting they won't see that first cut until September at the earliest.
'The real question is what is going to happen in the second half of the year, and will those trends continue?' former Cleveland Fed president Loretta Mester said.
'That's where the high level of uncertainty still is with us, and that I think is why the Fed is on hold until some of that we get a little more clarity about not only the magnitude of the tariffs and the breadth of the tariffs, but what effect they'll have on inflation,' she added.
Mester said holding the fed funds rate steady doesn't seem very costly to gain more clarity in the summer on tariffs.
But Tilley said he believes the Fed should leave the door open for a rate cut in July, which is when expects the first rate cut. He expects that by that time, the economy will show signs of weakening and the job market will have cooled further.
'They need to leave that door open because a year ago, when they went into the June meeting, they completely took July off the table,' Tilley said. 'In September, they ended up cutting by 50 basis points because they realized they had fallen behind.'
JPMorgan chief economist Michael Feroli said he doesn't anticipate a rate cut until December, noting that Fed officials have been 'univocal in their desire to wait and see how higher tariffs affect the economy before acting.'
Feroli is looking for an additional three consecutive cuts early next year before reaching a resting spot at 3.25%-3.50%. Rates are currently in the range of 4.25%-4.5%.
George said her sense is that the bias is still to cut rates, as officials signaled in March. She noted that Fed governor Christopher Waller has made it clear he sees that possibility and others holding out hope that cuts are still possible.
'I don't think they have the leeway to be acting on or penciling in changes,' George said. 'That would shake the markets around. I don't think they want to cause people to think things are going to be tighter for longer when they're not ready to say that.'
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inflation slows to 3.4% but no Bank of England rate cut expected
Inflation eased to an annual rate of 3.4% in May, according to official figures just released, but the Bank of England is widely expected to leave interest rates on hold despite that. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that the consumer prices index measure eased from 3.5% the previous month. It said that despite upwards pressure on prices from food and clothing, the decline was driven by falls in airfare prices following Easter. Money latest: The headline figure also reflected a small downwards correction to ONS inflation data ahead of April related to vehicle excise duty calculations. ONS acting chief economist Richard Heys said: "A variety of counteracting price movements meant inflation was little changed in May. "Air fares fell this month, compared with a large rise at the same time last year, as the timing of Easter and school holidays affected pricing. Meanwhile, motor fuel costs also saw a drop. "These were partially offset by rising food prices, particularly items such as chocolates and meat products. The cost of furniture and household goods, including fridge freezers and vacuum cleaners, also increased." Forecasts suggest that inflation will tick up over the second half of the year - with effects from Donald Trump's trade war and rising commodity costs amid events in the Middle East among the concerns ahead for the Bank of England. It has adopted a "careful" and "gradual" approach to interest rate cuts as a result. That is despite weakening employment data, reported earlier this month, which showed a tick up in the official jobless rate and a 109,000 reduction in payrolled employment. The Bank is widely expected to leave Bank rate on hold on Thursday following the June meeting of its rate-setting committee. LSEG data showed, ahead of the inflation data, that financial markets currently see two more interest rate cuts by the year's end. Risks to prices ahead will come from a sustained Israel-Iran war pushing up oil and gas prices but there have been different views among policymakers over whether the trade war will result in inflation or not. As such, the minutes of the Bank's meeting will be closely scrutinised for hints on whether rate cut caution is easing.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel-Iran crisis: How vital is the Strait of Hormuz for oil market?
The flare-up of tensions between Israel and Iran has reignited concerns over the security of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for the global energy market. This narrow stretch of water, just 29 nautical miles wide at its tightest point, funnels nearly a third of the world's seaborne oil and a fifth of global LNG. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) calls it the "world's most important oil chokepoint," underlining the strategic importance of the passage that links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Investors and analysts are weighing the implications of a potential disruption in this narrow but critical waterway. What happens if the Strait of Hormuz is suddenly sealed off? Following Israeli attacks on Iran, Iranian officials have raised the spectre of closing the Strait—triggering a sharp surge in crude prices. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), around 20 million barrels per day (mb/d) of crude oil and refined products passed through the Strait of Hormuz in 2023, representing nearly 30% of total global oil trade. Most of this volume—around 70%—was bound for Asia, with China, India and Japan among the largest recipients. While alternative pipeline infrastructure exists, it is limited. The IEA estimates that only 4.2 mb/d of crude oil can be rerouted via overland routes, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline to the Red Sea and the UAE's Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline to Fujairah. This capacity represents barely one quarter of the typical daily volume transiting the Strait. 'Any prolonged crisis in the Strait of Hormuz would not only disrupt shipments from key Gulf producers—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq and Qatar—but also make inaccessible the majority of the world's spare production capacity, which is concentrated in the Persian Gulf,' the IEA warned in a report. Related Israel kills IRGC intelligence chief and deputy, Iranian state media says Netanyahu says Israel has not ruled out killing Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Era of nuclear disarmament 'coming to an end', SIPRI warns Iran seeks international mediation amid conflict with Israel, Trump promises peace LNG markets are even more exposed to potential disruptions. All LNG exports from Qatar—the world's second-largest LNG exporter—and the UAE must pass through the Strait. The IEA reports that 90 billion cubic metres (bcm) of LNG transited the Strait in the first ten months of 2023, equal to 20% of global LNG trade. With no viable alternative routes for LNG exports from Qatar or the UAE, any maritime closure would severely tighten global supply. Around 80% of these LNG volumes are destined for Asia, while Europe receives roughly 20%, meaning disruptions would exacerbate competition between regions, especially in a tight market. 'The sheer volume of oil passing through the Strait and the scarcity of alternative routes means even brief disruptions would have significant consequences for the global market,' the IEA stated. While a full closure remains a low-probability scenario, analysts agree that the threat alone is enough to inject volatility into energy markets. Crude oil prices surged by 13% last week amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. Although prices have since eased slightly after reports confirmed that Iranian energy infrastructure remained untouched by Israeli strikes, the risk of further escalation—and potential disruption to global energy flows—remains elevated. In response, Wall Street analysts have been quick to assess the possible fallout from any interruption of oil and gas shipments through the Persian Gulf, particularly the Strait of Hormuz. Goldman Sachs warned that an extreme risk scenario involving a prolonged closure of the Strait could push prices well above $100 per barrel. The investment bank estimates that Iran currently produces around 3.6 million barrels per day (mb/d) of crude oil and 0.8 mb/d of condensates, with total seaborne exports averaging 2.1 mb/d so far this year—most of it heading to China. T ING's head of commodities strategy, Warren Patterson, indicates that the market has begun pricing in a substantially higher geopolitical risk premium in light of recent developments. Patterson stated that any disruption to Iranian oil flows would be enough to eliminate the expected oil surplus for the fourth quarter of 2025, likely pushing Brent crude prices toward $80 per barrel. Yet, the analyst warns that a more severe scenario—such as a disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz—could be far more consequential. 'Almost a third of global seaborne oil passes through this chokepoint,' he noted. 'A significant disruption to these flows could drive prices up to $120 per barrel, particularly because most of OPEC's spare capacity is located in the Persian Gulf and would be inaccessible under such conditions.' "This escalation also has ramifications for the European gas market," he added. The Strait of Hormuz is more than just a shipping lane—it's a lifeline for global energy. With no easy detours for oil or LNG flows, its vulnerability puts markets on edge every time tensions flare in this region. A full closure of the Strait may still seem a remote event, but the mere threat is enough to rattle markets and keep oil prices elevated. As Iranian and Israeli forces continue to exchange strikes, the risk of miscalculation looms large. In a region where diplomacy is fragile and stakes are high, one wrong move could turn a regional conflict into a global energy crisis. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asian shares mixed and oil prices stay high over Iran-Israel crisis
Asian shares were mixed and oil prices remained high on Wednesday as investors closely tracked the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. US benchmark crude oil was down around 0.43% at $74.52 per barrel in the afternoon in Asia — or the morning in Europe. Brent crude, the international standard, slipped around 0.43% at $76.12, although both WTI and Brent remain high on the month. Crude prices rose more than 4% on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump left a Group of Seven summit in Canada early and warned that people in Iran's capital should evacuate immediately. Within about eight hours, Trump went from suggesting a nuclear deal with Iran remained 'achievable' to urging Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives. Iran and Israel continued to exchange air strikes on Wednesday. The fighting has driven prices for crude oil and gasoline higher because Iran is a major oil exporter and it sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. Past conflicts in the area have caused spikes in oil prices, though they've historically proven brief after showing that they did not disrupt the flow of oil. Related Israel-Iran crisis: How vital is the Strait of Hormuz for oil market? Explosions ring out in Tehran as Israel says it struck a centrifuge site overnight Japan, meanwhile, reported that its exports fell in May as the auto industry was hit by Trump's higher tariffs, with exports to the US falling more than 11%. But Tokyo's Nikkei 225 jumped 0.78% to 38,837.48. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 1.17% to 23,698.65 while the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.3% to 3,388.77. The Kospi in Seoul gained 0.54% to 2,966.20 while Australia's S&P/ASX 200 shed 0.1% to 8,533.10. On Tuesday, US stocks slumped under the weight of higher oil prices and weaker than expected retail sales in May. Trump raised the temperature on Israel's fight with Iran by calling for 'Unconditional surrender!' on his social media platform and saying, 'We are not going to' kill Iran's leader, 'at least for now'. The S&P 500 fell 0.84% to 5,982.72 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.7% to 42,215.80. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.91% to 19,521.09. On early Wednesday morning in the US, S&P futures rose 0.11% to 5,991.50, Dow Jones futures increased less than 1% to 42,245.00, while Nasdaq futures advanced by 0.13% to 21,759.00. The markets will be looking to the Federal Reserve as it makes a decision on its interest rates today. The nearly unanimous expectation among traders and economists is that the Fed will make no move. In currency trading early on Wednesday, the US dollar fell 0.2% to 144.94 Japanese yen. The euro edged 0.18% higher, to $1.1502.