Protesters hold 'people's forum' in Calgary ahead of G7, prepare for Sunday march
On the final day before G7 leaders gather in Kananaskis, Alta., activists and community groups met in downtown Calgary on Saturday afternoon for a "people's forum" that took aim at the priorities of G7 leaders.
They also discussed plans for a demonstration and march near city hall in Calgary on Sunday. Organizers said the goal was to unify fragmented activist groups ahead of the protest.
"The G7, it's happening for a few days, but it's going to wrap up and leave," said Yasmeen Khan of the International League of Peoples' Struggle (ILPS), which describes itself as an anti-imperialist organization.
"But the issues are still going to be there. So how do we, in Calgary and in Alberta particularly, build a people's movement?"
A series of protests and marches are expected throughout the day in downtown Calgary on Sunday, representing a range of different groups and priorities, including labour, youth, Indigenous and environmental activists.
There are three "designated demonstration zones" established by officials running through the summit: one in Banff and two in Calgary, but police have said people have the right to assemble outside the zones.
The ILPS expects several hundred people at the city hall protest, with buses arriving from Edmonton.
They also have plans for a march in conjunction with other community and activist groups, which may move beyond the official protest zones.
"We are saying that it's a peaceful march. [Our] police liaisons will discuss with the police. If there's a go, then we'll do the march," Khan said.
Still, there's concern over how any potential confrontations with police will be handled, especially if numbers swell outside the range of what organizers are expecting.
Officials promise 'measured, proportionate' response
Officials have referred to the G7 summit as the "largest domestic security operation" a country can take on, with advanced technological threats contributing to heightened security concerns.
'Remote terrain of Kananaskis' presents unique challenges for G7 security operation
A major police presence will be in place during the summit, including officers from RCMP, Calgary Police Service and other agencies.
As demonstrations unfold in Calgary, security officials say they're taking a "measured and proportionate" approach with an emphasis on dialogue and de-escalation.
"We remain committed to transparency and accountability in all our actions," said David Hall, Alberta RCMP superintendent and event security director for the G7 Integrated Safety and Security Group, in a release.
He said they will take "enforcement action only when necessary to maintain public order or respond to criminal activity."
'Feels kind of Hunger Games'
Officials have said footage from demonstration zones is to be livestreamed to the restricted area for leaders to watch. There is also a demonstration zone at the Calgary airport, but it isn't being livestreamed.
Police have said the designated demonstration zones are meant to ensure safety while providing visibility. But some participants of Saturday's event viewed them differently.
"I feel like live-streaming a protest zone to people in a resort feels kind of Hunger Games. It's a little dystopian," said Isa Carlin, a member of Migrante Alberta, an organization that advocates for the rights of migrants.
Other activist groups are also expected to join Sunday's demonstrations.
The Calgary Raging Grannies group has said it will be at the protest zone at city hall, as will activists rallying for Indigenous water rights and water security.
Moninder Singh, spokesman for the Sikh Federation of Canada, said there will also be a series of protests against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was invited to the G7 by Prime Minister Mark Carney.
"There has been a topic of discussion to just keep the protest until he's wheels-up, until Mr. Modi's wheels are up and out of the country," Singh said.
One major environmental group, Greenpeace Canada, has said it won't send a large contingent to Alberta this year.
On Saturday, city hall was the location for a rally of members of Calgary's Ukrainian community. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is attending the G7.
The summit itself is being held west of Calgary in the wilderness resort of Kananaskis, surrounded by multiple layers of security and inaccessible to the public.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
N.S. Pride groups applaud federal funding to improve event safety, security
Pride groups in Nova Scotia are applauding recently announced federal funding that organizations can use to help cover safety and security costs for festivals and events. Rechie Valdez, minister of women and gender equality, announced about $1.5 million toward a community safety fund. The initiative has been in place since 2023 and is administered by Fierté Canada Pride, a national organization representing 2SLGBTQ+ Pride groups in Canada. Pictou County Pride's director of community engagement said the funding shows the federal government understands that hate toward 2SLGBTQ+ people is rising. "For many of us we are noticing a lot more safety considerations within the community, especially for trans and gender-diverse folk," said Lucy White. This year, there have been a number of incidents of vandalism in Nova Scotia targeting 2SLGBTQ+ businesses and people. Police-reported hate crimes targeting sexual orientation in Atlantic Canada have also been on the rise. Small events and festivals are eligible for up to $10,000 from the fund. Groups with an event budget under $2 million can apply for up to $50,000 dollars, while the largest events can receive up to $250,000. The money can be used to cover the cost of things like insurance and working with a security company to develop an emergency response plan. "A lot of the times we talk about rising hate, but we don't talk about the actual financial costs that [Pride groups] are subject to ... to keep their community safe," said Marc Basque, community safety co-ordinator with Fierté Canada Pride. He said a group doesn't have to be a formally registered organization to apply for the funding. Fiona Kerr, the executive director of Halifax Pride, said the fund will be a big help with rising costs. "We don't really introduce new safety measures, but the ones that we currently do pay for seem to go up exponentially every single year," said Kerr. Kerr is glad to see the federal government taking the matter seriously. She said Halifax Pride has increased security capacity in recent years, with that being the main thing the money will help with. Kerr added that it will help pay for increased first-aid presence at events. "The weather, the heat is not getting any better," said Kerr. "That's been a large concern for us on our parade weekend." Pictou County Pride is not a large enough organization to need help from the fund, said White. But, she said, it could be helpful down the line if the group grows. White added that the fund's existence is "really positive."
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Canada's cybersecurity head offers rare insight into Nova Scotia Power breach
The head of Canada's cyber-defence agency is offering some insight just weeks after a ransomware attack against Nova Scotia Power. The utility's computer systems were breached by ransomware hackers on March 19, but Nova Scotia Power did not discover it until April 25. The company disclosed the cybersecurity incident three days after that. About 280,000 customers — more than half of the utility's customers in the province — were informed by letter that their personal information may have been compromised in the attack. The data included names, addresses, phone numbers, birth dates, driver's licences, social insurance numbers and banking information. On Thursday, the Nova Scotia Energy Board granted approval to Nova Scotia Power to move forward with a $1.8-million project to improve cybersecurity. The attack and its aftermath have sparked many questions about the security of the company's IT systems. Rajiv Gupta, head of the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, spoke to CBC News in a rare interview about how these types of incidents unfold and what people and organizations like Nova Scotia Power can do to protect themselves. This interview has been edited for length and clarity: Can you explain a bit about your agency and what it does? The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security is really Canada's cyber defence agency. So, we provide advice, guidance and services to critical infrastructure systems of importance to Canada. Work primarily with the federal government is where we had started, but have really grown into critical infrastructure. And our goal is to raise cyber resilience across Canada. We fall under CSE, which is the Communications Security Establishment, and CSE has a mandate for foreign intelligence, which goes back 80 years in terms of WWII. We report to the minister of national defence. What do you make of the recent attack against Nova Scotia Power, which did ultimately affect about 280,000 customers? We don't comment specifically on specific incidents, but as a cyber centre … any critical infrastructure providers that have incidents can report their incidents to the cyber centre. So last year we saw about 1,500 incidents. We see a lot of these, and that's what's really important and kind of sad to understand as well, that this is happening so often in terms of cyber-criminal organizations comprising critical infrastructure organizations in Canada. Their motivation is money. They would compromise the network. So basically getting their software inside the network, but then stealing all the sensitive information from the organization and … then going ahead and encrypting systems and locking people out of their system. So we used to call that double extortion. So that way the criminal organization could threaten to release sensitive information, unless a ransom was paid, or also basically not give back access to systems unless a ransom was paid. So that was what we're seeing and it was incredibly impactful to system operators within Canada. In this case, Nova Scotia Power did not pay the ransom that was asked of them. Is that common practice? What we always do is we provide advice and guidance to organizations and we say, "it's a business decision," because we're not the ones operating their business, and we don't know their exact context, say if it's a threat to life or something else. But we always say, 'Hey there's a lot of downside to paying the ransom.' First of all, you're funding these criminal organizations. So, the more ransom is paid, the more we're going to proliferate this sort of behaviour. At the same point in time, you're paying this ransom to criminals. What's that contract worth in the end anyway? Is there really any guarantee that they're either not going to share the confidential information, or they're actually going to give you the keys to decrypt your systems and get your access back? The proceeds of this can go to criminal or even terrorist type causes as well, so, worrisome in that sense. Are you able to say whether Nova Scotia Power had actually contacted your agency [following the breach]? The one thing that I will say is that they did reach out to us. We always recommend that organizations that are victimized reach out to the cyber centre. We've seen many of these in the past and we have advice and guidance to share. And not only can we help the organization in their recovery, and in terms of paying the ransom, ransom might help you unlock your systems, but there's still always recovery costs that are part of this as well, regardless of whether you work with the criminal organization or not. But in this case, they did reach out to us. And the other thing we always encourage is … we hope that they share information about the compromise as well. Because we can take that and share that with other critical infrastructure organizations in Canada. Did they share with you the extent of the breach? We wouldn't go into any details in that sense, but they did notify us of the breach. Is there any sense of who might have been the perpetrator in this attack from your perspective? Nova Scotia Power says it has a sense of who it is. I wouldn't comment on that. There's various groups and they often change shapes and forms as they get disrupted. Unfortunately it's an ever-evolving group of cyber criminals that are out there that seem to be performing these behaviours. And we have an assessment out in terms of a cyber criminal activity in Canada as well that kind of points to the groups that we've seen as active. About 140,000 [social insurance numbers] were included in the stolen data. How serious is this, when that type of personal information is accessed? I couldn't speak to the seriousness of that type of information, but what I will say is that this is exactly what cyber criminals go after. And depending on the type of information, it'll fetch a different price on the dark web. Organizations will collect personal information, whether it's SIN numbers, or credit card numbers, or health card numbers, other sorts of confidential information. Typically that information gets resold on the dark web for other criminals that are going to actually monetize that for other purposes. It's kind of a not very positive circle that exists on the dark web. The way this actually works in terms of what we call "cybercrime as a service" is that it's a whole ecosystem of criminal entities that actually work together. And because it's typically run out of operations that are beyond the legal borders — often in Russian speaking countries where law enforcement won't necessarily prosecute — it's very difficult to disrupt these organizations. And even when law enforcement is able to disrupt them, it's fairly easy for them to kind of reconstitute themselves. What are some of the risks when this personal information is shared on the deep web or dark web? Once that information is out there, that often just spurs the next cycle of fraud. Whether it's spear phishing emails that are using that information, whether it's leveraging information about an organization or their clients to actually further compromise them. That's why it's really important to take note for everyone to be mindful of the things they can do to protect themselves. Be extra vigilant of understanding what's being mailed to you and double checking those links and making sure it's coming from an authenticated source and whatnot. Being mindful of content, making sure you have strong authentication in terms of how you're actually accessing applications as well. What would be your advice to Nova Scotia Power? Really for all of these organizations, do your due diligence. Understand what your really critical elements are of your organization that would be your worst-case scenario. And then once you know what your worst-case scenario is, then you can defend that. Build the plan according to our ransomware playbook, have the backups in place, and have the strong measures in place. The utility [Nova Scotia Power] applied for funding about a month before the ransomware attack. They cited the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security's most recent threat assessment, pointing out that power grids are so interconnected that they can be really vulnerable to these types of attacks. What would be the warning signs of an attack like this? One of the things that we've been very mindful of … as the world gets more hostile, we're worried about impacts to critical infrastructure like electrical guide grids, pipelines, these sorts of things. A lot of them are controlled by systems that were never meant to be connected to the Internet. Nowadays, as people are looking to optimize efficiency, and connect to cloud services and connect sensors to networks, they're becoming more exposed to threat actors from around the world. Normally your electrical grid would only be threatened by people that are actually in the country and nearby, but as soon as you connect it to the Internet, you're pretty much opening a lot of this up to people from anywhere. We are not a regulator. The cyber centre itself provides advice, guidance and services, but we have no authority over any of these entities. We work voluntarily to provide the best practices.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Points-based immigration system favours single PR applicants over married couples, experts say
Canada's points-based immigration system can give a slight boost to applicants who are single. To get an edge, some married permanent residency candidates are saying their spouse won't accompany them to score as many as 40 extra points out of a possible 600. Immigration lawyer Matthew Jeffery says the points system only benefits married applicants if their spouse is well-educated, proficient in English or French, and has the right work experience. 'However, if the spouse does not have these things, it can result in a lower score for the primary applicant,' Jeffery said. 'To avoid losing points as a result of a poorly qualified spouse, an applicant can list their spouse as non-accompanying. This means that they will not immigrate to Canada at the same time as the primary applicant, but will remain in the home country.' Calgary-based immigration consultant Mandeep Lidher describes the practice as fairly common. He says married applicants face a 'systemic disadvantage' under the current points system for skilled workers. 'This structural imbalance incentivizes the lawful use of the non-accompanying spouse option,' Lidher told 'This is a lawful and system-sanctioned pathway for applicants who may otherwise be disadvantaged by their spouse's limited language scores, education, or lack of Canadian work experience.' Instead of applying at the same time, it can therefore be beneficial for only one person to apply for permanent residency, then sponsor their spouse to accompany them later through family reunification channels. 'No, this is not manipulation,' Lidher explained. 'An applicant only breaches the law if they engage in misrepresentation … that is, by withholding their marital status or falsely declaring a spouse as non-accompanying, when they actually intend to immigrate together.' 'To game the system' Ottawa is aware of the practice and has warned some applicants about misrepresenting their situation. Lidher provided a copy of an April 2025 'procedural fairness letter' that was sent to a permanent residency applicant. In it, a Canadian immigration processing officer expressed 'serious concerns' over the married applicant declaring themselves unaccompanied, despite already living in Canada with their foreign spouse. 'It appears that you have decided to include your spouse as 'non-accompanying' to meet the minimum required score because you earn more points if you don't have a spouse or common-law partner or if they are not coming with you to Canada,' the officer wrote. 'It also appears you would not have met the minimum required score if your spouse was included in your application as an accompanying dependent.' Canada's points-based immigration system has become increasingly competitive, especially since Ottawa announced in October that it would reduce permanent residency targets by at least 20 per cent from 500,000 to 395,000 permanent residents in 2025, 380,000 in 2026 and 365,000 in 2027. The minimum number of points needed to be able to apply for permanent residency has been edging upwards. While numbers can fluctuate, the lowest-ranked candidate on June 12 under the Canadian experience stream had a total of 529 points – that's up from the 368-point cutoff recorded four years earlier on June 10, 2021. When someone applies to be considered for permanent residency through the Express Entry online system for skilled workers, profiles are scored through what's known as the Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS), which awards points based on factors like age, education, work experience and language skills. 'Canada's Express Entry system is designed to select skilled immigrants who will thrive, but honesty is paramount,' Toronto-based immigration consultant Kubeir Kamal told 'Declaring a spouse as non-accompanying, if such circumstances exist, is a valid option if done transparently, but actually misrepresenting marital status to game the system risks severe consequences, including application refusal and bans.' In a statement to a spokesperson from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada said the department is committed to protecting against fraud and misrepresentation. 'Misrepresentation includes providing false information or withholding information,' the IRCC spokesperson said. 'If a spouse is declared as not accompanying while the intent is for the spouse to come with the principal applicant, an officer may find that the applicant misrepresented themselves to get more CRS points.'
