5 days of diplomacy, 5 days of deadly Russian attacks on Ukraine
At least 31 civilians have been killed and 145 injured in Russian strikes across Ukraine since U.S. President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15.
Hours before Putin walked down the red carpet in Anchorage, Russian attacks killed six civilians and injured 17.
The next day, on Aug. 16, three people were killed and 12 were injured as a result of Russian attacks in Kherson Oblast, where the words 'human safari' have become synonymous with Russia's first-person-view drone attacks in the area that target civilians.
"Getting around the city is like the lottery, because it is impossible to plan or predict shelling or drone attacks,' Kherson resident, Nataliia Shatylova Pohasiy, told the Kyiv Independent.
Five people were killed and 11 were injured on Aug. 17. Ahead of the Zelensky-Trump meeting at the White House, Russian strikes killed 13 and injured 65 across Ukraine on Aug. 18.
Just hours before Zelensky and European leaders were scheduled to meet with Trump, a Russian missile attack on Zaporizhzhia killed three and injured another 30 people. Zelensky condemned the attack.
Russia "knows that today there is a meeting in Washington to end the war," he said, referring to his talks with Trump later in the day.
"Putin will kill demonstratively in order to continue putting pressure on Ukraine and Europe and to undermine diplomatic efforts," Zelensky added.
The most casualties on Aug. 18 were reported in Kharkiv, with 24 people injured, seven killed, including a one-and-a-half-year-old girl.
On Aug. 19, not long after the Trump-Zelensky meeting, Russia launched a missile attack on central Ukraine. On Aug. 20, five people were killed and 34 were injured, 14 of them in Sumy Oblast.
"A family with wounded children, aged five months, four years, and six years, sought help after the attack," Zelensky said on Aug. 20.
In July this year, at least 286 civilians were killed and 1,388 injured in Ukraine, setting a new record since the first year of Russia's full-scale invasion, U.N. human rights monitors said on Aug. 13.
"For the second month in a row, the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine hits a new three-year high," said Danielle Bell, head of the U.N. human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine.
Russia's use of long-range weapons like missiles and loitering munitions accounted for almost 40% of the casualties, the U.N. said in its report. Short-range drones were the second most common cause of civilian losses, amounting to 24%.
Read also: We finally watched 'Russians at War' — it's worse than we thought
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome
-- S&P Global Ratings has affirmed its "AA+" credit rating for the United States with a stable outlook, noting that revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs could potentially offset the fiscal impact of his tax cuts and spending legislation. The rating agency, which was the first to downgrade the U.S. government's credit rating in 2011, made the announcement on Monday. Lisa Schineller, primary U.S. analyst at S&P Global Ratings, emphasized that future rating decisions would depend on policy outcomes rather than just intentions. "Outcomes are what's really going to weigh and inform the rating," Schineller said in an interview. "The outcomes of how you execute the budgetary legislation, how the tariff revenue comes, their combined impact on growth and investment that leads to either better or worse or similar fiscal out-turns, that's our focus." While the immediate rating remains unchanged, S&P indicated that questions about the economic effects of U.S. trade policies could influence the country's credit rating in the coming years. Related articles S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome These Under-the-Radar Stocks Offer Better Risk-Reward Ratio Than Nvidia Apollo economist warns: AI bubble now bigger than 1990s tech mania
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants to go to heaven for ending the war in Ukraine. What religion is he?
President Donald Trump said he hoped helping end the war between Ukraine and Russia would help boost his chances of getting into heaven. In an Aug. 19 appearance on Fox News' "Fox & Friends," Trump was talking about his phone call to Russian President Vladimir Putin after the meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders at the White House the prior day. "I wanna end it. You know, we're not losing American lives ... we're losing Russian and Ukrainian mostly soldiers," Trump said. "I wanna try and get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons." He then went on to talk about saving lives with "six, actually seven," peace deals (USA TODAY counts five). Trump has said he was "saved by God to make America great again" in the July 2024 assassination attempt when a bullet grazed his ear. So what religion is he? More: Trump talks God in his speech on bombing Iran. What did he say, what religion is he? What religion is Donald Trump? Trump once identified as a Presbyterian, but in 2020 he told Religion News Service he began considering himself a non-denominational Christian. First lady Melania Trump, however, made news in 2017 when she met the late Pope Francis and revealed she was Catholic when asking the pontiff to bless her rosary beads. Trump heaven quote: 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well.' Trump said the following about heaven in an Aug. 19 appearance on "Fox & Friends" discussing efforts to achieve peace between Ukraine and Russia: 'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I am really at the bottom of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' At the White House press briefing later that day, press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked whether Trump was joking in his comments or if there was a spiritual motivation behind his peace efforts. "I think the president was serious," Leavitt said. "I think the president wants to get to heaven as I hope we all do in this room as well." What happened at the Zelenskyy meeting? Zelenskyy's August trip to the White House had far fewer fireworks than the February visit, when he was berated by Trump and Vice President JD Vance. In addition to Zelenskyy, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also attended the summit on Aug. 18. Zelenskyy, wearing a black suit instead of the military garb that drew comments in February, met with Trump in the Oval Office ahead of the wider group of foreign leaders. He also thanked Trump, something Vance had criticized Zelenskyy of not doing during the previous Oval Office spat. Trump then met with the European leaders in the White House East Room, saying they would know 'in a week or two weeks' if a deal to stop the fighting is possible. After the day of meetings with the European leaders, Trump called Putin to urge him to meet with Zelenskyy. Trump deemed it a step in the right direction. "Everyone is very happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine. At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy," he wrote on Truth Social. "After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself. Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years." Although the meeting showed strong European unity, it was unclear whether major progress toward peace was made. Trump said the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in a deal but did not clarify the extent of the commitment. He also appeared to dismiss the need for a ceasefire ahead of peace negotiations. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, Bart Jansen, Zac Anderson, Francesca Chambers, Josh Meyer, Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump heaven quote: 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well.'
USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. More than half of respondents -- 57% -- said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump's Republican Party. The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington -- where Republicans control both chambers of Congress -- and state capitals. The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans- such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering - were "bad for democracy." At Trump's urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump's first term led to two impeachment probes. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state's district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans' expected Texas gains. The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points. As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force. In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state's potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as 'cheating' but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind. The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats. 'Shady Business' Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort. "I don't like it when either side tries to do that. I think that's shady business," Kelley said. "The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth." Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it. "It's unfair, and it sets a bad precedent," said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering "is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing. "They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.' Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party. Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that "people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted," while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed. The poll also showed politics weighing more on people's everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year's presidential election has negatively affected their friendships. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump's first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats - 18% - reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017. Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics. 'I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don't think that they're trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,' Larson said. Close to half of Democrats - or 46% - said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party. Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party's leaders. 'I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,' Ogden said. Analysts said that ordinary Democrats' greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party's chances at regaining political standing. 'Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,' said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster. Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating. "The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don't want to talk to the opposition party," Ceraso said. "We have to be better." (Reporting by Jason Lange, Nolan D. McCaskill and James Oliphant; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)
