logo
EDITORIAL: Super disparities

EDITORIAL: Super disparities

Yahoo08-02-2025
The best budget decisions, it would seem, are those that receive broad support.
So on the face of it, a proposal in the Minnesota Legislature that calls for a constitutional amendment to require a three-fifths majority vote in the House and Senate on income, sales and property tax decisions holds a certain appeal.
But upon deeper examination, we see problems – really big problems. Most alarming of all, this amendment has the potential to paralyze rural Minnesotans' voice in the state's fiscal matters. In its wake, basic services such as police protection, K-12 education, higher education and even nursing home care in rural areas would see severe impacts.
Budget decisions should require a thoughtful, studied legislative process. But if this supermajority amendment passes, a minority of legislators could hold the budget process hostage. Special interests – especially those of the metro area, where the population base is concentrated – would receive an unfair advantage.
Growing inequities between wealthy metro interests and poor rural interests are the last thing Minnesota needs. Legislative gridlock already is a constant fear, fueled by last summer's impasse when only a simple majority was needed to make tax decisions. Think of the mess a supermajority consensus would create.
Sixteen other states, including California, already have similar constitutional amendments. Anyone who follows California's nightmarish financial situation should realize this isn't a good idea. But that isn't stopping a zealous group of lawmakers in St. Paul.
In the Senate, the amendment bill is sponsored by Sen. Benjamin Kruse of Brooklyn Park. The House version is sponsored by Rep. Steve Draskowksi of Mazeppa, and is supported by a number of GOP representatives, including Rep. Ron Shimanski of Silver Lake.
Frankly, we don't know how Mr. Shimanksi could possibly support legislation that could be so detrimental to the people of McLeod and Meeker counties and the rest of rural Minnesota. This amendment definitely favors urbanites.
If this amendment passes:
< Programs such as Local Government Aid – which help pay for basic services in cities such as Hutchinson and Litchfield but are hardly needed in property-rich suburban communities – would be shoved aside to pay for other state spending priorities.
< Education funding could be reduced, forcing rural Minnesota school districts – which tend to be property poor compared to their metro cousins – to doubly lose because they'd have to ask voters for additional funding to keep schools operating at functional levels.
< Funding for nursing homes could become tighter than ever, forcing some to close, causing rural Minnesota communities to lose their largest employer.
< Funding for higher education could shrink, causing tuition to rise and possibly result in fewer class offerings or even the closing of some institutions, which would more likely affect rural areas.
Worst of all, the amendment could lead to more constitutional amendments, which in the end would result in legislating through the Constitution, a horrible notion that circumvents any form of a representative democracy.
Rural Minnesota needs to stand its ground – and it has many defenders. Groups opposing the supermajority amendment include the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, the Minnesota Taxpayers Association, the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and others.
Partly because of its supermajority amendment, California can't pay its bills or its state workers. Minnesota isn't in that situation now, and never has been. In fact, it generally has prospered during its 154 years of majority rule. Why fix something that isn't broke?
(Editorials are written by Publisher Matt McMillan and Editor Doug Hanneman. They can be reached at mcmillan@hutchinsonleader.com, or hanneman@hutchinsonleader.com.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelenskyy knows he risks another Oval Office ambush - but has to be a willing participant in peace talks
Zelenskyy knows he risks another Oval Office ambush - but has to be a willing participant in peace talks

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zelenskyy knows he risks another Oval Office ambush - but has to be a willing participant in peace talks

There will be no red carpet or fly past, no round of applause when Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrives in Washington DC on Monday. But the bitter memory of his last visit to the White House will feature prominently in the Ukrainian president's thoughts. In February, he was mocked for not wearing a suit and told he didn't "have the cards" by US President Donald Trump, before being walked off the premises early, like an unruly patron being thrown out of the bar. knows he is risking another ambush in the Oval Office but has to present himself as a willing participant in peace talks, out of fear of being painted as the obstacle to a resolution. There was initially measured optimism in Kyiv after Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, because it appeared that no deal had been cut between Washington and the Kremlin without Ukraine in the room, as had been feared. But that restrained positivity quickly evaporated with the release of a statement by Trump the morning after the night before. In the heady heights of a meeting with strongman Putin, he seemed to have abandoned the one key thing that European leaders had impressed upon him - that there had to be an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine as an absolute starting point to a permanent resolution. Trump had apparently reached the conclusion that no ceasefire was required. "The best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine... is to go directly to a peace agreement," is how he put it on his Truth Social media account. Read more: That sent shockwaves through Kyiv. Many there and elsewhere believe Russia has no intention of stopping the war yet, and will use its military advantage on the battlefield to pressure Ukraine in drawn-out negotiations to give up more territory. In the meantime, the slaughter of Ukrainians will continue. It is the most dramatic of 180s from Trump, who before the meeting and after lobbying from European leaders had said he would not be happy if Putin failed to agree to a ceasefire, and even promised "severe consequences". Yet now reports suggest Trump is giving credence to the Russian position - in a phone call to Zelenskyy he laid out Putin's proposal that Ukraine relinquishes even more territory, in return for an end to the war. The Ukrainian president will have, no doubt, been distressed to see the pictures of Putin being greeted like a king on an American military base in Alaska. It is in direct contrast to how he was hosted on US soil. In Trump's orbit everything is a personality contest, and where he has very obvious deference to Putin, he has disdain for Zelenskyy. That makes the Ukrainian's position very difficult.

Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes
Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes

Epoch Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.— A former political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker.

Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push
Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push

Pro-democracy activists and labor groups held hundreds of rallies and other events across the United States on Saturday, Aug. 16, protesting the Trump administration's push for Texas to redraw its congressional map in favor of Republicans. Former Congressman Beto O'Rourke was among those who spoke on Saturday in Texas, from which dozens of Democratic state lawmakers fled to deny Republicans the quorum needed to vote on a redistricting plan that President Donald Trump had demanded. "They do this because they are afraid," O'Rourke told an audience on Saturday, speaking of those attempting redistricting. "They fear this power they see here today." More: Obama calls Texas GOP redistricting an 'assault' on democracy Drucilla Tigner, executive director of pro-democracy coalition Texas For All, told Reuters pro-democracy and labor groups held over 300 events attended by tens of thousands of people in 44 states and Washington, D.C. Many of the more than 50 Texas Democrats who fled the state have been staying in Illinois, also the site of protests on Saturday. The Texas lawmakers in Illinois are out of reach of civil arrest warrants that could be acted on within Texas. The Texas Democrats kept the map from coming to a vote during a special session Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called that ended Friday. Abbott immediately called a second special session. Abbott said that redistricting plans, legislation to increase flash flood safety in the wake of deadly July flooding, and other legislative work remain undone because Democrats are absent. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday, Aug. 14 unveiled a redistricting plan in his state that he says would give Democrats there five more Congressional seats, possibly offsetting any Republican gains in Texas. The Texas House Democrats said in a written statement on Thursday that they will only return to Texas if their state's special legislation is ended and once California's redistricting maps are introduced.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store