Commission meeting with X in wake of Grok AI antisemitism scandal
Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier, confirmed to Euractiv that a "technical" meeting will take place between its officials and representatives of X over Grok.
The meeting comes after the chatbot reportedly spread antisemitic and hateful prompts on X, including posts that appeared to celebrate Hitler. X has since taken down abusive content generated by the AI chatbot and, in a post on X on Saturday, Grok's developers tried to frame the episode as an "abuse" of the AI's functionality, rather than a design flaw.
Despite Grok being caught spewing hate speech, the Commission has not clarified whether today's technical meeting will specifically address this topic. "As with any other designated platform, this is a usual step in the Commission's supervisory work," Regnier said.
Since the Grok hate speech incident, the Polish Deputy Prime Minister has sent a letter to Tech Commissioner, Virkkunen, urging the EU to investigate Grok's outburst under the Digital Services Act (DSA). "What we are seeing from X right now could be considered a major infringement of the DSA," he wrote.
In the same week, the Paris prosecutor's office opened an official investigation into X and its owner, Elon Musk, alleging algorithmic manipulation and fraudulent data extraction as part of organised crime, among other suspicions.
X has been under investigation by the Commission since December 2023, over a raft of suspected DSA breaches. In July 2024 the EU confirmed some violations. However – so far – X has not been issued with any DSA fines.
"France is stepping in where Europe should [be]," said Renew lawmaker Sandro Gozi, in response to news of the Paris investigation.
"It's been almost 600 days since the European Commission launched its own probe into X. And still, nothing," he added.
The Commission has said that its services are consistently "in touch with X" – a point Virkkunen reiterated during a press conference on Monday.
X was contacted about today's technical meeting with the EU but the company offered no standalone comment – merely pointing back to its existing X post about the Grok episode.
(nl)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
EU's migration Zeitenwende must include all, no opt-outs, Danish minister says
Kaare Dybvad, Danish minister for integration and immigration, hopes Denmark's Council presidency can push returns forward, downplaying Dutch hopes of getting their own opt-out in an interview with Euractiv. Since Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen seized power in 2019, Dybvad has served as minister in her different governments and now holds the migration portfolio. As such, for the next half a year, Dybvad will sit at the end of the table when EU migration ministers meet. On Tuesday, he hosted his European counterparts and EU migration chief Magnus Brunner for an informal gathering in Copenhagen. What follows is an edited transcript. Denmark has been a vocal backer of 'return hubs.' What exactly is your position, and how widely supported is this idea across the EU? Dybvad: We support the return hubs as a concept. I'd say most European countries, at least the ones I've heard from, support return hubs in some form. Of course, there are concerns – especially about safeguarding human rights and monitoring conditions. But broadly, this approach is seen as a way to ensure that more people are actually returned. Is there any progress on where these return hubs might be located, or which third countries are in play? That's tricky. You don't get the countries before you get the deal. If you want these arrangements, you need to negotiate first – not announce names in advance. But I don't see it as harder than other agreements already out there. The Italian-Albanian deal, for example, shows it can be done. If the EU negotiates as a bloc, it has leverage. More broadly, there seems to be a shift across the EU toward stricter migration policy. Do you see this as sudden or something more gradual? It's been a gradual change. When I started three years ago, Austria was basically the only one supporting our line. Now that's changing – and the biggest shift came from Germany. Their new government openly supports abolishing the connection criteria. That's key to making third-country arrangements legal under EU law. Denmark has had an opt-out on justice and home affairs since the 90s – what role does that play in Denmark's position as a broker on migration issues? I've had that conversation with the former Dutch asylum minister, Marjolein Faber. She was very interested in getting one for the Netherlands. But honestly, I don't think the opt-out does a lot. There are areas where we don't vote or get affected by decisions, sure. But when it comes to real migration outcomes – lower numbers, better control – it's more about efficient return policy and coordination with neighbours. That matters more than any opt-out. At the European level, in the Council with the EU countries, how do you see Danish migration policy affecting other countries? I don't know if our migration policy directly affects other countries, but I think that we proved that you can, from a centre-left perspective, handle these problems, that you can get democratic control of migration policy. And I hope, and this is also what some of my colleagues say, that this inspires others to try to get better control, and to do it from a standardised and left position instead of letting far-right parties run with this agenda. Do you see other centre-left parties, your colleagues in S&D, adopting your stance on this? Aren't you pretty alone on the centre-left? I'm seeing a lot of centre-left parties, social democratic parties, and governments that are huge in this policy. In Austria, you have the SPÖ; in Germany, you have the SPD in government with the Christian Democrats. In Belgium, the Flemish social democrats are part of the coalition government. In Sweden, you'll see the opposition social democrats now also changing their policy. So I think I see it in quite a lot of places right now. And of course, many of the Central and Eastern European social democrats also have quite a strict policy. The Maltese government, which is social democratic, has also introduced some very strict migration policies. There are a lot of sovereign democrats and governments in Europe right now implementing some of the policies that we have tried to implement. But in the European Parliament, the Socialists are led by the Spanish delegation, one of the biggest, and far from your line. How do you get them on board? That's going to be a discussion in the coming half year, of course, from our side. I hope people will be reasonable, and that at least the delegations from different countries will look at their own countries and see what is working, and how we're actually implementing policy at the domestic level. And I'd say for the Spanish side – if I could get some kind of agreement like Spain has with Morocco, we would very much like that. I think there are some very effective migration policies that have been introduced by the Sánchez government – and at least from my side as a minister, I'm very jealous of that. (mm)
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Czech industries urge PM to pushback on EU climate rules
Six Czech industry associations have called on Prime Minister Petr Fiala to defend energy-intensive sectors in EU climate talks, warning that Green Deal targets could cripple key sectors. In a joint letter on Tuesday, the groups argued that soaring energy prices, which they linked to EU climate policy, have already stalled major decarbonisation projects, including those at Třinecké železárny, Lovochemie, and Orlen Unipetrol. 'It simply doesn't add up economically,' the letter states, warning that most cost pressures will drive companies out of the market. To avoid what they describe as a wave of industrial decline, the associations demanded urgent national measures, including a zero tax rate on gas, lower network charges for electricity and gas, as well as temporary state aid for industrial users if prices remain high beyond 2025. The group also wants the government to defend free allowances under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), despite the launch of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and to expand compensation for indirect emissions costs to cover strategic chemicals In calling for the release of a long-delayed expert report on national energy strategy, which remains withheld by the finance ministry, the associations also criticised the government for its lack of transparency. 'We want to know what the energy situation is, how it will be solved, and how much it will cost,' wrote the signatories, who represent Czech steelmakers, chemical producers, forging companies, foundries, engineering firms and paper mills. (cs, de)
Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – EU AI code passes the Meta stress test, now it's time for hardball
The EU wants to set the global standard for responsible AI regulation. But it fears that complicated digital rules could block its nascent AI industry from succeeding in the intensifying race for AI dominance. Nowhere have these rivalling ambitions clashed more than over the EU's new general-purpose AI Code of Practice, which details the AI Act's vague requirements for ChatGPT and the likes. 1,000 lobbyists with irreconcilable views have fought it out over 12 heated months. While companies demanded minimal requirements, the Commission promised an innovation-friendly implementation. For their part, civil society and MEPs panicked that the Code (which grants presumed compliance) would undermine an essential part of the AI Act. The make-or-break moment has now arrived, as companies decide whether or not to sign on to the final Code. The world's wealthiest companies will have few qualms in signing a weak Code, which will grant them a cheap and easy path to making their most powerful technology AI Act compliant. But a more exacting Code runs the risk of having no signatories at all – making a mockery of the Commission's business-friendly pitch. A sigh of relief in the Berlaymont then, when ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and French challenger Mistral said they would sign last week. Meta, by contrast, will not sign the Code. This is good news: The tech giant's refusal signals that the intense industry pressure failed to fully warp the Code to Meta's liking. Commission let tech firms water down key AI Act text, NGOs claim The allegations come at a critical juncture in the EU's development of its AI rulebook. Mark Zuckerberg is hell-bent on winning the AI race. He has reportedly offered salary packages of €260 million – worth more than 99.996% of European companies – to at least 10 top AI researchers to poach talent for a new 'superintelligence' team. At the same time, he and Meta have repeatedly demonstrated that they are bad-faith actors who must be dragged kicking and screaming to comply with EU laws. In June last year, Meta halted its AI rollout in Europe after its opt-out scheme to train AI on social media posts was peppered with data protection complaints. It warned that EU rules would create a 'gap in the technologies that are available in Europe,' versus the rest of the world. In April, it relaunched AI features with a minimally adjusted opt-out scheme to train on users' posts. The pattern is clear: First, Meta rolls out a model it knows will challenge EU laws, preferring to lawyer up rather than practise due diligence. Then it loudly accuses the EU of strangling innovation and causing legal uncertainty, threatening to pull its products from the market. When push comes to shove, it makes marginal adjustments that stretch the law to its limits. It's not just AI training – the company battles with all the EU's digital laws. Meta has been clashing with the Commission over its "pay or consent" advertising model, for which it was fined €200 million in April and could still face further fines. Meta is under investigation for breaching the EU's digital platforms law, and is separately accused of partnering with sanctioned Russian publishers. Zuckerberg, who alone holds majority voting shares in the €1.5 trillion company, is spearheading Meta's cynicism. After Donald Trump took office, Zuckerberg turned on a dime to dismiss fact-checking as censure and praised growing 'masculine energy' in the private sector. Meta is calling for Trump to intervene against EU enforcement of digital rules, which Zuckerberg has likened to tariffs. The list goes on. Time and again, Meta has shown it has no interest in honest and constructive dialogue. Zuckerberg is moving fast to break things, including the EU's AI rulebook. Meta's condemnation should be a relief. 'What will, however, not be voluntary for Meta is to be compliant with the AI Act by 2 August,' said a Commission spokesperson today. Roundup Strategic joint procurement of critical raw materials and tighter business-to-business links are set to form the backbone of a new 'EU-Japan Competitiveness Alliance,' according to a draft summit communiqué seen by Euractiv, which is expected to be launched on Wednesday as EU leaders visit Asia. Fungicide-icide – An EU expert group has confirmed it has decided against the use of the fungicide potassium phosphonate in organic agriculture because the chemical is synthetic and leaves traces in food that persist for years. EU speaks on Israel aid killings – EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told her Israeli counterpart Tuesday that Israel's military 'must stop' killing civilians at aid distribution points in Gaza, after the World Health Organization said its facilities in Gaza had been targeted by Israeli forces. Across Europe The Polish arm of Canadian-founded Central European Petroleum has announced Poland's largest-ever oil and gas discovery near Świnoujście off the Baltic coast, which could hold over 33 million tons of market-grade gas and provide Poland and the EU with much-needed gas. Anti-corruption changes – Ukraine MPs approved amendments to remove the independence of two Ukrainian anti-corruption bodies Tuesday, a day after the arrest of one of the agency's officials. The bodies will be placed under control of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. Iran persists with nuclear programme – Iran is scheduled to meet Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, but the nation has said it has no plans to abandon its nuclear programme, including uranium enrichment, despite the 'severe' damage caused by US strikes to its facilities. Iran will also meet with Chinese and Russian representatives on Tuesday.
