
Not arrested as result of a probe but on CM's orders: RCB official to HC
Nikhil Sosale, marketing and revenue head of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), on Monday alleged that his arrest in connection with the June 4 stadium stampede was carried out not as part of a lawful investigation, but under direct orders from chief minister Siddaramaiah.
Sosale's legal team told the Karnataka high court that he was detained by the Central Crime Branch (CCB) at 4.30 am at the airport, bypassing the Cubbon Park police who initially filed the case. They further contended that the arrest lacked legal justification since the probe had already been transferred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). 'This arrest did not happen on the basis of any investigation but on orders of the CM,' the counsel argued before the bench.
Responding to the plea, the attorney general told the court that interim bail could not be granted unless the HC determined that the arrest was indeed illegal.
Sosale is one of several people arrested after the stampede outside the M Chinnaswamy Stadium during RCB's IPL victory celebration left 11 people dead and dozens injured. He was remanded to 14-day judicial custody.
RCB files petition
Meanwhile, Royal Challengers Sports Limited (RCSL), owner of the IPL franchise, filed a separate petition seeking to quash the FIR, claiming the company was wrongly implicated. RCSL argued that the tragedy occurred because of delays in opening the stadium gates and inadequate police deployment, which failed to manage the crowd that had gathered from across Karnataka and other states. According to their petition, the gates that were scheduled to open at 1.45 pm opened nearly an hour later, triggering a surge.
The event management company, DNA Entertainment Pvt Ltd, has also petitioned the high court for similar relief, citing police lapses as the primary cause. Their plea claimed that a majority of police personnel were posted at Vidhana Soudha, leaving the stadium without adequate crowd control. Both organisations alleged that the FIRs were filed hastily and under political pressure to shield law enforcement agencies from disciplinary scrutiny.
Both petitions are scheduled to be heard by the HC on Tuesday.
Notices to injured
Amid these developments, deputy commissioner of Bengaluru Urban district G Jagadeesha, who also functions as the district magistrate, has issued notices to 45 injured people, asking them to appear on June 11 to record their statements as part of the ongoing magisterial inquiry ordered by chief minister Siddaramaiah. The inquiry report is to be submitted within 15 days.
Officials said the statements of family members of the deceased and eyewitnesses will be recorded on June 13. 'Once these statements are recorded, the Deputy Commissioner will proceed to record the statements of the family members of the deceased and eyewitnesses on June 13. A letter has also been sent to the office of the Bengaluru police commissioner, seeking information regarding the details of the police personnel deputed at the Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4,' said an officer familiar with the development.
CID seeks Sasale's custody
Meanwhile, the CID, which is now leading the investigation, will likely seek custody of Sosale and three others from DNA Entertainment — Sunil Matthew, Kiran, and Sumanth — who are currently lodged in Bengaluru Central Prison. 'We have to question him since he is a primary suspect in the case. We will also seek the custody of the three and record their arrest,' said an officer in the know of the development.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Not identified by survivor, Pocso convicts get bail
Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court suspended the sentence of two men convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, and granted bail, since the survivor had failed to identify them during the trial proceedings in the district court. The two appellants had been sentenced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment by district court for allegedly threatening, extorting, and forcing a 16-year-old boy into performing oral sex. However, HC observed that the survivor neither identified the accused in court nor gave a clear description during his testimony. Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke, presiding over the single-judge bench, noted that there was no substantial evidence to support the conviction, observing that the survivor could not confirm the identity of the accused and that no medical evidence of sexual assault was presented. The survivor, during the district court trial, had stated that the assailants had their faces covered with scarves during the incident. Additionally, the victim's friend, the only other witness present at the time, also failed to identify the accused in court.


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Saving Sukhna: Demolition drive targets unauthorised constructions in Kaimbwala village
1 2 3 Chandigarh: In a decisive move to enforce the directives of the Punjab and Haryana high court and protect Sukhna catchment area, a demolition drive was successfully carried out in the periphery of Kaimbwala village on Tuesday. The operation was initiated under the orders of the deputy commissioner. The demolition was executed with the help of two poclain machines and one JCB, and was supported by a strong police presence, including lady constables. The entire operation was conducted under the close supervision of SDM central, UT. During the drive, approximately 20 unauthorised commercial shops and showrooms, nine tin sheds, one boundary wall, and two khokhas were demolished. The operation was completed peacefully and without any incident. This action was taken in strict compliance with the orders issued by the HC, which mandates the preservation of the Sukhna catchment area to help restore Sukhna Lake to its original state. The court has prohibited the development of housing colonies or any construction activity within this ecologically sensitive zone. It has also empowered enforcement agencies to halt ongoing constructions and demolish any unauthorised structures without prior notice. The Supreme Court has reinforced that no construction is permitted in this area after May 21, 2012. Any violations will result in immediate action against the offenders.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Plea in HC against Jayanth house razing
1 2 Kolkata: A petitioner, claiming to be a resident of an illegal four-storey house at Ariadaha under the Kamarhati Municipality, on Tuesday challenged the demolition notice served by the civic body, as directed by the Calcutta High Court. The house in question is White House, owned by Jayanth Singh, prime suspect in a mob violence case. The petitioner, Prasant Singh, in his application before the division bench of Justice Rajasekhar Mantha and Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta, pleaded that the Kamarhati Municipality didn't serve him a notice to vacate the building, where he was a resident. Singh's counsel said the municipality served the notice to Jayanth, mentioning June 15 as the demolition date. The counsel said Prasant was a resident of that house and the municipality didn't serve him a notice. when Sec 218 of West Bengal Municipal Act provided for a notice. HC gave a chance to Prasant for a hearing, provided he proved he was a genuine resident of the house.