Nato to unveil new 5% defence spending target this week, chief indicates
Nato allies will commit to a target of spending 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence this week, the alliance's chief has indicated.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is among the world leaders expected in The Hague in the Netherlands this week for the Nato summit.
Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said a defence investment plan, set to be agreed at the gathering, 'introduces a new baseline, 5% of GDP to be invested in defence'.
Speaking at a press conference ahead of the summit, former Dutch prime minister Mr Rutte said the move would be a 'quantum leap'.
He told reporters: 'As the world becomes more dangerous, allied leaders will take bold decisions to strengthen our collective defence, making Nato a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance.
'This will include a major new defence investment plan, raising the benchmark for defence investment to 5% of GDP.'
He said the defence plan 'that allies will agree in The Hague introduces a new baseline: 5% of GDP to be invested in defence.
'This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic, and fundamental to securing our future.'
Sir Keir has committed to spend 2.5% of GDP on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034.
It was reported on Sunday evening that Spain has reached a deal with Nato that would see it excluded from the 5% spending target.
Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
US President Donald Trump has previously called for nations in the bloc to commit to 5%.
Defence was one of the areas that benefited at the spending review earlier this month, when figures published by the Treasury showed that average annual real-terms growth for defence between the 2023-24 and 2028-29 financial year is 3.6%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour STILL can't bring themselves to back Donald Trump's strikes after Iran retaliated by launching missile barrage at US airbase in Qatar
Keir Starmer risked being marginalised on the world stage last night after failing to back Donald Trump 's strikes against Iran. As Tehran launched revenge attacks on US bases in the Middle East, the Prime Minister was last night accused of a 'lack of moral clarity' as he refused to take sides in the deepening conflict. British citizens in Qatar were warned to 'shelter in place' last night as Iran fired missiles at America's giant Al Udeid Air Base. Iranian state media said the country's 'mighty and victorious' response to the American assault on its nuclear facilities had begun. Tehran vowed to inflict 'serious, unpredictable consequences' on the US, but, in a sign that it fears further provoking President Trump, it is reported to have warned the Qataris in advance of the attack and focused on a base from which military aircraft had already been removed. Sir Keir was last night facing growing questions about his refusal to support the action taken by America in striking Tehran's nuclear facilities. Yesterday he insisted the UK was 'absolutely focused on de-escalation in the Middle East'. Critics warned that ministers had been left 'paralysed' over the issue after Attorney General Lord Hermer advised that joining Israel 's attacks on Iran, which began 11 days ago, would break international law. Labour's agonies intensified at the weekend following the audacious US assault on the Fordow facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear programme. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs the issue of whether or not Britain supported the attack is not a 'binary question'. And the PM risked diplomatic marginalisation after Nato and Germany backed President Trump's dramatic intervention. Nato chief Mark Rutte said the US bombing raid did not break international law – and said that his 'biggest fear' was that Iran's murderous regime would acquire a nuclear weapon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said there was 'no reason to criticise what America did at the weekend,' adding: 'Yes, it is not without risk. But leaving things as they were was not an option either.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds yesterday acknowledged that the PM's influence on the escalating crisis in the Middle East is now 'not great' with the UK left on the sidelines of the 'special relationship'. Sir Keir emerged from talks with the US President last week to declare Mr Trump would not attack Iran – only to find himself proved wrong days later. Chancellor Rachel Reeves also dodged the question as to whether she backed Washington yesterday. Kemi Badenoch said it was 'quite extraordinary' that ministers were unable to side with the United States against a regime which MI5 says has attempted 20 plots on British soil in the past three years. Mrs Badenoch said Labour's attempt to sit on the fence showed 'a complete absence of moral clarity and, in fact, moral courage'. The Tory leader said she was clear that the US bombing raid was legal, after the shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson advised that aiding Israel was in line with international law because a key ally was facing a 'genocidal threat' from Iran's nuclear programme. During a BBC interview yesterday, Mr Lammy refused eight times to endorse Mr Trump's actions, saying repeatedly that the UK was 'not involved'. In a separate interview with LBC, armed forces minister Luke Pollard failed on seven occasions to back the military action by the US, saying: 'That's not one for me to comment on.' A spokesman for the PM said preventing Iran gaining a nuclear weapon would be a 'good thing'. But he added: 'Our focus is on diplomacy. That is the priority and that is what every member of this government is working towards and that's been the focus of the calls with international partners over the weekend. Iran should take the opportunity presented by the US to re-enter talks.' Sir Keir raised eyebrows yesterday by leaving Mr Lammy to update MPs on the crisis. He missed his weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions last week because of the G7 summit in Canada and is likely to miss it again tomorrow when he is due at the Nato summit. Before and after pictures of Fordow underground complex, taken on June 20 and June 22 'The strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said in a late-night address from the White House No 10 insisted the PM was 'not avoiding Parliament'. Sir Julian Lewis, former chairman of Parliament's intelligence and security committee, said Israel and its allies had a right to defend the country from Iran. He asked Mr Lammy: 'How many times must a terrorist-funding, fanatical regime threaten to wipe another country from the face of the earth before a Government advised by Lord Hermer of Chagos acknowledge that military action to delay and degrade its nuclear weapons programme is both ethically and legally justifiable?' Mr Lammy acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment programme goes far beyond what is needed for civilian energy purposes. 'Britain has long had concerns about Iran's nuclear programme,' he said. 'A nuclear-armed Iran would endanger the immediate region and threaten the global community.' Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin said that Lord Hermer's advice had left ministers 'paralysed and divided'. Former security minister Tom Tugendhat said: 'Labour and the Lib Dems agree they don't want a nuclear Iran and demand only diplomacy – as though no one had thought of that for the past 20 years. 'It's bad enough to look weak. It's worse to advertise irrelevance but the Government has just achieved it.' Human rights lawyer Phillipe Sands, a friend of Lord Hermer and Sir Keir, last night said Israel's attacks on Iran went 'way beyond' what could be justified under international law and that the US was 'not directly threatened at all by Iran'.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'We don't want to be the worst in the world!': Labour's feeble energy costs ambition to cut bills as Business Secretary says he hopes it will make Britain 'not the least competitive'
A scheme to cut energy costs will mean the UK is not the worst in the world, the Business Secretary said on Monday. In an astonishing admission of the limits of the Government's ambitions, Jonathan Reynolds said he hoped it would make Britain 'not the least competitive'. He said that while the UK could not hope to compete with low prices in the US, it could move to 'the middle of the pack'. Energy-intensive businesses have warned they face 'crippling' costs, putting them at a disadvantage to competitors in the US and Europe where costs are far lower. Ministers have pledged to slash electricity costs for thousands of businesses to help them compete with foreign rivals. They hope bills can be cut by 25 per cent for some companies as part of the Government's industrial strategy which it announced on Monday. Asked if he was striving for parity with Europe in terms of prices, Mr Reynolds told reporters that the UK would not be able to compete with the US. But he added: 'What I can do, what we can do here, is not be the least competitive. So I want to not be the least competitive.' He said that the UK energy prices had spiralled above those in other countries in recent years. 'We're going to move to a position where we are not the least competitive, [where] we are equivalent to other economies that we would be competing against for inward investment decisions,' he said. He added: 'It moves us from being an outlier right into the middle of the pack, cheaper than Italy, Czech Republic, and broadly comparable to, say, Germany.' The British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme aims to cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms from 2027. It will do this by exempting them from green levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market. The scheme will also cut network charges for around 500 of the most energy-intensive firms, including the steel industry, chemicals and glassmaking. Acting shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said: 'It's astonishing that Labour are finally admitting that the costs of Net Zero are so high that they're having to spend billions of pounds of taxpayers' money subsidising businesses' energy bills to stop them going bust.' Sir Keir Starmer also hailed a £40 billion investment by Amazon over three years which he said would create thousands of jobs.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Zopa enters current account market offering cashback and 7.10% savings interest
Digital bank Zopa has entered the current account market, enabling customers to earn 2% interest on balances as well as cashback and 7.10% interest on a linked savings account. The new account, called Biscuit, offers 2.00% AER (annual equivalent rate) interest on balances. Customers can also earn 7.10% interest on a regular saver account, depositing up to £300 per month. After 12 months the regular savings account becomes an easy access savings account (with a current rate of 3.50%) but customers can then open another regular saver, the bank said. People can also earn 2.00% cashback on bills on up to £1,500 of direct debits per year. Merve Ferrero, chief strategy officer at Zopa Bank, said Biscuit aims to deliver 'great value across everyday spending and saving'. A survey commissioned by Zopa indicated that nearly a quarter (24%) of people chase cashback offers while nearly a fifth (19%) have multiple bank accounts and financial products in a bid to find value, sidestep fees or to be rewarded for their loyalty. A third (33%) of people surveyed said they prefer the bulk of their bills and significant outgoings to leave their account on or close to payday, so they know how much money they have left to spend. One in eight (12%) people have some 'no spend' days during the week and more than a third (37%) use mobile banking to stay on top of their finances. The research was carried out by OnePoll, among 2,000 people across Britain who are in employment, in June. Rachel Springall, a finance expert at said: 'It is exciting to see another challenger bank launch a current account into the fray for consumers hoping to make their money work harder for them. Digital banks are offering some lucrative benefits and are a refreshing alternative to the major higher street banks. 'The perks of traditional current accounts do tend to vary depending on how a customer uses it.' She said the Zopa account 'may be suited to consumers who don't want the hassle of opening a variety of accounts to cover different needs'. Ms Springall said it is vital that customers work out how much they will fully earn from any account.
