logo
Judge dismisses charges against man accused by attorney general, FBI director of being MS-13 leader

Judge dismisses charges against man accused by attorney general, FBI director of being MS-13 leader

CBS News30-04-2025
Why the DOJ wants to drop charges against an alleged MS-13 gang leader
Senior U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton on Wednesday dismissed criminal charges against Henrry Villatoro Santos, a Virginia man accused of being a regional leader of the violent MS-13 gang, clearing the way for expedited deportation proceedings.
Earlier this month, the Justice Department asked the court to drop the charges, indicating the government planned to deport Villatoro Santos. A U.S. marshal from the Fugitive Task Force was in the courtroom, suggesting Villatoro Santos could be transferred into immigration custody after the hearing.
"They're likely to take him very quickly," Villatoro Santo defense attorney, Muhammad Elsayed, said after the hearing.
Villatoro Santos's arrest was announced last month in a nationally televised news conference featuring Attorney General Pam Bondi, who alleged he was the "East Coast leader" of the MS-13 transnational gang. He was accused of unspecified violent crimes and helping to lead the gang's criminal attacks across the country. But as the Justice Department has pursued the dismissal of charges against Villatoro Santos, it has not publicly tied him to any acts of violence. His attorneys have repeatedly questioned the nature of the proceedings.
"This is an unusual case," Elsayed said in court, emphasizing that it was up to the court "to determine whether the motion was made in good faith." He argued that the Justice Department had provided "no explanation whatsoever" for withdrawing the charges and questioned the lack of clarity regarding what legal process would follow.
"There will likely be additional proceedings," Elsayed said after the hearing.
Villatoro Santos was facing a federal felony gun possession charge in Virginia. Charging documents in his criminal case made only a fleeting reference to MS-13. An immigration officer's affidavit said, "FBI agents and TFOs also observed indicia of MS-13 association in the garage bedroom" of Villatoro-Santo's home.
Villatoros Santo's attorney accused the Justice Department of misusing Rule 48(a) — the procedural tool used to dismiss the indictment — arguing it amounted to an attempt to bypass due-process protections. "They want to deport him without due process," Elsayed said, referencing statements by Bondi and criticizing the lack of input from the Department of Homeland Security.
"The court has to dig deeper than just the basic motion," Elsayed argued, alleging "prosecutorial harassment" and drawing parallels to other politically sensitive case dismissals, including that of New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
"The DOJ did not seek to remove this case without knowing what's coming next," Elsayed said, warning of a potential "unlawful deportation" and citing past instances when the administration had "defied court orders" in deportation cases.
Government attorneys countered that the defense had already delayed the case beyond its initial request, arguing, "The defendant cannot continue to tread water on the criminal docket."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin asks SCOTUS to ban weed users from owing guns: Where do Oklahoma laws stand?
Trump admin asks SCOTUS to ban weed users from owing guns: Where do Oklahoma laws stand?

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump admin asks SCOTUS to ban weed users from owing guns: Where do Oklahoma laws stand?

The Trump administration's lawyers want the Supreme Court to make it official that regular weed smokers, as well as other drug users, should not be allowed to own firearms. An appeals court has said a federal law making it a crime for drug users to have a gun can't be used against someone based solely on their past drug use. In Oklahoma, there are protections for both firearm owners and marijuana users set in place that could work against this legislation, should the Supreme Court make a decision. Here's what to know in the state. Justice Department says gun violence goes down when sober The U.S. Justice Department is appealing four cases to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to focus on one involving a dual citizen of the United States and Pakistan who was charged with unlawfully owning a Glock pistol because he regularly smoked marijuana. A New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that, in the case history and tradition support 'some limits on a presently intoxicated person's right to carry a weapon,' the appeals court said, 'they do not support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage.' The DOJ disagrees with this, citing laws from the country's founding that restrict the rights of habitual drinkers, even when sober. 'And for about as long as legislatures have regulated drugs, they have prohibited the possession of arms by drug users and addicts — not just by persons under the influence of drugs,' they wrote. What are Oklahoma's gun and marijuana laws? It has been codified in Oklahoma that a resident can't be denied 'the right to own, purchase or possess a firearm, ammunition or accessories' because they are a medical marijuana patient or caregiver. The statute, which was passed in 2019, was further defined with the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act. However, the statute further reads that 'no state or local agency, municipal or county governing authority shall restrict, revoke, suspend or otherwise infringe upon the right of a person to own, purchase or possess a firearm, ammunition, or firearm accessories or any related firearms license.' This means that while no local level can override Oklahoma's state laws, the federal level can decide. Depending on their decision, the state laws may be affected. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: SCOTUS could ban gun rights for pot users: Where do Oklahoma laws stand? Solve the daily Crossword

Salvadoran man arrested while trying to self-deport from California. His punishment? Deportation
Salvadoran man arrested while trying to self-deport from California. His punishment? Deportation

Los Angeles Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Salvadoran man arrested while trying to self-deport from California. His punishment? Deportation

A Salvadoran man with a criminal record was recently arrested at San Francisco International Airport while trying to board a flight to self-deport. After three weeks in custody, a federal court convicted him of being in the country illegally following a prior removal, according to court documents, and he is now expected to be deported back to El Salvador — exactly where he was attempting to go when he was detained. Jeisson Rony Escobar-Valencia, 30, was brought to the Bay Area at 11 years old by his father, who had obtained temporary protected status due to unsafe conditions in El Salvador. Escobar-Valencia spent the entirety of his adolescent and adult life in the U.S, where he now has a 2-year-old son and 1-year-old daughter, according to documents filed by his attorney, Elisse Larouche. Escobar-Valencia is a convicted sex offender and was previously deported, but his lawyer said that when he boarded the flight at SFO, he was 'trying to do the right thing — leave the U.S. because he did not have legal status here.' In 2018, Escobar-Valencia was convicted of committing lewd acts with a child under 14 years old. According to Larouche, he entered a plea deal that he thought would protect him from deportation. It did not, however, and he was deported to El Salvador in May 2021 after spending three years in prison. Shortly after arriving back in El Salvador, Escobar-Valencia was the victim of an attempted homicide in a neighborhood controlled by MS-13, according to a police report included in court documents. He jumped out of a moving car after an attacker held a knife to his throat and sliced a 4-inch cut. After this traumatic encounter, Escobar-Valencia feared he would be kidnapped or attacked again, according to Larouche. 'It was in this context that Mr. Escobar-Valencia made the decision to return to the U.S.,' Larouche wrote. 'He understands now that he should not have returned, but at the time, he was in extreme fear and made the wrong and unlawful choice.' Upon his return to America, Escobar-Valencia was arrested in Martinez, Calif., in July 2021 and served four months in jail for failure to register as a sex offender. On Feb. 14, he was once again arrested for failure to register as a sex offender in Richmond, Calif. In July, he made the decision to self-deport, purchasing his own ticket from San Francisco to San Salvador. The Trump administration has been urging people who are in the U.S. illegally to self-deport as part of its ongoing immigration crackdown. In May, the Department of Homeland Security began offering people without documentation a $1,000 stipend and travel assistance to leave the country voluntarily. But when Escobar-Valencia attempted to board his flight on July 23, he was apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, according to court documents. '[Escobar-Valencia] said goodbye to his family including two young children and partner, and was determined to set up a life in El Salvador where his family could later join him,' Larouche wrote. 'Instead, the government intervened to criminally prosecute Mr. Escobar-Valencia, putting him in criminal custody for this case followed by a prolonged period in immigration custody before he can return to El Salvador.' Escobar-Valencia subsequently entered a plea bargain agreeing to the 'virtual certainty of his deportation' in exchange for the swift resolution of his case, according to court documents. On Aug. 14, a federal judge sentenced him to time served plus one more day in prison, after which point Escobar-Valencia was transferred into ICE's custody.

Unlikely enforcers shape Trump's "weaponization" crusade
Unlikely enforcers shape Trump's "weaponization" crusade

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

Unlikely enforcers shape Trump's "weaponization" crusade

A housing regulator, a prosecutor rejected by the Senate and a former Democrat have emerged as the unlikely faces of President Trump's"weaponization" crusade. Why it matters: In a sea of Trump loyalists, these three officials — Bill Pulte, Ed Martin and Tulsi Gabbard — stand out for how aggressively they've shattered norms in pursuit of the president's enemies. 1. Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has used his 3 million followers on X to reinvent the sleepy mortgage regulator as a platform for political combat. Pulte has elevated allegations of mortgage fraud against two of Trump's top antagonists, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). Both are now under criminal investigation. Pulte also has led the campaign to oust Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calling for him to resign — or be fired — over cost overruns in the Fed's $2.5 billion headquarters renovation. On Wednesday, Pulte escalated Trump's war on the central bank by accusing Fed governor Lisa Cook of mortgage fraud. Trump responded by calling for Cook to resign. 2. Martin, a conservative activist who defended Jan. 6 rioters, was named the Justice Department's weaponization czar after his nomination to be U.S. attorney for D.C. collapsed in the Senate. In his brief time as acting U.S. attorney, Martin demoted prosecutors who had worked on Jan. 6 cases, vowed to pursue legal action against critics of Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, and attempted to launch an investigation into Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Now leading the DOJ's probe of James, Martin stunned ethics experts by showing up outside the New York attorney general's Brooklyn home in a trench coat and posing for tabloid photos. Martin's conduct in the case has violated Justice Department rules and norms barring prosecutors from commenting on specific cases, and turning investigations into public spectacles. 3. Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, sent shockwaves through the intel community by accusing former Obama officials of a "treasonous conspiracy" stemming from the 2016 Russia probe. Her allegations — now the subject of a criminal grand jury investigation — have electrified Trump's base and seem to have turned the former Democratic congresswoman into one of the president's favorite Cabinet members. Gabbard went further this week, revoking the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials she claimed had manipulated or leaked classified intelligence. Then on Wednesday, she approved plans to slash ODNI's staff by 40% — extending Trump's purge of an intelligence community he has long viewed as hostile. What they're saying: "Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence," Gabbard said in a statement. "Anyone who engages in criminal activity should be held accountable. No one is above the law. President Trump's only retribution is success and historic achievements for the American people," a White House official told Axios. The big picture: Trump's fixation with the "weaponization" of government stems from his own years under investigation: the Russia probe, two impeachments and a cascade of criminal prosecutions after he left office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store