Cavities in children could increase by millions if fluoride is banned, study suggests
The Brief
An estimated 25.4 million more teeth will result in tooth decay in the next five years if fluoride is banned from the U.S. public water supply, according to a recent model simulation.
The study also predicted an estimated $9.8 billion will be spent on additional dental care over the next five years.
Some states like Utah and Florida have already banned fluoride from the state's public water supply.
Researchers created a model to estimate the impact a ban on fluoride in the United States water supply would have on children's dental health and the results are bleak.
The simulations estimated that a ban would result in tooth decay in 25.4 million more teeth, which is equivalent to a decayed tooth for one out of every three children over the next five years. The results were published in Jama Health Forum on May 30.
"There's strong evidence from other countries and cities, such as Calgary in Canada, showing that when fluoride is eliminated, dental disease increases. Our study offers a window into what would happen in the United States if water fluoridation ceased," Lisa Simon, MD, DMD, and senior author of the study, said.
Why you should care
Not only would eliminating fluoride increase the occurrence of tooth decay, but the estimated cost of dental care would rise exponentially, according to the study.
By the numbers
The models simulated the potential dental care costs over five and 10 years.
$9.8 billion in additional dental care costs over five years
$19.4 billion in additional dental care costs over 10 years
"Most of the increased cost could be attributed to publicly insured children, meaning it would be a direct public health cost," said Simon.
Dig deeper
Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the CDC. In 1950, federal officials endorsed water fluoridation to prevent tooth decay, and in 1962 set guidelines for how much should be added to water.
Fluoride can come from several sources, but drinking water is the main one for Americans, researchers say. Nearly two-thirds of the U.S. population gets fluoridated drinking water, according to CDC data.
The addition of low levels of fluoride to drinking water was long considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the last century. The American Dental Association credits it with reducing tooth decay by more than 25% in children and adults.
About one-third of community water systems — 17,000 out of 51,000 across the U.S. — serving more than 60% of the population fluoridated their water, according to a 2022 CDC analysis.
What they're saying
"We know fluoride works. We're able to show just how much it works for most communities and how much people stand to lose if we get rid of it," said Simon.
Big picture view
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said he wants communities to stop fluoridating water, and he is setting the gears of government in motion to help make that happen.
Kennedy has said he plans to tell the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to stop recommending fluoridation in communities nationwide. And he said he's assembling a task force of health experts to study the issue and make new recommendations.
Two states have already banned adding fluoride to public water systems. These include Florida and Utah.
The Source
Information for this article was taken from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, a study that observed oral health and water fluoridation data collected from 8,484 children aged 0-19 which was published in JAMA on May 30, 2025, a Mass General Brigham news release about the study, and reporting by The Associated Press. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"An unwarranted betrayal": Karine Jean-Pierre leaves Democratic Party, announces new book
Karine Jean-Pierre has left the Democratic Party. The former press secretary announced her decision on Wednesday, along with the news of her upcoming book, "Independent." "Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," Jean-Pierre said in a statement. "At noon that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes." Set to release on October 21, the book's subtitle promises a "look inside a broken White House" and hints at a defense of the Biden administration. In a description from the publisher, Democratic Party pressure to force Biden to end his campaign is painted as a "betrayal." The description goes on to call the book a guide to carving out "a political space more loyal to personal beliefs than a party affiliation." Jean-Pierre's book will follow Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson into the suddenly crowded market of post-mortems on Biden's single term in the Oval Office. Her departure-cum-book announcement drew mockery from her former colleagues, who called it a "joke" and a "grift." "She made a joke about being an independent last year, and now it's a book," an anonymous former White House staffer told Politico. "All ideas are monetary, even the dumb ones."Democratic strategist Caitlin Legacki pushed back against KJP while speaking to the outlet, saying that Biden and Harris did "hero's work" in preventing a Republican supermajority in Congress. "It's more productive to focus on that, and thank Biden for doing the responsible thing by stepping aside, than it is to pretend this was an unwarranted act of betrayal," she said.

Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Look Ahead at the 2026 Midterm Elections
Most Americans aren't thinking about next year's midterm election. But leaders, lawmakers and candidates in both parties are—and for good reason. The most consequential battle across the contested arenas in 2026—the Senate, the House, governorships and state legislatures—will likely be the fight for the House. It's the most likely to flip from Republican to Democrat, putting a major crimp in President Trump's final two years.

Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Medicaid Is Overdue for a Big Beautiful Overhaul
National health-insurance coverage has been a top priority for the American left for decades. Medicaid has been the main vehicle for reaching this goal since 1965. The program now accounts for more than half of the 150 million Americans covered by government health insurance. President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' presents the Senate with a choice: Continue on the path toward national health insurance by locking in recent Medicaid expansions, or reform Medicaid and reverse course. After the defeat of President Harry Truman's national health-insurance plan in 1949, Democrats began an incremental journey. Medicare for seniors and Medicaid mainly for state welfare recipients were their first major steps. After Medicare was extended to the disabled in 1972, Democrats turned their attention to expanding Medicaid.