Analysis: Putin may never be ready to meet Zelensky
'The idea was discussed that it would be appropriate to study the opportunity of raising the level of representatives of the Russian and Ukrainian sides,' he said. In Kremlin-speak, that means they are nowhere near ready, and maybe never will be.
And that should come as no surprise.
This is a war that started with Putin unilaterally recognizing a chunk of Ukrainian land (the self-styled Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics) as independent, while labeling it 'our historical lands.'
He has argued Ukraine is 'an inalienable part of [Russia's] own history, culture and spiritual space,' its separation from Russia a historical mistake.
The Kremlin makes no effort to hide its disdain for Zelensky. It not only routinely questions the legitimacy of the Ukrainian leader, fixating on the postponement of elections in Ukraine because of martial law, but in its latest 'peace' memorandum requires Ukraine to hold elections before any final peace treaty is signed.
Putin and other Russian officials rarely refer to Zelensky by name, instead preferring the scathing moniker of 'the Kyiv regime.' And don't forget it was Zelensky who traveled to Turkey for the first direct talks between the two sides in mid-May, only for Putin to send a delegation headed by a writer of historical textbooks.
Putin has already got what he wanted – a bilateral meeting with Trump, a leader he views as his equal. To meet with Zelensky would, in his eyes, be incompatible with his world-view, and his war aims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
34 minutes ago
- Daily News Egypt
The Gains of the Alaska Summit
The Alaska Summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was regarded as a rare and timely opportunity for the two leaders to act as allies, rather than adversaries, in shaping a better future for the world. Both had already hinted at being open to such a prospect. Trump recently warned that the world would face a 'serious problem' if the New START treaty expired without a follow-up framework, while Putin emphasised that the treaty's expiry was an urgent issue to be addressed with Washington. When it comes to the global nuclear question, no other actors matter: only Trump and Putin—who together control more than 90 percent of the world's nuclear warheads—can make the decisive choices. It is a strictly bilateral issue, one that must be settled at the highest level. The outcomes of the Alaska Summit suggest that the Ukraine crisis was, in effect, less the centrepiece than a pretext to reset relations between Moscow and Washington in a form wholly different from anything seen since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Several critical areas of convergence emerged, potentially paving the way for renewed strategic stability talks between the two nuclear superpowers: Reaffirming the January 2022 P5 statement issued by the permanent members of the UN Security Council, which declared that 'a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.' This principle has gained urgency since the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict. Maintaining New START limits voluntarily, even beyond the treaty's expiry—an interim cap that would prevent a near-term arms race and reassure both allies and rivals. Refraining from explosive nuclear testing, despite the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty's continued limbo, partly due to the absence of US and Russian ratification. Freezing non-strategic or 'tactical' nuclear weapons—smaller warheads designed for battlefield use—an issue reignited by European debates on arming Ukraine. Acknowledging the risks of unconstrained missile defence, as the US accelerates its 'Golden Dome' project while Russia expands advanced delivery systems. By debating these questions, Washington and Moscow gain the chance to think more seriously—and together—about managing the future, from breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies to the growing role of outer space in security competition. On Ukraine, however, much remains unresolved. Putin insists on a definitive settlement: US guarantees that Kyiv will not join NATO, coupled with implicit recognition of territories occupied by Russia since the war began. For Putin, the summit's gains are manifold: restoring dialogue with Washington and breaking international isolation; sidelining Western Europe, which he deems irrelevant after the war; cornering Zelensky and portraying him as the obstacle to peace; strengthening Russia's hand vis-à-vis its wavering ally, China; and beginning the process of easing US sanctions, with initial steps already evident in areas such as AI services and civil aviation. If the Alaska talks do indeed pave the way toward ending the war, this would mark the greatest foreign-policy achievement of Donald Trump's presidency since he took office in January. For Trump, the summit also intersects with his personal ambitions. His moves on the international stage suggest a clear priority: securing the Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan nominated him in June following his intervention in the brief India–Pakistan clash; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu submitted a nomination letter in July; and Cambodia's prime minister added another in August, citing his mediation in a border conflict. Some of these crises may have been exaggerated or insufficiently resolved, but collectively they feed into Trump's campaign for the prize. Trump's desire appears partly symbolic—perhaps to rival Barack Obama, who won the Nobel in 2009 after just one year in office, and whom Trump once mocked for not knowing 'why he got it.' Should Trump succeed, he would become the fifth US president to win the Nobel Peace Prize, after Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, and Obama. Politically, Trump also harvested three key gains: securing access to Russia's rare raw materials vital to technological dominance; constraining Europe's role, which Washington has seen as burdensome since World War II; and driving a wedge between Moscow and Beijing, America's primary global competitor. The warmth of Trump's red-carpet welcome for Putin at Anchorage Air Base was itself revealing: their chemistry was evident, and Putin appeared unusually relaxed, even affectionate, in moments that typically demand rigid protocol. This raised expectations that the summit might mark the beginning of a dramatic reorientation in world politics—perhaps even an 'overturning' of the post–Cold War order. From Washington's perspective, the Alaska Summit was meant to focus narrowly on Ukraine and arms control. Europeans viewed it as a potential breakthrough on the war ravaging their continent. Moscow cast it as a comprehensive bilateral reset. For Trump, however, it was all of these—and more: a stage for personal glory, geopolitical manoeuvring, and the pursuit of a Nobel Prize. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University
Daily News Egypt
an hour ago
- Daily News Egypt
Egypt welcomes international efforts for peace in Ukraine
Egypt on Wednesday welcomed recent international efforts to reach a peaceful settlement to the crisis in Ukraine, praising a US-Russia summit in Alaska and a separate meeting between the US and Ukrainian presidents in Washington. In a statement, the Egyptian foreign ministry said it values the efforts of US President Donald Trump to end the military operations and their negative consequences. It welcomed the Aug. 15 summit in Alaska and the Aug. 18 meeting in Washington that brought together the US and Ukrainian leaders, along with several European counterparts. 'Egypt affirms that these efforts are fully consistent with its own position, which calls for advancing political and diplomatic solutions to international crises,' the statement read, adding that 'there are no military solutions to this protracted crisis.' The only way forward is through serious negotiation, political flexibility, and adherence to international law and the U.N. Charter, the ministry said. The statement also expressed hope that these efforts would lead to an end to the war soon, given its severe political, security, humanitarian, and economic repercussions, which have disproportionately affected developing countries, especially in achieving food security. The diplomatic push comes as European leaders seek to leverage Trump's support for a plan that includes sending European troops to Ukraine as part of a potential peace deal. While Trump has ruled out deploying US forces, he has indicated a willingness to provide other support, such as air cover. On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow was ready to discuss a political settlement with Ukraine, stressing that security guarantees must be provided on an equal basis and involve Russia, China, the US, Britain, and France. While praising the diplomatic efforts in Ukraine, Egypt's foreign ministry said it hopes the international community will also 'exert its efforts in the Middle East to resolve the Palestinian issue decisively and finally.' It stressed the need for Israel to accept the deal that Hamas has agreed to, based on a proposal by US envoy Steve Witkoff, 'to quickly reach a ceasefire in Gaza, ensure the entry of humanitarian aid, and the release of hostages and a number of Palestinian prisoners.' Egypt renewed its readiness to continue contributing constructively, in cooperation with regional and international partners, to support paths aimed at establishing international peace and security.
Daily News Egypt
an hour ago
- Daily News Egypt
From Cannes to Edinburgh: Europe's 2025 Festivals Demonstrate that Art Is a Powerful Instrument for Peace
In the ancient streets of Edinburgh, where historic stones echo with the sounds of theatre, comedy, and music, the world is witnessing one of the boldest calls for peace: the 2025 International Fringe Festival. The world's largest arts gathering, with more than 3,000 performances, has in its current edition transformed into a vibrant arena for debate on peace, with Palestine and Ukraine at its heart. Amid the lights and satirical performances, Palestinian artist Sami Abu Warda's Palestine: Peace de Resistance stands out. Blending historical narrative with dark comedy, he delivers an absurd yet piercing response to the Palestinian tragedy. His biting satire of colonialism is more than art—it is an act of resistance that transforms suffering into a space for dialogue and reflection. Another performance, Palestine Stands Up, features Palestinian artists sharing their stories through comedy that provokes laughter but leaves a lasting ache—raising a profound question: can peace emerge from laughter? The festival has not been untouched by politics. During an event attended by Scotland's First Minister, John Swinney, Palestinian protesters voiced opposition to his government's support for Israel. The demonstrations were strong enough to cancel several shows—reminding the world that art does not exist apart from politics, but reflects it through the perspective of peoples rather than governments. Yet Edinburgh is not alone this year; Europe as a whole has become one vast stage for peace. At the Cannes Film Festival in May 2025, the Palestinian pavilion returned with strength, affirming that images can resist silencing. Three documentaries on the conflict were screened, including one focusing on Palestinian journalists who face war armed with cameras instead of rifles. In a moving moment, Jury President Juliette Binoche paid tribute to Palestinian photographer Fatima Hassouna, calling on the world to condemn the blockade of Gaza. Meanwhile, Ukraine was honoured through the awarding of the French Order of Arts and Letters to producer Volodymyr Yatsenko—a gesture affirming culture's resilience in the face of destruction. In July, the Festival d'Avignon in France opened its stages to Ukrainian artists envisioning reconstruction. Since 2022, the festival has dedicated space to Ukrainian art, but in 2025 the message was even clearer: here, art is not simply performance but a collective rehearsal for imagining a post-war future. One highlight was a panel entitled The Roles of International Festivals Today, which gathered organisers from across continents to debate the role of culture in a conflict-ridden world. By contrast, the Berlinale 2025 in Germany faced a political storm, after the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) called for its boycott over alleged 'complicity with Israel.' Here, the debates surpassed cinema itself, confronting a larger question: can art ever be neutral? Or is neutrality in times of bloodshed nothing but an illusion? Even smaller festivals echoed the same spirit. Serbia's Festival of Arts and Human Rights (June 2025) featured workshops, plays, and films that addressed Palestine and Ukraine while linking them to broader themes of truth, justice, and freedom. The conclusion was clear: peoples are searching for genuine peace, and art offers the path forward. Why, then, are festivals able to say what political conferences cannot? Research provides an answer. A study from SIT University affirms that cultural festivals foster dialogue and mutual understanding far beyond the language of political interests. On ResearchGate, scholars argue that in post-violence contexts, the arts help repair social ties and nurture empathy between former enemies. Meanwhile, the Oxford Research Encyclopedias emphasise that while art can be harnessed for violence, it more often becomes a powerful instrument of peace, creating shared narratives that dissolve the boundaries of 'us' and 'them.' The picture grows sharper in other studies. Research at Nova Southeastern University highlights that art in conflict zones must be recognised in all its diverse forms, and its true value lies in its independence from biased state politics. A study on reconciliation in Bosnia adds that art builds peace 'from below'—from the people themselves—whereas politics, imposed 'from above,' often fails to reach the human heart. Here lies the stark contrast: political conferences are closed arenas, dominated by governments and their alliances, while artistic festivals are open spaces that amplify the voices of artists, activists, and ordinary people. Politics deafens; art restores hearing with voices that cannot be silenced. In the end, if 2025 has taught us anything, it is that art is neither luxury nor ornament, but a true force for peace. The festivals of Edinburgh, Cannes, Avignon, Berlin, and Serbia have all demonstrated that culture is stronger than political propaganda. If we truly want lasting peace, we must first listen to the artists—before the politicians. Dr. Marwa El-Shinawy – Writer and Academic
