West Lothian 'tourist tax' could bring in £1m as council urged to push forward
A visitor levy scheme for West Lothian could potentially bring in more than £1m a year into council coffers.
But while councillors welcomed the start of consultations agreed this week, the Tories branded the proposals a tourist tax which would hit local business and discourage visitors.
And councillors were concerned as officers offered a cautious two year path to an actual introduction following a similar decision taken by the council in Edinburgh last month.
Councillor Sally Pattle, Lib Dem, Linlithgow, asked how soon the levy could be introduced. 'How urgently are we moving on this, what is the time line given this is an easy revenue stream we can capitalise on.'
The meeting heard that there are statutory guidelines on the introduction of a levy demanding clear consultation.
'Are those conversations taking place already?' asked Councillor Pattle.
Jim Henderson, Business development manager said the conversation was in the early stages.
Edinburgh last month agreed to impose a five per cent levy from next summer. Glasgow, Argyll and Bute, and Aberdeen are all now in formal consultation stage. Other councils such as East Lothian, Stirling, Dumfries & Galloway, and others have been given approval for 'early engagement' work.
Many cities across Europe now have visitor levies in place.
A report to West Lothian's Executive outlined potential income based on the 298,000 visitors who stayed in the county in 2024. The most expensive accommodation, with an average spend of £100 per person per night would generate £1,342, 800 at a five per cent levy.
The lowest proposed levy of two per cent would generate more than £500,000 in the most expensive accommodation.
In a report to the Executive, Stewart Ness, Tourism and Town Centre Manager said: 'Whilst Visitor Levy is historically considered in areas of 'over-tourism', such as Edinburgh, it may be inappropriate to argue that this applies across West Lothian where some areas might benefit from an increase in visitors.
'There could be a risk that West Lothian is 'left behind' by neighbouring local authority areas that do use the ring-fenced funds raised through the introduction of a Visitor Levy to invest in tourism in their areas.'
Stressing the need to establish consultation with local businesses Mr Ness added: 'Local authorities are encouraged to conduct early engagement before entering the consultation phase.
'Although not statutory, this engagement phase is considered by the guidance to be best practice. Learning from other local authorities' areas who have undergone the process is available and this could be used to guide the process in West Lothian.
'By engaging with the tourism businesses in this collaborative fashion, it will increase understanding for the scheme amongst those who will be responsible for collecting the levy.
'By using already established networks, such as Visit West Lothian and Business Gateway, it should increase the participation rates of businesses in the engagement.'
However Conservative group leader Damian Doran-Timson criticised a move to what he called a tourist tax which could damage local business.
In an amendment he said: 'Given the importance of this tax on business and the negative impact this is likely to have on the tourist economy across West Lothian it is vital that all West Lothian Councillors are involved in the decision making on this extra tax.'
The amendment welcomed the decision to engage with those in the tourism industry and added: ' [We] trust the Council will ensure those who will have to administrate the scheme are fully advised of the processes involved and the implications.'
He told the meeting: 'This is a tax on people, a tax on businesses and a tax in individuals.'
The amendment called for any future decision on the implementation of a levy to come back to full council because all councillors would have businesses in their areas which could be affected.
The SNP group leader Janet Campbell welcomed the report but said : ' It doesn't seem to be moving forward at a pace we would have expected and, given that we are looking at more than £1m, which would almost cover the savings to be made on the community centres. It seems to be a bit of a no-brainer.'
Councillor Pattle said: ' I welcome this report, but I have concerns about the lack of urgency, I hope that we are able to move forward with this easy income strategy at pace.'
In a vote Councillor Doran-Timson's amendment demanding later decisions come to full council rather than the executive was defeated along with a similar amendment from the SNP.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Nothing just or orderly about transitioning to the dole
As deals go, it was fairly uncontroversial and did no raise much publicity, but it, perhaps, further illustrates Aberdeen's steep economic decline. For the Woodbank is currently owned by Shell and has 21 bedrooms, seven meeting rooms, private dining rooms and a sports centre. Only Shell staff and executives could use the facility and was widely used as thousands of workers started moving to the North-east during the height of the oil boom. But now it is surplus to requirements by the oil giant which like other industry majors are turning their back on the North Sea due to dwindling reserves and punitive taxes that make it not worth their while drilling for it. Last year, US oil giant Chevron announced it will close its office in Aberdeen, as it leaves the North Sea after more than 50 years. The multinational energy corporation is active in 180 countries, and boasted revenues of $200billion (£145bn) in 2023. Last year, Chevron announced that it would sell its remaining North Sea assets amid declining production. Chevron was one of the first companies to invest in North Sea oil, with drilling beginning in the early 1970s. How bad things have got was recently highlighted with figures showing that more than 13,000 Scots oil and gas jobs have been lost in the space of just one year, while more than 40% of the UK's energy needs is being imported. BrewDog pub closures should act as a warning to Starmer Nothing about the A9 dualling project suggests momentum Ms Hyslop Scotland needs more workers - here's how we attract them It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 I have walked amongst Scotland's largest seagulls - and they are a menace According to the trade association Offshore Energies UK (OEUK), the number of jobs both directly and in the broader supply chain in North Sea oil and gas has dropped by nearly half since 2013, from 117,900 to just 60,700 in 2023. In the last full year tracked, there was a loss of 13,400 jobs, with hundreds more expected to be shed with the closure of Scotland's only oil refinery. Aberdeen's main thoroughfare Union Street currently has one in four shops lying empty as highly paid workers leave the city for greener pastures. Is this what politicians mean when they refer to a just transition? I'm not sure the near 60,000 people who have lost their jobs in the industry over the past decade at the altar of Net Zero would say anything about it being just for them. According to the official definition, a 'just transition' refers to a shift towards a sustainable, low-carbon economy that is fair and inclusive, ensuring that no one is left behind in the process. But while all the jobs have been lost in the North Sea, Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) analysis for the first quarter of this year shows that net energy import dependency, which measures how much the UK needs to buy in after accounting for exports, is at 47%. This is nearly 10% more than in 2019 – when net import dependency was at 38.7%. Overall, energy production in the first three months of this year is 25% lower than in the pre-pandemic year of 2019. It is no surprise then that the offshore energy industry trade group has called on UK ministers to give greater support for North Sea production, insisting it is not incompatible with net zero aims – contrary to environmental group narratives. But the UK Government has been standing firm on the denial of future oil and gas exploration licences, which it was felt was required to meet global warming targets. This steadfast principle has partly led to Scotland losing on average 37 oil and gas jobs every day. So much for the old adage that we're all in this together. The OEUK has told the UK Government that issuing no new oil and gas licences for the exploration of new fuels will result in the UK being more reliant on imports of oil and gas to meet energy demands. They warned in a briefing: 'This is not in the national interest, and undermines UK energy security and climate goals.' Their analysis says that UK Government advisers, The Climate Change Committee (CCC), estimate the UK will require 13-15 billion barrels of oil and gas equivalent (boe) in the period 2025 to 2050 to meet its energy needs. But they say the North Sea Transition Authority forecasts the UK to produce only four billion barrels of oil and gas in the period 2025 to 2050, less than one third of the 'balanced path' for net zero transition. They warn that importing energy takes away support for production at home to supply the Scottish and UK economy, with the spin-off of endangering jobs and therefore less tax to the Treasury. But it also says that relying on imported energy instead of domestic North Sea supplies can increase the carbon footprint by up to four times, because it has to be transported. Oil workers pay quite a bit of tax too and certain specialists will have simply moved away to other oil producing areas and pay tax there instead. In the midst of this, artists including Paloma Faith, Lola Young and The Cure's Robert Smith have urged the Prime Minister to reject future drilling at Rosebank in the North Sea. In a letter addressed to Sir Keir Starmer, the musicians argued that further development of the oil field north west of Shetland would undermine the UK's climate commitments and the sustainability of the cultural sector. The letter urges the Government to follow the science and states, 'any new application to exploit Rosebank's reserves must be refused'. Sadly, give the form of previous administrations, ministers will probably put more weight on the opinions of singers rather than their own advisors and the industry. Everyone knows the world must wean itself off fossil fuels and great strides gave already been made but it's not an overnight quick fix. We still have to get it from somewhere - so why not here? Once these jobs have gone, they've gone and there is nothing just or orderly about it.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Fix visa problems to allow Gaza students to study in Scotland
The Sunday Mail reports that Shaymaa, 32, who is using her first name due to safety concerns, is one of 10 Palestinians in Gaza who have been accepted onto fully-funded courses in Scotland. There are understood to be 78 Palestinians who have been accepted onto University courses in the UK. But, due to the only biometric processing centre in Gaza being closed – and all routes out of the country blocked by Israel - there is no way for the students to be allowed to complete the visa checks. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' The UK requires visa applicants to provide fingerprints and photographs. The First Minister said he is 'appalled' that students are being prevented from reaching safety in Scotland. Edinburgh University and LibDem MP Christine Jardine have been lobbying the UK Government over the issue but fear time is running out as courses start in just a few weeks. Shaymaa is due to begin her PhD in English literature at Edinburgh University on September 1. She told the Sunday Mail: 'Education is the path to the future. It is one of the few remaining pathways to survival and dignity for Palestinians right now. 'The UK has an opportunity to offer practical, life-saving solutions to students like me. 'I urge him to implement an emergency route for students and researchers from Gaza, including biometric deferral and safe passage, so we are not excluded from opportunities we have rightfully earned.' Swinney said: 'I am appalled at the situation Shaymaa and other students from Gaza are facing. We must see urgent action from the UK Government to support them in taking up their university places in Scotland. 'The people of Gaza are already suffering unimaginably at the hands of the Israeli government – the idea that these students could also be denied the chance to take up the university places in Scotland they have worked so hard to attain is not acceptable to me.' The First Minister said Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth had contacted UK officials over the issue on August 13, and added that France, Ireland and Italy had managed to successfully evacuate students from Gaza. Gilruth has not yet received a reply, it is understood. 'The UK Government cannot simply duck its responsibilities here,' he added. 'Where there is a political will, a resolution can be found – and failure to act is literally putting these people's lives at risk. READ MORE: Alex Salmond's niece speaks out after Nicola Sturgeon memoir attacks 'I am clear that the international community must put a stop to Israel's killing in Gaza and that we must see the immediate recognition of a sovereign, independent Palestine. But until that point, the UK Government must do everything it can to ensure ordinary Gazans are not punished further.' Swinney said that the UK should do 'everything in its power' to get the students to safety. Earlier this month, 80 MPs signed an open letter to the Prime Minister urging him to take action to help the 78 students. SNP MP Pete Wishart, LibDem Wendy Chamberlain and Brian Leishman were among those who signed the letter. Shaymaa, originally from Absan al-Kabira, in the south of Gaza, was forced to flee her home when Israeli strikes started and has been displaced multiple times in the past 18 months. She is now living in a tent on a beach in al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, with 11 others. 'Coming to Scotland wouldn't just allow me to continue my academic journey– which has been severely disrupted – but would also give me the chance to live and study in physical safety,' she said. "It's not just about personal safety either. It would be a chance to reclaim a sense of direction, to write and think and teach without fearing for my life every second. It would allow me to begin healing and to carry the stories of Gaza into spaces where they urgently need to be heard.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are aware of these students and are actively considering how we can best support.'
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock calls for Keir Starmer to scrap two-child benefit limit - and suggests 'Robin Hood' wealth tax to fund it
Labour must scrap the two-child cap on benefits to lift children out of poverty, former party leader Neil Kinnock has said as he called for a 'Robin Hood' wealth tax. Lord Kinnock claimed rising levels of poverty 'would make Charles Dickens furious' and claimed the Tories had undone hard work that was begun by Gordon Brown. The 83-year-old, who led Labour in opposition from 1983 to 1992, is the latest senior party figure to urge the current Government to end the two-child limit on benefits. The two-child benefit limit was brought in by the Conservatives in 2017 and restricts child tax credit and universal credit (UC) to the first two children in most households. But organisations working in the sector argue that an estimated 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty immediately at a cost of £2billion if it was scrapped. Speaking to the Sunday Mirror, Lord Kinnock acknowledged the Government may not be able to scrap the two-child cap 'all at once'. He added: 'But I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids fewer are in poverty.' Lord Kinnock suggested such a move could be funded by a wealth tax on the 'top 1 per cent', saying: 'I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that.' He claimed that over the decade and a half the Conservatives were in power, child poverty gradually rose. The Labour peer told the newspaper: 'In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. 'It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help.' The two-child limit has been long-criticised by Labour backbenchers as a driver of child poverty. Former Labour prime minister Mr Brown recently said ending the two-child limit, as well as the benefit cap, would be among the most effective ways of reducing child poverty. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has left the door open to a rise in gambling taxes after Mr Brown urged her to raise levies to cover the cost of lifting the two-child cap. The Institute for Public Policy Research believes reforms to gambling levies could generate the £3.2billion needed to scrap the two-child limit and benefit cap. The think tank's research said axing the policies could lift half a million children out of poverty and 'reverse years of rising hardship for low-income families'. Ministers are expected to set out plans to tackle child poverty this autumn, and campaign groups have said it must contain a commitment to abandon the two-child limit. Economists have warned tax rises in the autumn are likely needed to plug a hole in the public finances left by poor economic figures and U-turns on welfare, prompting speculation about which areas Ms Reeves might target. There were more than 1.6million children living in households in England, Wales and Scotland affected by the two-child benefit limit in April, according to figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions last month. Work and pensions minister Alison McGovern told the Commons on July 15 that the Child Poverty Task Force will look at 'all the levers across incomes, costs, debt and local support that we can pull to prevent poverty, including social security reform'. But she added at the time that the Government will not commit to lifting the two-child benefit cap until it is clear how it will be paid for. The Government's child poverty strategy had been due to be published in spring, but was subsequently delayed until autumn to align with the Budget. The Daily Mail has contacted the Department for Work and Pensions for comment.
