City of Cape Town secures interim interdict to combat construction extortion in Philippi
Image: File
The City of Cape Town has welcomed the decision by the Western Cape High Court to reinstate an interim interdict against extortionists and others who, it claims, are hell-bent on derailing its MyCiTi construction project along Govan Mbeki Road in Philippi.
The interdict is effective until April 21, 2026, when the matter will be argued before the court. Any person threatening officials and contractors at the site or attempting to disrupt or delay the work will be arrested.
The City obtained an interim order against the extortionists on June 3, 2025, after City officials and the contractor's staff received death threats and were verbally intimidated.
Mayoral committee member for urban mobility, Councillor Rob Quintas, said the order was reinstituted after the respondents, among which were the Philippi Business Forum and Crossroads Business Forum, failed to present their answering affidavits to the Western Cape High Court on why the order should not be made permanent.
'I welcome this decision, and am relieved that the officials and contractor can continue their work at this site. The City will not give in to attempts by any individual or group to extort business and work opportunities, or to hijack our projects. There are lawful and transparent processes available to local businesses and residents from the affected wards to apply for the available opportunities that form part of this construction project,' Quintas said.
He said those involved in the intimidation, death threats, and other disruptive tactics are well aware of the processes as they have been briefed at numerous public information days and during other engagements.
'There is only one way to benefit from the available opportunities at any City project – and that is by following the legal and transparent route. This route ensures equal access to all. We will not deviate from it. I have only one message to these business forums and other individuals who are known to us: We will not tolerate criminality and extortion, neither will we bend over backwards to accommodate those who do,' Quintas said.
He said over the past weeks, self-proclaimed 'activists' within and other affiliated entities have engaged in intimidation, threats, and blatant misinformation campaigns in their efforts to dictate how and to whom employment opportunities are awarded.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'Their actions hold serious consequences and pose real threats to public safety and the delivery of essential services,' Quintas said.
'For clarity: All opportunities are allocated according to a rigorous and transparent process, which ensures equal access for all qualifying businesses and job seekers in the project footprint. Attempts to bypass or distort this process are not only unfair to others in the community, but also unlawful,' Quintas reiterated.
He also reminded the broader community that: The interdict does not prevent anyone from participating in the project. It only stops those who are trying to hijack it through threats, violence and sabotage
The City continues to encourage all eligible businesses to submit their profiles via the clearly marked boxes at the Subcouncil Offices.
Those who choose to follow the process fairly will find the City ready and willing to support their participation.
'I call on the public and the media to remain vigilant against misinformation and disinformation. False claims designed to stoke division and derail progress do not serve the interests of the communities who will benefit from the roll-out of the MyCiTi bus service to these areas. Residents are encouraged to contact the City for more information about how to participate and get regular updates on the project,' Quintas said.
robin.francke@iol.co.za
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
StopEACOP Campaign wants Total Energies out of Africa
StopEACOP Campaign not only wants Total Energies out of South Africa, but wants it to pay for the damages and harm it has caused. Speaking in Rosebank on August 19 was StopEACOP Campaign coordinator, Zaki Mamdoo, who said the protest aimed to elevate the voices of communities across the continent and that the lived realities of communities who grappled with displacement due to Total Energies. Read more: Watch: Protest action in Melrose Arch 'The demonstrations are part of the 'kick Total Energies out of Africa campaign' due to legitimate concerns and extreme frustration over the devastation and hyper-exploitation, and the distraction caused by Total in its various extractive fossil fuel ventures on the continent. This includes the East African pipeline, which is a major 1443km pipeline stretching from the Great Lakes of Uganda to Tanzania.' Mamdoo added that to make way for the pipeline, more than 100 000 people have been displaced and pushed off their land. In a public statement released by a climate change NGO, the Green Connection, on August 13, it explained that the Western Cape High Court halted Total Energies' drilling project. 'In a major victory for small-scale fishers and coastal communities, the Western Cape High Court has overturned the government's approval of Total Energies' Block 5/6/7 offshore drilling plans. The court ruled that the environmental impact assessment (EIA) was deeply flawed, failing to address key risks, legal requirements, and public participation,' said the statement. Total Energies acknowledged the Western Cape High Court's halting of its project. 'Total Energies E&P South Africa acknowledges the decision of the High Court of South Africa to set aside the Environmental Authorisation granted in April 2023 for further exploration in offshore Block 5/6/7 and to remit the matter to the decision-maker for reconsideration following requested additions. Although the company announced its exit from this block in July 2024, it remained fully committed to respecting the judicial process to its term and to engaging continuously with all its stakeholders. ' Total Energies added that from the outset of the exploration project, the Block 5/6/7 joint venture complied with all required local regulations, in particular environmental and social. Total Energies E&P South Africa, along with its joint venture partners, is in the process of legally assessing the judgment in more detail and deciding on the course of action. Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration!
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
TotalEnergies contemplates next move after offshore drilling setback
The Western Cape High Court has overturned the government's approval of TotalEnergies' Block 5/6/7 offshore drilling plans. Image: File TotalEnergies E&P South Africa and its partners are contemplating their next move having been dealt a huge blow when the Western Cape High Court recently halted their offshore oil exploration plans. The court set aside the government's decision to grant environmental authorisation for offshore drilling in Block 5/6/7, along the South-West Coast to TotalEnergies EP South Africa. The court has sent the matter back to the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) for a fresh decision. Total intends to transfer the environmental authorisation to Shell. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by environmental rights organisations, The Green Connection and Natural Justice, arguing that Total's Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report failed to properly assess the socio-economic impact of the proposed project because it did not assess the socio-economic impact which a well blowout and consequent oil spill may cause on the fishing industry and small scale fishers, among others. Judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood ruled that Total must be afforded the opportunity to submit new or amended assessments, as the case may be, to cure the deficiencies identified in the first to fifth grounds of review of the judgment. She also said that public participation must be conducted in regard to the new and/or amended assessments submitted by Total, before the government decided on the matter. TotalEnergies E&P South Africa said along with its joint venture partners, they are the process to 'legally assess the judgement in more detail and decide on the course of action'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'TotalEnergies E&P South Africa acknowledges the decision of the High Court of South Africa to set aside the Environmental Authorisation granted in April 2023 for further exploration in offshore Block 5/6/7 and to remit the matter to the decision-maker for reconsideration following requested additions. Although the Company announced its exit from this block in July 2024, it remained fully committed to respecting the judicial process to its term and to engaging continuously with all its stakeholders. From the outset of the exploration project, Block 5/6/7 joint venture complied with all required local regulations, in particular environmental and social,' Total Energies said. Reacting to the court outcome, the the African Energy Chamber (AEC) said the ruling was a setback for the country's energy security. 'South Africans deserve energy security, economic opportunity and industrial growth. Oil and gas exploration, development and production offer the promise of achieving these goals. Standing in the way of responsible oil and gas development does not protect our future, it jeopardises it. We must work together to responsibly harness our resources, end energy poverty and give our people the chance to prosper. 'In opposing vital projects such as those led by TotalEnergies and Shell, groups such as The Green Connection and Natural Justice continue to demonstrate their commitment to disrupting development in Africa,' said AEC executive chairperson, NJ Ayuk. Environmental groups welcomed the court outcome as a landmark victory. Natural Justice defending rights programme manager, Melissa Groenink-Groves said: 'This judgment is a victory in the growing opposition to oil and gas exploration in our country. Recently, a number of oil and gas projects have been given Environmental Authorisation, but this judgment again confirms that companies must follow due process, undertake comprehensive assessments and provide communities with an opportunity to have their voices heard, in respect of all relevant information.'
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
High Court denies bail for fisherman accused of violently attacking wife on anniversary
The Western Cape High Court found the accused wife abuser would endanger the life of the complainant, and it was not in the interests of justice to have him released. Image: IOL A man who allegedly violently attacked his wife on their ninth wedding anniversary, and faces possible life imprisonment, will remain behind bars after his second bail attempt was denied by the Western Cape High Court. The 37-year-old father of four was a fisherman in Mossel Bay up until his incarceration in May last year and faces a charge of attempted murder. He sought to appeal against his bail application, which was heard and denied in the Mossel Bay Magistrate's Court. The lower court found that the man would endanger the life of the complainant, and it was not in the interests of justice to have him released. According to court documents, on May 18 last year, the couple celebrated their anniversary when the man accused his wife of infidelity and began beating her with his fists. This was then followed by him telling his wife to undress, and after she fell to the ground, he proceeded to hit her multiple times with a hammer all over her body. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The attack resulted in her arm being broken. The woman sought help from neighbours, and her husband was then arrested and charged a few days later. During his second bail hearing, the man, adamant that he could only afford R300 bail, denied the charges against him and claimed that he caught his wife in bed with another person. The man is expected to go on trial on November 7. Court documents read: 'The State led evidence that the appellant had assaulted the complainant, including by striking her with a hammer so hard that her arm was broken. The medical evidence suggested that the injuries were life-threatening, and photographs put up by the State revealed severe harm to the complainant's face and body. 'Not only this, but evidence was led to show that he had previously assaulted the complainant, and that the complainant had been raped by the appellant's brother in the presence of the appellant and thereafter he had asked the complainant to withdraw charges against his brother. The State also adduced evidence that the complainant is very afraid of the appellant.'
