'It all starts here': Olympic champion 4x100m relay team begins journey to world championships
From left to right, Canada's Andre De Grasse, Brendon Rodney, Aaron Brown and Jerome Blake celebrate after winning the men's 4x100m relay world title at Hayward Field in Eugene, Ore., in July of 2022. The same men will look to book a spot at the 2025 world championships when they compete at the World Athletics Relays this weekend. (File/AFP via Getty Images - image credit)
Last year's Paris Olympics provided some incredible moments for Canadian track, arguably none more thrilling than the gold-medal victory in the men's 4x100-metre relay final.
This weekend, that team of Andre De Grasse, Aaron Brown, Brendon Rodney, and Jerome Blake is back where their journey to Olympic gold began, the World Athletics Relays, and are eager to once again use the event as a launching pad.
This year's meet in Guangzhou, China, provides a direct pathway to the big event on this season's competition calendar: the World Athletics Championships in Tokyo in September.
Relay teams can qualify a spot at worlds by reaching their respective finals in Guangzhou.
"It's super important. It all starts here in World Relays in China," De Grasse said. "The main objective for us [is to] make sure that we qualify … so that we are at the world championships when it matters."
Watch all the action from World Athletics Relays beginning on Saturday at 7 a.m. ET on CBCSports.ca and CBC Gem. Click here for the full broadcast schedule.
After the highs reached by Canadian track athletes in Paris, there wasn't much time for them to catch their breath before the build toward the world championships. Canadian head coach Glenroy Gilbert says this weekend's competition is the perfect place for his athletes to zero in on the season ahead.
"You're always driving towards the benchmark event," Gilbert said. "We're just coming off an Olympic year, so athletes' focus or drive [and] determination wanes a little bit because of the whole Olympic high."
WATCH | De Grasse on expectations for the relay team:
Canada will be looking to qualify men's and women's teams in both the 4x100m and 4x400m events. Canadians will also run in the mixed 4x400m and 4x100m competitions, with the latter event making its debut at this World Relays.
"We're always trying to qualify as many relays as we can for the world championships," Gilbert said. "So right now we obviously want to give the athletes a positive experience, [and] a positive experience will come by way of them performing well enough at least to qualify the spot.
"The big focus will be in Tokyo later in the summer."
Zoe Sherar, Alyssa Marsh, and Kyra Constantine – three members of the Canadian women's 4x400m team that won bronze at the 2024 World Relays – will be among those back in action in Guangzhou.
WATCH | The Canadian men's 4x100m relay team wins gold in Paris:
So, too, will the World Relays silver medallists in the men's 4x100 – De Grasse, Brown, Rodney, and Blake. Guangzhou will be the second meet of the season for the team after they won the Florida Relays in early April.
De Grasse, Brown and Rodney have teamed together since 2016, with Blake joining the mix in time to help capture Olympic silver in Tokyo in 2021. A year later, they combined to win the world title in Eugene, Ore., before striking gold at Paris 2024.
Kyra Constantine, left, and Zoe Sherar, are shown in this June 2024 file photo. The two were part of the bronze-medal winning women's 4x400m relay team at World Athletics Relays in the Bahamas in 2024. Both women are on the roster for Canada at this weekend's edition in Guangzhou, China. (File/The Canadian Press)
Canada's 'secret weapon'
Gilbert knows what it takes to have sustained success in the relay. The 56-year-old was part of Canada's Olympic gold-medal winning 4x100 team in 1996, as well as two world title wins. He believes the current Canadian team has developed a chemistry and familiarity that's "massive" to relay success.
"The more you run together, the more flawless you become, especially if everybody's engaged and everybody feels an accountability for their role in their part of that relay," Gilbert said.
"We had the same situation 30 years ago with my team, but the same thing with these guys is being able to focus and stay with what they need to do, recognizing that they all have to be ready and they take that part of it very serious. The relay means a lot to them."
De Grasse agrees, but he credits part of his team's success to Gilbert, who De Grasse calls their "secret weapon."
"To have a guy like Glenroy in our corner, it's really special," De Grasse said. "You know, you don't get that opportunity a lot, to be able to have someone that's done it before and knows what it takes and give us that mentorship and that leadership that he provides."
From left to right, Andre De Grasse, Brendon Rodney, Jerome Blake, and Aaron Brown, are shown celebrating after winning gold at the Paris Olympics last August. ()
Becoming Olympic champions might lead some teams to rest on their laurels, and take their foot off the gas pedal, but Gilbert says De Grasse and his teammates have turned the page on 2024.
"It's a new race. It's a new day. It's an opportunity for them to go up against the rest of the world," Gilbert said. "The focus is to qualify the spot. Fine tune, and sharpen the sword's edge for the world championships – because that's what really matters."
De Grasse agrees – and believes that he and his teammates' experience can be a positive without living in the past.
"We have a world championship under our belt already. So we kind of know what it takes to be at our best. And if all four guys are running well individually, when we put that team together, it's going to be unstoppable."
Important rookie reps
While qualification for worlds is the main mission for Team Canada in Guangzhou, there is another goal that won't be found on a giant placard that says 'QUALIFIED,' or on any results page. At least, not anytime soon.
The World Athletics Relays represent important reps on the world stage for Canada's next generation of sprinters.
"I explained this to the younger guys – it is one thing to be fast, and that's the prerequisite of having a good relay. You need to be fast, but the other part of it is being able to compete on the world stage, which takes time and experience," Gilbert said.
"It's not just a foregone conclusion that you get in there and all of a sudden you're hitting it out of the park like the other guys. It takes time and that's what the camps and the exposure to a meet like this is all about."
Canada's Malachi Murray is shiwn in this 2022 file photo from the Birmingham Commonwealth Games. Murray is part of a new crop of sprinting talent that will compe at the World Athletics Relays this weekend in China. (File/Getty Images)
The Canadian roster is an intentional mix of returning veterans and fresh faces, part of the plan to help develop the next crop of sprinters, like Duan Asemota, Eliezer Adjibi, and Malachi Murray.
"The three of these guys have been pretty solid, kind of been a staple … coming up behind where the [current 4x100m] guys are now," Gilbert said. "I think [they're] the big three that you'd probably have to look out for."
The development of the next generation of relay sprinters is also a big deal for De Grasse, too.
"I know a lot of the younger guys are coming up and they want a chance to prove themselves and get on the team as well. So I look forward to welcoming the new guys that are coming to [the] relays, [and] getting to know them," he said.
"[It's] a chance for them to have their opportunity, and [I'm] just trying to coach them and mentor them so that when the four of us are done, or maybe they can take one of our spots, that they're ready for the challenge."
Full Canadian roster at World Athletics Relays
Athlete
Event(s)
Hometown
Aaron Brown
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Toronto
Andre De Grasse
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Markham, Ont.
Brendon Rodney
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Etobicoke, Ont.
Duan Asemota
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Ajax, Ont.
Eliezer Adjibi
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Ottawa
Jerome Blake
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Kelowna, B.C.
Malachi Murray
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Edmonton
Norris Spike
Men's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Brampton, Ont.
Audrey Leduc
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Laval, Que.
Catherine Leger
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Montreal
Donna Ntambue
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Montreal
Gabrielle Cole
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Ajax, Ont.
Jacqueline Madogo
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Guelph, Ont.
Marie-Éloïse Leclair
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Candiac, Que.
Sade McCreath
Women's 4x100m, Mixed 4x100m
Ajax, Ont.
Austin Cole
Mixed 4x400m
Sherwood Park, Alta.
Christopher Morales Williams
Mixed 4x400m
Maple, Ont.
Nathan George
Mixed 4x400m
Vancouver
Alyssa Marsh
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Whitby, Ont.
Dianna Proctor
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Edmonton
Jasneet Nijjar
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Surrey, B.C.
Kyra Constantine
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Brampton, Ont.
Lauren Gale
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Ottawa
Madeline Price
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Toronto
Micha Powell
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Montreal
Zoe Sherar
Women's 4x400m, Mixed 4x400m
Toronto
Ramone English*
Men's 4x100m
Edmonton
*Reserve
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
28 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
11 Mind-Blowing Facts About Sex Testing In Athletics
Hormone testing has long been a source of controversy in sports. Female athletes are tested for hormonal and genetic 'defects' to ensure athletes do not have an 'unfair advantage' over one another. Not only is it misogynistic; it is also unfair. Athletes like Caster Semenya, Imane Khelif, and many more have been subjected to humiliating tests—all in the public eye—that supposedly determine their sex. The practice has been criticized time and again, as they are considered unscientific, unethical, exclusionary, and, of course, deeply intrusive. After being back in the news again last week, I decided to do a deep dive into why these tests exist in the first place, and what their impact has been. I found 11 facts that might make you cock your head to the side and go, "why?!" In 1946, the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) officially began a 'femininity check' to rule out foul play in sports events. According to this 'femininity check', athletes were required to produce certificates that proved they were eligible to participate. This was done because there were a handful of cases of ace female athletes that were accused of being male (spoiler alert: they weren't male.) Dora Ratjen, a 1936 Olympic Gold winner, was incorrectly outed as a man, Heinrich Ratjen. But he later claimed that he was forced to compete as a woman by the Nazis in order to win more medals for Germany. Thanks to the burgeoning Cold War, rumors around countries sending men in place of women to win medals for their countries were rampant—which is why Ratjen's story gained prominence, years later. But documents released after Ratjen's death in 2008 showed that he was not a man— his gender was 'uncertain', which reduced his claim to mere conspiracy. Ratjen's gender was mixed from birth, and his parents had raised him as a girl. The first gender 'frauds' in international sport were identified as a British shot putter, and a Czechoslovakian runner. Two popular cases came up during this discourse: that of Mark Weston, and Zdenek Koubek. Koubek had previously set a world record in the women's 800-meter dash before declaring that he was to transition into a man. The first 'scientific' sex tests, called 'nude parades', were introduced in 1966, where a panel of female doctors would examine the athletes' genitals and secondary sex characteristics. Several athletes of the time have talked about how intrusive and humiliating these tests used to be. The worst part? Any female athlete who refused to undergo the test was automatically out of the competition. These tests lasted two years, till the IAAF decided to go for less intrusive methods of testing one's gender (spoiler alert: that also didn't work.) From the late 1960s to the 1990s, female athletes were tested on the basis of genetics—and given femininity certificates. Any woman who competed in any sport in the Olympics had to carry this certificate—which looked like a card, that confirmed their 'gender'. A Spanish hurdler, Maria José Martínez Patiño, was the first athlete to formally protest the chromosome test, which was adopted after the sex tests of the 60s. Known as the Barr Body test, it was administered to check if the athlete had male or female chromosomes. When Martínez Patiño's test came back abnormal, she was asked to was only after a detailed investigation that they found androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), where she was genetically male (XY), but physiologically female. Her body couldn't use the testosterone, leaving her with lower levels than most women. She fought against the disqualification, and was eventually reinstated with all her titles intact. Princess Anne was excused from the gender test at the 1976 Montreal Olympics. In 1992, the IAAF removed all forms of gender verification in favor of doping tests. Doping tests analyse the presence of certain drugs in the athlete's urine, blood, sweat, or saliva, that are deemed as performance enhancers. A failed sex verification test sent Santhi Soundarajan, the first Indian athlete to undergo a sex verification test, on the verge of suicide—showcasing the devastating effect of these tests on female athletes. The talented middle-distance runner was stripped off her medal in 2006. after her failed verification test. After this news became public, she faced immense scrutiny and public humiliation, to the point where she attempted suicide. In 2016, however, she was diagnosed with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), a condition much like Maria José Martínez Patiño's. In a landmark ruling, Indian sprinter Dutee Chand's case against the IAAF showed how flawed these hormone tests truly were. When sprinter Dutee Chand was expelled from international competitions thanks to a failed sex test, she reached out to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to fight. She challenged the IAAF's rules around elevated testosterone levels, which they believed gave female athletes an added advantage. The CAS eventually ruled in her favor, saying there was no sufficient evidence that high testosterone improved athletic performance, and Dutee was allowed to participate again. And finally: despite the supposed concerns about 'fairness' in sport, no case of males impersonating females has been identified.
New York Times
37 minutes ago
- New York Times
NHL Draft Confidential 2025: What insiders think of Matthew Schaefer, goalies and more
Today, we bring you our annual NHL Draft Confidential. You know where people like me stand on the players and the draft, but today we turn to the NHL, and the people who will ultimately decide where these players land, for their thoughts on the big questions facing this draft class. Numerous NHL evaluators were surveyed for this article. As a note, 'Scout 1' in a given question does not refer to the same Scout 1 in another question. Scouts and executives were granted anonymity in order to speak freely about the prospects in question. The most interesting debate in this year's draft, as it is with most drafts, is what happens at the very top. Most expect Erie defenseman Matthew Schaefer to be the first pick. Then there's a big group of forwards after him. Who will be the first forward taken? How close is the grouping? Does anyone have a forward ahead of Schaefer? We asked the NHL. Scout 1: 'Misa would be our top forward followed by (James) Hagens but there's a sizable gap from Schaefer to those guys.' Scout 2: 'We have Schaefer, then a gap. (Anton) Frondell is No. 2 for us. He's a potential (Aleksander) Barkov/(Anze) Kopitar type of forward.' Scout 3: '(Michael) Misa should be No. 1, even ahead of Schaefer. I don't understand why he's not getting as much hype as previous top OHL guys, when he's been just as good, if not better, than some of the top Ontario kids in recent years. He could be an NHL superstar.' Advertisement Executive 1: 'Schaefer is the best player in the draft. It's not close, quite frankly. After that, Misa is the top forward, but it's close. He has the best chance to be a No. 1 center, all-around player who scores a lot.' Scout 4: 'Schaefer is the top player by a good margin, then it would either be Frondell or Hagens. Misa I think is getting overrated — his compete level is average and he's not as dynamic as some portray.' Scout 5: 'Martone is the best forward in this draft, and I think in the playoffs he will show he has as much value as Schaefer. He's a competitor who plays a style that will translate to success when the chips are down.' Scout 6: 'Misa and Schaefer would be neck and neck for me. I would lean Misa. Misa has the potential to be a star No. 1 center, and that's the harder player to find compared to a No. 1 D, even if both are very valuable. (Caleb) Desnoyers would be third, then. He's a great all-around center, a guy you win with.' Executive 2: 'Schaefer, then a gap to Misa, then a gap to the rest. (Roger) McQueen would have been in the group with Misa if he was healthy.' Executive 3: 'Schaefer and Misa are clearly ahead of the rest of the pack. Then it would be some order of Hagens, (Jake) O'Brien and Martone. Desnoyers and Frondell are nice players, but we worry about their offensive upside.' Executive 4: 'Schaefer and Misa distinguished themselves from the pack. Then it's Desnoyers and Frondell in a group with Martone on the edge of that group. I expect that combination of players will make up the first five picks.' Scout 7: 'It goes Schaefer, then O'Brien, and then Frondell. O'Brien is so talented, has a lot of upside, and a lot of physical development left to go.' Scout 8: 'Schaefer is in a group by himself, then I would have Desnoyers, Hagens, Martone and Misa all closely bunched together. My lean would be towards Desnoyers as the best of that bunch. He's a winner who does a lot of things very well.' Advertisement Scout 9: 'Schaefer is the top player. Misa could get close, he is extremely talented, although he is inconsistent and has some bad habits. The top forward is between Misa and Desnoyers, but you have to take Misa after the year he had.' Executive 5: 'After Schaefer/Misa, Brady Martin is right in the mix with that next group, may even be at the top. He looks very similar to what Sam Bennett has become.' Scout 10: 'Schaefer and Misa are the clear top two players. After that I would have Desnoyers, Frondell, O'Brien and Martin in a close group together.' Scout 11: 'Schaefer is the best player in the draft, then I would have Desnoyers at 2. He does so much well, he could be a player you build around.' Executive 6: 'Schaefer is the clear No. 1. Then it would be a group of Misa, Desnoyers, Frondell and Martin for me. It's funny because I think Hagens could potentially outscore all of those forwards by the end of their careers, but you're trying to build a team that wins playoff rounds, and those guys bring different elements.' Schaefer is by leaps and bounds the top defense prospect in this draft. No other defenseman is expected to go in the top five. But the second defenseman to be picked will be interesting, and we expect another one will go in the top 10. So we asked people in the league for their second-ranked defender. Executive 1: 'Kashawn Aitcheson is an apex predator. He knocks a guy out with a hit, and then he knocks out the guy who comes calling for the fight afterwards. There's nobody in a top four in the NHL who plays like him. If you want his attributes, it's normally in a No. 6 or 7, but he is a top-four defenseman, a better version of Radko Gudas.' Scout 1: 'Mrtka will give you the least headaches of the top candidates. He's poised, makes good plays at both ends, just a very good all-around defenseman. Aitcheson's and Smith's hockey sense are concerning.' Advertisement Scout 2: 'Mrtka is clearly the top guy. He transformed Seattle when he got there.' Executive 2: 'Smith. He's a better skater than Aitcheson or Mrtka. He has the most skill of all of them. His decisions aren't the best, but he has the most pro potential.' Executive 3: 'Smith. He's big and such a good skater, competes, has offense. There's no miss factor with him.' Scout 3: 'Mrtka is going to play 1,000 games and just eat up minutes. You wished he played a bit harder, but he has successful pro written all over him.' NHL teams will at least somewhat follow public discourse. So I asked people around the league who are some top prospects for this draft that they feel the public is overrating. Scout 1: 'Victor Eklund. He's a small winger without elite offense, those types tend to fall. He's top 10 on almost every list, but I can almost guarantee that won't happen on draft day.' Scout 2: 'Lynden Lakovic. His compete is an issue, doesn't get to the middle and lack of physical engagement, and his hockey sense is ordinary. He's more of a late first-rounder than a top-15 pick.' Scout 3: 'Cullen Potter is a one-dimensional offensive guy. His skating is elite, but his compete is average and he doesn't make many plays.' Scout 4: 'Cameron Schmidt. The lists that have him as a first-rounder are way off. He's talented, but he has a lot of issues in his game. He's probably going in the third round.' Scout 5: 'Schmidt. He's not special enough of a scorer for where people have him rated. He's skilled and can shoot, but he slowed down a lot in the second half, and his hockey sense is questionable. I'm not even sure I would draft him.' Executive 1: 'Ivan Ryabkin. We wouldn't even draft him. His compete and habits are pretty bad, and he's not a great skater for his size.' Scout 6: 'Radim Mrtka. He's not that smart or competitive. I get he's big and skates well, but he's nothing special other than that. More of a teens pick than a top-10 type.' Advertisement Scout 7: 'Kashawn Aitcheson has major questions for us in terms of his hockey sense and decisions. You love how hard he plays, but he's not that big either. He's good but nothing special.' Executive 2: 'People need to slow down on the Brady Martin hype because he had a good U18s. He's super likable because he hits a lot of guys and has skill, but he's not a smart player and probably a middle-six wing in the NHL.' Executive 3: 'Desnoyers and Frondell are both being oversold a bit. They're good players who compete but don't have high-end hockey sense. They are second-line centers at best in the NHL. I would much rather bet on guys like Hagens, Martone or O'Brien.' On the other side of the coin, who does the league feel is not getting enough love? Scout 1: 'Cameron Reid. He's an elite skating defenseman with good enough skill and sense. He's not a big points guy in the NHL, but he can be successful in the NHL.' Scout 2: 'Caleb Desnoyers. See him listed often as a 6-10 guy, would say he's a lot closer to top five. He's a well-rounded center with very good puck play and size — he will go in the first few picks.' Scout 3: 'Cole McKinney. Don't see him talked about a lot. He was very good the last few months of the season, helped turn that NTDP team around.' Executive 1: 'Blake Fiddler has a lot more of an identity than some of the other top-ranked defensemen. He's not flashy, but he's hard and can skate and has enough skill. I bet NHL coaches will love him even if he's not a big points type.' Scout 4: 'People are underrating how high (Justin) Carbonneau in Blainville will go. He does a lot of things NHL teams will love and will translate to the playoffs. He's a handful to contain, he hits guys, skates well and has legit offense.' Scout 5: 'Jack Nesbitt had a bad U18s, but before that, I thought he had a chance to be a top 10-12 pick. I bet he still goes top 20. He's a big, heavy center with a lot of skill who did a lot of important things for that Windsor team.' One of the more fascinating prospects in this year's draft is Mason West. He is a 6-foot-6 center who played high school hockey in Minnesota. He's a projected late first/high second-round pick by NHL teams. However, he also has offers to play college football as a quarterback. Scout 1: 'He's a fantastic athlete. Go look up highlights of the way he can throw a football. He's just so talented. If he commits to hockey and can iron out some details, he has a lot of NHL potential. He's a first-round talent if he's a hockey player.' Executive 1: 'We're just not in love with the hockey player. He's tall and fast, but he plays on the outside a lot, and he's not overly physical. He's at best a second-round talent who you're now not sure if he's playing hockey or not. He's telling everyone he intends to play football in the fall, then go to the USHL.' Advertisement Scout 2: 'He didn't have a great overall season, but the way he ended it was very convincing between his high school playoffs and in the USHL. He looks like an NHL player.' Executive 2: 'It seems he's trending towards being a hockey player. He doesn't have QB offers from major schools. But that could change. My biggest concern is you use a high pick on him and then Minnesota offers him a scholarship to be their QB, and then I think he would go that way.' Executive 3: 'It doesn't seem like he's a premier quarterback recruit. His combine interview will be critical. If he switches positions in football, he could be a higher-tier recruit. What sport is he truly invested in?' We are near the end of the survey by quickly hitting on the goalie crop. Almost everybody agrees Joshua Ravensbergen is the top goaltender this year. We asked where teams would be comfortable taking him, and who would be their next name. Executive 1: 'Ravensbergen is a late one/high two type of goalie. The two Russian goalies, Semyon Frolov and Pyotr Andreyanov, look so good on video. If we felt comfortable taking Russians, we would have them as second-round picks.' Executive 2: 'We don't love Ravensbergen like some others. He's a maybe first-rounder for us. The London guy, Alexei Medvedev, would be our next guy. He's very athletic. I wouldn't say he's truly elite at anything but very good at everything.' Scout 1: 'Ravensbergen is a late first type of goalie. He's so big and athletic. Then there's a drop to Frolov, then a drop to everyone else.' Executive 3: 'Ravensbergen is a mid-first. We think he has starting goalie potential. Then it's Frolov, who I love. If we got live views I could see us talk him into a first-rounder. He has a ton of talent and structure in his game.' Executive 4: 'I'm a little hesitant on the Ravensbergen hype. He had a lot of tough stretches this season. We don't have any goalie rated in the first, but the closest would be one of the Russian goalies, and we would lean towards Frolov.' Finally, we end on a flash poll, where I ask evaluators who are the best prospects in the class at various traits. • Matthew Schaefer (Unanimous vote) • James Hagens (Unanimous vote) • Jake O'Brien (Majority votes) • Matthew Schaefer (Multiple votes) • Brady Martin (Majority votes) • Kashawn Aitcheson (Multiple votes) Best shot • Anton Frondell (Majority votes) • Kashawn Aitcheson • Victor Eklund • Cameron Schmidt (Illustration: Kelsea Petersen / The Athletic; photos of Radim Mrtka, Matthew Schaefer, Joshua Ravensbergen: Michael Miller / Getty, Leila Devlin / Getty)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
24 Hours in 24 Minutes: Ferrari Conquers Le Mans 2024
Danila Klimovich Plays Overtime Hero As The Abbotsford Canucks Take A 5–4 2OT Victory Against The Texas Stars In Game 4 The Abbotsford Canucks are one win away from facing the Charlotte Checkers in the 2025 Calder Cup Finals. In Game 4, after multiple lead changes, Abbotsford took a 5–4 2OT win against the Texas Stars. Tristen Nielsen had two goals, while Linus Karlsson, Victor Mancini, and Danila Klimovich also found the back of the net. Artūrs Šilovs stopped 27 of the 31 shots Texas threw at him.
