
Claire's on edge of collapse with 281 stores at risk as fashion retailer to file for administration
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
CLAIRE'S has confirmed it will file for administration putting 281 stores at risk.
The jewellery and accessories chain has said it wants to appoint administrators to secure the future of the brand.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Claire's UK has confirmed it has appointed administrators
Credit: EPA
The retailer said that stores will continue to stay open and trade as normal and no jobs will be lost.
The firm plans to use the administration process as a way to continue trading in the UK. Its website is also currently operational.
Consultancy firm Interpath are expected to be drafted in in the coming days to oversee the administration.
Chris Cramer, chief executive officer, said: "This decision, while difficult, is part of our broader effort to protect the long-term value of Claire's across all markets.
"In the UK, taking this step will allow us to continue to trade the business while we explore the best possible path forward.
"We are deeply grateful to our employees, partners and our customers during this challenging period."
It comes after the US parent business of Claire's filed for bankruptcy in the US for a second time, earlier this month.
The ear-piercing favourite also declared itself bust in 2018 due to unpaid loans.
Claire's operates 2,750 stores across 17 countries, but reports suggested the UK arm was unlikely to find a buyer.
Potential buyers, like Hilco Capital, have pulled out of making offers recently after realising how serious the chain's problems are, a senior insolvency expert said.
Earlier this week, it was reported Claire's staff had been told to not let bailiffs enter stores to take anything, following the collapse of the US parent business.
Claire's UK arm has struggled financially, racking up £25million in losses over the past three years.
In the year to March 2024, it reported a £4.7million loss, slightly better than the £5million loss the previous year, with turnover slipping to £137million.
The company blames inflation, rising costs, and supply chain issues for its struggles.
It has also been hit hard by US tariffs on Chinese imports, as much of its low-cost merchandise comes from China.
Retail experts have said Claire's is struggling to stay relevant in a competitive market.
Budget-conscious shoppers are now turning to online platforms for affordable jewellery and accessories, and increasingly away from physical high street branches.
Julie Palmer, partner at Begbies Traynor, said: "Claire's low-price offering is clearly not strong enough to win over its core customers – teens and young adults – as they now have access to a vast array of affordable and convenient products online through platforms like Amazon and Temu.
"So, with fewer reasons for its customers to visit their stores, the retailer has struggled to stay relevant."
RETAIL SECTOR STRUGGLES
The retail sector has struggled since the onset of online shopping and the coronavirus pandemic.
Higher inflation since 2022 has also hit shoppers' budgets while businesses have struggled with higher wage, tax and energy costs.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
As thousands more teenagers scramble for university places, I have to ask – why?
A Chinese economist once asked me to explain British universities. 'Why do you take your young,' he said, 'at their most creative age, lock them in a monastery for three years and make them drunk?' Each August I recall this question when hundreds of thousands of British teenagers scramble to enter university. They must perform utterly archaic feats of memory in their exams and then embark on an academic experience that has almost nothing to do with real life. Their reward may be a higher income, but perhaps not higher than their innate ability would have gained them anyway. England's present university system is in a terrible mess, chronically in need of a royal commission. Between 1997 and 2010, university student numbers increased by 68%. Then, under the coalition government, universities were offered £9,000 a year for each of an unlimited number of students. It was an open invitation to lower standards and increase overcrowding. Some cities found themselves with two if not three universities, with multiple campuses, student residences and overheads to match. The waste was ludicrous. Their vice-chancellors received crazy sums. The average for the Russell group is now £400,000. The government supposedly recouped the cost of all this by treating fees and maintenance grants as borrowed. This allowed university extravagance to appear not as public spending but as debt, on the thesis that the students would repay it with interest one day. Until recently no more than a quarter of graduates were expected to fully repay their loans – small wonder, as they averaged £50,000 a head. The accumulated student debt is enormous. It has reached more than £250bn and is said to be heading for £500bn by the late 2040s. Quite why higher education should be so privileged as not to count as current spending has never been clear. As with HS2, the Treasury likes to treat certain sorts of posh spending as 'investment' rather than hard cash. The reliance on fees from overseas students – now covering nearly a quarter of university income – caused the present crisis. As this income has fallen, in part through recent immigration and visa changes, 40% of England's universities are set to be in financial deficit. Jobs and courses are being cut back. Meanwhile, every bit of news out of the university sector seems grim. Employers are disregarding not just classes of degree, but degrees at all. It is 10 years since the large accountancy firm EY started disregarding A-levels and degree classes in recruitment, while PwC said it would rely on aptitude and behaviour tests. I know of no job that ever depends on a class of degree. The Office for National Statistics records that more than a quarter of graduates in England are now in medium- or low-skilled jobs. Another survey shows the graduate 'premium' is plummeting. This is not just a British issue. Across the US and the EU, graduate unemployment is almost on a par with non-graduate. Students seem miserable. The two-thirds who leave home to go to college report soaring mental illness, with 90% suffering from loneliness. The Boston Consulting Group last year found ex-students the fastest group of young people going straight into long-term sickness. The solution is glaring: cut back. The thesis that university courses requirea minimum of three years, each with barely six months of teaching, is absurd. For most courses, two years should be enough, as the former universities minister, Jo Johnson, has proposed. The number of institutions claiming fully-fledged university status should be slashed. The practice of almost every city hosting two universities – or 40 in London – should end in a mass of mergers. There should be a return to vocational colleges, with an emphasis on contact with local employment. This was proposed by James Dyson in setting up just such a college in Wiltshire, the Dyson Institute, in 2017. Another, the New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering in Herefordshire, was started by the Tory MP Jesse Norman. It is simply absurd that a large number of graduates should be doing work supposedly not requiring a degree, and yet the welfare state is chronically short of trained medical and care staff. This is a serious failure of education planning. Higher education should be free at the point of use; not, as now, free only to those whose parents can pay their fees upfront. But those completing a university course should repay the privilege with a modestly higher rate of tax throughout their working life. Loans should cover only maintenance. Of course university is not just a preparation for work, even if for 18-year-olds that is the primary issue at hand. A university is more than a start in life. It is also an experience of liberal education that goes far beyond the young who are its current beneficiaries. A true university should promote breadth of thought and freedom of speech to old as well as young. It should not turn in on itself as its resources shrink. It should make its courses and work accessible to people beyond its walls and across the community. Universities are costing us dear. We should not feel they are wasted on the young. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist

Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Three Claire's stores in North Wales at risk of closing
Claire's revealed on Wednesday (August 13) that it had filed a Notice of Intention to Appoint Administrators ("NOI"). Interpath later confirmed Will Wright and Chris Pole had been appointed joint administrators. The administrators are set to seek a potential rescue deal for the chain, which has seen sales tumble in the face of recent weak consumer demand. This all comes after the US-based Claire's group filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in a court in Delaware last week. It is the second time the group has declared bankruptcy, after first filing for the process in 2018. Chief executive of Claire's, Chris Cramer, said: 'This decision, while difficult, is part of our broader effort to protect the long-term value of Claire's across all markets. 'In the UK, taking this step will allow us to continue to trade the business while we explore the best possible path forward. "We are deeply grateful to our employees, partners and our customers during this challenging period.' Claire's currently has 306 stores across the UK and Ireland - 278 in the UK and 28 in Ireland, while it has more than 2,150 employees. All these stores and jobs are now at risk, following Wednesday's administration update. There are three Claire's stores in South Wales that are at risk of closing: Claire's has revealed that for now, all its UK and Ireland stores will remain open and staff will stay in their current positions. Interpath said Mr Wright and Mr Pole will be contacting all of Claire's employees in the UK and Ireland to 'provide further information about what the administration means for them'. RECOMMENDED READING: The major high street brand stores closing in September from Poundland to M&S Full list of every Hobbycraft store closing down - See if your local is shutting Santander closing Flintshire branch within hours - how you'll be affected Mr Wright, UK chief executive at Interpath, said: 'Claire's has long been a popular brand across the UK, known not only for its trend-led accessories but also as the go-to destination for ear piercing. 'Over the coming weeks, we will endeavour to continue to operate all stores as a going concern for as long as we can, while we assess options for the company. 'This includes exploring the possibility of a sale which would secure a future for this well-loved brand.'


Economist
6 hours ago
- Economist
China claims to want women to have children and a career
WHEN MS WANG returned to work at a Chinese internet giant after having a baby, her boss pulled her aside. She told her she'd be less invested in her work because the country's breastfeeding policy would allow her to leave one hour earlier. 'I'll be a normal colleague, not a breastfeeding mother,' she replied, staying past 10pm regularly like the rest. Based in Beijing, she was entitled legally to 158 days of maternity leave. But she received the worst performance rating in her team last year because others had to cover her work while she was away. She was fired in April.