logo
61-day annual marine fishing ban to come into effect from June 1

61-day annual marine fishing ban to come into effect from June 1

The Hindu20-05-2025

Considering the declining marine fish stocks, a 61-day annual marine fishing ban will take effect in the coastal belt from June 1 to July 31.
Accordingly, mechanised boats and traditional boats fitted with inboard or outboard engines of 10 HP and above are banned from fishing activities. However, fishing boats fitted with engines of up to 10 HP will be allowed to fish during the period.
The Joint Director of Fisheries said in a release on Tuesday that fishermen who flout the government order will not receive a diesel subsidy for a year and will be subject to penal provisions under the Karnataka Marine Fishing (Regulation) Act, 1986.
The main objective of banning deep-sea fishing is to protect fish wealth, as commercially important species breed during this period. It is also used to prevent juvenile fishing and excessive fishing.
Meanwhile, stressing the need to extend the two-month ban on fishing during the fish breeding season to three months (till August), D. Siddaiah, Joint Director, Department of Fisheries, Dakshina Kannada, told a meeting in Mangaluru recently that there should be uniformity in the ban across the West coast. All States on the West Coast should arrive at a consensus to impose the three-month ban (from June to August). Extending the ban for one more month will help in boosting fish production, he said.
The Joint Director said that the marine fish catch in Dakshina Kannada dropped by 28.04 % in the last financial year. The catch came down to 1.72 lakh tonnes in 2024-25 from 2.39 lakh tonnes during 2023-24, he told the meeting presided over by Dinesh Gundu Rao, the Minister in charge of Dakshina Kannada.
Stakeholders in the fisheries sector attribute the fall in catch to various factors, including the rise in temperature, illegal fishing using lights, over (excessive) fishing, and bull trawling.
According to the State Department of Fisheries, total fish production in Karnataka fell to 9.75 lakh tonnes in 2023-24 from 12.24 lakh tonnes in 2022-23. Marine fish production also dropped to 5.42 lakh tonnes from 7.30 lakh tonnes during the same period.
Meanwhile, a report 'Rapid Assessment of Blue Economy Potential in Karnataka' prepared by the College of Fisheries, Mangaluru in 2021, when A. Senthil Vel was the dean of the college, said the marine fisheries sector witnessed acute unsustainability, unrestrained increase in fishing vessels and rampant use of destructive fishing methods in the past decade. In addition, the report said that unwavering demand from the fish meal industry has also led to a decline in commercially important fish stocks and adverse impacts on the livelihoods of fishermen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Punjab cabinet approves amendment to Shops Act
Punjab cabinet approves amendment to Shops Act

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Punjab cabinet approves amendment to Shops Act

The Punjab cabinet on Wednesday approved an amendment to the Punjab Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958, aimed at reducing compliance burdens on 95% small businesses and enhancing the ease of doing business in the state. The decision was taken at a meeting of the council of ministers, chaired by Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann here. It was the third cabinet meeting held in a row. A spokesperson from the Chief Minister's Office disclosed that under this progressive amendment, all establishments employing up to 20 workers will be exempted from all provisions of the Act. 'This move will benefit lakhs of shopkeepers across Punjab. However, such establishments will still be required to submit relevant information to the labour department within six months of the Act coming into force or the commencement of their business,' informed the CM after the meeting. He was flanked by labour minister Tarunpreet Singh Sond. The labour minister said shops, offices, stores, godowns, warehouses, banks, entertainment centres, workshops, car mechanics etc are covered under the amendment. 'To enhance employee earnings, the permissible overtime in a quarter has been increased from 50 hours to 144 hours. Additionally, the daily spread-over period of work has been extended from 10 hours to 12 hours, inclusive of rest intervals,' informed the CM while talking to the media. Nevertheless, employees must be paid overtime at double the regular rate for work exceeding 9 hours per day or 48 hours per week, he said. The registration process has also been streamlined and the establishments with 20 or more employees will now receive deemed approval for registration within 24 hours of application submission. Under the amendment, establishments employing up to 20 workers are only required to provide basic information and are not obligated to register. Moreover, penalties under the different sections of the act have been rationalized — raising the minimum fine from ₹25 to ₹1,000 and the maximum from ₹100 to ₹30,000. To prevent harassment and allow businesses time to achieve compliance, a three-month grace period will be provided between the first and second offences, as well as subsequent ones. A new Section 26-A has also been introduced to allow for the compounding of offences, thereby decriminalising the Act and eliminating the need for shopkeepers to attend court. When asked about the amendment being anti-workers, Mann said as per the amendments they can work up to 12 hours and beyond nine hours of daily work schedule, they will be paid double remuneration. 'Where would employees complain? If they go to the labour court, they can lodge a complaint with the inspectors. For the protection of their rights we have increased the penalty,' said the CM. 'In case of any violation, which also includes low payment, we have set in place a system of redressal of grievances at assistant labour commissioner (ALC) level,' he added.

Waqf Board rift reaches CMO over implementation of amended Act
Waqf Board rift reaches CMO over implementation of amended Act

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Waqf Board rift reaches CMO over implementation of amended Act

1 2 3 Hyderabad: An internal disagreement between Telangana Waqf Board chairman Syed Azmatullah Husseni and chief executive officer Mohammed Asadullah over the convening of a board meeting escalated to the chief minister's office on Wednesday. The chairman has expressed concerns over the CEO's interpretation and attempted implementation of the amended Waqf Act, claiming that most states—particularly those not governed by the BJP—have yet to act upon it. He alleged that the CEO's move to enforce the new provisions in Telangana was unilateral and against the spirit of consensus within the board. The rift intensified when the chairman formally directed the CEO to convene a board meeting. In response, the CEO sought clarification from the state government on the legal standing of the board under the revised Waqf Act. The state govt subsequently advised the CEO not to proceed with the meeting until legal guidance is obtained from the advocate general. Speaking to TOI, Husseni questioned the CEO's eligibility under the new law, pointing out that the revised Act stipulates the CEO must be of joint secretary rank or above, whereas Asadullah is a deputy secretary–level officer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "As per the law, he should step aside until a suitable appointment is made," Husseni said. He also confirmed raising the issue with the CMO and pointed to the Centre's affidavit in the Supreme Court, which clarified that existing boards need not be dissolved immediately, nor should the Waqf-by-user clause be enforced rigidly at this stage. In response, Asadullah maintained that, as the statutory convener of the Waqf Board, he acted in accordance with protocol. He said that the amended Act had received Presidential assent and was thus in force, and that his letter to the govt merely sought procedural clarity. "The state govt advised me to await legal opinion before calling the meeting," he said. On the question of eligibility under the revised Act, Asadullah acknowledged the requirement for a joint secretary–level officer to serve as CEO and stated that he would comply with any direction issued by the govt on the matter. The state govt is expected to review the issue once Tafseer Iqbal, special secretary of the minorities welfare department, returns from leave on June 16.

Delhi riots conspiracy case to be heard afresh after Judge's transfer
Delhi riots conspiracy case to be heard afresh after Judge's transfer

India Today

time3 hours ago

  • India Today

Delhi riots conspiracy case to be heard afresh after Judge's transfer

The Delhi riots larger conspiracy case will be heard afresh after a recent judicial transfers resulting in the transfer of the judge who had been hearing the matter. The case will be heard again on June 6, 2025. The case, registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), will now be taken up for hearing by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Lalit Kumar of the Karkardooma Previously, the case was being heard by ASJ Sameer Bajpai, who had continued proceedings after the transfer of ASJ Amitabh Rawat, the original judge overseeing the trial. ASJ Rawat had presided over the hearings in the matter before being transferred. His successor, ASJ Bajpai, carried on hearing the arguments starting last to court proceedings held on June 2, the prosecution had already completed its submissions, and five of the accused had also concluded their arguments on the point of charge. Since the Judge has been transferred, the prosecution, the accused people and their counsel sought some time to consult with each other regarding the timeframe to address the the Special Public Prosecutors (SPPs) and defence counsel were directed to furnish their schedule regarding the timeframe and the manner in which they would address the arguments, particularly the time to be taken by parties have also been asked by the court to provide each other with the schedule of the arguments. Must Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store