Garda staff body doubts damaging allegations about roads policing will be substantiated
An Garda Síochána
has questioned the accuracy of
claims made about the performance of roads policing gardaí
.
The
Garda Representative Association
(GRA) accused Garda Commissioner
Drew Harris
and the Policing and Community Safety Authority (PCSA) of 'drip-feeding' damaging allegations to the media about gardaí which it doubted would ever be substantiated.
The GRA, which represents more than 11,000 rank and file members in the 14,300-strong force, attacked Mr Harris's management style, claiming it has 'dramatically impacted on the morale and motivation' of all gardaí.
It accused Mr Harris,
who is due to retire in less than a month
, of being 'disrespectful' to gardaí, abdicating his responsibilities as commissioner, valuing the input of consultants more than Garda supervisors and lacking confidence in his own managers.
READ MORE
The Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors
(AGSI), which represents Garda middle management, said it was 'deeply concerned' at the conclusions reached about the standard of roads policing in the new report by Crowe consultants.
It said it remained 'resolutely committed' to its 'core mission of keeping people safe' and improving policing performance.
However, AGSI added that it was 'disappointed' at the manner in which elements of the Crowe report emerged in the public domain at a public meeting of the PCSA.
It pointed out it had not yet been provided with the report, reflecting a 'broader dysfunctionality' around consultation in the Garda force.
[
Garda roads policing numbers hit historic low
Opens in new window
]
Outgoing Garda Commissioner Drew Harris spoke to the media ahead of his retirement and last meeting at the PCSA on Thursday. Photograph: Sam Boal/ Collins Photos
AGSI, which has enjoyed better relations with Mr Harris than the GRA, addressed the core findings of the Crowe report, expressing its concern and saying it had confidence that improvements could be made to roads policing performance.
However, the GRA referenced the report's damning findings about roads policing only in the context of doubting them.
GRA general secretary Ronan Slevin said by commissioning consultants to review roads policing, Mr Harris was guilty of 'inaction' and using a management style that sabotaged morale.
He also questioned claims made by Mr Harris and Ms Byrne at Thursday's PCSA meeting about the contents of the Crowe report.
'The initial feedback from our members who interacted with Crowe is at odds with the drip fed comments from the (PCSA) and the commissioner,' he said.
He added that gardaí 'now anxiously await' the Crowe report's publication 'and question whether any findings will substantiate the damaging allegations made against our members'.
AGSI said the report appeared to be 'highly critical' of how the Garda 'under Commissioner Harris' leadership, has overseen and supported' personnel in roads policing.
However, it recognised that such reports could become 'valuable tools' and believed progress would be made once the report was published and fully understood.
Crowe, a consultancy firm, was commissioned by Garda headquarters to carry an independent review of roads policing. That occurred after anonymous correspondence, apparently from a Garda member, was sent to Garda management expressing concern about roads policing.
The report would be published once it was checked to ensure nobody referenced could be identified, the commissioner said. Photograph: Artur Widak/ NurPhoto via Getty Images
PCSA chair Elaine Byrne said Mr Harris had 'acted on' the whistleblower claims by commissioning the Crowe report.
She said that action 'very much reflects a cultural change' in the Garda where 'uncomfortable truths' had been 'confronted' rather than hidden. She hoped that approach would continue after Mr Harris retired next month.
Ms Byrne said the Crowe report was 'shocking' because 'there are members in roads policing who seem very much disinterested in their job'.
Some gardaí displayed a 'blatant disregard' for their jobs and were 'openly hostile' about doing their work, she said. The report, she added, also showed some Garda managers were too fearful to intervene when they identified poor performance, which was very concerning.
Mr Harris also said he was 'shocked' by the report, describing it as 'sobering to say the least'. He said some gardaí were 'brazen' about their disinterest in their jobs, even while their work was being reviewed by examiners who travelled with them in Garda cars.
The report would be published once it was checked to ensure nobody referenced could be identified, the commissioner added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Couple fails to stop demolition of Co Meath home built in ‘wilful' breach of planning laws almost 20 years ago
A couple have lost a last ditch legal bid at preventing the demolition of their large Co Meath home built in 'wilful breach' of planning laws almost 20 years ago. There was 'no merit' to the appeals by Chris Murray and his wife Rose, Mr Justice Senan Allen said, when giving the three judge Court of Appeal 's judgment dismissing them. The appeals concerned an action that, while initiated in September 2022, was 'the latest battle' in a 20-year war about the fate of the unauthorised development at Faughan Hill, Bohermeen, Navan . It was, he believed, obvious to Meath County Council from the outset that the action and appeal were 'artifices calculated to postpone the evil day'. READ MORE After Mr Murray's 2006 application for permission to build a house on the lands was refused, the couple, 'undaunted, and in wilful breach of the planning laws', built a house anyway of about 588 sq m (6,220 sq ft), twice the size of the house for which permission was refused, the judge said. The council took proceedings in 2007 under the Planning Act and in 2017 the Supreme Court upheld High Court orders for the couple to remove any unauthorised development from their land. They were given one year to vacate the property. When that was not complied with, the council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it. The council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it Three days before they were to vacate, the Murrays issued a case against the council, claiming there was new evidence relating to land sterilisation agreements made by the previous owners of the land that invalidated the council's planning refusals. Last year the High Court granted a council application to strike out that case as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process. In the Court of Appeal judgment on Tuesday, Mr Justice Allen said the couple built a 6,220 sq ft house without planning permission, 'well knew' they would need permission 'but hoped they would get away with it'. The Murrays claimed, as a result of actions, inactions and misrepresentations by the council, they had acquired a 'pig in a poke' title to the lands, he said. While a planning condition for a nearby residence stated an agreement sterilising (preventing) the lands from any other housing or non-agricultural development should be entered into – and the council relied on that in refusing permission to the Murrays – it was accepted no sterilisation agreement was ever entered. There was 'no justification' for contending the council misrepresented the case to the court, he said. The Murrays had not appealed the original permission refusal to An Bord Pleanála or sought to judicially review it, he said. They had had 'every opportunity' to make whatever case they thought they had; the courts had considered all they had to say but the Supreme Court had, in 2017, decided the house 'had to come down'. While they argued in this appeal that adequate account was not taken of their new evidence, there was no appeal against the High Court conclusion it would not have affected the original outcome. At the heart of their opposition to the council's enforcement procedures was a grievance with the refusal of their original planning application but, as a matter of law, that grievance was 'not justiciable'. Any infirmity in the original refusal could not conceivably have provided any justification for unauthorised construction of a house, still less one twice the size, he said. It was 'perverse' that the Murrays, having 'driven a coach and four' through the planning Act, were complaining the council failed 'to strictly comply with the prescribed procedures'. A 'so-called constitutional challenge' concerning the council's use of section 160 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 in its proceedings was unrelated to the new evidence, he said. The couple's fresh permission retention applications were not relevant to whether their proceedings raised a fair issue to be tried, he held. The couple had not identified any error in the decision under appeal, the court concluded.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Early morning shift with Dublin's street cleaners
Nikita Hand speaks to the media at the High Court after Conor McGregor loses his appeal over the verdict in the civil rape case. Video: Stephen Conneely
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keir Starmer promises ‘no more gimmicks' as migrant-returns deal with France kicks in
Britain has promised to begin detaining 'within days' asylum seekers who arrive there illegally on small boats, under a returns deal with France that was ratified this week. The 'one in, one out' deal was agreed last month, but only finalised in recent days. It stipulates that Britain can send a small number of small boat arrivals back to France. However, it must also accept an equal number of migrants sent by the French in the other direction, such as family members of migrants already living in the UK. Yvette Cooper, Britain's home secretary, suggested the first detainees could be sent back to France 'within weeks'. Britain's Labour government has insisted the returns deal with France will act as a deterrent to illegal immigrants. Ms Cooper declined, however, to give an exact timeline on when the first returns would take place, while Britain's home office also would not confirm how many migrants would be sent back to France under the scheme, which will operate on a pilot basis for the next 12 months. It is believed only about 50 a week will be sent back initially. READ MORE The arrival on small boats of illegal immigrants to English shores – many of whom then go on to claim asylum – has been a significant political issue in Britain since 2018. The previous Tory government devised a scheme to send such immigrants on to Rwanda, but this was scrapped by Labour immediately upon winning the election last July. Since then, however, small boat arrivals have soared, putting significant political pressure on prime minister Keir Starmer 's government. Official statistics show about 25,000 have arrived on small boats so far this year, up almost 50 per cent on 2024. Figures released by the home office in recent days show 1,047 arrived on 15 boats on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week alone. Balmy weather in Britain since May has contributed to the rise, due to calmer sea conditions that facilitate more crossings. Britain's government this week announced a further £100 million (€115 million) would be spent on border security, including funding for up to 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle the issue. 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve,' said Mr Starmer. The wider topic of illegal immigration and asylum seekers continues to raise tensions in Britain, a year after an outbreak of race-fuelled riots across England. There were several demonstrations over the weekend in London, Manchester and Newcastle outside hotels that provide accommodation to asylum seekers. Meanwhile, hard-right activists who have demonstrated against immigration continue to draw significant media attention in Britain. Prominent activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson , was released on bail on Tuesday after he was arrested on Monday at Luton airport. He had been sought by UK police last week following the alleged assault of another man at St Pancras train station in London. Mr Yaxley-Lennon released a video on Tuesday in which he alleged he had been the one assailed by a man, who was filmed by a passerby lying on the ground at St Pancras, allegedly following an altercation with Mr Yaxley-Lennon. The activist complained to his social media followers that he can no longer walk the streets of Britain alone. He insisted, however, that he had not fled from Britain after the St Pancras incident, as media had reported, but that his trip abroad had been pre-planned.
