Israeli military strikes Yemen ports after ship attack in Red Sea
The Yemeni port city of Hodeidah was struck along with the ports of Ras Isa and Salif and the Ras Al Kathib power station, according to the Houthi-run Al Masirah television station.
The Israeli military said that it 'struck and destroyed terror infrastructure belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime'.
'Among the targets were the ports of Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Salif,' it said.
It was the Israeli army's first attack on Yemen in about a month.
The army also attacked the Galaxy Leader ship docked at Ras Isa port, which was seized by the Houthis in late 2023, it added.
'The Houthi terrorist regime's forces installed a radar system on the ship, and are using it to track vessels in international maritime space, in order to promote the Houthi terrorist regime's activities,' it said.
Shortly after Israel's attacks, two missiles were launched from Yemen towards Israel, the army said on Telegram, adding that it was working to intercept them.
The strikes came about half an hour after an Israeli army spokesman warned on social media of its attacks.
They also came hours after a vessel was attacked in the Red Sea on Sunday by several small boats that opened fire on it including with grenades, according to the UK Maritime Trade Operations.
A fire broke out on the Liberian-flagged vessel Magic Seas and the crew were forced to abandon ship, the UKMTO said on social media. A passing merchant vessel rescued all crew members, while the ship remains abandoned.
No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, but security firm Ambrey said the vessel fit the typical profile of a Houthi target.
Israel has carried out several strikes in Yemen over recent months in response to missile attacks by the Houthis.
The Houthis have been launching missiles and drones at Israel since the Gaza war broke out in October 2023. The Houthis say they are acting in solidarity with the Palestinians.
The group have also attacked shipping vessels they deem to be linked to Israel in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden since November 2023.
They broadened their campaign to target ships tied to the US and Britain after the two countries began military strikes aimed at securing the waterway in January last year.
But in May this year, the Houthis reached a ceasefire with the US that ended weeks of intense American strikes against the group. US President Donald Trump said the rebels had 'capitulated'. Israel was not included in the truce.
The Houthis pledged last month to resume attacks in the region after the US entered the Israel-Iran war with strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. Yemeni security sources told The National in June that the rebels were considering renewed attacks on US targets around the Middle East and increasing attacks on Israel in support of Tehran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian says Israel tried to assassinate him
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian told US conservative broadcaster Tucker Carlson in an interview released on Monday that Israel attempted to assassinate him. While most of the interview was fairly straightforward, with Pezeshkian giving unsurprising responses to the former Fox News commentator's questions, Pezeshkian did say that he was not "afraid of sacrificing" his soul for Iran. "They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed," he told Carlson in response to a question on whether he believed Israel had tried to kill him. Pezeshkian did not specify when the assassination attempt took place, saying only that it was during "a meeting". 'I was in a meeting... they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting," he continued. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'I am not afraid of sacrificing my soul in defence of my country... None of the government officials are afraid of losing their lives in the line of defence. But will… more bloodshed and killing bring peace and tranquillity and stability to the region?' he added. Multiple times throughout the interview, conducted in both English and Farsi, Pezeshkian said that Iran wants peace, not war, and that the Islamic Republic was still willing to engage in talks with the United States. 'We have never been after' a nuclear bomb Pezeshkian said Iran had never sought to build a nuclear bomb. 'The truth is that we have never been after developing a nuclear bomb - not in the past, not presently, or in the future - because this is wrong and is in contrast to the religious decree issued by the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran,' he said. 'It is religiously forbidden for us to go after a nuclear bomb, and this was always corroborated, thanks to our cooperation with IAEA because they were always there to verify this'. When asked by Carlson about how much uranium Iran was enriching, Pezeshkian did not directly answer but said Iran was 'ready to hold talks over it' and have supervision. He reminded Carlson that Iran had been 'sitting at the negotiating table' with the US when Israel 'destroyed' diplomatic negotiations by launching unprovoked attacks on 13 June. No trust Pezeshkian said Iran had "no problem" restarting nuclear talks with the US, but said they had lost trust in the country, given what had happened over the last few weeks. "We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations," he told Carlson. "There is a condition... for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again? How can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks, the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us? 'My proposal is that the US administration should refrain from getting involved in a war that is not America's war. It is Netanyahu's war. He has its own agenda…and that is having forever wars, wars that go on and on and on'. Pezeshkian said that his end goal was peace, and he believed that Iran could 'easily resolve our differences and conflicts with the US through dialogue and talks'. 'We have always been after peace. It is been my heartfelt opinion that we need to live in peace and harmony during this short and limited time granted to us by god almighty to live in peace and tranquility with everybody'. He said that Iran had not waged war on anybody in the last 200 years, but only had wars imposed on it, referring to the recent conflict with Israel and the war with Iraq in the 1980s. Trump could 'guide' Mena Regarding Trump, he said he believed the US president could 'guide' the region and the world to peace and was powerful enough to put Israel in its place, adding that if he did not, another war would only spread more instability in the Middle East, which was not in the interests of the US government. When asked by Carlson if he believed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was passing information to Israel, Pezeshkian said there was a "lack of trust". 'There is lack of trust as a result of the last report by IAEA and the type of the reports. The way they prepared the reports somehow gave an excuse to the Israeli regime to prepare the ground for [the] unlawful and unauthorised attack against our nuclear facilities. Even after that, the IAEA failed to condemn these attacks or try to [in] any way to stop them'. 'There is real fear': How Israel's attack on Iran enabled an assault on press freedoms Read More » Pezeshkian told Carlson that Iran would not draw on military support from allies Russia and China, saying, 'In God we trust. We are capable of defending ourselves and standing on our own two feet'. Carlson acknowledged he would be criticised for interviewing the Iranian president. In a video over the weekend, he defended the move, saying, "American citizens have the constitutional right, and the God-given right, to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them,' including 'hearing from the people they're fighting'. The interview follows the US's military attacks on Iran's nuclear sites at the end of June. President Donald Trump's decision to support Israel's war on Iran sparked widespread criticism, including from his own "Make America Great Again" base, who are opposed to another "forever war" in the Middle East. In recent weeks, Carlson has been an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. In an interview of Senator Ted Cruz that went viral prior to the US first attacking Iran on 13 June, Carlson accused Cruz of not knowing "anything" about the country.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran's Pezeshkian tells Tucker Carlson Israel tried to assassinate him, ready for nuclear talks with US
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told US conservative broadcaster Tucker Carlson in an interview released on Monday that Israel had attempted to assassinate him. While most of the interview was fairly straightforward, with Pezeshkian giving unsurprising responses to the former Fox News commentator's questions, Pezeshkian did say that he was not "afraid of sacrificing" his soul for Iran. "They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed," he told Carlson in response to a question on whether he believed Israel had tried to kill him. Peseshkian did not specify when the assassination attempt took place, saying only that it was during "a meeting". 'I was in a meeting... they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting," he continued. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'I am not afraid of sacrificing my soul in defence of my country... None of the government officials are afraid of losing their lives in the line of defence. But will… more bloodshed and killing bring peace and tranquillity and stability to the region?' he added. Multiple times throughout the interview, conducted in both English and Farsi, Pezeshkian said that Iran wants peace, not war, and that the Islamic Republic was still willing to engage in talks with the United States. 'We have never been after' a nuclear bomb Pezeshkian said Iran had never sought to build a nuclear bomb. 'The truth is that we have never been after developing a nuclear bomb - not in the past, not presently, or in the future - because this is wrong and is in contrast to the religious decree issued by the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran,' he said. 'It is religiously forbidden for us to go after a nuclear bomb, and this was always corroborated, thanks to our cooperation with IAEA because they were always there to verify this'. When asked by Carlson about how much uranium Iran was enriching, Pezeshkian did not directly answer but said Iran was 'ready to hold talks over it' and have supervision. He reminded Carlson that Iran had been 'sitting at the negotiating table' with the US when Israel 'destroyed' diplomatic negotiations by launching unprovoked attacks on 13 June. No trust Pezeshkian said Iran had "no problem" restarting nuclear talks with the US, but said they had lost trust in the country, given what had happened over the last few weeks. "We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations," he told Carlson. "There is a condition... for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again? How can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks, the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us? 'My proposal is that the US administration should refrain from getting involved in a war that is not America's war. It is Netanyahu's war. He has its own agenda…and that is having forever wars, wars that go on and on and on'. Pezeshkian said that his end goal was peace, and he believed that Iran could 'easily resolve our differences and conflicts with the US through dialogue and talks'. 'We have always been after peace. It is been my heartfelt opinion that we need to live in peace and harmony during this short and limited time granted to us by god almighty to live in peace and tranquility with everybody'. He said that Iran had not waged war on anybody in the last 200 years, but only had wars imposed on it, referring to the recent conflict with Israel and the war with Iraq in the 1980s. Trump could 'guide' Mena Regarding Trump, he said he believed the US president could 'guide' the region and the world to peace and was powerful enough to put Israel in its place, adding that if he did not, another war would only spread more instability in the Middle East, which was not in the interests of the US government. When asked by Carlson if he believed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was passing information to Israel, Pezeshkian said there was a "lack of trust". 'There is lack of trust as a result of the last report by IAEA and the type of the reports. The way they prepared the reports somehow gave an excuse to the Israeli regime to prepare the ground for [the] unlawful and unauthorised attack against our nuclear facilities. Even after that, the IAEA failed to condemn these attacks or try to [in] any way to stop them'. 'There is real fear': How Israel's attack on Iran enabled an assault on press freedoms Read More » Pezeshkian told Carlson that Iran would not draw on military support from allies Russia and China, saying, 'In God we trust. We are capable of defending ourselves and standing on our own two feet'. Carlson acknowledged he would be criticised for interviewing the Iranian president. In a video over the weekend, he defended the move, saying, "American citizens have the constitutional right, and the God-given right, to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them,' including 'hearing from the people they're fighting'. The interview follows the US's military attacks on Iran's nuclear sites at the end of June. President Donald Trump's decision to support Israel's war on Iran sparked widespread criticism, including from his own "Make America Great Again" base, who are opposed to another "forever war" in the Middle East. In recent weeks, Carlson has been an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. In an interview of Senator Ted Cruz that went viral prior to the US first attacking Iran on 13 June, Carlson accused Cruz of not knowing "anything" about the country.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Britain once jailed suffragettes. Now it jails Palestine activists
On a quiet Saturday in London, beneath the statue of Gandhi in Parliament Square, police arrested 83-year-old Reverend Sue Parfitt. Her crime? Holding a placard that read: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' She smiled as they took her away - dignified, calm, unafraid. She was one of more than two dozen people arrested that day - many of them women and elderly, most carrying nothing but banners and conscience. Their 'offence' was to stand in solidarity with Palestine Action, the group newly branded a terrorist organisation by the British government, despite never having harmed a single person. Its methods? Spray paint, red dye, road blockades - all part of a non-violent campaign to end Britain's role in arming Israel's destruction of Gaza. The irony is almost unbearable: this proscription was ordered by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and backed overwhelmingly in parliament on the very anniversary of women in Britain winning the right to vote. Most female MPs voted to criminalise Palestine Action - and many of them later smiled for photos celebrating the suffragette legacy of militant resistance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That legacy wasn't meek. The Women's Social and Political Union, led by Emmeline Pankhurst, planted bombs. They disrupted postal services, set fire to public buildings and politicians' homes, smashed windows, handcuffed themselves to railings, attacked Church of England buildings, and vandalised golf courses and male-only clubs. They disrupted political meetings, broke the law, and starved themselves in protest. Silencing dissent Palestine Action has never come close to such tactics. And yet today, it is labelled a terrorist threat. As Baron Peter Hain put it: 'Palestine Action members spraying paint on military aircraft at Brize Norton seems positively moderate by comparison [to the suffragettes' actions].' But while most female MPs today celebrate the suffragettes in words, they vote to criminalise their spirit in action. One of the few exceptions is Baroness Jenny Jones, a Green peer who has been outspoken in her defence of Palestine Action and searing in her condemnation of Britain's complicity. She is everything the suffragette legacy demands: principled, defiant, willing to speak uncomfortable truths in a chamber soaked in political cowardice. She stands with those resisting oppression - not those funding it. UK arrests 83-year-old priest for backing Palestine Action and opposing Gaza genocide Read More » She is the type of female legislator who was in Pankhurst's mind when she spoke at one of her trials: 'We are here, not because we are law-breakers; we are here in our efforts to become law-makers.' And it is no surprise that while the likes of Cooper target campaigners - including women such as Parfitt and the cofounder of Palestine Action, Huda Ammori - Jones calls out the state's duplicity: the criminalisation of protest, the arming of apartheid, the silencing of dissent. As she put it in parliament: 'If you want Palestine Action to disappear, then stop sending arms to Israel and giving military support to a foreign government engaged in ethnic cleansing.' This isn't just hypocrisy. It's a violent moral inversion. At the same protest on Saturday stood a Welsh nurse who only weeks ago was at the Rafah border pleading with Egyptian security forces to let him through into Gaza to facilitate aid delivery. Now back in the UK, he continues to protest - heartbroken, undeterred. This is the face of the movement: ordinary people moved by the extraordinary obscenity of genocide, and by the complicity of their own governments in enabling it. Growing movement Just a week earlier, punk duo Bob Vylan sent shockwaves through Glastonbury by chanting 'Death to the IDF' on stage, referencing the Israeli army. The words were echoed by thousands and broadcast live on the BBC. Palestine was everywhere at the festival - in lyrics, on flags, spoken from the stage. The crowds cheered. The establishment panicked. Prime Minister Keir Starmer rushed to condemn the chant, and even the White House weighed in. What the same western political establishment has failed to condemn, of course, are the crimes giving rise to those chants: the bombs dropped on hospitals, mass starvation, and body parts in rubble. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Two days later, London's high court ruled it lawful for the UK to supply parts for F-35 fighter jets - the very aircraft used to flatten Gaza. The message was unmistakable: chanting against genocide perpetrators is a scandal. Arming a genocidal army is lawful. Yet despite every effort to suffocate the pro-Palestine movement - police vans, proscription orders, media blackouts - it is only growing. A long-suppressed BBC documentary on Palestinian medics, which the broadcaster delayed and ultimately dropped, was finally aired by Channel 4. It showed in harrowing detail the systematic targeting of doctors and hospitals by Israeli forces. As commentator Gary Lineker said: 'The BBC should hang its head in shame.' The people are already ahead of their leaders. And sooner or later, the leaders will follow - whether they want to or not Meanwhile, Haaretz, Israel's own paper of record, published testimonies from Israeli soldiers describing how they were ordered to shoot starving Palestinians gathered for food. Not militants - children, parents, civilians. The body count in Gaza now exceeds 56,000. And Britain is arresting the people trying to stop it. But the tide is turning. Public opinion is not just shifting; it is collapsing around the western establishment. In the UK, net favourability towards Israel is now at -46. Nearly half of Britons believe Israel is committing genocide, while a majority support the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Across Europe, it's the same, with net favourability towards Israel at -44 in Germany, -48 in France, -54 in Denmark, -52 in Italy and -55 in Spain. In the US, the shift is also stark. A Pew poll conducted in March found that 53 percent of Americans now view Israel unfavourably, a rise of more than 10 percentage points from three years ago. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that four in 10 Americans now believe Israel's problems are 'none of our business.' Unstoppable shift The battle to liberate Palestine is no longer being fought solely in Gaza or the occupied West Bank. It is being waged just as critically in the heart of the western world: between an increasingly awakened public and an establishment determined to suppress it. The Israeli project is not a self-contained national affair. It is, at its core, a western colonial enterprise. And the last two years have exposed how deeply its survival depends on the political and military sponsorship of western governments - above all, the United States. This is why the frontline now runs through London, Paris, Berlin and Washington - through parliaments, universities, media outlets and courtrooms. It is a battle for moral authority, a contest between power and truth. And its outcome will shape the fate of Palestine. But history teaches us something else too: that the most transformative struggles - from the abolition of slavery and women's suffrage, to the civil rights movement - were won not because the powerful saw the light, but because the public made them feel the heat. And that public pressure, relentless and sustained, forced open doors long held shut. So it will be with Palestine. The people are already ahead of their leaders. And sooner or later, the leaders will follow - whether they want to or not. Public opinion will, in time, impose its will on those in power. It may take years. It may come slowly. But this shift is already underway, and it is unstoppable. History is watching. And when Palestine is finally free - as it will be - the names remembered won't be those who armed Israel with bombs. It will be the ones they tried to silence. The ones they arrested. The ones who marched. The ones who healed. The ones like Reverend Sue Parfitt, who smiled as they took her away. The ones like Baroness Jenny Jones, who refused to betray what justice means. We will remember who stood on the side of freedom - and who stood in its way. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
