
An Ohio couple welcomes a baby boy from a nearly 31-year-old frozen embryo
In what's known as
embryo adoption
, Lindsey and Tim Pierce used a handful of donated embryos that have been frozen since 1994 in pursuit of having a child after fighting infertility for years. Their son was born Saturday from an embryo that had been in storage for 11,148 days, which the Pierces' doctor says sets a record.
It's a concept that has been around since the 1990s but is gaining traction as some fertility clinics and advocates, often Christian-centered, oppose discarding leftover embryos because of their belief that life begins at or around conception and that all embryos deserve to be treated like children who need a home.
'I felt all along that these three little hopes, these little embryos, deserved to live just like my daughter did,' said Linda Archerd, 62, who donated her embryos to the Pierces.
Just about 2% of births in the U.S. are the result of
in vitro fertilization
, and an even smaller fraction involve donated embryos.
However, medical experts estimate about 1.5 million frozen embryos are currently being stored throughout the country, with many of those in limbo as parents wrestle with what to do with their leftover embryos created in IVF labs.
Further complicating the topic is a 2024
Alabama Supreme Court decision
that said that frozen embryos have the legal status of children. State leaders have since devised a temporary solution shielding clinics from liability stemming from that ruling, though questions linger about remaining embryos.
Archerd says she turned to IVF in 1994. Back then, the ability to freeze, thaw and transfer embryos was making key progress and opening the door for hopeful parents to create more embryos and increase their chances of a successful transfer.
She wound up with four embryos and initially hoped to use them all. But after the birth of her daughter, Archerd and her husband divorced, disrupting her timeline for having more children.
As the years turned into decades, Archerd said she was wracked with guilt about what to do with the embryos as storage fees continued to rise.
Eventually, she found Snowflakes, a division of Nightlight Christian Adoptions, which offers open adoptions to donors from people like Archerd. She was also able to set preferences for what families would adopt her embryos.
'I wanted to be a part of this baby's life,' she said. 'And I wanted to know the adopting parents.'
The process was tricky, requiring Archerd to contact her initial fertility doctor in Oregon and dig through paper records to get the proper documentation for the donation. The embryos then had to be shipped from Oregon to the Pierces' doctor in Tennessee. The clinic, Rejoice Fertility in Knoxville, refuses to discard frozen embryos and has become known for handling embryos stored in outdated and older containers.
Of the three donated embryos the Pierces received from Archerd, one didn't make the thaw. Two were transferred to Lindsey Pierce's womb, but just one successfully implanted.
According to Dr. John David Gordon, the transfer of the nearly 31-year-old embryo marks the longest-frozen embryo to result in a live birth. He would know: Gordon says his clinic assisted in the previous record, when Lydia and Timothy Ridgeway were born from embryos frozen for 30 years, or 10,905 days.
'I think that these stories catch the imagination,' Gordon said. 'But I think they also provide a little bit of a cautionary tale to say: Why are these embryos sitting in storage? You know, why do we have this problem?'
In a statement, Lindsey and Tim Pierce said the clinic's support was just what they needed.
'We didn't go into this thinking about records — we just wanted to have a baby,' Lindsey Pierce said.
For Archerd, the donation process has been an emotional roller coaster. Relief that her embryos finally found a home, sadness it couldn't be with her and a little anxiety about what the future holds next, with possibly meeting the Pierces and the baby in person.
'I'm hoping that they're going to send pictures,' she said, noting that the parents have already sent several after the birth. 'I'd love to meet them some day. That would be a dream come true to meet — meet them and the baby.'
___
This story has corrected the first name of Lindsey Pierce in the second paragraph.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
'World's Oldest Baby' Born From 30-Year-Old Frozen Embryo
An adopted embryo that was frozen for 30 and a half years has given rise to what some claim is the 'oldest baby' in the world. According to an exclusive scoop from MIT Technology Review's Jessica Hamzelou, the newborn baby boy was conceived in the United States in May 1994 to one set of parents and born on 26 July 2025 to another set of parents. For decades, the embryo remained frozen in time, both young and old all at once. Related: The biological mother, Linda Archerd, and her then-husband froze the embryo while undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the 1990s. After having a baby girl, the couple was left with three embryos in the bank. Decades later, Archerd decided it was time to donate them. Lindsey and Tim Pierce are the happy recipients of her generosity. "We didn't go into it thinking we would break any records," Lindsey told Hamzelou at MIT Tech Review. "We just wanted to have a baby." Previously, the longest-frozen embryos to result in the birth of a child were cryopreserved in the US for just over 30 years. The double embryo transfer resulted in twins in 2022. The latest record-breaking adoption was completed by a fertility clinic in Tennessee, run by reproductive endocrinologist John Gordon, who believes every embryo has a chance at life because of his religion. US fertility clinics like his are pushing the limits of IVF technology, even if the frozen embryos they transfer wouldn't be accepted elsewhere in the world. In Australia, for instance, embryos can only be frozen for up to five years, while in the United Kingdom they can be stored for up to 55 years. In the US, however, embryos can be frozen indefinitely. What's more, many go unclaimed, which raises ethical concerns, and which legally means they cannot be donated for reproductive use or research. By some estimates, there are currently as many as 1.5 million embryos frozen in the US. "These are formidable numbers that keep growing every year with currently no clear ethical or legal means to reach a practical solution," computational biochemist Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin wrote in a paper from 2024. In recent years, clinics have been thawing and transferring older and older frozen embryos for 'adoption'. The result is that some of the newborn children have siblings who are decades older than them. The Pierce family's son, for instance, was conceived at around the same time as Archerd's daughter in the 1990s, meaning his sister is around 30 years older than him. The Pierce family adopted the embryo from Archerd through the Snowflakes program, which is run by the Nightlight Christian Adoptions agency. Beth Button, executive director of the program, told Hamzelou at MIT Tech Review that she thinks "over 90 percent of clinics in the US would not have accepted these embryos." IVF technologies have changed a lot over the years, and older embryos are stored in ways that can be trickier to thaw using modern methods. There are also concerns over viability. In 2022, a large retrospective study in China found that prolonged storage time can negatively affect the survival rate of embryos, although it did not seem to have a significant influence on neonatal health. Still, the research is mixed. Other studies have found that the length of cryopreservation does not influence embryo survival after thawing. Most studies on the topic are based on embryos that have been frozen for much less than 30 years. Fertility clinics in the US are putting this life-giving technology to the test. They have not yet found the limit. Related News This Potent Psychedelic Mysteriously Echoes Near-Death Experiences Mysterious 2,500-Year-Old 'Gift to The Gods' Finally Identified 4,000-Year-Old Handprint Discovered on Ancient Egyptian Artifact Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
What is IVF? Trump once called himself 'father of IVF,' but has not released coverage plan
Months after a deadline for policy recommendations to expand access to in vitro fertilization passed, the White House has not released any plans for the fertility treatment. In February, Trump signed an executive order directing policy advisers to make recommendations on how to lower costs for IVF after promising to do so on the campaign trail. The order gave the Domestic Policy Council 90 days to do so, making the deadline May 19, according to CBS News. On Aug. 3, the Washington Post reported that anonymous sources said the White House currently has no plan to provide or require coverage. Trump once called himself the "father of IVF" during the campaign as he pledged to find ways to cover the cost of the treatment, either through government coverage or through a mandate on insurance companies. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for an update on the possible policy plans. More: The White House wants women to have more babies. They're ignoring part of the problem − men What is IVF? IVF is the process of combining a sperm and egg in a laboratory and transferring them to a uterus, commonly used to aid conception for someone with fertility issues. Advocates for the treatment were worried that access to the treatment could come under threat after the Dobbs decision in June 2022. That fear was somewhat realized in February 2024 when the Alabama Supreme Court decided embryos had the legal status of children in a landmark case. The Alabama legislature later passed a bill to protect IVF patients and providers. Why is IVF controversial? Approximately 2% of births in the U.S. each year come from IVF pregnancies, and it can be a life-changing procedure for people experiencing infertility who want to start a family. But the procedure is opposed by some religious groups, many conservative Christians, who argue that life begins the moment an egg is fertilized and that humans should leave procreation to God, not science. When the first IVF baby was born in 1979, a coalition of anti-abortion groups spoke out against the procedure. But that was after the Roe v. Wade decision, so embryos were treated as private property that the respective egg and sperm donors could decide if they wanted to implant, destroy or pass on the embryo without consequence. What has Trump said about IVF in the past? Trump has long supported IVF, but surprised many conservatives on the campaign trail when he promised to require insurance companies or the government to cover costs associated with IVF. 'Under the Trump administration, your government will pay for – or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for – all costs associated with IVF treatment," Trump said at an event in August 2024. 'We want more babies, to put it very nicely.' At a Fox News town hall in October, Trump called himself the "father of IVF," while promising coverage for the procedure, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Upon returning to the White House, Trump issued an executive order in February directing his policy advisers to make recommendations on how to lower the costs of the procedure. The order he signed had no immediate impact on the cost or access of the treatment. 'I've been saying we are going to do what we have to do and I think the women and families, husbands, are very appreciative of it,' Trump said of the order from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Contributing: Jessica Guynn, Bailey Schulz, Adrianna Rodriguez, Liam Adams, John Kennedy, Trevor Hughes, Riley Beggin, USA TODAY NETWORK Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is IVF? Deadline for Trump's coverage plans passed months ago


Cosmopolitan
3 days ago
- Cosmopolitan
60 Years of Covering Reproductive Rights
For decades, Cosmopolitan has provided young people with the information they need to protect their bodies and own their choices when it comes to topics like birth control, sexual health, fertility, and abortion. We were there, reporting and spreading awareness before abortion became legal nationally—and we were there after the Supreme Court recently overturned that fundamental right. Through it all, we've published in-depth guides and deeply personal accounts of how people in this country think about, promote, restrict, and access reproductive freedoms. Below, we take a look back at how our coverage has evolved—and how it's remained the same—over the years. One woman examines the emotional complexities of having an abortion and recounts how challenging it was before the U.S. Supreme Court legalized the procedure via Roe v. Wade. In 1960, the FDA approved the first birth control pill, but years later, people still had plenty of questions. This thorough, four-page guide answered everything from 'How does the pill work?' to 'Could it mask cancer symptoms?' A compassionate male gynecologist offers a simple and timeless truth: 'The only difference between making love and making a pregnancy is a contraceptive.' Before it was even available in the U.S., we educated readers on the then-new copper IUD. A first-person account from a woman who was lured into an anti-abortion 'clinic' where, instead of getting actual health care, she received one-on-one counseling from a series of anti-choice extremists. Their goal? To guilt her out of her decision to have an abortion. A writer's personal story finds a delicate balance between stark honesty about the emotional and psychological aftermath of having an abortion and the urgent insistence that no woman should feel shame for getting one. This deeply reported feature details the rise—and dangers—of the Christian anti-abortion movement. To 'put an end to contraception confusion,' this story meticulously explains every then-current option: how it works and how to get it. As politicians enacted new restrictions on later-term abortions, this 12-page story explained the laws while also detailing how to still access vital resources. Legislators in President Trump's first term went after accessible, affordable birth control. We examined exactly what was at stake in this comprehensive guide. When researchers started testing a male contraceptive gel, Cosmopolitan got special access to the early trials. We sat with participants and revealed how the potentially groundbreaking birth control method for men could change everything. After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, our fervent response included an original survey, deep legal context, the debunking of misinformation, rallying calls from reproductive rights leaders, and current resources. Post-Roe, we kept our efforts up, publishing this compelling look inside a secret fleet of mobile abortion clinics. In a culture where any discussion about reproductive freedoms feels once again urgent, we broke down what might happen to people after quitting hormonal birth control.