Manipur shuts down to mark 2 years of clashes, sees widespread public support
Markets, educational institutions, and private offices remained closed, while public transport stayed off the roads.
On May 3, 2023, ethnic violence broke out between Imphal Valley-based Meiteis and adjoining hills-based Kuki-Zo groups, leaving 260 dead, 1,500 injured, and over 70,000 people displaced. Amid growing tensions, chief minister N Biren Singh resigned in February this year and Manipur was placed under President's Rule. The state assembly, which has a tenure till 2027, has since been put under suspended animation.
On Friday, security was tightened across Manipur after Meitei group Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI) called a shutdown in the valley districts, while the Zomi Students Federation (ZSF) and the Kuki Students Organisation (KSO) declared the same for the hill districts to mark the second anniversary of the violence.
Also Read:Manipur: Meitei, Kuki-Zo communities to mark anniversary of ethnic clashes on May 3
A candlelight march is also scheduled for Saturday evening at Kangla Nongpok Thong to honour those who lost their lives in the conflict.
The call for 'Sintha Leppa' (suspension of normal activities) drew a widespread response from the public on Saturday, with markets remaining shut, public vehicles off the roads, and private offices closed across the state. Schools, colleges and other institutes were also shut.
Security forces have also been deployed at key locations to prevent any unwanted activities, officials said.
In the hill districts of Churachandpur and Kangpokpi, members of the Kuki community are observing 'Day of Separation', demanding a separate territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Starvation is a war crime, but will justice ever be done?
Calls to prosecute the war crime of starvation are becoming louder and more frequent. "[Famine] is a weapon of war being wielded across the globe at the moment. But this has to stop, it's against international humanitarian law," Shayna Lewis, senior adviser on Sudan for the US-based group PAEMA (Preventing and Ending Mass Atrocities) told DW recently. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She was talking about the Sudanese city of El Fasher, which has been under siege for a year now and where food is running out for around 30,000 people trapped there. "It is a crime internationally and it needs to be prosecuted as such," Lewis argued. Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have said similar about Israel's blockade of aid and food into the Gaza Strip. "Israel is starving Gaza. It's genocide. It's a crime against humanity. It's a war crime," Michael Fakhri, the United Nations' special rapporteur on the right to food, told UK newspaper the Guardian last week. Food as a weapon of war Experts say that part of the reason there are now more calls to prosecute starvation of civilians as a war crime, is that there is more famine being caused by conflict. Over the first decade of this century, there was very little famine, researchers at the World Peace Foundation, or WPF, wrote in a 2022 collection of essays, "Accountability for Starvation." But more recently that has changed. "This is an ancient phenomenon, warring parties have been using it for centuries," Rebecca Bakos Blumenthal, a legal adviser with the Starvation Accountability project run by Netherlands-based law foundation, Global Rights Compliance, or GRC, says. After 2015, this kind of tactic has re-emerged, she noted. Over the past decade, there have been conflict-related famines in Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Food security experts suggest Russian attacks on Ukraine's agricultural sector could also be seen as criminal attempts to weaponize food. Basically there's just more of this war crime happening again, they argue. "Even while global food security is improving, the incidence of famines is increasing," Alex de Waal, a professor at Tufts University in the US and head of the WPF's research into mass starvation, wrote last week. "This tells us that the global food security is more volatile and unequal. That's consistent with hunger being used as a weapon." The deliberate withholding of food or other essentials needed for civilians' survival is categorized as a war crime by many nations as well as in various iterations of international law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute (which is applied by the International Criminal Court, or ICC). But so far, those who wield that "weapon" have never been brought to trial: The war crime of starvation has never been prosecuted in an international court on its own, only as a part of around 20 other war crimes cases. And just because civilians are going hungry in a conflict, doesn't mean a crime was committed. "One of the issues in law is the question of intent," de Waal told DW. "The war crime of starvation requires that the perpetrator is acting with intent." Starvation happens over the longer term, de Waal points out, and some legal scholars have argued it must be proven that a perpetrator intended to starve people from the very beginning of, for example, a siege or blockade. But most legal experts believe there could also be "indirect intent," de Waal explains. That is, it's clear that starvation will occur "in the normal course of events," and the perpetrator knows that, they've had opportunities to prevent it, but didn't do so. Another issue for any legal case involving starvation is the lack of precedent, and which international or national courts have jurisdiction over the alleged war criminals. Changing views on starvation as war crime Up until a couple of years ago, starvation was often seen as a developmental or humanitarian issue, GRC's Blumenthal explains. But now there is more attention being paid to its criminal aspects. "I've worked on this issue for quite a few years now and these things do move slowly," concedes Blumenthal, who's been looking at the topic since 2020. "But I do think the needle is moving and there have been some consequential steps taken over the past 10 years." In 2018, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 2417, "condemning the starving of civilians as a method of warfare." In 2019, changes were made to the Rome Statute, making starvation a war crime in non-international armed conflicts too, rather than just international. There have also been UN commissions of inquiry on conflicts in South Sudan and Ethiopia-Tigray specifically focusing on the topic of starvation as a war crime, Blumenthal points out. "We're seeing a lot more international and local organizations, together with accountability mechanisms, calling this out and certain striking examples, like the case of Gaza today, have really amplified awareness around the crime as well," she notes. In fact, the ICC warrants issued against Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024, which specifically mention the war crime of starvation, are a "historic milestone," Blumenthal notes. It's the first time that international warrants have been issued for starvation as a stand-alone crime. The ICC also has an open investigation into Sudan going, she adds. "The issue has undoubtedly gained more attention over the last 10 years," de Waal confirms. "The legal frameworks are all in place. What's lacking is the political will to act." Will perpetrators of starvation ever end up in court? There are still jurisdictional challenges, de Waal told DW. "But I am confident that there are many cases for which conviction is possible. It just requires getting the accused in court." Blumenthal agrees. "There are misconceptions around this and so many people think [starvation] is an inevitable part of war," she says. "But during our in-depth investigations, it's surprising how quickly it becomes clear that actually these patterns are very stark and in many situations, you can discern a deliberate strategy." Blumenthal is cautiously optimistic that one day soon those who deliberately starve civilians will face justice. "That is certainly the hope," she concludes. "That's what we are all working towards."
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Russian Minister Sergei Lavrov's USSR Shirt Was In Focus Amid Putin-Trump Summit
Washington: The sartorial choice of Sergei Lavrov, Russia's top diplomat, during US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin's Alaska meeting on Friday, drew the attention of many across the globe. In what's seen as a not-so-subtle act of trolling, the Russian Foreign Minister was seen wearing a sweatshirt emblazoned with 'CCCP', the Russian initials for the USSR. Seventy-five-year-old Lavrov's attire is being seen as a nod to Kremalin's imperial ambitions, forwarding Putin's long-running narrative: Russians and Ukrainians are 'one people' -- a claim that denies Ukraine's legitimacy and territorial integrity while promoting a broader notion of unity with Russia. On Telegram, Russian fashion bloggers identified the $120 sweatshirt as the work of Chelyabinsk-based brand, Selsovet, that specialises in 'Soviet heritage' clothing. Former Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis was quick to point out Lavrov's clothing choice on X and wrote. ''Just give us half of Ukraine and we promise we will stop,' says negotiator wearing USSR sweatshirt.' "Just give us half of Ukraine and we promise we will stop" says negotiator wearing USSR sweatshirt. — Gabrielius Landsbergis🇱🇹 (@GLandsbergis) August 15, 2025 Belarusian politician Franak Viačorka noted that "Lavrov's 'USSR' sweater in Alaska is a clear nod to the Putin regime's imperial ambitions." Lavrov's 'USSR' sweater in Alaska is a clear nod to the Putin regime's imperial ambitions. They're stuck in the past and want to pull Ukraine and Belarus back with them – forgetting we are free nations that will never return to their 'brotherhood'. Dictators cannot be appeased. — Franak Viačorka (@franakviacorka) August 15, 2025 "They're stuck in the past and want to pull Ukraine and Belarus back with them – forgetting we are free nations that will never return to their 'brotherhood'. Dictators cannot be appeased," he said. The Putin aide, who was once seen as a pragmatic and skilled diplomat, has been seen mirroring the Kremlin's radicalised politics in recent years by adopting an increasingly combative tone and often resorting to trolling and mockery. Like most of Russia's veteran delegation to Alaska, Lavrov had also started his political career in the Soviet Union and had been accused of clinging to a Soviet imperialist mentality by the Russian opposition. The Soviet Union, or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), spanned much of Eurasia between 1922 and 1991, before it dissolved, leading to the independence of countries like Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, apart from Russia and Ukraine.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Japan grapples with its past 80 years after World War II
Representative image (Picture credit: AP) August 15th marks the 80th anniversary of Japan's unconditional surrender and the end of World War II, putting focus once again on reckoning with the country's past. The domestic debate in Japan on shaping narratives about World War II is so tense that it is often referred to as "history wars. " Japan's actions during the war are also a sore spot in international diplomacy. China and both North and South Korea have bitter memories of life under Japanese occupation, and rarely miss an opportunity to remind their neighbour of the past. Inside Japan, what were once far-right fringe voices have grown more prominent in recent years by insisting on a narrative denying or minimising the brutality of Imperial Japan during World War II. Historical revisionist groups want the victims of Imperial Japan's rampage across Asia and the Pacific eight decades ago to leave history in the past. "There are very few people alive today who experienced the war in any of these countries, but I do not think they will ever stop talking about it because it is an effective tool with which to bash Japan," said Hiromichi Moteki, chairman of the Tokyo-based Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, which promotes a narrative of Japan's actions during World War II that denies the atrocities that Japan committed. "They want to claim the moral high ground over Japan, but all we want to do is have the right to remember and honour our war dead and teach our younger generations the history of the nation," he told DW. Historical denialism in Japan Moteki's organisation seeks to spreads its message by translating Japanese nationalist works of historical revisionism into English. An article published in the Georgetown University's Journal of International Affairs exploring historical revisionism in Japan describes Moteki's organisation as part of an "interlocking web of small but vocal lobby groups" that emerged as part of a "denialist movement" in the 1990s. Other groups with similar aims include the "International Research Institute of Controversial Histories" or the "Historical Awareness Research Committee." Moteki's group, for example, claims World War II was not a war of aggression started by Japan but an act of self-defence against the US and European nations that had colonised Asia. It claims Imperial Japan "liberated" the countries it conquered. Similar to other nationalist organisations, the society also falsely insists that euphemistically named "comfort women," most of whom were from Korea, were not abducted and forced into sexual servitude but were in fact well-paid prostitutes. It also contends that Allied prisoners of war were well treated and that labourers from Korea and Taiwan willingly toiled in mines, shipyards or factories during the conflict. Seeking to make Japan a 'victim' of foreign conspiracies At the same time, the group says the US committed war crimes by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The deniers claim that the hundreds of trials carried out by the allies prosecuting Japanese troops for war crimes were merely "victor's justice." "These groups share a distinctive method of historical writing similar to the methods of Holocaust denialism," writes Tessa Morris-Suzuki, professor emerita of Japanese history in the College of Asia and Pacific at Australian National University. "They seize on historical documents that are often relatively obscure and cherry-pick them for information that supports their cause. These fragments of information are then strung together without contextualization into writing that overlooks source reliability, ignores contradictory evidence, and fundamentally misrepresents content," Morris-Suzuki wrote in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. "These issues are embedded in a wider, all-embracing view of twentieth-century Japanese history: one that presents Japan as the victim and attributes negative images of Japan's pre-war and wartime past to international propaganda conspiracies," she continues. The Georgetown report, which was published in 2021, said a "substantial number" of conservative lawmakers "belong to lobby groups which disseminate revisionist views." Historical revisionist lobby groups have also worked with diplomats on propaganda efforts abroad, including opposing monuments to "comfort women" in countries like the US and Germany. Japan's history seen through the eyes of victims Yuji Hosaka is a professor of history and politics at Sejong University in South Korea who has long been critical of Japan's failure to honestly address its past, or to teach younger generations of Japanese the truth about the war-time era. "I see many on the right in Japan who just want to forget about all the bad things that happened when Japan occupied Korea and invaded China and Southeast Asia," he said. "These people often say that Japan brought development and modern technology to help these countries, but that just makes the people of Korea angry." Korean historians largely agree that after annexing the peninsula from 1910, Japan forcefully assimilated the Korean people, forbade them from speaking their own language, suppressed the indigenous culture and exploited the land and its people. The intent was to make Korea a part of the Japanese empire, with thousands of Koreans serving in the Japanese military during the war. Hosaka says that Japanese history school books still gloss over the atrocities carried out by the Japanese military, with often little or no mention of the Nanjing Massacre which killed hundreds of thousands in China, the abuse of civilian labourers and POWs, or other crimes for which Japanese were executed after the war. "Those who forget the past will inevitably find themselves in a similar situation again in the future," he said. "It is imperative that Japan learns from the past." "In the past, Germany and France worked together to create common history books for their children," he added. "I believe that Japan should reach out to Korea and China and do the same thing." An editorial in the July 7 edition of the China Daily newspaper declared, "It's time Japan faced its war crimes and militarist past." For China, the Nanjing Massacre continues to bear weight in the present day. According to Chinese historians, 300,000 civilians and soldiers were killed in a six-week frenzy of murder, torture, rape, arson and looting after the invading Japanese military entered Nanjing, then the capital city of China, on December 13, 1937. The massacre is recognised internationally as well. The Encyclopaedia Britannica writes that the "number of Chinese killed in the massacre has been subject to much debate, with most estimates ranging from 100,000 to more than 300,000. " Those who had ordered the massacre were executed after being found guilty of committing war crimes by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in 1948. Japan should 'stop apologising' Moteki and others on the right say successive Japanese leaders have expressed genuine remorse for what happened nearly a century ago but that other countries always say the apologies are inadequate or are insincere. "It will never change," said Moteki, who was born in 1941. "Japan has to defend itself from these criticisms and verbal attacks. But the time has come for Japan to stop apologising because it is meaningless now." On August 15, the anniversary of the emperor announcing in a radio broadcast that Japan was surrendering, Moteki will go to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine in central Tokyo to pay his respects to war dead. He will be surrounded by thousands more who want to mark the anniversary, including dwindling numbers of old soldiers, the relatives of men who fought, and far-right groups in uniforms. Yasukuni is the last resting place of more than 2.4 million military and civilian victims of war in Japan since 1869. To other nations, however, Yasukuni is a controversial symbol, as it also honours more than 1,000 people convicted of war crimes.
