logo
The rise of 'bait-and-switch pricing'

The rise of 'bait-and-switch pricing'

U-Haul trucks are a fixture of modern American life. They're invisible and ubiquitous at the same time — you don't think about them until you need one, or one's blocking the bike lane, or it's move-in day at the local college. Suddenly, the big white-and-orange vans are impossible to overlook. So is the price tag slapped on the side: "$19.95." In bright green, it's meant to stand out. Except that $19.95 is not what you will actually pay.
Truth in Advertising, a watchdog group focused on sketchy advertising and deceptive marketing, filed formal complaints on Monday with the Federal Trade Commission and nearly two dozen state attorneys general, urging them to put a stop to what they described as U-Haul's"bait-and-switch pricing scheme." While the $19.95 emblazoned on the trucks comes with some fine print — it's for in-town moves, and doesn't include mileage and fees — consumers don't always realize ahead of time just how big those little add-ons may wind up being. Plus, the fine print isn't exactly easy to read on a moving vehicle.
"There's not a consumer on the entire planet who will pay this $19.95 for a U-Haul truck," Laura Smith, TINA.org 's legal director, says. "So the price is false."
The complaint sent to the FTC says the company "advertises a misleadingly low moving truck rental fee and then adds on a multitude of other fees and charges throughout the reservation and rental process."
It's another example of how difficult pricing has become to navigate across the economy. Not only are costs constantly changing, but companies employ tactics such as bait-and-switch pricing and hidden fees to reel people in with one number, only to tack on countless extra charges. By the time a customer gets to the final number they owe, it's nowhere near what they expected. It's not just U-Haul; the switcheroo happens with airlines, hotels, concerts, cable companies, and more. It's so common that many people simply throw up their hands and just accept whatever their impossible-to-decipher receipt says they owe.
"What it really makes it hard to do is to compare the prices of things, and that's really the biggest harm it does to the market," Rebecca Tushnet, a Harvard law professor who studies false advertising law, tells me. "It leads the whole market to become unreliable and unstable, because you can't really effectively fight back."
In reporting this story, I decided to dig up the receipt for my last DIY move where I used a U-Haul, which, thankfully, was back in 2016. Lo and behold, the $19.95 rental rate is listed. So is a bunch of other stuff: $10.32 for the 8 miles I apparently drove, $11 for what looks like insurance, and $1 for an "environmental fee," which U-Haul's website says is "used to support and foster the development and maintenance of sustainable U-Haul business operations," plus taxes. My total wound up being $45.05, more than double the advertised rate for what was, all in all, a short move. At the end, it even lists the total (before taxes) under "Actual Charges."
There's not a consumer on the entire planet who will pay this $19.95 for a U-Haul truck.
When someone rents a moving truck, U-Haul automatically folds in fees that consumers can't get out of, such as the environmental fee, which immediately pushes the cost above the $19.95 rate. These fees could, in theory, be wrapped into the original price, but instead they're tacked on at the end. There are also mandatory-ish charges, such as insurance, mileage, and tolls, that people may not entirely understand or know whether they need. Many consumers have had the experience of standing at a car or truck rental counter trying to figure out whether they actually need the insurance the agent is trying to sell them on, or if the guy is just trying to up his commission. As consumers go through the U-Haul booking process, they're nudged toward all sorts of extra services and charges, including moving blankets, dollies, and movers. Some of these items are preselected, so consumers have to actively unselect them or scroll to a small-font option to skip.
"They're not mandatory, but you have to sift through those screens before you actually check out," Smith says.
Smith says that consumers have reported a "slew of" other fees they'd been charged by U-Haul — for cleaning, extra mileage, late returns, lost keys, and more — many of which customers disputed as unfair. The problem isn't the price U-Haul is charging, she says, "the problem is how they advertise the price." You may walk in expecting a cheap deal to pick up that couch down the street, and walk out with a multiline receipt that leaves your wallet lighter than you expected.
This isn't the first time U-Haul's pricing practices have drawn scrutiny. In 2010, it settled charges brought by the FTC accusing it of inviting its closest competitor, Avis Budget Group, to collude to fix prices on one-way truck rentals.
"Here we are in 2025, and obviously it's a different kind of deceptive pricing issue, but nonetheless, continuing to engage in deceptive marketing or in deceptive pricing," Smith tells me.
The fees appear to be a money-maker for U-Haul. In its third fiscal quarter, ending in December, the company reported a $38.8 million increase in revenue for self-moving equipment rental, a 4.6% jump from the year before. Per-transaction revenue increased for both its in-town and one-way markets.
U-Haul didn't respond to requests for comment for this story. It did not admit wrongdoing in its 2010 settlement with the FTC.
Moving is wildly stressful. It's always harder and takes longer than you think and, often, more expensive than you expect. Moving companies' estimates can be eye-popping. Truck rentals such as U-Hauls are positioned as an alternative, cheaper option — assuming you have some very nice friends who are willing to help — but their costs can get unwieldy fast. In such high-stress situations, it's extra difficult for customers to compare prices and police fees.
"They invest time, energy, and effort in trying to rent a moving truck, and by the time they discover the true price of the rental, they've already sunk their time and energy into getting the truck," Smith says. When you show up at the rental lot the day of your move and realize that $19.95 is actually $60, are you really going to change course? It's unlikely.
This is the kind of stuff companies that engage in bait-and-switch and drip pricing, where they show one initial price and gradually add other fees and charges on, depend on: consumers getting so confused, tired, or distracted that they don't have the wherewithal to push back.
"People sort of end their searches very early," Tushnet says. "Even if it's more than they expect to pay, and even if there are better alternatives out there, they've just exhausted their time to look, and so they end up paying the extra."
Companies do it because they try to make things seem as affordable as possible.
Less-than-straightforward advertising strategies around pricing are a staple of many industries, including rental cars, plane tickets, and live entertainment. Some industries argue that these types of setups are beneficial for consumers. Airlines, for example, say all the optional add-on fees make it possible for passengers to choose their own adventures in terms of amenities and comfort. Banks say overdraft and late fees are fair when consumers screw up and discourage them from overspending in the first place. In other industries, it's more common for companies to pass the buck and say it's not really their fault. Rental car services aren't the only ones tacking on extra fees and taxes to their services — airports, states, and municipalities do it, too. When one asks who's responsible for concert ticket fees, all parties involved point fingers. Whatever the justification, the benefit for companies is clear: It's a way to get customers in the door.
"Companies do it because they try to make things seem as affordable as possible, they try to lure you in with this super-low price even if they know darn well that the total is going to be much higher than with all the mandatory fees," says Teresa Murray, the consumer watchdog director for the US Public Interest Research Group, an advocacy group. "Companies don't try hard enough to be transparent."
As consumers, we've almost become accustomed to the idea that we won't really know what things are going to cost until we're about to swipe our credit cards or sign on the dotted line. We try our best to comparison shop, but it's hard when the actual costs aren't listed up front. You can mentally bake in some fees or a little markup, but how much that's going to be is tough to gauge. Ultimately, consumer advocates say these practices often lead to diminished competition and consumers paying higher prices.
There have been some efforts to reverse the trend on a government level. On May 12, a new FTC rule on deceptive or unfair fees is set to take effect. It bars bait-and-switch and other misleading pricing tactics on live events and short-term lodging such as hotels, and requires businesses in those sectors to disclose total pricing up front.
"If that kind of thing applied to a bunch of other industries, like we were hoping, then we wouldn't have the problems like what we're talking about," Murray says. She added that some businesses are taking it upon themselves to be more forthcoming about their prices. More all-in pricing would help consumers compare deals and mean more honest competition for people's dollars. But don't hold your breath on an economy-wide price transparency transformation out of the goodness of corporate America's heart. Murray offered some tips on how consumers can protect themselves: Read the fine print, ask questions, don't be afraid to walk away, and do your transactions on a credit card so you can dispute the charges later if you need. It's smart, practical advice. It's also a reminder that, as consumers, we always have to be on defense.
As for U-Haul, it's not clear whether the FTC or state regulators will take action. Truth in Advertising has heard from a couple of states that said they'd look into it, which isn't unusual since potential regulatory investigations are generally kept confidential. In the meantime, the next time you're renting a moving truck, know that $19.95 sounds too good to be true because it is. You'll very likely be met with more charges and fees, plus the pizza and beer you have to buy for your friends as you collectively realize you're too old to schlep that couch up a flight of stairs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs ‘could cover costs of big, beautiful bill tax cuts'
Trump tariffs ‘could cover costs of big, beautiful bill tax cuts'

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump tariffs ‘could cover costs of big, beautiful bill tax cuts'

Donald Trump's tariffs could generate enough revenues to cover the costs of his sweeping tax cuts, according to one of the world's biggest credit rating agencies. S&P Global said the economic impact of the US president's 'one big beautiful bill' act – which was signed into law in July and includes $3.7 trillion (£2.7 trillion) of tax cuts over the next 10 years – could be offset by his aggressive trade war. The agency's optimistic outlook for the Act led to it holding firm on its AA+ long-term rating for the US. That is in contrast to fellow credit ratings agency Moody's, which downgraded the US from the gold standard AAA sovereign debt rating in May amid concerns about ballooning debt. S&P Global suggested tariffs could soften the blow to the US public finances. Lisa Schineller, an analyst at S&P, said: 'Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending. 'At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation.' This will serve to strengthen Mr Trump's controversial tax-cutting bill, which was branded a 'disgusting abomination' by billionaire Elon Musk earlier this year. The bill faced significant opposition before it eventually passed through Congress, with many critics warning it would increase America's vast debt pile. It comes after Mr Trump was recently embroiled in a row with Goldman Sachs about the impact of his tariffs on the US economy. The president criticised David Solomon, the Goldman boss, by claiming that he should 'not bother running a major financial institution' after the bank said American companies would start passing on the costs from tariffs to consumers. He urged Mr Solomon to 'focus on being a DJ', in reference to the Goldman boss's previous hobby moonlighting as a disc jockey under the moniker DJ D-Sol. The US reported a $21bn jump in customs duty collections from Mr Trump's tariffs in July. However, in the same month, the government budget deficit grew by nearly 20pc to $291bn. Concerns about the US debt pile have sent the cost of government borrowing higher, with the US 30-year Treasury bond yield peaking at 5.09pc in May – although it has since fallen back to 4.94pc. Since returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on global trading partners. The president set a baseline 10pc tariff on all imports to the US, with various additional duties imposed on different countries and products. The US remains involved in trading negotiations with various nations. Mr Trump announced this month that he would extend a suspension of tariffs on China until at least early November after the world's two largest economies briefly imposed levies of more than 100pc on each other. S&P projected the American government deficit would average 6pc of GDP between 2025 and 2028, down from 7.5pc in 2024. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Oracle will reportedly power a giant data center with gas generators
Oracle will reportedly power a giant data center with gas generators

Engadget

time34 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Oracle will reportedly power a giant data center with gas generators

Bloomberg has published a deep dive into operations at Oracle, chronicling the software giant's rise in cloud computing and current push into powering artificial intelligence projects. The publication reported that Oracle has promised to develop tens of billions of dollars in data centers, which have become a hot business. Notably, Oracle landed a deal to back operations at OpenAI, in a partnership that will give the AI company 4.5 gigawatts of computing power . According to Bloomberg , that's enough energy to power "millions of American homes." So far, Oracle has seemed willing to throw money at its AI data center projects, no matter how expensive or irresponsible the needs might be. For instance, a source said the company plans to spend more than $1 billion a year powering a single data center in Texas with gas generators rather than waiting for a utility connection to be built. When completed, this data center is expected to be one of the largest known sites, with computing power of 1.4 gigawatts. In addition to the huge monetary cost, such a project can also have negative human and environmental impact. The Elon Musk-owned xAI is under fire after a supercomputer for its artificial intelligence operations became a primary source of air pollution in Memphis thanks to methane-powered turbines. Other majors, including Google , Microsoft and Meta , have chosen to try nuclear power for their data center projects, which comes with its own potential complications and risks. Purely on the financial side, Oracle's decision to invest so much so quickly meant the company reported its first negative annual cash flow since 1990. Should the current rates of AI investment turn out to be a bubble, it could be very bad news to have many billions of dollars on the line.

Trump's expansion of steel and aluminum tariffs could raise these prices

timean hour ago

Trump's expansion of steel and aluminum tariffs could raise these prices

Price increases could hit tableware, motorcycles and assorted children's products as a result of the Trump administration's expansion of 50% steel and aluminum tariffs to an additional 400 goods, analysts said. The fresh levies, which took effect on Monday, extended tariffs on the metal products that Trump initially rolled out in March. Air-conditioning units, space heaters, high chairs, knives and some furniture items are among the products newly affected by tariffs. 'Basically, if it's shiny, metallic, or remotely related to steel or aluminum, it's probably on the list,' Brian Baldwin, vice president of customs at logistics company Kuehne + Nagel International AG, said in a post on LinkedIn. In a statement on Tuesday, the U.S. Commerce Department touted the new tariffs as means of preventing importers from finding workarounds. 'Today's action expands the reach of the steel and aluminum tariffs and shuts down avenues for circumvention – supporting the continued revitalization of the American steel and aluminum industries,' Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Jeffrey Kessler said. Importers typically offset the tax burden in the form of higher prices for shoppers, though so far tariff-induced price increases have proven marginal. The overall inflation rate stands at 2.7%, below the 3% rate in January, before Trump took office. In June, Trump ratcheted up a tax on all foreign steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%. The move this week expands those steep levies to hundreds of additional products. In all, the steel and aluminum tariffs now affect $320 billion worth of products, up from $190 billion prior to the expansion, Jason Miller, a professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University, told ABC News. In addition to consumer goods, the new levies will hit a range of imported raw materials like auto parts, construction equipment and farming machinery relied upon by domestic producers, Miller said. 'These tariffs will definitely affect U.S. manufacturers that import inputs,' Miller said, noting the added costs could filter their way into higher consumer prices. The 50% tariff will apply to the proportion of a good made up of imported steel or aluminum, Miller said. A Germany-made steak knife, for instance, would be tariffed at 50% for its steel content, while the remainder of the product's value would face a 15% universal levy for goods from the European Union, he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store