The '3 Brothers' - Turkey, Pak, And Azerbaijan
During India and Pakistan's 100-hour war in May 2025, Islamabad fired a barrage of drones and missiles at enemy military installations and, according to Delhi, civilian populations.
The biggest wave was late May 8 and early May 9; between 300 and 400 drones, and over a dozen missiles attacked 36 towns or cities from Srinagar in Jammu and Kashmir to Jaisalmer in Rajasthan, spanning nearly 1,300 km along the Line of Control and the international border.
Advertisement - Scroll to continue
A vast majority of these were shot down, and those that weren't were neutralised, i.e., electronically disabled, thanks to India's 'Iron Dome', - the Integrated counter-Unmanned Aerial System, or C-UAS. Only three injuries - in Punjab - and one casualty - in J&K - were reported.
On the face of it then, Pak's attempt to attack had been firmly rebuffed.
But from the debris of the shot-down projectiles, a new plotline has emerged - a nexus between Pakistan and Turkey, and a third nation - Azerbaijan. The three countries share an increasingly robust economic and military relationship, not to mention their common Islamic heritage.
The 'Three Brothers'
Historically each has supported the other; after the Soviet Union fell Turkey and Pak were quick to recognise Azerbaijan, and Turkey and Pak have a growing symbiotic military relationship, one underscored by each side's reluctance to depend on either the West or China.
And oil-rich Azerbaijan has quietly become a leading source of aid and investment for Pak; in February 2025, for example, Baku committed $2 billion in infrastructure, energy, and mining.
Baku and Islamabad also struck weapons deals, and the latter was reportedly backed by the former and Ankara during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war involving Azerbaijan and Armenia.
Incidentally, India has emerged as a supporter of Armenia.
In 2024 Delhi became Yerevan's largest defence supplier after a $2 billion deal that included sale of the indigenously developed Akash missile system that kept the Turkish-made Pak drones at bay.
NDTV Exclusive | Guardians Of The Sky - India's Integrated Air Defence Outfoxed Pak
There has also been economic cooperation - in banking, trade, and tourism, among other fields - which is critical given all three are on ancient trade corridors linking the 'far East' and Europe.
Pak PM Shehbaz Sharif and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev (File).
The nexus also adds to a significant common diplomatic, or 'soft', power that can be used to project combined geopolitical influence eastward from Pak, across Central Asia, and even up to Europe, with analysts also pointing to Islamabad's 'power and influence among Muslims'.
These, then, are the 'three brothers' against whom, in effect, India fought the 100-hours war.
NDTV Opinion | Story Of '3 Brothers' And Why Azerbaijan Is Cheering For Pakistan
Arguably, Pak was the face, Turkey the weapons hand, and Azerbaijan aided by unleashing a flood of disinformation and propaganda seeking to discredit Delhi's military actions.
The Turkish Angle
Now, many of the Pak drones that attacked India last week were Turkish-made.
These included the Asisguard SONGAR, which can transmit live video and carry weapons, and the Bayraktar TB2, a medium-altitude, long-endurance UCAV, or unmanned combat aerial vehicle.
That foreign-made/foreign-purchased weapons were used wasn't a surprise; Pak also deployed Chinese-made JF-17 fighters and fired PL-15 air-to-air missiles sold by Beijing, just as India had French-made Rafales, Israeli drones, and Russian missiles in its expansive arsenal.
Debris of a Turkish-made Pakistani drone shot down over J&K.
But the Ankara link - a link reinforced by the docking of a warship and a possible arms shipment delivered by a C-130 military transport, days before Operation Sindoor - raised eyebrows.
Turkey insisted no arms had been supplied and the warship's visit was naval courtesy.
Clearly, though, weapons have been supplied.
Turkey-Pak Weapons Deals
Over the past several years Ankara and Islamabad have, discreetly, stepped up defence ties.
For example, the Pakistan Air Force now flies more than three-dozen United States-made F-16 fighter jets that have been upgraded by Turkish Aerospace Industries in a $75 million deal.
A Turkish company was given $20 million to develop electronic warfare training centres.
Another got an $80 million contract to design and build a fleet tanker - "capable of performing a variety of maritime operations, including provision of logistic support to other ships by transferring fuel", according to the Manohar Parrikar Institute - for the Pak Navy.
Upgraded submarines cost $350 million, electronic targeting equipment cost $50 million and there was a $1.5 billion deal for four Turkish warships with anti-submarine capabilities.
There was also another $1.5 billion deal for 30 attack helicopters - upgraded versions of the Italian-made A-129 - but Islamabad walked back on that after getting China's Z-10MEs.
Turkey has sold weapons to Pakistan, and those were used, albeit to no real effect thanks to effective countermeasures, against India. Delhi hasn't yet, and is perhaps unlikely to, take this up with Ankara, but sources have said the India-Turkey relationship may be re-evaluated.
There has been civilian pushback against Turkey; tourists and Bollywood, perhaps two of Ankara's most lucrative imports from Delhi, have gone on a 'boycott Turkey' drive.
Azerbaijan has also come in for criticism from the Indian public.
This hasn't, so far at least, affected Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan - whose stature as a 'global statesman' is on the rise after hosting the first, post-war, face-to-face Russia-Ukraine peace talks. Erdogan has reiterated support for his 'dear brother', Pak's Shehbaz Sharif.
Kıymetli @CMShehbaz kardeşim,
Dünya üzerinde pek az millete nasip olan Türkiye-Pakistan kardeşliği, hakiki dostluğun en güzel örneklerinden biridir.… https://t.co/NePsq2Lr3O
— Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (@RTErdogan) May 13, 2025
Erdogan, in fact, has visited Pak six time since becoming President in 2003.
So, if India's trade ties with the other two 'brothers' is to take a hit, how much are we talking?
Exports to Turkey stood at $5.2 billion between April 2024 and February 2025. This was $6.65 billion in 2023/24 and is only 1.5 per cent of India's total exports of $437 billion.
Explained | India's Trade Ties With Turkey, Azerbaijan Amid Pak Conflict
Exports to Azerbaijan were only $86.07 million between April 2024 and February 2025, against $89.67 million in 2023/24. This is only 0.02 per cent of India's total outbound shipments.
Combined, imports amount to less than 0.6 per cent.
There is, therefore, a trade surplus, even if it isn't sizeable.
'Three Brothers' vs India?
The 100-hours war emphasised two points.
The first - the Indian military is tactically astute, has a potent arsenal of short-, medium-, and long-range missiles and drones, backed by squadrons of effective, if outdated, fighter jets, all protected behind a reliable, layered aerial defence system capable of soft and hard kills.
This protection is provided by India's 'Iron Dome' - within which sit various radar arrays to locate, identify, and track potential airspace threats. Countermeasures are then deployed, from jamming signals to firing interceptors from the Akash or the Russian-made S-400.
Russian-made S-400 missile defence systems were used to counter Pak threats (File).
The second - the 'three brothers' nexus needs to be taken seriously, more so since there appears to be a gentle shift in Islamabad moving away from Washington (and maybe even Beijing) to Ankara.
And Delhi is doing that. In Europe, for example, there is military support to Armenia (to counter Azerbaijan) and engagement with Greece-supported Cyprus (to offset Turkey).
There is also the planned India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, and the fact this does not include or pass through either Turkey or Azerbaijan isn't a coincidence.
India will likely continue to engage Turkey and Azerbaijan, because it doesn't make sense, at this stage, to cut oneself off from key powers in the Central Asian region, but Delhi will be watching the 'three brothers' closely, moving to counterbalance or support where needed.
With input from agencies
NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click on the link to get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.
Share
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Who is Iranian rapper Tataloo, a former President Ebrahim Raisi endorser who now faces death sentence
Iranian singer-cum-rapper Amir Hossein Maghsoudloo, popularly known as Tataloo, is facing death sentence after being convicted on charges of blasphemy and 'insulting Islamic sanctities'. Tataloo, who once supported a hard-line Iranian presidential candidate, now stands out against the gray prison uniform. The court sentenced him to the death penalty in May after he was found guilty of blasphemy in January this year. The 37-year-old rapper's songs reverberated with the Islamic Republic's youth at a time when the opposition to the country's government was splintered and largely remained leaderless. His music became popular as it challenged Iran's theocracy and the hierarchy of the system. In a major turn of events in 2022, the Iranian rapper's lyrics became more political after the death of 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman Mahsa Amini and the subsequent wave of nationwide protests. Amini was detained and died in state custody of Iran in relation to state-imposed religious dress in September 2022. Tataloo also appeared in videos that criticised the government. Tataloo started his music career in 2003. He is known for combining rap, pop, rhythm-and-blues and rock with Farsi lyrics. He comes from the underground genre and released his first album in 2011 which reportedly polarized the audiences. However, Tataloo never played publicly in Iran, where all the concerts are controlled by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. Tataloo appeared in a 2015 music video which supported Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and the controversial nuclear program of the Islamic Republic, which has concerned the West for years that it could lead to Iran developing atom bombs. In the video for 'Energy Hasteei,' or 'Nuclear Energy,' Tataloo sang 'This is our absolute right: To have an armed Persian Gulf.' He endorsed hard-liner Ebrahim Raisi in 2017 and sat with him for a television appearance as part of Raisi's failed presidential campaign against Hassan Rouhani. Raisi later became the president in 2021 but was killed in a helicopter crash in 2024. Tataloo faced legal issues in Iran in 2018 and was allowed to leave the country for Turkey, where many Persian singers and artists performed lucrative stage concerts. T he singer started hosting several live video sessions on social media and became an instant rage among the youth, along with his tattoos covering his face and body. Among the tattoos he boasted, one was an Iranian flag and another image of his mother next to a key and heart. In 2020, Instagram deactivated his account after he called for underage girls to join his 'team' for sex. The Iranian singer even acknowledged taking drugs. Tataloo's long run in music came to a halt in late 2023 when his passport expired and he was deported from Turkey. Upon his arrival in Iran, the singer was immediately taken into custody. The Iranian Supreme Court upheld his death sentence in May this year.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Why is Iran cracking down on dog-walking in public spaces?
Iran has expanded its ban on public dog-walking to over 25 cities, citing health, safety and morality concerns. With no national law outlawing pet ownership, local prosecutors are enforcing restrictions using penal codes. Critics argue the crackdown reflects deeper efforts to suppress personal freedoms and cultural shifts seen as un-Islamic by the regime read more An Iranian child looks at the dog as he walks, in Tehran, Iran, March 30, 2021. File Image/WANA via Reuters Iranian authorities have drastically widened restrictions on dog ownership and public pet activity by banning dog-walking in at least 25 cities across the country. While there is no nationwide legislation banning dog ownership outright, these local-level prohibitions are being enforced using Iran's penal provisions and religious-cultural rationale. The measures, first implemented in Tehran in 2019, have now become a countrywide trend. Judicial officials in numerous provinces have justified the crackdown by citing concerns over hygiene, safety, morality and social order. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The renewed focus on dog bans puts a spotight the Iranian state's enduring discomfort with what it considers Western cultural infiltration, and is a continuation of the post-1979 Islamic regime's efforts to suppress behaviours seen as un-Islamic or foreign in origin, reported AFP. How Iran is enforcing a ban on dog walking Over the past week, prosecutors and judicial officials in cities across Iran have imposed fresh restrictions against dog walking, including in Ilam, Kermanshah, Hamadan, Kerman, Boroujerd, Robat Karim, Lavasanat, Golestan, Kashmar and Khalkhal, among others. The restrictions follow a precedent set by Tehran in 2019, where police first issued a directive against walking dogs in public places. According to domestic news outlets, cities like Isfahan and Kerman recently joined the expanding list. In Isfahan, public prosecutor Mohammad Mousavian announced that the act of walking a dog is considered a violation of 'public rights' and that it jeopardises the 'health, comfort, and peace of citizens.' As per Mousavian's directive, all forms of dog walking — whether in public areas, parks or inside private vehicles — are now banned. 'Any form of dog walking in the city — whether in parks, public spaces, or vehicles — is prohibited and will be dealt with seriously,' he said. Law enforcement has been directed to confiscate vehicles transporting dogs and to shut down pet shops and unlicensed veterinary clinics. Authorities in Ilam echoed a similar position. According to local media, a city official said, 'Legal action will be taken against violators,' though further details were not provided. In Khalkhal, a city in Ardabil province, prosecutor Mozaffar Rezaei confirmed the prohibition, stating, 'Offenders will face consequences if they are seen walking dogs in parks, public spaces, or carrying them on their vehicles.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rezaei also stated that 'in addition to the financial and physical damages, religious rulings and cultural considerations must be taken into account, as this practice reflects the promotion of a Western lifestyle.' In Kashmar, a city in northeastern Iran, the public prosecutor declared that the purpose of the ban was to protect 'public hygiene and the physical and psychological safety of the public.' The reformist-leaning Faraz News reported that more than 20 cities had announced new restrictions over a single weekend. Despite the lack of a uniform national policy, local authorities have relied on articles from Iran's Penal Code and Constitution to impose these restrictions, notably Article 638 concerning public morality, Article 688 on threats to public health, and Article 40 which prohibits actions that cause harm to others. Why Iran is banning dogs in public spaces Iran's theocratic establishment has long opposed dog ownership, perceiving it as a sign of Westernisation and cultural deviation. Religious interpretations that classify dogs as najis, or ritually impure, underpin much of this opposition. Contact with dogs, especially their saliva, is viewed by many scholars as religiously unacceptable. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2017, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei weighed in on the issue, stating: 'Keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible.' He added via Tasnim News Agency, 'If this practice resembles that of non-Muslims, promotes their culture or causes harm and disturbance to neighbours, it is deemed forbidden.' The religious establishment's influence on public lawmaking was also visible in 2021 when 75 lawmakers signed a letter denouncing dog ownership as a 'destructive social problem' that could 'gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life.' This echoed earlier efforts in 2010 when Iran's Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance barred advertisements for pets or related products. In 2014, lawmakers introduced legislation that proposed fines or even corporal punishment for dog-walkers, though the bill failed to pass. The controversial 'Protection of the Public's Rights Against Animals' bill, first floated over a decade ago, also attempted to curb pet ownership. Dr. Payam Mohebi, president of the Iran Veterinary Association and a vocal critic of the draft law, noted, 'Over the years, they have changed this a couple of times and even discussed corporal punishment for dog owners. But their plan didn't get anywhere.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also recalled earlier legislative proposals that sought to confiscate dogs and abandon them in deserts or hand them over to zoos. What that means for dog owners in Iran With the latest directives, police have been authorised to take more aggressive measures. Authorities have been instructed not only to confiscate dogs and impound vehicles but also to track and prosecute social media accounts promoting pet ownership or selling animals. Mousavian called on Iran's cybercrime units to dismantle such accounts and launch legal proceedings against those behind them. The justification given was that the bans were 'in response to serious public demands.' These developments come amid increasing reports of dog owners being fined, harassed or facing threats of eviction. In some cases, dogs have been confiscated or owners arrested for walking their pets in public. This video that I've received today made me angry. A young man being beaten up savagely by the police in Iran just because he resisted to give his dog away. His mother is trying to help him but see what happens. According to the laws in Iran, walking a dog in public is a crime. — Masih Alinejad 🏳️ (@AlinejadMasih) July 13, 2021 Given the heightened scrutiny, many citizens have started walking their dogs late at night or driving them around to avoid police detection. Despite these efforts, enforcement has remained inconsistent. In cities like Tehran, many residents continue to walk their pets in less visible locations, revealing the difficulty of fully enforcing the ban in urban environments where pet ownership has steadily grown. How pet ownership is evolving into a form of resistance in Iran Owning a pet — especially a dog — has, over time, evolved into a subtle form of resistance in Iran. For younger generations in particular, having a dog is a lifestyle choice that also expresses personal identity and rejection of rigid state norms. The act of walking a dog in public is increasingly being interpreted as a symbolic challenge to the state's attempts to control everyday life. This dynamic is comparable to other forms of passive resistance in Iran — such as violating the compulsory hijab, participating in underground gatherings, or consuming banned substances. All are behaviours that exist in legal grey areas and continue despite government disapproval. Public frustration is growing over what some perceive as misplaced priorities. Critics argue that with rising concerns over violent crime and economic instability, law enforcement should focus on genuine threats to public safety rather than cracking down on pet owners. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In Isfahan, a group of animal rights activists gathered outside the governor's office to protest what they alleged was municipal culling of stray dogs and called for a reversal of recent bans, reported Iran International. It remains uncertain how effective the government will be in curbing a social trend that continues to gain popularity, despite — or perhaps because of — official disapproval. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
After facing defeat in Operation Sindoor, Pakistan seeks deadly weapon from..., capable of....
After facing defeat in Operation Sindoor, Pakistan seeks deadly weapon from…, capable of… ALP-300G: After facing defeat against India during Operation Sindoor, Pakistan is busy acquiring more weaponry from other countries. The Pakistani army was forced to retreat in front of Indian missiles, drones, and state-of-the-art defence. The biggest reason for Pakistan's defeat was its blind trust in China. Now, to correct the mistakes, Islamabad is sidelining the Dragon and acquiring weapons from Turkey. Why is Pakistan buying weapons from Turkey? The Pak army is preparing to buy a deadly radar system, the ALP-300G from Turkey. It is capable of identifying areal threats from a long distance. As per several reports, during the Indo-Pak conflict between 8 and 10 May, Pakistan's Chinese defence system HQ-9 was completely failed, allowing Indian suicide drones and missiles to infiltrate and destroy targets. The Pakistan Air Force is in talks with Turkish defence company ASELSAN to buy ALP-300G radar system which can be deployed in just 30 minutes. What is ALP-300G System? The ALP-300G is a long-range air defence system that uses AESA and digital beamforming technology. It is capable of tracking ballistic, anti-radiation missiles and even stealth aircraft. With the help of its multi-channel beam structure. The system can also monitor multiple targets simultaneously. This system is easily deployable and transportable via a standard 10-ton truck. Furthermore, it's fully interoperable with NATO's air command and control systems, maintaining functionality even in adverse weather conditions. How Cautious Should India Be? Pak's decision to import this lethal technology from Turkey is a signal for India that next time, Pakistan will come with better preparation. In such a situation, India also needs to strengthen its military strategy so that it always remains one step ahead on every front.
