What are the concessions to the welfare bill - and will MPs back it?
Number 10 has made concessions on its welfare bill after crisis talks with Labour rebels.
Sir Keir Starmer will be hoping the changes are enough to avoid a Commons defeat when the measures are put to a vote on Tuesday - but several MPs have said they are still not satisfied.
Sky News looks at what was in the deal and whether it will be enough to win over critics.
Changes to PIP
In a letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed all existing claimants of the personal independence payment (pip) will be exempt from the cuts to eligibility.
It means the new qualifying requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only.
This is a big U-turn as the changes to pip, the main disability benefit in England, had caused the most upset among MPs planning to rebel.
Pip is money given to people, including some of whom are in work, who have extra care or mobility needs as a result of a disability.
People who claim it are awarded points depending on their ability to do certain activities, such as washing and preparing food, which influences how much they will receive.
Currently claimants need to score a minimum of eight points across a range of tasks to qualify for the daily living element (there is a mobility element that is not affected by the plans). Under the new rules people will need to score a minimum of four points in at least one activity to qualify.
By limiting the changes to new claimants only, it is estimated 370,000 people who had been due to lose out will now get to keep their benefit.
This will come at a cost of £1.5bn by the end of the parliament, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
It is not clear how that will be funded, prompting speculation of tax rises at the autumn budget.
Universal Credit
The second row back involves planned changes to universal credit (UC)
The government had intended to freeze the health top-up at £97 a week during this parliament.
However, all current recipients of the health element, as well as any new applicants meeting the "severe conditions criteria", will now have their incomes protected in real terms.
The government will still cut the rate to £50 for new claimants from 2026/7, while raising the standard rate of UC for jobseekers.
More money for people to find work
The health top-up is for people who have a limited ability to work because of a disability or long term sickness, but ministers are concerned about the rising number of claimants and want to incentivise people back into work.
Ms Kendall previously said £1bn would be used for targeted support schemes to help people out of inactivity and into jobs.
In her letter, she said the government "will front load more of the additional funding generated by these reforms for back to work support for sick and disabled people".
0:43
Will MPs back the changes?
Care minister Stephen Kinnock told Sky News on Friday morning the changes are a "really big step in the right direction".
The purpose of the bill was to shave £5bn off the welfare budget by 2030 and tackle the rising numbers of people who are economically inactive. Lots of MPs said they agreed with the principle of reform but were concerned with the impact on disabled people.
Initially, over 120 Labour MPs had signed a "reasoned amendment" calling for the changes to be delayed while disabled people were consulted on.
Dame Meg Hillier, the influential chair of the Treasury select committee who had tabled the amendment, said last night that the government had offered a "good deal".
However, it is ultimately up to individual MPs to decide if they want to support it.
Several MPs on the left of the party have come forward to say they won't. This includes the likes of Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne and Nadia Whittome, who have expressed concerns about a two-tier system.
Sky News has spoken to other MPs who privately say they won't back the bill. One rebel said a WhatsApp group has been set up to announce their intentions and he believes 50 have already stated their intention to vote against the bill.
Others have told Sky News they are undecided. One rebel said she has "no idea" how she'll vote and is "waiting to see the finer details and how things pan out on Monday". Another said he expects he will no longer vote against but will make his mind up firmly when he has seen the full details.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
8 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP
Pauline McNeill, Glasgow Labour MSP, raised the issue in the Scottish Parliament with the government. She highlighted the plans for the old 02 ABC site on Sauchiehall Street, approved this month by Glasgow City Council despite objections from the local community. READ NEXT:Get You in Town: New campaign to promote Glasgow city centre as a destination McNeill questioned the number of applications being approved and said the motivation for investors is the ability to collect high rental charges. She said: 'Scotland needs good, affordable student accommodation, but the way that planning consents are being granted in Glasgow makes it seem as if they are being handed out as an easy fix for gap sites. 'We are seeing oversaturation because purpose-built student accommodation is currently favoured by investors due to the ability to charge high rents. 'Last week, a proposed nine-storey student accommodation block was approved on the site of the former O2 ABC iconic music venue, but that is just one of many student developments that have been heavily objected to by local residents and community groups.' McNeill asked Ivan McKee, public finance minister, if there should be a right to challenge overprovision. READ NEXT:Hundreds access emergency homeless help over winter in Glasgow McKee said the council can act if there are concerns about any negative impact. He said: 'Local authorities, including Glasgow City Council, are able to identify areas of concentration where further development would undermine residential amenity. 'That power already exists. There is also a power for local communities to produce local place plans to feed into local development plans. 'We should recognise, as I think Pauline McNeill does, that students who are studying at our colleges and universities are a hugely important part of society. I welcome international students and the making of provision for them, and any PBSA provision obviously takes pressure off the private rented sector, which I think we would all agree is to be welcomed.' The plan 02 ABC site is for a House of Social nine storey block, including student accommodation, a food hall, a public courtyard, a bar, a gym, and more.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Post-Brexit food labelling branded ‘bureaucratic madness' by M&S boss
Marks and Spencer 's chief executive has lambasted a key aspect of the Windsor Framework's final phase as "bureaucratic madness," as over 1,000 products destined for Northern Ireland will soon require "Not for EU" labelling. Stuart Machin revealed the significant operational challenge, describing the new requirement as "yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for retailers." From next week, a substantial portion of M&S's product range for Northern Ireland will need these specific labels affixed. The "Not for EU" labels have been progressively introduced since the post-Brexit trading deal, known as the Windsor Framework, was agreed in 2023. This framework was negotiated between the UK and the European Union to resolve complexities arising from the Northern Ireland Protocol, which effectively maintains Northern Ireland within the EU's trade orbit. The stringent labelling rules are designed to prevent goods intended for the UK market from inadvertently entering the EU single market via the Republic of Ireland. Despite the current friction, the UK Government recently indicated its expectation for a more streamlined flow of trade once its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement with the EU is finalised. Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal. He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration. 'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X. 'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'. 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world. 'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Charities warn PM's major backdown over welfare cuts not enough
The government offered concessions on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to avoid a major Commons defeat, following significant opposition from Labour backbenchers. The compromises include protecting Personal Independence Payments (PIP) for all existing claimants and delaying changes to PIP eligibility for new claimants until November 2026. Despite these concessions, numerous charities and campaign groups, including Amnesty International and the Disability Benefits Consortium, continue to oppose the bill, arguing it will entrench poverty and create a two-tier benefits system. Critics warn that the revised bill remains 'fatally flawed' and will push future disabled claimants into hardship, urging MPs to continue to vote against it. While some Labour rebels view the concessions as a 'workable compromise,' others still plan to vote against the bill, believing the adjustments do not go far enough.
