Is it any wonder that the UK is such an unequal society?
Do our imperial masters still consider our country to be part of the British Empire and try to consolidate that status by handing out a few baubles in the hope of keeping the masses happy? No wonder the UK is such an unequal society, led by a Prime Minister who also happens to be a benighted knight of the realm.
Dennis Canavan, Bannockburn.
Inexcusable indifference
I refer to Doug Maughan's letter of June 13, 'Hypocrisy and double standards taint the West's view of Israel'.
I suggest that Benjamin Netanyahu believes that as long as he has Donald Trump guarding his back, he has nothing to fear from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Trump administration has already imposed sanctions on four judges at the ICC over the tribunal's investigation into Israel's alleged war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank.
While the five countries (thankfully including the UK) who are imposing sanctions on two Israeli far-right ministers are members of the ICC, neither Israel nor the US is. Both are countries which believe they are above international law, outwith the bounds of common decency.
Mr Maughan's letter ought to be recognised as a call not only to our 'leaders' but to each one of us. We must resist 'the temptation to shrug and look away'. Indifference, silence, on our part to such suffering as the Palestinians are experiencing is inexcusable and makes us allies of Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers.
John Milne, Uddingston.
* Doug Maughan may also be interested to know that it has been reported that former Labour MP Lord Austin has been sent by the government to Israel 'as a trade envoy to maintain our relationship with Israeli businesses.'
Money is also regularly raised by the sale of Israeli government bonds on the London market. Israeli banks involved in the West Bank are also active in London.
I'm sure that the Prime Minister, being an ex-lawyer, will be able to explain to this confused member of the public why Israel's activities in Gaza and the West Bank are much less serious than those of Russia in Ukraine and the former South African government, both sanctioned.
Ewan Henderson, Haddington.
Let's sanction this warfare state
History repeats itself with false claims about what a perceived enemy is about to do. On February 3, 2003, British journalists were handed a dossier purporting to show Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ready to be used within days in an attack on the UK. Tony Blair went on television later that month saying Iraq had 'vast quantities of... anthrax, VX nerve agent, and mustard gas' and we had to strike.
On June 14, 2025 Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said that Iran could have produced a nuclear weapon in a very short time' while a henchman averred that 'Iran had enough fission material for 15 nuclear bombs within days'. Yet weeks earlier Tulsi Gabbard, the US National Intelligence Director, stated to Congress that the US 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon' and that its leader 'has not authorised a nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003'.
Over the past year Israel has mercilessly bombed Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and now Iran, killing thousands and causing chaos and carnage. It is a warfare state. With a population of 10 million it has over 600 warplanes, not far short of the total strength of the RAF. It is led by an extreme right-wing cabal untrusted by 70% of the Israeli people, according to opinion polls.
It's time for the UK to place sanctions on this dangerous regime and stop supplying arms, intelligence and material to it.
William Loneskie, Lauder, Berwickshire.
Spineless attitude towards Iran
My, how times change. Under our current Labour party leadership Britain has given away the Chagos Isles, handed the EU a say in the future of Gibraltar and now produces no response to the Iranian threat to our shores if we aid Israel.
Where is the spine of the British government? When given a choice of supporting Iran or Israel in the current situation there should be no hesitation yet there is and Labour has been very critical of only Israel.
Israel has targeted precise locations for missiles whilst Iran has just fired them off indiscriminately. Where is the harsh criticism of Iran, where the press can only report stories favourable to the regime? Does Labour think the world will really be safer if Iran has a nuclear bomb? Right now that seems to be its position, ably backed up in Scotland by the theoretically anti-nuclear SNP and the Greens.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Nuclear power and renewables
Can anyone explain to me how hydro power and nuclear power are equivalent in how they supply electricity to the grid? ('Should Scotland blindly follow England down the nuclear power path?', Rebecca McQuillan, June 12).
My understanding is that the amount of energy produced by a nuclear plant is pretty much fixed. It can not easily be modulated to increase or reduce output and the only change comes when it is being serviced (a planned break) or when there is a fault (an unplanned break).
Whereas the hydro power system that Rebecca talks about has a reservoir into which water can be pumped at times of excess electricity. Then, at times of high demand for electricity, water can be released from the reservoir to generate power. The hydro power/reservoir system works like a battery that can be switched on and off at times of high or low demand.
So nuclear power and the hydro/reservoir system perform fundamentally differently. If we have nuclear power, we need an additional system to deal with the ups and downs of electricity demand and to deal with the times when the nuclear power station closes down, which can happen unexpectedly.
This flexible source of energy could be provided by a battery type system (such as the hydro power/reservoir system) or a generator that can be powered up and down easily (such as a gas-fired power station) or a cable from Norway or somewhere. Nuclear power does nothing to offset the ups and downs of renewables.
J. Pountain, Glasgow.
A fair system of Legal Aid
One has to hope that our nation is sufficiently civilised as to enable those of otherwise insufficient means to obtain access to legal representation in our courts ('Scots court chaos looms as solicitors boycott scheme', June 10).
At the same time, that seems unlikely to happen when you consider the competing claims on public finances, such as the NHS, the putative care service, dilapidated schools, housing crisis, national defence, winter fuel payments, the two-child benefit cap, ferries and other causes that are more likely than legal aid to appeal to the electorate.
Even if the current campaign were to achieve a realistic settlement, for how long would that last? Clearly the government has no long-term will to support an effective legal aid system. I would therefore like to ask the solicitors' profession where lies the constitutional duty to provide public access to justice, whether with the government as the national executive or with the judicial arm of the nation's constitution.
Certainly, the government is signed up to international treaties to provide access to justice but that appears to have cut little ice in the last 40 years since the state took over control of the legal aid system from the solicitors' profession.
The whole raison d'etre of that profession and of the constitutional monopoly it enjoys in professional legal representation, is that it has a responsibility to the whole nation, whether or not the government provides sufficient financial support. A solicitor's duty to an immediate client may therefore require to be balanced with the responsibility of the profession to the public as a whole.
Consideration therefore might need to be given to a system which operates in other jurisdictions. whereby the solicitors' profession provides legal representation for the impecunious, financed equitably across the profession out of fees paid by the financially more fortunate clients of that profession.
This would be somewhat along the lines of the legal representation that was made available via the Poor Roll, prior to the formal institution of the legal aid system which has now fallen into substantial disrepair.
Michael Sheridan, Scotstoun, Glasgow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Israel's military claims ‘aerial superiority' over Iran's capital
The military says it has degraded Iranian air defences and missile systems to the point that its planes can now operate over Tehran without facing major threats. It says Israel now controls the skies from western Iran to Tehran. It came after Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early on Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes. One missile fell near the American consulate in Tel Aviv, and its fallout caused minor damage, US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said on X. There were no injuries to American personnel. The site where an Iranian missile struck in Haifa, Israel (Ariel Schalit/AP) Iran announced it had launched some 100 missiles and vowed further retaliation for Israel's sweeping attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure, which have killed at least 224 people in the country since Friday. Israel said so far 24 people have been killed and more than 500 injured as Iran launched more than 370 missiles and hundreds of drones. In response the Israeli military said fighter jets had struck 10 command centres in Tehran belonging to Iran's Quds Force, an elite arm of its Revolutionary Guard that conducts military and intelligence operations outside Iran. Powerful explosions, likely from Israel's defence systems intercepting Iranian missiles, rocked Tel Aviv shortly before dawn on Monday, sending plumes of black smoke into the sky over the coastal city. Authorities in the central Israeli city of Petah Tikva said that Iranian missiles had hit a residential building there, charring concrete walls, shattering windows and ripping the walls off multiple apartments. The Israeli Magen David Adom emergency service reported that two women and two men — all in their 70s — and one other person were killed in the wave of missile attacks that struck four sites in central Israel. 'We clearly see that our civilians are being targeted,' said Israeli police spokesman Dean Elsdunne outside the bombed-out building in Petah Tikva. 'And this is just one scene. We have other sites like this near the coast, in the south.' Petah Tikva resident Yoram Suki rushed with his family to a shelter after hearing an air raid alert, and emerged after it was over to find his apartment destroyed. 'Thank God we were OK,' the 60-year-old said. Despite losing his home, he urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to keep up the attacks on Iran. 'It's totally worth it,' he said. 'This is for the sake of our children and grandchildren.' In addition to those killed, the MDA said paramedics had evacuated another 87 wounded people to hospitals, including a 30-year-old woman in serious condition, while rescuers were still searching for residents trapped beneath the rubble of their homes. 'When we arrived at the scene of the rocket strike, we saw massive destruction,' said Dr Gal Rosen, a paramedic with MDA who said he had rescued a four-day-old baby as fires blazed from the building. During an earlier barrage of Iranian missiles on central Israel on Sunday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran will stop its strikes if Israel does the same. People evacuate after a missile launched from Iran struck Tel Aviv on Monday (Baz Ratner/AP) But after a day of intensive Israeli aerial attacks that extended targets beyond military installations to hit oil refineries and government buildings, the Revolutionary Guard struck a hard line on Monday, vowing that further rounds of strikes would be 'more forceful, severe, precise and destructive than previous ones'. Health authorities also reported that 1,277 were wounded in Iran, without distinguishing between military officials and civilians. Rights groups, such as the Washington-based Iranian advocacy group called Human Rights Activists, have suggested that the Iranian government's death toll is a significant undercount. Human Rights Activists says it has documented more than 400 people killed, among them 197 civilians. Israel argues that its assault on Iran's top military leaders, uranium enrichment sites and nuclear scientists was necessary to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Iran has always insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, and the US and others have assessed that Tehran has not pursued a nuclear weapon since 2003. But Iran has enriched ever-larger stockpiles of uranium to near weapons-grade levels in recent years and was believed to have the capacity to develop multiple weapons within months if it chose to do so.
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Israel's military claims ‘aerial superiority' over Iran's capital
The military says it has degraded Iranian air defences and missile systems to the point that its planes can now operate over Tehran without facing major threats. It says Israel now controls the skies from western Iran to Tehran. It came after Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early on Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes. One missile fell near the American consulate in Tel Aviv, and its fallout caused minor damage, US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said on X. There were no injuries to American personnel. Iran announced it had launched some 100 missiles and vowed further retaliation for Israel's sweeping attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure, which have killed at least 224 people in the country since Friday. Israel said so far 24 people have been killed and more than 500 injured as Iran launched more than 370 missiles and hundreds of drones. In response the Israeli military said fighter jets had struck 10 command centres in Tehran belonging to Iran's Quds Force, an elite arm of its Revolutionary Guard that conducts military and intelligence operations outside Iran. Powerful explosions, likely from Israel's defence systems intercepting Iranian missiles, rocked Tel Aviv shortly before dawn on Monday, sending plumes of black smoke into the sky over the coastal city. Authorities in the central Israeli city of Petah Tikva said that Iranian missiles had hit a residential building there, charring concrete walls, shattering windows and ripping the walls off multiple apartments. The Israeli Magen David Adom emergency service reported that two women and two men — all in their 70s — and one other person were killed in the wave of missile attacks that struck four sites in central Israel. 'We clearly see that our civilians are being targeted,' said Israeli police spokesman Dean Elsdunne outside the bombed-out building in Petah Tikva. 'And this is just one scene. We have other sites like this near the coast, in the south.' Petah Tikva resident Yoram Suki rushed with his family to a shelter after hearing an air raid alert, and emerged after it was over to find his apartment destroyed. 'Thank God we were OK,' the 60-year-old said. Despite losing his home, he urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to keep up the attacks on Iran. 'It's totally worth it,' he said. 'This is for the sake of our children and grandchildren.' In addition to those killed, the MDA said paramedics had evacuated another 87 wounded people to hospitals, including a 30-year-old woman in serious condition, while rescuers were still searching for residents trapped beneath the rubble of their homes. 'When we arrived at the scene of the rocket strike, we saw massive destruction,' said Dr Gal Rosen, a paramedic with MDA who said he had rescued a four-day-old baby as fires blazed from the building. During an earlier barrage of Iranian missiles on central Israel on Sunday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran will stop its strikes if Israel does the same. But after a day of intensive Israeli aerial attacks that extended targets beyond military installations to hit oil refineries and government buildings, the Revolutionary Guard struck a hard line on Monday, vowing that further rounds of strikes would be 'more forceful, severe, precise and destructive than previous ones'. Health authorities also reported that 1,277 were wounded in Iran, without distinguishing between military officials and civilians. Rights groups, such as the Washington-based Iranian advocacy group called Human Rights Activists, have suggested that the Iranian government's death toll is a significant undercount. Human Rights Activists says it has documented more than 400 people killed, among them 197 civilians. Israel argues that its assault on Iran's top military leaders, uranium enrichment sites and nuclear scientists was necessary to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Iran has always insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, and the US and others have assessed that Tehran has not pursued a nuclear weapon since 2003. But Iran has enriched ever-larger stockpiles of uranium to near weapons-grade levels in recent years and was believed to have the capacity to develop multiple weapons within months if it chose to do so.
Scotsman
36 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Petrol price alert: How the Israel-Iran conflict will impact the motorist and UK economy
'That's the end of the cheapest petrol prices in the UK for four years' – Tony Redondo, Cosmos Currency Exchange Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Motorists have been warned of an imminent hike in prices at the pump as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies. Experts also point to the knock-on effect that rising oil prices could have on the wider UK economy amid concerns that inflation may spike again. It comes as the Bank of England this week announces its latest decision on interest rates with a hold widely anticipated. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Following a 7 per cent surge on Friday, the price of a barrel of Brent crude edged higher on Monday, at around $74, which could have a direct effect on petrol prices in the UK. That would spark the end of a period of falling prices for motorists, with a litre of unleaded currently selling for below 130p on many forecourts - the cheapest petrol prices in Britain for four years. UK motorists have seen some of the lowest prices for petrol and diesel in four years. Oil price hikes have followed intensive Israeli aerial attacks that have extended targets beyond military installations to hit oil refineries and government buildings. In response, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has struck a hard line, vowing that further rounds of strikes would be 'more forceful, severe, precise and destructive than previous ones'. Tony Redondo, founder at Cosmos Currency Exchange, warned of an end to the relative downturn of the price of fuel at the pump for Brits. He said: 'Global oil prices are up, hitting their highest price in almost five months after Israel struck Iran, dramatically escalating tensions in the Middle East and raising worries about disrupted oil supplies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That's the end of the cheapest petrol prices in the UK for four years. Gold has been up to a one-month high as the markets swing to risk aversion mode. Stock markets will sell off. These are all predictable knee-jerk reactions.' Policymakers meet at the Bank of England this week to decide on the next move on interest rates. Prem Raja, head of trading floor at Currencies 4 You, added: 'Markets are reacting with a classic risk-off tone. Investors are seeking safe havens, and oil prices are rising with supply disruptions feared, potentially ending the UK's run of low petrol prices.' Ironically, the strong oil price has been helping to support the wider stock market, with the UK's benchmark FTSE-100 index proving remarkably resilient amid gains for energy companies and defence contractors. Shares in Footsie heavyweights BP and Shell were bolstered by the higher oil price. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said the latest Middle East conflict remained a 'fluid situation' with the potential for markets to experience sudden jolts if the tensions escalate further. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Global oil prices jumped last week after Israel attacked Iran, raising concerns about major disruptions to supply,' he noted. 'Despite a weekend of violence between the two countries, investors showed no signs of panicking, judging by movements in financial markets on Monday. 'The gold price is often a measure of investor sentiment, going up when people are worried and going down when they're optimistic. The precious metal slipped 0.6 per cent to $3,432 per ounce which indicates that investors remain alert to ongoing geopolitical tensions but they're not reaching for their tin hats.' Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said there were worries that the attacks from Iran and Israel could ignite a wider conflict, destabilising the Middle East and affecting oil supplies. 'There's an intense focus on the Strait of Hormuz, described as an 'oil artery' in the region,' she added. 'Around a fifth of global oil supplies flow through this narrow channel and an escalation could disrupt distribution Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Israel has already been targeting Iran's energy facilities, including Iran's South Pars gas field. Although gas prices have also edged up slightly, the biggest moves have been seen with crude prices which are up around 12 per cent since hostilities erupted and could head higher if the Strait is targeted. 'The worsening situation is set to be the focus of the G7 meeting of leaders of wealthy nations in Alberta, Canada. While hopes that Trump will sign more deals seem to be keeping trade optimism a bit higher, many countries remain in a queue and the cost to the global economy is mounting.' Interest rates UK interest rates are predicted to stay at 4.25 per cent on Thursday at the latest meeting of the central bank's monetary policy committee (MPC) after inflation jumped in April. The MPC has voted to cut rates at every other meeting since it started easing borrowing costs last August, from a peak of 5.25 per cent. This has been possible while the rate of inflation has been steadily falling from the high of 11.1 per cent in October 2022, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, inflation jumped to its highest level for more than a year in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Consumer prices index (CPI) inflation hit 3.5 per cent in April, up from 2.6 per cent in March. Since releasing the data, the ONS said that an error in vehicle tax data collected meant the April figure should have been 3.4 per cent. Riz Malik, director at R3 Wealth, fears the escalating conflict in the Middle East could affect the UK's economy.
