Sask. snowbirds selling vacation home in Arizona, say they can no longer live in Trump's America
Social Sharing
Dale Botting has spent the past 45 winters travelling to sunny Arizona to escape Saskatchewan winters and enjoy the warm weather, golf and friends he's made at his desert vacation home.
But this winter will be his last.
Botting has listed his home in Chandler, Ariz., a suburb of Phoenix, that has been in his family since his dad purchased it 45 years ago.
Botting said he could have dealt with the weak Canadian dollar and has resisted the urge to cash in on his home's appreciated value over the years, but he could no longer live in Donald Trump's America.
"It's this Trump regime and this cultism," Botting told The 306 host Peter Mills from his Arizona home office.
Botting, a Saskatoon business leader, and former deputy minister and CEO of Enterprise Saskatchewan, said he's among the first of his friends to sell out of the snowbird dream.
But he believes others will soon follow and that it's best to get out while housing prices are still stable.
"As an ethical investor, I just don't like what I'm seeing. I don't like to invest in governments that are becoming more authoritarian and more imperialistic and we certainly see that."
The decision comes with mixed emotions. Botting and his wife Rose still love to golf and have built a good community in Chandler, including many American friends.
But Botting said he wants to fight the looming trade war from Canadian soil.
That's something he's uniquely equipped to do as a former head of the Saskatchewan Trade and Export Partnership.
"I worry about folks who are watching this increasing authoritarianism kick in almost every bloody night. The last 30 days have started to feel like 30 years."
He's not the only Canadian that feels that way.
Arizona real estate agents say Canadians are bailing out of the American market in record numbers, partly driven by the weak Canadian dollar and the chance to cash in on their home's appreciated value.
But for many, it's Trump's constant needling of Canadians through tariff threats or suggesting Canada should become the 51st state.
"They've been feeling bullied and the pinch of the Canadian dollar," said Laurie Lavine, a realtor in Phoenix, Ariz.
Lavine has an appreciation for the current Canadian sell off. He was born and raised in Winnipeg, holds dual citizenship and has lived in Phoenix for the past 16 years selling real estate.
"The bullying is kind of the last straw that broke the camel's back, and seven out of my 10 listings are for that reason alone."
Lavine said other realtors are experiencing the same surge of Canadians selling off their Arizona properties because they are fed up with Trump.
"In all my 27 years as a realtor, I've never really experienced this before," said Lavine, who sold real estate in Alberta before moving to Arizona.
One accountant that Lavine works with to help Canadians navigate the tax implications of selling American property is so busy he can't see new clients for two weeks, Lavine said.
"Normally I can get a client in to see him within a couple of days."
Lavine said most people he speaks with are puzzled by Trump's threats against Canada, and some worry the threats of tariffs or annexation are just the start of what Trump could do.
"My clients are fearful that in addition to tariffs they might decide to put an extra tax on a non-resident owning a property down here so many have decided to cash out," he said.
"They've just had enough."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense
LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Canada's clean energy investment slows but momentum could surge with new power deals
Canada's steady, growing investment in clean power over the past decade slowed in 2024 with a drop-off in renewable energy plant construction, according to the latest International Energy Agency (IEA) figures. But in the face of heightened geopolitical uncertainty — and with most of the country's provinces planning to award deals this year to build more power plants and infrastructure — the Canadian green transition could quickly pick up pace again, a leading think-tank says. Capital spending on power generation in Canada between 2021-25 averaged US$7.3 billion a year — $5.3 billion of which went into renewables projects, the IEA stated in its 10th World Energy Investment report. The remaining $2 billion was split between new fossil fuel and nuclear developments. Clean energy spending numbers in the country are up compared to 2016-2021, when renewables saw $3.3 billion in capital expenditure, while fossil and nuclear saw $1 billion and $1.2 billion invested, respectively. The Canadian data also reflects the accelerating global shift away from oil, gas and coal, which is expected to see $1.1 trillion invested in 2025, while renewables, nuclear, grids, storage, e-fuels, and electrification are on course to reach a record $2.2 trillion spend. 'Today's investment trends clearly show a new Age of Electricity is drawing nearer,' said Fatih Birol, executive director of the IEA, as the report was released online lastThursday. "A decade ago, global investments in fossil fuels were 30 per cent higher than those in electricity generation, grids and storage. This year, electricity investments are set to be some 50 per cent higher than the total amount being spent bringing oil, natural gas and coal to market.' Birol noted spending on low-carbon power generation has almost doubled over the past five years, with solar power investment alone forecast to hit $450 billion in 2025, making it the 'single largest item in the global energy investment inventory.' Battery storage investments are also climbing rapidly, he said, with the IEA expecting spending to surge past $65 billion this year. A Canadian green 'gold rush' ahead? Evan Pivnick, Clean Energy Canada's clean energy program manager, said the drop in construction of solar and wind farms in Canada over the past year is disappointing. However, the 'bigger theme' in the IEA data is the growth of renewables share in the country's energy mix, which rose from 27.6 per cent in 2016-2020 to 36.6 per cent in 2021-2025, he added. Given that almost every province and territory is planning to hold a new power procurement round this year — where governments allocate future production capacity on the grid — conditions could exist for a renewables 'gold rush,' Pivnick said. 'The focus should be on interprovincial powe grids and interties - between Ontario and Quebec and Quebec and Atlantic Canada and between Alberta and BC,' says Clean Energy Canada's Evan Pivnick. 'Renewables are the cheapest form of new energy and prices continue to fall. We have historically been an oil-producing nation, but we have unbelievable renewable energy resources in wind and solar, all backed up by a world-class hydropower network,' he said. Canada has some singular challenges, including a vast geography with 13 different energy grids, Pivnick noted. 'But I think we are entering a new chapter in our energy transition.' Pivnik said the IEA data also reveals striking similarities between the energy transition in Canada and much of the rest of the world. One is underinvestment in transmission, which will hinder bringing new power online and getting it to industrial, commercial and residential consumers. Another is that energy security is becoming a major motivation in all national energy policy thinking. The IEA's Birol referred to it as the 'new main driver' of investment in power generation. 'Building renewable energy projects is the best way to make Canada's energy more secure and protect the country's electricity prices from fluctuations in global markets and political dynamics," said Pivnik. Canada's national renewables build-out has become sluggish in the last few years, primarily because Alberta — the country's erstwhile clean-energy powerhouse with over 10,000 MW of installed wind and solar — in 2022 imposed a moratorium on renewables projects. Nationwide solar and wind build down Nationwide, a mere 314 MW of solar power was switched on last year, down from 765 MW the year before, taking total plant capacity to 4,000 MW, according to figures from the C anadian Renewable Energy Association, an industry body. Wind power fared little better, with the installation of 1,434 MW of turbines in 2024, down from 1,774 MW the year before, expanding the fleet to a total 18,434 MW. The average yearly investment in Canada's electricity network fell slightly in 2021-2025 compared to the previous five years, the IEA found, to $4.1 billion from $4.2 billion. The same was seen globally as capital spending on grids, currently at around $400 billion a year, is not keeping pace with spending on generation and electrification, the agency said. Pivnick believes new transmission infrastructure should be top of the list for the new Liberal government's so-called 'nation-building' projects plan. 'The focus should be on interprovincial grids and interties - between Ontario and Quebec and Quebec and Atlantic Canada and between Alberta and BC,' Pivnick said. Power connections like these are the most cost-effective way to enhance Canada's ability to build more clean energy capacity in the provinces and distribute the country's energy resources to the regions that need them most, he added. Globally, China, far and away, led the energy investment tables with a forecast $874 billion to be spent this year, of which $627 billion will go into renewables projects — as much as the EU and US combined. The Asian superpower's share of worldwide renewables spending has risen from a quarter to almost a third over the past 10 years, based on a portfolio of technologies including solar, wind, hydropower, nuclear, batteries and EVs. Declining spending on new oil Capital spending on oil production is foreseen falling six per cent globally, while the nuclear sector's investment renaissance is expected to result in expenditure growing 50 per cent in 2025 to $75 billion. The rampant rise in worldwide electricity demand has also continued to fuel investment in coal, led by China, with the construction of nearly 100,000 MW of new lignite-fired power plants given the green-light. The IEA report noted that energy sector spending patterns were 'very uneven globally' with many developing economies struggling to get capital for energy infrastructure. Africa, though it is home to 20 per cent of the world's population accounts for just two per cent of global clean energy investment. Birol said: 'Investment flows are not yet on track to deliver on the renewable and efficiency goals agreed at COP28' in Dubai, UAE, which finished with a declaration stating the conference marked the 'beginning of the end' of the fossil fuel era. 'The annual investment required in renewable power still needs to double to achieve a tripling of installed renewable capacity by 2030, accompanied by rising spending on grids, storage and other forms of flexibility to ensure secure and cost-effective utilization of this capacity.'
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"
It takes a lot to make Simon Donner lose his cool. The co-chair of the feds' advisory group on climate policy has a daily practice of swimming in the Pacific and braves the frigid water all winter long. But he couldn't bear the blather about 'decarbonized oil' spilling from the first ministers' meeting this week. The prime minister and premiers emerged from their meeting in Saskatoon last Monday and jointly declared they would 'work urgently to get Canadian natural resources and commodities to domestic and international markets, such as critical minerals and decarbonized Canadian oil and gas by pipelines, supported by the private sector….' Donner took to social media to denounce the whole notion of 'decarbonized oil' as 'Orwellian.' It was strong language from the co-chair of the federal Net-Zero Advisory Body (NZAB). Donner is a climate scientist at UBC studying oceans and the intersection of climate science and policy. In that role, he gets to call the fouls as he sees them. But when people accept official government advisory roles, their criticisms usually devolve into gracious gibberish. So, it was refreshing to hear Donner push back on the statement by Carney et al. The whole idea is just plain 'silly,' he said. There is no such thing as 'decarbonized oil' — 'Oil contains carbon and emits CO2 when combusted.' Oil is, after all, a hydrocarbon. Along with methane gas and coal, the combustion of these fossil fuels is the primary driver of climate change. You already knew that, I'm sure. But the reason it's important to spell it out is that you're in the minority. Everyone knows there's a conflict between Big Oil and the greenies. But after decades of climate denial, online disinformation and general gaslighting, there is still widespread confusion about the most basic facts — just under half of Canadians pick out 'burning fossil fuels' even when given a list of possible sources most responsible for climate change. The marketing spin about 'decarbonized oil,' isn't new. The oil and gas industry and various agencies were talking about carbon capture on oil production last century. More recently, Natural Resources Canada published a Roadmap for the Decarbonization of Canada's Oil and Gas Sector in the Trudeau years. The nonsensical term is a close cousin to the attempts at marketing deep offshore drilling in the Atlantic as 'net-zero.' And adjacent to the most brazen branding effort to date — so-called 'ethical oil.' Decarbonized oil doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons. @ writes for @ The decarbonized doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of our new PM, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons but nevertheless talked about 'decarbonized barrels' at the press conference following the first ministers' meeting. And it was particularly painful considering the venue — a province under a state of emergency where more than 15,000 people have fled wildfires. Extended families are crammed into single hotel rooms and sleeping in parking lots. While the first ministers discussed their nation-building plans in Saskatoon, a group of evacuees held a protest in the city demanding more resources for firefighting and evacuation support. It is still only Spring, but over 33,000 Canadians have already been forced to evacuate. John Vaillant, the author of Fire Weather relayed a startling conversation this week: the CEO of Red Cross Canada told him that when he started with the organization 17 years ago, 'eighty per cent of our work was outside Canada. Now, eighty per cent of our work is inside the country.' The early-season heatwave and fire conditions on the Prairies are 'at least five times more likely than they would be in a world without climate change,' according to attribution scientists. 'These conditions, which set the stage for dangerous wildfires, will only become more frequent and more severe if we continue burning fossil fuels,' said Dr. Kristina Dahl, VP of Science at Climate Central. The contrast was too much for another member of NZAB. ''Decarbonized oil and gas' does not exist,' wrote Catherine Abreu. '[It is] a complete contradiction in terms, and a dangerous lie that Canadian government after Canadian government has tried to spin under the spell of industry lobbying.' It may be too early to tell who's doing the spinning and what kind of spell they're casting. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith sounded positively enthusiastic about an emerging 'grand bargain' to satisfy the demands of the oil and gas industry. But some political watchers suspect Mark Carney is spinning a political web of his own. CNO's Max Fawcett argues that Carney is effectively calling Smith's bluff — a kind of judo move that avoids direct confrontation and puts the pressure back on her: 'He will, as Smith demanded, create the conditions for a more rapid assessment of infrastructure projects. But it's clear that one of those conditions will be the net-zero targets that Smith and Alberta's oil and gas industry have repeatedly committed themselves to.' Politics is the art of the possible, as they say. And perhaps there's a method behind the oxymorons and doublespeak. But it's hard to shake the sense that we're kidding ourselves and avoiding the basic reckoning. Still muttering about decarbonizing hydrocarbons even as the flames close in.
