
Trump Administration Live Updates: Trump Rallies for His Policy Bill as G.O.P. Works to Save It
Lyn Redwood, who once ran the anti-vaccine group that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. founded, spoke during the meeting on Thursday.
An advisory panel recently appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted on Thursday to walk back longstanding recommendations for flu vaccines containing an ingredient that the anti-vaccine movement has falsely linked to autism.
The vote signaled a powerful shift in the way federal officials approach vaccines, putting into action Mr. Kennedy's deep skepticism about their safety and delivering the first blows to a scientific process that for decades has provided effective vaccines to Americans.
Mr. Kennedy fired all 17 experts on the panel about two weeks ago, and then appointed eight new members, at least half of whom have expressed skepticism about some vaccines.
'We came to this meeting with no predetermined ideas, and will make judgments as if we are treating for our own families,' the panelists said in a statement.
To critics, the two-day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices offered the clearest signs yet that the Trump administration intends to unravel the system that has long guided clinical decisions about vaccination.
'As a physician and scientist who has devoted my entire career to vaccines and preventing and treating infections, this meeting has been devastating to watch,' said Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, an expert on vaccines who resigned from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention earlier this month.
Dozens of studies have shown the vaccine ingredient, called thimerosal, to be harmless. It has not been a component of most childhood shots since 2001.
'The risk from influenza is so much greater than the nonexistent risk as far as we know from thimerosal,' said the lone dissenter, Dr. Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine who is widely considered to be the most qualified member of the new committee.
'I find it very hard to justify' the panel's decision, he added.
In a separate vote, the new panel recommended seasonal flu vaccines to all Americans 6 months and older. The common single-dose flu shots do not contain thimerosal.
The committee advises the C.D.C. on vaccine efficacy and safety, and it makes recommendations regarding who should receive a vaccine and when.
Insurance companies and government programs like Medicaid are required to cover immunizations that the C.D.C. recommends, and states base their school mandates on the agency's guidance.
In addition to certain flu vaccines, some panelists on Thursday questioned the safety of other products that have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and thoroughly vetted by independent experts.
Others seemed unaware of basic information about the Vaccines for Children program, which provides free immunizations to roughly half of all American children.
'It's striking how little the voting members seem to know about the diseases and vaccines that they are discussing,' said Dr. Adam Ratner, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist and expert on vaccine policy.
During the deliberations on a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus, known as R.S.V., one of the panelists, Dr. Robert Malone, said that there had been 'very, very active discussion and consideration within the committee, just for the record, concerning this product.'
'It has been very actively debated internally,' he said.
Outside experts interpreted his remarks to mean that panelists had been privately discussing the topic among themselves, something that they are not legally allowed to do.
Image
Dr. Robert Malone was among the panelists on Wednesday.
Credit...
Megan Varner/Reuters
'In other contexts, off-record conversations have been grounds for overturning a decision,' said Dorit Reiss, an expert on vaccine policy and law at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco.
'Though it reflects lack of understanding of their limits, it's unlikely to lead to overturning,' she added.
A spokesman for the Health and Human Services Department said that Dr. Malone had been referring to a one-on-one conversation between Dr. Malone and another panelist, which was 'permissible.'
Presentations at the meetings are generally made by C.D.C. staff members. But among the speakers on Thursday was Lyn Redwood, a former leader of Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group founded by Mr. Kennedy.
Ms. Redwood, who has been hired as a special employee at the Health and Human Services Department, alleged in the meeting that thimerosal was toxic and dangerous to children. (She said that she was making the comments as 'a private citizen.')
A scientific review of evidence demonstrating the safety of thimerosal was posted online by C.D.C. scientists on Tuesday but taken down shortly thereafter.
'Giving someone like Lyn Redwood a voice at the A.C.I.P. meeting to spread misinformation about a long-settled matter of vaccine safety is yet another troubling way in which R.F.K. Jr. is inappropriately interfering with the C.D.C. vaccine policy process,' said Dr. Fiona Havers, who resigned last week from her position as a senior C.D.C. adviser on vaccine policy.
Image
Dr. Fiona Havers, who resigned from her position as a senior C.D.C. adviser on vaccine policy.
Credit...
Melissa Golden for The New York Times
On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that Ms. Redwood's presentation incorrectly said the only flu vaccine still containing thimerosal had 50 micrograms per dose, double the actual amount.
That slide was removed from the version Ms. Redwood offered on Thursday, but the inaccurate information was repeated in a different slide.
Her presentation had also initially included references to studies that did not exist; that slide was also removed.
During the 2024-25 respiratory virus season, only 3 percent of children and 2 percent of older adults received flu vaccines containing thimerosal, according to an analysis of electronic health records by Truveta.
Dr. Meissner sharply objected to Ms. Redwood's comments.
'I'm not quire sure how to respond to this presentation,' he said. 'This is an old issue that has been addressed in the past.'
'There is no scientific evidence that thimerosal has caused a problem,' he added.
Liaisons to the A.C.I.P. from several organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, also challenged the idea that thimerosal is toxic.
In another unusual move, Martin Kulldorff, the panel's chair, proposed that the members vote to stop allowing the use of a vaccine for measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox for children under 4. That combination vaccine has been available since 2005.
It slightly increases the risk of febrile seizures, which can occur with any childhood illness but do not cause lasting harm. The C.D.C. already recommends administering the M.M.R. shot and the chickenpox shot separately in the first dose.
The panelists are expected to vote on the vaccine's use at a future meeting.
The committee sounded a skeptical note with its very first vote on Thursday.
Clesrovimab is a new monoclonal antibody approved by the F.D.A. this month to protect infants from R.S.V. infection. The committee's vote on recommending it was expected to be straightforward, as clesrovimab is not technically a vaccine.
But a new panel member, Retsef Levi, a professor of operations science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that he would like to discuss some data he 'had found' from clinical trials that raised concerns about deaths in children receiving the product.
Experts from the C.D.C. and the F.D.A., and the vaccine's manufacturer, all said the data had been reviewed very carefully before the antibody's approval and did not reveal any association between the deaths and the product.
Image
Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse affiliated with an anti-vaccine group, attended the meeting virtually on Wednesday.
Credit...
Megan Varner/Reuters
Experts watching the proceedings were incensed.
'These trials have been discussed at length at prior meetings, and the questions were answered to the satisfaction of all of the members,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, the chair of the infectious disease committee at the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a member of the R.S.V. work group convened by the C.D.C.
Dr. Meissner, the panelist who dissented in the vote on flu vaccines, noted that the work group of 60 experts, including himself, had reviewed the safety data 'very, very carefully.'
He defended both the monoclonal antibody and an R.S.V. vaccine for pregnant women as valuable new tools. R.S.V. is the leading cause of hospitalizations in infants.
'We have come so far in the last few years in making these products available, and really it's a result of the extraordinary investigations,' Dr. Meissner said.
Safety, he added, 'is simply not an issue here.'
Another monoclonal antibody, nirsevimab, sharply reduced R.S.V. hospitalizations among infants during the 2024-25 season, and so far it does not appear to pose serious safety concerns, according to data presented at the meeting on Wednesday.
Dr. Levi and Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse affiliated with an anti-vaccine group, voted against recommending clesrovimab; the other five members voted yes. After some confusion, the panel also voted to include the antibody in the children's vaccine program.
Some panelists also raised concerns about a flu vaccine that would be offered to everyone aged 9 and older. As of June 14, flu was associated with 250 deaths in children in the United States, according to data presented on Thursday.
Dr. Malone called that a 'modest number,' but some experts noted that the number of deaths was the highest in a nonpandemic year in a long time, and almost certainly an undercount.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Migrant family sues over US detention in what may be first challenge to courthouse arrests involving kids
ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow A mother and her two young kids are fighting for their release from a Texas immigration detention center in what is believed to be the first lawsuit involving children challenging the Trump administration's policy on immigrant arrests at courthouses. The lawsuit filed Tuesday argues that the family's arrests after fleeing Honduras and entering the US legally using a Biden-era appointment app violate their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure and their Fifth Amendment right to due process. 'The big picture is that the executive branch cannot seize people, arrest people, detain people indefinitely when they are complying with exactly what our government has required of them,' said Columbia Law School professor Elora Mukherjee, one of the lawyers representing the family. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment. Starting in May, the country has seen large-scale arrests in which asylum-seekers appearing at routine court hearings have been arrested outside courtrooms as part of the White House's mass deportation effort. In many cases, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings and then US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will arrest the person and place them on 'expedited removal,' a fast track to deportation. Mukherjee said this is the first lawsuit filed on behalf of children to challenge the ICE courthouse arrest policy. The government has until July 1 to respond. There have been other similar lawsuits, including in New York, where a federal judge ruled earlier this month that federal immigration authorities can't make civil arrests at the state's courthouses or arrest anyone going there for a proceeding. The Texas lawsuit was filed using initials for the children and 'Ms. Z' for the mother. Their identities have not been released because of concerns for their safety. For weeks in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, the mother has watched her 6-year-old son's health decline, Mukherjee said. He recently underwent chemotherapy treatment for leukemia and because of his arrest missed his check-in doctor's appointment, Mukherjee said. 'He's easily bruising. He has bone pain. He looks pale,' Mukherjee said, adding that he has also lost his appetite. 'His mom is terrified that these are symptoms that his leukemia situation might be deteriorating.' The mother, son and 9-year-old daughter fled Honduras in October 2024 due to death threats, according to the lawsuit. They entered the US using the CBP One app and were paroled into the country by the Department of Homeland Security, which determined they didn't pose a danger to the community, Mukherjee said. They were told to appear at a Los Angeles immigration court May 29. President Donald Trump ended CBP One for new entrants on his first day in office after more than 900,000 people had been allowed in the country using the app since it was expanded to include migrants in January 2023. During the family's hearing, the mother tried to tell the judge that they wished to continue their cases for asylum, Mukherjee said. Homeland Security moved to dismiss their cases, and the judge immediately granted that motion. When they stepped out of the courtroom, they found men in civilian clothing believed to be ICE agents who arrested the family, Mukherjee said. They spent about 11 hours at an immigrant processing center in Los Angeles and were each only given an apple, a small packet of cookies, a juice box and water. At one point, an officer near the boy lifted his shirt, revealing his gun. The boy urinated on himself and was left in wet clothing until the next morning, Mukherjee said. They were later taken to the processing center, where they have been held ever since. 'The family is suffering in this immigration detention center,' she said. 'The kids are crying every night. They're praying to God for their release from this detention center.' Their lawyers have filed an appeal of the immigration judge's May decision, but they're at risk of being deported within days because the government says they are subjected to expedited removal, Mukherjee said. The arrests of the family were illegal and unjustified, said Kate Gibson Kumar, an attorney for the Texas Civil Rights project who is also representing the family. 'The essential question in our case is, when you have these families who are doing everything right, especially with young children, should there be some protection there?' Gibson Kumar said. 'We say 'yes.''


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Migrant family sues over US detention in what may be first challenge to courthouse arrests involving kids
A mother and her two young kids are fighting for their release from a Texas immigration detention center in what is believed to be the first lawsuit involving children challenging the Trump administration's policy on immigrant arrests at courthouses. The lawsuit filed Tuesday argues that the family's arrests after fleeing Honduras and entering the US legally using a Biden-era appointment app violate their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure and their Fifth Amendment right to due process. 'The big picture is that the executive branch cannot seize people, arrest people, detain people indefinitely when they are complying with exactly what our government has required of them,' said Columbia Law School professor Elora Mukherjee, one of the lawyers representing the family. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment. Starting in May, the country has seen large-scale arrests in which asylum-seekers appearing at routine court hearings have been arrested outside courtrooms as part of the White House's mass deportation effort. In many cases, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings and then US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will arrest the person and place them on 'expedited removal,' a fast track to deportation. Mukherjee said this is the first lawsuit filed on behalf of children to challenge the ICE courthouse arrest policy. The government has until July 1 to respond. There have been other similar lawsuits, including in New York, where a federal judge ruled earlier this month that federal immigration authorities can't make civil arrests at the state's courthouses or arrest anyone going there for a proceeding. The Texas lawsuit was filed using initials for the children and 'Ms. Z' for the mother. Their identities have not been released because of concerns for their safety. For weeks in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, the mother has watched her 6-year-old son's health decline, Mukherjee said. He recently underwent chemotherapy treatment for leukemia and because of his arrest missed his check-in doctor's appointment, Mukherjee said. 'He's easily bruising. He has bone pain. He looks pale,' Mukherjee said, adding that he has also lost his appetite. 'His mom is terrified that these are symptoms that his leukemia situation might be deteriorating.' The mother, son and 9-year-old daughter fled Honduras in October 2024 due to death threats, according to the lawsuit. They entered the US using the CBP One app and were paroled into the country by the Department of Homeland Security, which determined they didn't pose a danger to the community, Mukherjee said. They were told to appear at a Los Angeles immigration court May 29. President Donald Trump ended CBP One for new entrants on his first day in office after more than 900,000 people had been allowed in the country using the app since it was expanded to include migrants in January 2023. During the family's hearing, the mother tried to tell the judge that they wished to continue their cases for asylum, Mukherjee said. Homeland Security moved to dismiss their cases, and the judge immediately granted that motion. When they stepped out of the courtroom, they found men in civilian clothing believed to be ICE agents who arrested the family, Mukherjee said. They spent about 11 hours at an immigrant processing center in Los Angeles and were each only given an apple, a small packet of cookies, a juice box and water. At one point, an officer near the boy lifted his shirt, revealing his gun. The boy urinated on himself and was left in wet clothing until the next morning, Mukherjee said. They were later taken to the processing center, where they have been held ever since. 'The family is suffering in this immigration detention center,' she said. 'The kids are crying every night. They're praying to God for their release from this detention center.' Their lawyers have filed an appeal of the immigration judge's May decision, but they're at risk of being deported within days because the government says they are subjected to expedited removal, Mukherjee said. The arrests of the family were illegal and unjustified, said Kate Gibson Kumar, an attorney for the Texas Civil Rights project who is also representing the family. 'The essential question in our case is, when you have these families who are doing everything right, especially with young children, should there be some protection there?' Gibson Kumar said. 'We say 'yes.''


CNET
14 minutes ago
- CNET
If You Can't Remember the Last Time You Changed Your Sheets, Read This
There's nothing quite like collapsing into bed at the end of a long day. Pulling up the covers, sinking into soft pillows and finally letting go of everything that's been weighing on you can feel like pure relief. But that cozy, restful feeling only really hits when your bedding is clean. If it's been a while since you washed your sheets, that sense of calm might be hiding more than you realize. Sheets collect a lot over time. That includes sweat, dead skin cells, body oils and dust mites. Pillowcases can get even dirtier, holding onto makeup residue, hair products and facial creams. That buildup can affect your skin and your sleep quality. Experts generally recommend washing all your bedding at least once a week to keep things fresh and healthy. If you are unsure how to get started or want to make your laundry routine more effective, here are six simple tips to help you clean your sheets the right way. How often should I change or wash my sheets? The common rule of thumb is to wash sheets every other week. Ideally, sleep experts recommend changing sheets every week but agree that every two weeks is the absolute longest one should go sleeping on the same set of sheets. When to wash all bedding Bedding type Frequency Sheets Once a week or every other week Pillowcases Once a week or every other week Duvet covers Once a week or every other week Comforters Once a month or every other month (or more frequently if you sleep with pets) Duvet inserts Once or twice a year Mattress pads Every three to four months Why do we wash our sheets and bedding? Hygiene is always important, even with our bedding. If you can't see stains or smell any odor, it doesn't mean your sheets are clean. Sheets can accumulate dead skin, mites, animal dander, pollen, makeup, bodily secretions and more grime, which may cause discomfort or skin rashes. One of the biggest reasons to regularly clean sheets is because of sweat. In a May study, 41% of participants reported experiencing night sweats in a month, and generally, people tend to run hot when covered in blankets or living in warmer climates. Sweat can soak into the sheets which can clog up the fibers and make the sheets smell. You should wash your sheets more often if you tend to sleep with your pet. Elena Grigorovich/EyeEm/Getty Images You should also wash your sheets more often if: You have allergies or asthma You have sensitive skin You sweat or overheat frequently You sleep naked You sleep with a pet You eat in bed You get in bed before showering You lay in bed wearing clothes you wore out in public You have an infection or open wound that touches the bedding What's the best way to machine-wash my sheets? Most bedsheets are machine-washable and aren't much of a hassle to clean. Cotton and linen bedsheets are especially easy, while silk and satin are a bit more temperamental, requiring cold temperatures and slow spin cycles. It's best to always check the care tag on your sheets but this is the best method to machine-wash the majority of sheet sets: 1. Don't overwhelm the machine It can be tempting to just throw every pillowcase, fitted sheet and comforter right into the machine but throwing everything in at once may be too much and you may not get a good clean. I recommend washing the fitted and flat sheets together with your pillowcases and then washing any heavier comforter, quilt or throw blanket separately. Definitely don't throw in any clothing or towels with your bedding because it could leach color or have buttons and zippers that will damage delicate sheets. Bulkier items like duvet covers should be washed alone. iso_petrov/Getty Images 2. Check the label I always recommend checking the care label for the ideal washing temperature because some fabrics can shrink in the wash. It's best to use the hottest temperature the sheets can tolerate because hot water most effectively kills germs and bacteria. Colder cycles may not fully get rid of the grime. Polyester blends are best in warm water, while cotton can tolerate hot water. Silk and satin sheets should be washed on a cold, gentle cycle. 3. Separate by color Separate your sheets by color to preserve the colors and prevent dye from transferring. This means that you should make sure to put light-colored and dark-colored sheets together before washing. 4. Check bedsheets for stains Stains are better when cared for pre-wash, so take a few minutes to examine your sheets or pillowcases for stubborn blemishes. You can use a gentle dish soap and water, or baking soda and water mixture to let sit for a few minutes if you spot a dark mark or makeup stain. 5. Measure out detergent Less is usually more when using detergent. Too much detergent can lead to the machine using excess water or cause buildup in the washing machine's pipes. Most detergents are acceptable to use on cotton and linen sheets but choose a detergent for delicate fabrics to wash silk and satin sheets. There are many silk or satin-friendly detergents on the market. A good rule of thumb is to use 2 ounces (1/4 cup) or half a cap full of liquid laundry detergent for a regular-sized load of bedding. You can also use 4 ounces (1/2 cup) or 1 full cap of liquid laundry detergent for a larger load of bulkier items. I also recommend skipping the fabric softener because it can weaken the fabric. 6. Dry completely For most sheets, you can use the dryer on low to medium heat. Satin and silk sheets would do best to air dry because they can be easily damaged even on a low-heat dryer cycle. You can also throw in a few dryer balls with your bedding because they allow gaps, helping the bulkier sheets to dry more quickly and evenly (I always hate when I think I'm finally ready to make my bed and I realize one whole section is still damp from being bundled up). You can avoid cleaning your bedsheets as often by making it a habit to not eat in bed, not sleeping with your pet and only cuddling down in the sheets after a shower. It may seem like a hassle to strip your bed every week but it's well worth the extra effort, so you can sleep and relax a little easier. For more hacks, check out how to remove makeup stains from bedding and our sleep experts' favorite bed material. Can you wash sheets and clothes together? While you can wash sheets and clothes together, many experts recommend washing them separately to prevent clothes from getting caught in the sheets and not being washed thoroughly. Sheets may also have different washing instructions from clothes so washing them separately can help preserve the different fabrics and prevent damage. More cleaning and laundry tips