G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit
Allies from the world's major economies affirmed their 'commitment to peace and stability' in a statement agreed shortly before the US president's abrupt departure from a major global summit in Canada.
The White House said Mr Trump had left the G7 leaders' conference after a group dinner on Monday because of 'what's going on in the Middle East,' without elaborating.
The US president said his reason for leaving the summit had 'nothing to do with a ceasefire' between Israel and Iran.
In their statement, the leaders called for a 'ceasefire in Gaza' and said they 'stand ready to coordinate' to protect market stability in the face of rising oil prices amid spiralling hostilities between Israel and Iran.
It said: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East.
'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel.
'We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians.
'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.
'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
Diana and I were honoured to welcome the @G7 leaders to Kananaskis this morning. This Summit is an opportunity for us to create more prosperity, stability, and security for the world. pic.twitter.com/1IJKjHCTzy
— Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) June 16, 2025
'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.
'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.'
In a post on X on Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.'
Mr Trump posted on Truth Social: '(Macron) has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a ceasefire. Much bigger than that.
He added: 'Stay tuned!'
Downing Street declined to comment on Mr Trump's early exit.
It means the US president will miss meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that had been scheduled for Tuesday, when leaders outside the G7 will join discussions.
Iran said at least 224 people had been killed in the country since strikes began on Friday, while Israeli officials said 24 people had been killed and more than 500 injured.
Earlier on Monday the president said Iran should have signed a deal that he proposed to them and also urged citizens to 'immediately evacuate' Tehran, a city of up to 17 million people, without offering further details.
'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I said it over and over again!'
The Leader's Summit is a forum for open discussion, collaboration, and consensus-building on pressing global issues. Read about the #G7 priorities guiding the discussions: https://t.co/fDkiRv6sGA pic.twitter.com/zManPzkzRL
— G7 (@G7) June 17, 2025
During an impromptu media spray with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after the two leaders announced a US-UK deal had been finalised on Monday, Mr Trump was asked if he supported regime change in Tehran.
'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens,' he said.
Elsewhere on the sidelines of the summit, Sir Keir held a bilateral meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron during which Downing Street said the leaders agreed 'on the need to find a route to peace through diplomacy and dialogue.'
French media later reported that Mr Macron had said the US president informed G7 leaders of ongoing discussions for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump tax bill risks exodus of clean hydrogen investment
June 16 - Tax and spending plans in President Trump's 'One Big Beautiful" bill passed by the House of Representatives on May 22 would hobble the nascent U.S. green hydrogen industry in the United States by removing crucial tax credits earlier than previously planned. Introduced in the Biden administration's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, base 45V production tax credits (PTCs) of up to $3/kg are offered depending on emissions. The credits are available for 'green' hydrogen projects, which use electrolyzers powered by renewable energy, and 'blue' hydrogen projects using steam methane reformation coupled with carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS). Trump's tax bill would bring forward the deadline for projects to qualify for the 45V credits, requiring them to begin construction by January 1, 2026 compared with the previous deadline of January 1, 2033 set out by the Biden administration. A revised bill released by the Senate Finance Committee on June 16 retained the changes. Final guidance on how to qualify for the credits was only published by the U.S. Treasury Department in January 2025 and is complex, requiring projects to source clean power from either nuclear plants "at risk of retirement" or new renewable energy projects, to minimize the impact on wider electricity supply. Many projects "will not be able to meet the end of 2025 deadline' set out in the proposed tax bill, Lee Beck, Senior Vice President for global policy and commercial strategy at green fuel developer HIF Global, told Reuters Events. "It takes four to six years to develop large infrastructure projects," Beck said "Having just a few months to make the required project changes, commence construction, and reach financial close is unrealistic in infrastructure timeframes.' In one example, HIF Global requires until the end of 2027 to begin construction of a green hydrogen plant in Matagorda County, Texas, Beck said. The project will require $7 billion of investment and the company has already spent more than $200 million developing the plant, which would produce 1.4 million tons/year of e-methanol using hydrogen and captured CO2 to supply the automotive, shipping and aviation sectors. Join 3,000+ senior decision-makers across energy and finance at Reuters Events Energy LIVE 2025. The shortened deadline for the 45V credits 'would pull the rug out from under the whole industry," Beck said. Many investors would pivot to other regions. HIF Global has plans to develop projects around the world and 'will allocate capital to the places that are most competitive,' Beck said. Economic impact Approved by a single vote majority in the House of Representatives, the tax bill is currently with the Senate and changes may yet be made. Many Republican states have benefited from the tax credits while some Republicans fear the bill will inflate the federal deficit. Dozens of stakeholders including the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the FCHEA sent a joint letter to Senate majority leader John Thune and Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance Mike Crapo on June 5, calling for the retention of the 45V credits for projects that start construction by December 31, 2029. Download our exclusive report: US Energy Strategies Under Trump 2.0 The early withdrawal of 45V tax credits would "send yet another destabilising signal to the market—stranding investment and halting project development," FCHEA President and CEO Frank Wolak told Reuters Events. Eliminating the credits early would impact American job creation and industrial competitiveness, Wolak said. 'Walking away from the 45V credit would cede our competitive edge to China and Europe, where governments are aggressively supporting their hydrogen industries," he said. Demand challenge Current hydrogen production is mostly 'grey' hydrogen produced from gas using steam methane reformation processes. The cost of green hydrogen is currently far higher than the cost of grey hydrogen and the 45V tax credits were introduced to help clean hydrogen developers move from pilot projects to larger commercial facilities and drive down costs. The Biden administration aimed to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen to $1/kg by 2031, compared with around $5/kg in 2022. CHART: US estimated clean hydrogen demand at threshold prices While Trump's proposed tax bill cuts back the 45V credits, it leaves intact 45Q tax credits for carbon sequestration that offer an alternative form of support for blue hydrogen projects. The 45Q credits offer $60 to $180/tonne of sequestered carbon if prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements are met. Developers must choose between 45V or 45Q schemes. A lack of U.S.-wide incentives for hydrogen consumers to switch to cleaner solutions means there is little motivation for offtakers to choose green or blue hydrogen over established grey hydrogen sources. A small number of states including California, Oregon and Washington provide some support for clean hydrogen through low carbon fuel standard programs. For exclusive hydrogen insights, sign up to our newsletter. The cost of green hydrogen will fall over time and this will allow developers to capture more market share, Sanjay Shrestha, President of green hydrogen developer Plug Power, told Reuters Events in April. Plug Power operates the country's largest proton exchange membrane electrolyzer in Georgia, featuring eight 5 MW units. Infrastructure cuts President Trump is also expected to cut funding for regional hydrogen hubs seen as crucial for building out the infrastructure to deliver clean hydrogen to customers. Under the Biden administration's H2hubs plan, $7 billion of federal funding was agreed for seven new hydrogen hubs for Appalachia, California, Gulf Coast, Heartland, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and the Pacific Northwest. MAP: US planned, installed electrolyzer capacity Phase 1 funding of $87.5 million was agreed in September 2024, providing funds to plan and develop the California hub, which would leverage wind power; the Pacific Northwest hub, based on hydro; and the Appalachian hub, which would make use of natural gas. Future funding instalments are in doubt however, as President Trump ordered the Department of Energy (DOE) to review all funding programs including the remaining H2hubs financing. The DOE is expected to complete the funding review by the end of the summer. The scheme planned to provide up to $1 billion of federal funding and attract $4 to $5 billion in private sector investment to each of the seven hubs. Without the connective infrastructure provided by the planned hubs to support the production, storage, delivery, and end-use of hydrogen, 'the commercial-scale deployment of clean hydrogen would likely be more challenging," Jeffrey Davis, Partner at law firm White & Case, told Reuters Events.
NBC News
28 minutes ago
- NBC News
Russian bombs hit dozens of civilian targets in Ukraine, killing at least 15
Russia's full-scale invasion is now in its fourth year, and the hostilities have heated up in recent weeks as Kyiv and Moscow failed to reach any agreement during two rounds of peace talks in Istanbul. Russian troops are pressing on with a grinding advance in eastern Ukraine and have opened a new front in the Sumy region in the northeast, despite calls for a ceasefire from U.S. President Donald Trump, who promised to end the war quickly. Zelenskyy was in Canada to attend the Group of Seven summit, hoping to gather more support for tighter sanctions against Russia and continued military aid for Ukraine. He had also hoped to meet U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss weapons purchases, but Trump left the G7 summit a day early due to the situation in the Middle East, the White House said. Trump has reoriented U.S. policy away from supporting Kyiv towards accepting Moscow's justifications for its invasion, and has so far resisted calls from European allies to impose tighter sanctions of Moscow for rejecting his calls for a ceasefire. At the summit, Trump called for the G7 to readmit Russia, which was expelled in 2014 after an earlier attack on Ukraine.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court to rule on Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
June 17 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court will hear arguments on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and civil unrest, days after a lower court ruled that the president unlawfully called the National Guard into service. The lower court's ruling last Thursday was put on hold hours later by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which will consider the Trump administration's request for a longer pause during its appeal. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco had ruled that the Republican president unlawfully took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard, but Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marines' mobilization. Breyer said Trump had not complied with the law that allows him to take control of the National Guard to address rebellions or invasions, and ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom, who sued over the deployment. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles sparked a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in a city in the midst of protest and turmoil over Trump's immigration raids. Political unrest spread to other parts of the country over the weekend, when a gunman assassinated a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota and large protests took place in many other cities to coincide with a military parade that celebrated the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary on the same day as Trump's 79th birthday. California's lawsuit, filed on June 9, argues that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violate the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they were instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The Trump administration argues that the law gives the president sole discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response and that neither the courts nor a state governor can second-guess that determination. In Thursday's order, Breyer said the protest fell far short of qualifying as a rebellion. "The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. The three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit that will hear the case consists of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden.
