logo
Art of the matter: Pens, paintbrushes & palettes in the digital age

Art of the matter: Pens, paintbrushes & palettes in the digital age

Time of India18 hours ago
What do India's Independence, the Emergency and the pandemic have in common? They helped cement Chennai's reputation as a hub for art supplies and stationery in the south. At the forefront is Hindustan Trading Company (HTC), in Royapettah, which turned 50 last year.
"My grandfather P V Narayanan operated a hole-in-the-wall store in Sowcarpet that sold school supplies and cashew, circa 1948," says Amritha Venketakrishnan, the third-generation proprietor.
The Make-in-Madras movement picked up steam after Independence. A vestige of the British Raj, the Govt Pencil Factory, was bought by V Perumal Chetty & Sons and rebranded as The Madras Pencil Factory. "My grandfather had made a name for himself in the distribution space.
So, with a sturdy Matador van, he took up distribution of Madras Pencil Factory's products, first in North Madras, then around the state. The business model was based on spot sales, trunk calls, and cartons delivered by rail," she says.
In 1974, the family set up HTC and the 1990s heralded another shift with liberalisation. As the company focused on art supplies, quick-drying acrylic paints became a game changer. HTC has just one store, spread over 6,000sqft, which doubles up as a community art space every week.
It's also planning a six-part documentary on the firm's history.
You Can Also Check:
Chennai AQI
|
Weather in Chennai
|
Bank Holidays in Chennai
|
Public Holidays in Chennai
Another landmark, Anandha Stationery Stores at Thiruvanmiyur, owes its origins to the Emergency declared in 1975. Overnight, it became illegal to operate any business that offered interest on goods pledged. So, Jawaharlal, a trader was compelled to change course and turn his 160sqft pawn shop into a kirana Sri Jain Stores that sold everything from baby food to lottery tickets.
The transition to stationery and art supplies happened in the 1990s, when his son Anand joined the business, and a rebranding followed.
Today, the family-run firm operates out of its main 1,350sqft showroom in Thiruvanmiyur, and has opened an outlet at Kilpauk. Anand says his father's philosophy was: "Remain afloat for three years, and if you can, stick with it." Jawaharlal still takes interest in the daily business and guides the third generation on taking things forward.
The pandemic triggered a demand for art supplies with more people exploring experiential learning. So, in 2020, Kalyana Sundaram, who worked in engineering sales for three decades, and his wife Savithiri co-founded Sketch Lobby, a store in the residential neighbourhood of Adambakkam. "Art hobbyists form the bulk of our customers, apart from students. We took a year to turn around, and saw profits in 14 months. Now, we have tapped the online market also," he says.
The digital age is changing the definition of art, but these homegrown companies are banking on the lure of paper, paint and brushes.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A question for Munir: Why India became ‘Mercedes' and Pakistan a ‘dump truck'?
A question for Munir: Why India became ‘Mercedes' and Pakistan a ‘dump truck'?

First Post

timea few seconds ago

  • First Post

A question for Munir: Why India became ‘Mercedes' and Pakistan a ‘dump truck'?

Asim Munir's 'Mercedes vs dump truck' analogy was meant to show Pakistan's grit, but in the cold light of economic history, it only revealed just how far the country has stalled while India races ahead read more Wish Pakistan Army's Field Marshal Asim Munir could pull off something like Winston Smith in George Orwell's classic 1984. In Orwell's novel, Smith works at the Ministry of Truth (Minitrue in Newspeak), where his job is to alter historical records and documents so they match the current version of events approved by the Party. He rewrites old newspapers, speeches and reports so that past predictions and statements always appear correct, making it seem like the Party is infallible — a kind of professional reality-revisionist. It's a bit like being a historian, except your main qualification is pretending the past never happened the way you remember it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Munir, a devout Muslim and apparently part-time automotive philosopher, presents himself as an ambassador of truth. In his own world, Munir told a gathering in Tampa, Florida, this week that India was 'a shining Mercedes' while Pakistan was 'a dump truck full of gravel'. Forgive him for thinking Mercedes and Ferrari are one and the same thing. His point, as he explained, was that if this lumbering dump truck rammed the Mercedes, the Mercedes would lose. It's a neat analogy, except that a dump truck is always a dump truck, and a shining Mercedes is always a shining Mercedes. The analogy itself says a lot about the state of progresses made by the two countries that attained Independence on the same night in August 1947. The internet, as expected, did not buy the ticket to this logic ride. Twitter (or X) users quickly noted that Pakistan's dump truck might not even start, or worse, topple over before ever reaching the Mercedes. Some suggested the dump truck was already in the scrapyard, stripped for parts and mortgaged to the IMF, the International Monetary Fund. One user quipped, 'Inka field marshal analogy me bhi apne desh ki beizzati karwa raha hai [even in analogies, Munir manages to humiliate his own country]. And yet, the analogy was honest. Pakistan is economically the dump truck, but not the sturdy, rumbling kind you see at a construction site. This is more like a battered, smoke-belching 1970s relic, bought on credit, with no fuel, and whose driver is constantly in court for loan defaults. From agrarian beginnings to IMF regular When Pakistan was born in 1947, its GDP was dominated by agriculture (53.2 per cent), and a desperate need to industrialise — much like India. Both countries needed industrialisation and shift in economic structure. Pakistan got fertile lands and minerals, with good sea port, and comparatively low population load. By the early 1950s, the two newly independent countries backed five-year plans to guide their path to economic progress. Yet, 78 years later as the two nations gear up to celebrate their respective Independence Days, the most powerful man in Pakistan thinks his country is a 'dump truck' to the 'shining Mercedes' that he described India as. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's growth story is well-documented and debated across organisations and universities. But how did Pakistan became a 'dump truck'? The first few years after Independence, 1947–1950, saw Pakistan's GDP growth limp along at barely over 3 per cent. By the 1950s, the country embraced planning with five-year plans, import regulation and modest growth — manufacturing at 7.7 per cent and agriculture at 1.9 per cent. By the 1960s, under General Ayub Khan, the economy showed some promise — GDP growth of 6.7 per cent, manufacturing booming at 8.51 per cent. But then came the wars, floods and the spectacular self goal of losing East Pakistan in 1971. The dump truck's first major crash. In the 1970s, the socialist experiments of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto nationalised industries — a sort of emulation of India's model — sent GDP growth into a pothole: agriculture grew at just 2.7 per cent, inflation soared to 15 per cent and the deficit ballooned to 8 per cent of GDP. The Mercedes next door, meanwhile, was busy sowing the seeds of its Green Revolution, which would propel it toward self-sufficiency in food production. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Golden illusion of the 1980s General Zia-ul-Haq's era (1977–1988) saw an economic uptick. GDP grew at 6.3 per cent, helped by US aid during the Afghan war, remittances and reversal of nationalisation. The dump truck got a new coat of paint and a temporary infusion of diesel—courtesy of Washington. But it was all external money. When the Soviet-Afghan war ended, the aid dried up. Pakistan returned to its default setting of political instability, sanctions and IMF begging bowls. The 1990s under alternating PPP and PML-N governments were a fiscal freefall—GDP growth at just 4.05 per cent, foreign debt tripled, and the country flirted with bankruptcy after nuclear tests in 1998. India, during the same decade, liberalised its economy in 1991, opening the floodgates to investment, technology and global trade. By the time Pakistan was negotiating its nth IMF tranche, India's GDP growth was comfortably cruising at 6 per cent annually. The Musharraf mirage Enter General Pervez Musharraf in 1999 — the other 'golden era' military ruler economists grudgingly acknowledge. Growth peaked at 8.6 per cent in 2004–05, foreign reserves swelled to $9 billion and debt-to-GDP dropped from 100 per cent to 55 per cent. For a fleeting moment, the dump truck almost resembled a serviceable pickup. But the model was fragile which was consumption-driven, import-heavy and utterly dependent on post-9/11 US aid. When that pipeline slowed, so did the economy. By Musharraf's exit, Pakistan was again struggling to finance even its basic fuel imports. Decade of decay (2008–2018) PPP rule after 2008 brought growth down to an average of 4 per cent, agriculture to 2 per cent. Power shortages crippled industries, inflation soared and debt piled on. The PML-N (2013–2018) managed some stability — GDP growth back to 5 per cent, inflation easing — but only by borrowing heavily from the IMF. In contrast, India during this same period emerged as the fastest-growing major economy, riding the tech boom, manufacturing incentives and infrastructure buildouts. By 2018, India's nominal GDP was over $2.7 trillion while Pakistan's was around $314 billion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan catastrophe and Covid collapse Imran Khan promised a 'Naya Pakistan' in 2018, but GDP growth crashed from 5.55 per cent in 2017 to just 0.99 per cent in 2019. Debt ballooned by $70 billion in three years and Covid-19 in 2020 shrank the economy by 6.4 per cent, wiping out millions of jobs. India, too, faced a Covid recession, but by 2022 was already back in high-growth mode, aided by digital adoption and strong exports. Pakistan, meanwhile, was queuing outside the IMF office like a regular at a tea stall. The 2023–2024 currency of crisis By 2023, Pakistan's GDP had fallen to $338.4 billion, inflation hit over 29 per cent and foreign exchange reserves hovered near default territory. Debt servicing consumed nearly half the federal budget, with $23 billion due in external repayments for FY2025–26. The Shehbaz Sharif government's $7 billion IMF bailout in late 2024 was a lifeline—but with austerity conditions that would choke growth. Inflation, however, dropped from 29 per cent to around 4.6 per cent in 2024 and reserves improved to $9.4 billion, but these are band-aid metrics. The fundamentals—low productivity, narrow export base and chronic political instability — remain untouched. India's Mercedes moment While Pakistan tries to keep the dump truck from rolling backward, India has officially overtaken Japan as the world's fourth-largest economy in 2025, with GDP at $4.187 trillion. This is not just size — it's trajectory. India is targeting over 7 per cent growth, driven by manufacturing, services, infrastructure and digitalisation. Initiatives like Make in India, the PLI schemes and massive infrastructure spending have turned India into a magnet for global investment. It has weathered demonetisation, a pandemic and global recessions — and still emerged stronger. Pakistan, in comparison, has averaged around 4 per cent GDP growth over the past two decades, punctuated by repeated IMF rescues. The gap between the Mercedes and the dump truck isn't just cosmetic — it's structural, systemic and widening. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why the dump truck analogy backfires Munir's boast that a dump truck can wreck a Mercedes ignores the basic principle of economics — and physics. The Mercedes is faster, more efficient and designed for long-term performance. The dump truck is slow, inefficient, and, in Pakistan's case, running on loans and donor goodwill. If the dump truck 'hits' the Mercedes — be it via war, sanctions or regional instability — it's Pakistan that risks total economic collapse. With imports covering basics like wheat and fuel, and foreign reserves covering barely two months of imports, Pakistan cannot sustain prolonged confrontation. Meanwhile, India, with diversified trade partners, a over $600 billion forex reserve and global investor confidence, would take a hit but recover. The dump truck, however, would be towed straight to the IMF workshop — for its 24th visit since 1958. Ironically, Munir's latest anti-India outbursts followed India publicly stating that it shot down at least five of Pakistan's fighter jets and also damaged F-16s in hangar during Operation Sindoor. Social media is abuzz reminding Munir of what a 'Mercedes' just did to the 'dump truck'. Munir is about loud speeches, empty wisdom The deeper irony is that the Pakistan military has been one of the biggest players in Pakistan's economic mismanagement and the primary beneficiary of Pakistan's budget revenues. The army controls vast business conglomerates in real estate, energy, agriculture and manufacturing. So, when Munir compares Pakistan to a dump truck, he might be advised to check who's been driving it for most of the past 75 years. Spoiler: it's been men in uniform. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Upgrade or obsolescence? Pakistan's economic journey since 1947 is a story of missed opportunities, political instability and over-reliance on foreign aid. Even its best growth periods — Ayub in the '60s, Zia in the '80s, Musharraf in the 2000s — were built on temporary external inflows rather than sustainable reforms. India's rise to a $4.1 trillion economy is not just the result of size or luck. It's the cumulative effect of decades of policy shifts, institution building and integration into the global economy. The Mercedes keeps upgrading. The dump truck, meanwhile, is still waiting for the next donor to fill the tank.

These iconic food outlets in India have been serving legacy dishes for almost 80 years
These iconic food outlets in India have been serving legacy dishes for almost 80 years

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

These iconic food outlets in India have been serving legacy dishes for almost 80 years

Some dishes are time capsules, preserving the tastes and traditions of a bygone era. India has reinvented its palate countless times since Independence, but a few restaurants and cafés have continued to serve their pre-1947 recipes. Signature dal makhani from Kesar Da Dhaba (left) and iconic butter chicken from Moti Mahal (right) Here's a look at some joints across cities and cuisines that have outlasted food fads. At Kesar Da Dhaba, which opened in 1916 in Lahore and relocated to Amritsar after the Partition, every bite is replete with legacy. "Some of the most iconic dishes on our menu since the early 1900s include Dal Makhani (slow-cooked for over 12 hours), Rajma, Palak Paneer, Parantha Thali, and Phirni," says owner Ramesh Sharma. Cooked with pure desi ghee, hand-pounded spices, and century-old slow-cooking secrets, these recipes have been passed down through generations. "Changing our recipes to follow viral trends would mean compromising our very. Our legacy lies in consistency and emotional connection -something no trend can replace." In Old Delhi, Karim's Hotel has been serving the same flavours for over 75 years: Nihari, Mutton Korma, and Badam Pasanda, untouched by modern influences. "We still use 70-80-year-old processes, like cooking food over charcoal for hours, and the same quality of raw spices. Timeless taste never goes out of style," says fifth-generation owner Arshad Kamaal. Also in the Capital is Moti Mahal, founded in Peshawar in 1920 and re-established in Delhi in 1947. A cornerstone of Delhi's culinary history, it is credited with popularising Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani. "We retained the original recipes invented by my grandfather, Kundan Lal Gujral. But we also added other dishes over time, keeping in mind customer expectations," explains chairman Monish Gujral. Down South, Rayar's Mess in Chennai, formerly Rayar's Café, keeps things simple. Established over eight decades ago by Srinivasa Rao, it still serves Pongal and Rava Dosa on banana leaves in a cosy space. 'We've kept the menu basic and traditional, and people travel and wait in line for hours just to eat here,' owner Kumar Padmanaban shares. Other legacy culinary landmarks to visit Old Famous Jalebi Wala - Since 1884, Delhi Madras Coffee House -Since 1935, Delhi Bengali Sweet House -Since 1937, Delhi Leopold Cafe - Since 1871, Mumbai Kyani's - Since 1904, Mumbai Britannia and Company - Since 1923, Mumbai Café Mondegar - Since 1932, Mumbai Tundey Kebabi - Since 1905, Lucknow Shaikh Brothers - Since 1885, Guwahati Glenary's - Since 1885, Darjeeling Indian Coffee House -Since 1876, Kolkata Flurys - Since 1927, Kolkata Vidyarthi Bhawan-Since 1943, Bengaluru (Written by: Richa Singh)

'Don't stick a knife in the president's back': JD Vance's ‘come back to MAGA' call to Elon Musk; hopes feud cools
'Don't stick a knife in the president's back': JD Vance's ‘come back to MAGA' call to Elon Musk; hopes feud cools

Time of India

time8 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Don't stick a knife in the president's back': JD Vance's ‘come back to MAGA' call to Elon Musk; hopes feud cools

US Vice President JD Vance is hoping former Department of Government Efficiency chief Elon Musk to come back into the MAGA (Make America Great Again, coined by President Donald Trump) movement by the midterms and said that if one is patriotic, they will not try to stick the knife in the back of the president. During an interview, JD Vance commented on the strained Trump and Musk relationship since the former introduced "Big Beautiful Bill." "He's obviously got a complicated relationship right now with, with the Trump White House, though. My argument to Elon is like, you're not going to be on the left, right? Even if you wanted to be. And he doesn't. They're not going to have you back. That, that, that ship has sailed. And so I really think it's a mistake for him to try to break from the president. So my hope is that by the time of the midterms, he's kind of come back into the fold. ," Vance said. Jokingly, Vance said that maybe Musk would not take his call. But seconds later he said he is joking and added thatthe drama around Tesla chiefand Trumpin the White House over the last couple of months is still going on and hoped that this to cool down. Vance also said that Musk hadhelped Republicans in winningthe election. Recalling the president's remarks he said that Trump even said it isall Musk'sfrustration. "My attitude is I try to sort of been pretty big ten about this stuff. Like, if you're patriotic, you're not trying to stick your knife in the back of the president, you're not trying to betray the movement. I don't care about these minor little disagreements and issues. We have to kind of win with the whole movement together. And that's kind of the attitude that I try to take," he added. Trump-Musk fallout This escalation ignited after Musk blasted Trump's flagship spending and tax bill — a measure that gutted clean energy incentives and electric vehicle subsidies. For Musk, whose empire runs on EV dreams, battery futures, and hefty federal contracts, the bill was betrayal by spreadsheet. Trump hit back with characteristic menace, suggesting SpaceX, Tesla, and Starlink only exist because of Washington's generosity. 'Without subsidies,' he said, 'Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' As if the feud needed more reality-TV energy, Steve Bannon jumped in, branding Musk a 'dangerous alien' and hinting at nationalising SpaceX to 'protect American interests.' To Bannon, who views the world through a civilisational siege lens, Musk isn't a heroic immigrant innovator — he's a techno-libertarian Trojan horse undermining nationalist economics. Musk fired back instantly, calling Bannon 'a traitor to reason,' and floated resurrecting his teased 'America Party' to challenge the Republican old guard. He knows that in the digital age, controlling platforms like X is more powerful than controlling Fox News. His threat wasn't idle bravado; it was a signal to technocrats, crypto die-hards, suburban engineers, and Silicon Valley libertarians that he could mount an ideological insurrection against Trumpian populism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store