'Is that how you poisoned my parents?' — Patterson confronted by ex
Erin Patterson has told a Victorian court that her estranged husband once directly asked if she poisoned his parents, a moment she says sent her into a spiral of fear and doubt.
The 50-year-old is on trial for the alleged murder of three family members and the attempted murder of a fourth, accused of serving a beef wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July last year.
Taking the stand for a third day in her own defence, Patterson shared details of a private conversation with Simon, whose parents Don and Gail were among the victims of the fatal lunch.
"He said to me, 'Is that how you poisoned my parents, using that dehydrator'?"
"I said of course not."
ADVERTISEMENT
Simon has denied making the accusation, but Patterson told the court the moment shook her and led her to reflect more deeply on what had happened.
The 50-year-old accused says she misled family about medical tests and she served the fateful meal on mismatched plates. (Source: 1News)
'I was scared': Patterson feared she'd be blamed
Patterson said the conversation triggered mounting anxiety about the meal and the ingredients used.
"It caused me to do a lot of thinking about a lot of things," she said. "I was starting to think: 'what if they'd gone in the container with the Chinese mushrooms'?"
Fearing she'd be blamed and knowing child protection services were coming to visit, she admitted she disposed of the food dehydrator at the Koonwarra tip.
Emotional testimony about family breakdown
ADVERTISEMENT
In her testimony, Patterson also reflected on her rocky marriage with Simon, saying their ability to communicate had collapsed in recent years.
"We just couldn't communicate well when we disagreed… we could never make each of us feel heard and understood."
She described a growing distance from Simon's family, claiming her husband no longer wanted her involved in family matters.
Earlier in the week, Patterson described the traumatic birth of her first child and the support she received from her now-deceased mother-in-law, Gail Patterson.
"I had no idea what to do with a baby… Gail was really supportive and gentle and patient with me."
She also recalled converting to Christianity after attending a church service led by Pastor Ian Wilkinson, the sole survivor of the fatal lunch.
Patterson admits leaving out key details to health officials
ADVERTISEMENT
Death cap mushrooms (file image). (Source: istock.com)
The court also heard that Patterson left out certain information during early communication with health authorities, including her doubts about the supermarket-sourced ingredients.
At the time, Victorian health official Sally Ann Atkinson was tasked with asking Patterson about the potential food poisoning outbreak and the origins of the ingredients from the fatal meal.
She said she was overwhelmed and scared at the time and didn't know what to believe.
"Very anxious, yeah. Very anxious," she told the court.
When pressed she said she "thought it was a possibility" the mushrooms sourced from the Asian grocer were responsible for the poisoning.
'I panicked': Patterson explains wiping phone data
ADVERTISEMENT
The jury was also shown evidence that one of Patterson's phones was reset multiple times – something she admitted doing herself on three occasions – while saying her son had performed the first.
She told the court the phone originally belonged to her but was handed over to her son after he damaged his own device earlier in the year. After retrieving it in August, Patterson said she cleaned the phone and eventually set it up again for her personal use.
Patterson said the third reset, on August 5, was a direct result of panic. She told the jury she had reloaded her apps and logged into her Google account, which included photos of mushrooms and her food dehydrator.
Winter's here, supermarket spying, and TikTok's new feature. (Source: 1News)
"I just panicked and didn't want [the detectives] to see them," she said.
The following day, Patterson said she remotely triggered another factory reset after police had searched her home.
"After the search of my house and the interview and the detectives had brought me home, I remember thinking 'I wonder if I can log into my Google account and see where all my devices are'. So I did that, and I could see my phone, and [my children's devices], and it was really stupid, but I thought, 'I wonder if they've been silly enough to leave it connected to the internet', so I hit factory reset to see what happened and it did."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
5 hours ago
- Techday NZ
US-China chip export debate highlights risks for AI leadership
DeepSeek. TikTok. Taiwan. And a White House shake-up on AI rules. The spiralling US-China technology rivalry landed at the heart of Johns Hopkins University last week, as a panel of top experts and policymakers took to the stage to debate whether restricting exports of advanced semiconductors to China can help the US maintain its edge in the race for artificial intelligence. The discussion, hosted by Open to Debate in partnership with the SNF Agora Institute, comes at a critical time. In Washington, the Trump administration has announced plans to roll back the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule and introduce new chip export controls targeting China – a move seen by many as a signal that the technology contest between the two superpowers is only intensifying. On one side of the Johns Hopkins debate were Lindsay Gorman, managing director at the German Marshall Fund's Technology Program, and former CIA officer and congressman Will Hurd. They argued the answer is yes: semiconductor controls can give the US a real advantage in the AI race. Gorman pointed to DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model whose CEO has publicly lamented the impact of advanced chip bans. "Money has never been the problem for us. Bans on shipments of advanced chips are the problem. And they have to consume twice the power to achieve the same results," she quoted, highlighting how China's AI advances still depend heavily on imported hardware. "The United States has significant hard computing power advantages – the ability to produce high-end chips, designed specifically for training AI models," Gorman told the audience. She argued that, together with its allies, the US controls a "strategic choke point" on computing power. "Properly implemented controls can have an effect and also have an increasing and compounding effect over time in retarding China's AI advantages and giving the United States a head start," she explained. Will Hurd, who also served on OpenAI's board before running for US president, compared the AI contest to the nuclear arms race. "Artificial intelligence is the equivalent of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission controlled gives you nuclear power… uncontrolled, nuclear weapons can kill everybody," he said. Hurd emphasised the importance of first-mover advantage, warning that the US cannot afford to lose its technological lead. He also highlighted a lack of reciprocity in the tech relationship between the two countries. "Chinese companies like Baidu, DJI, and TikTok operate freely in the US, but American companies are not allowed to operate in China," Hurd pointed out. "If there was a level of reciprocity between our two countries, we wouldn't be here having this debate about chip controls." Yet, on the opposing side, former senior US diplomat Susan Thornton and technology strategist Paul Triolo insisted the US could not outpace China in AI simply by tightening export controls. Triolo argued that the controls are "not working and will not lead to US dominance in AI", describing them as a blunt instrument that creates confusion for industry and disrupts global supply chains. "Most experts believe that Chinese companies are only three months behind US leaders in developing advanced AI models," Triolo said, suggesting any technological gap is vanishingly slim. Thornton, who spent decades at the heart of US-China diplomacy, warned of unintended consequences. "The main thing we should be asking ourselves about this question… is what is the cost benefit of US policy actions?" she said. "We have to face the reality that China is already building AI… a third of the world's top AI scientists are Chinese. China is one third of the entire global technology market. So it's clearly a player." She cautioned that blocking China from critical technology could backfire, hurting US companies, alienating allies and raising the risks around Taiwan, the global centre of advanced chip manufacturing. "Certainly, the one thing we need to do is avoid going to war," Thornton warned. "Taiwan, the most sensitive issue in US-China relations, has now been dragged right into the middle of this AI issue because they're the place that produces all the cutting-edge chips that we're trying to control." Audience members pressed the panel on whether international collaboration on AI safety was possible, and whether the US could ever match China's data advantage, given the size of the Chinese population and its permissive data environment. Hurd conceded that "the US will always have less data because we have a little thing called civil liberties," but argued that superior algorithms and privacy-protective machine learning could level the playing field. For Triolo, the dynamic nature of the technology means that attempts to wall off China are self-defeating. "There are many ways to get to different ends. The controls have forced Chinese companies to work together, develop innovations, and become more competitive both domestically and globally," he said. Gorman, in closing, rejected what she called "a defeatism that says America can't out-compete China or slow its progress". "Our companies are doing well. There isn't an issue here with demand, it's with supply. Doing better means that we have to throw what we can at this problem now with a smart application of tools," she argued. But Thornton had the last word, urging caution. "Making the AI competition with China a zero-sum game, not only will not work, it is dangerous," she said. "We should focus on the things that are going to matter to our children and their children, which is the long-term AI competition, which if not constrained and bounded by international agreements and by cooperation among countries… it'll be a very dangerous world."
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Australian warship accidentally blocked radio, internet to parts of NZ
An Australian warship visiting Wellington accidentally caused internet and radio outages across parts of New Zealand earlier this week. The incident occurred when HMAS Canberra, one of Australia's largest warships, sailed along the country's coast Wednesday morning, en route to Wellington to visit the city. According to 9News, telecommunication companies had reported interruptions as early as 2am. An Australian Defence Force spokesperson told the Australian outlet that crew aboard the ship became aware the vessel's navigation radar was interfering with Wi-Fi in Taranaki and Marlborough. "On becoming aware, HMAS Canberra changed frequencies, rectifying the interference. There are no ongoing disruptions." ADVERTISEMENT Services had returned to normal by the time the ship docked in the capital on Thursday. An NZDF spokesperson told 1News: "The issue was reported to the New Zealand Defence Force. We contacted the Australian Defence Force and the issue was resolved." It had no further comment on the nature of the event. Matthew Harrison, founder and owner of Taranaki internet provider Primo, wrote on LinkedIn that the outage "wasn't just a blip". "It was full-scale, military-grade radar triggering built-in safety protocols designed to protect airspace… and it rolled across our network in sync with the ship's movement. "We've never seen anything like it here before," he wrote. "It's not every day a warship takes your gear offline." The vessel, an amphibious assault ship, can carry and launch numerous helicopters from its deck. ADVERTISEMENT It docked in Wellington with the Australian Capital Territory Chief Minister, Andrew Barr, onboard. Barr said the visit reaffirmed "deep and growing ties" between the two capitals. 'Our sister city relationship with Wellington is one of genuine friendship and mutual respect. It's built on a shared commitment to sustainability, creativity, and inclusive growth." Its delegation and crew participated in several community activities in Wellington, including assisting a soup kitchen and cleaning up selected coastal areas and tracks around the city. 'This week's celebration reflects the strength and significance of our city's relationship with Canberra, further deepening the bonds of friendship and collaboration between us,' Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau said about the visit. 'Our partnership is a source of great pride and a key element in Wellington's international engagements, fostering a continued exchange of ideas, culture, and goodwill.'
Otago Daily Times
14 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Bill could create global ‘ripple effect'
EV advocates warn of Chinese dominance as a result of cuts to credits in the United States, writes Grant Schwab. The cuts to Biden-era tax credits in the budget passed by the Republican-controlled US House of Representatives could stunt the growth of the nation's still-fledgling electric vehicle industry and create ripple effects throughout the global vehicle market, clean energy advocates warn. "Anybody who claims to be concerned about Chinese dominance in battery minerals and supportive of US competitiveness in that sector needs to know: This bill is absolutely devastating to that goal," Zero Emission Transportation Association executive director Albert Gore said. The credits are meant to stoke both the domestic supply of critical minerals and advanced battery technologies and the demand for products that use those materials, namely next-gen, zero-emission vehicles. Environment-minded conservatives argue that broader tax breaks — which would be less targeted towards EVs and critical minerals — and regulatory rollbacks are instead best for growing those industries, and that Democrats are wrong to catastrophise over the changes. But with significant policy whiplash looming, advocates said multibillion-dollar investments in key sectors could shrivel thanks to the harsh realities of competing with the United States' chief economic rival. They also predicted political consequences for Republicans if the Senate follows suit and President Donald Trump, who has been critical of non-Tesla electric vehicles, signs a rollback into law. "The plan passed by House leadership will make it harder to produce the energy America needs, while simultaneously putting hundreds of projects, thousands of jobs and billions in investments at risk — mostly in Republican states that elected them," Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, a nonpartisan business group focused on energy and the environment, said in a statement. Even with those risks, House Republicans voted to pull back on EV-related credits in their tax and spending mega bill that passed along party lines on May 22 after all-night negotiations. The final version of the package seeks to eliminate four tax credits for EVs by the end of 2025 and modify another on manufacturing that industry leaders have said is crucial to building domestic battery prowess. The EV credits include offering $7500 on the purchase of qualifying new light-duty models, $4000 for used models, providing up to $40,000 for commercial vehicles and giving $1000 to individuals to install EV chargers. A manufacturing credit targets battery producers and upstream industries. Battery cells are each eligible for a credit of $35 per kilowatt-hour of energy they can store. Critical mineral miners, processors, purifiers and recyclers can claim a credit equal to 10% of their production costs. The bill proposes phasing out that credit a year earlier than initially planned and adding new requirements against the use of materials from certain foreign nations. "The production credit is critical for our industry, and it will be a significant impact for our industry if it goes away," Ford chief executive Jim Farley said at the Detroit Auto Show in January. "Many of our plants in the Midwest that have converted to EVs depend on the production credit". — TNS
