First Images From the World's Largest Camera Are Paving the Future of Astronomy
On June 23rd, over 300 public and private Watch Parties tuned in to get a glimpse of the First Look images from Rubin Observatory, according to a Rubin Observatory press release. The reason? This observatory features the world's largest ever camera, an 8.4-meter telescope, and is at the forefront of the current astronomy scene.Rubin works so well for three primary reasons: its scope, the detail of the images, and the time it takes to capture said images. For example, the image taken of the Trifid and Lagoon Nebulae utilized two trillion pixels of data and a combination of 678 exposures to create a 5-gigapixel image. Taken in just under 7.2 hours, this stunning image layers the large amount of different exposures to cast the image into enormous detail. Coupled with the extremely wide range of the camera, viewers can now see the Trifid and Lagoon Nebulae in striking and comprehensive detail.These first images are the product of over two decades of work from a global team, according to Željko Ivezić, Director of Rubin Observatory Construction. The facility, jointly funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science and the U.S. National Science Foundation, was built at the summit of Cerro Pachón in Chile, where the high elevation, dry air, and dark skies provide an ideal location for astronomical observations.
According to Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, the observatory 'demonstrates that the United States remains at the forefront of international basic science and highlights the remarkable achievements we get when the many parts of the national research enterprise work together.' Brian Stone, performing the duties of NSF director, details these 'remarkable achievements' by stating how Rubin will 'capture more information about our Universe than all optical telescopes throughout history combined,' including information about dark matter and dark energy.The observatory's relationship with dark matter is deeply embedded within the observatory's history, specifically concerning its namesake. The observatory is named after Vera C. Rubin, a pioneering U.S. astronomer who found conclusive evidence for dark matter. Dark matter and dark energy are important because they are key players in what is facilitating our universe's expansion, according to NASA.
So what's next for the Vera Rubin Observatory? According to CNN, the observatory will make the first scientific observations of the Southern Hemisphere (also known as 'first light') on July 4th. Looking ahead, over the next ten years, the observatory will take 1000 images of the Southern Hemisphere every night as part of the observatory's primary mission to meticulously capture the universe's changes: the Legacy Survey of Space and Time. These images will not only be important for astronomical discoveries, but also for planetary defense, as having more precise images will allow us to better observe and predict asteroids that may potentially impact the Moon or the Earth. Additionally, the observatory seeks to bring cutting-edge astronomical data and images to the general public through the interactive, user-friendly SkyViewer app. The app offers both guided and free-form exploration of select Rubin images as well as an interactive sonification that encourages users to experience the wonder of the cosmos through an endless soundscape.
This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 27, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brazil's overhead 'monkey bridges' preventing wildlife road deaths
A report on August 12 confirmed the life-saving results of overhead rope ladders installed throughout the rainforests of Brazil. The 'monkey bridges' were originally built in October 2022 and have since allowed thousands of monkeys, hedgehogs and opossums to cross roads without risking their lives in traffic or causing road accidents, reducing reports of collisions to near-zero.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far
In the search for signs of life on what seemed like a promising little exoplanet, astronomers' hopes have dimmed. Living things, as we understand them, seem to flourish best in an atmosphere like the one on Earth. But scientists who have been using the James Webb Space Telescope to examine the planet known as Trappist-1 d have found no sign of an earthlike atmosphere, according to a study published on Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal. Exoplanets revolve around stars other than our sun. And the exoplanet in question is the third of seven that orbit Trappist-1, a star some 40 light-years from our place in the Milky Way. It is a red dwarf, so named because this type of star emits reddish light and tends to be small. In the search for life elsewhere in the galaxy, the discovery of the Trappist-1 planetary system was a big deal. Researchers announced in 2017 that the seven planets around Trappist-1 seemed to have excellent potential as hosts for living things. But in the years since, astronomers have not detected habitable atmospheres on the two innermost planets. They are still examining the outer ones. The star Trappist-1, which was named for a telescope in the Atacama Desert of Chile, is just a little bigger than Jupiter. Red dwarves are the most common stars in our galaxy, but this particular star and its planets are a bit easier to study than other known planetary systems. The system is fairly close to Earth, and the seven planets follow a tight, fast orbit. That makes them good candidates for a method of observation called transmission spectroscopy. When light from a star shines through a planet's atmosphere on its way to the Webb telescope, scientists can find clues about the chemical makeup of that atmosphere by determining which wavelengths of light it absorbed. The third world from the Trappist-1 star, a rocky planet, had appeared promising, according to Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago and the study's lead author. But the starlight that passed the exoplanet before reaching the Webb telescope did not appear to have been filtered through the kinds of atmospheric molecules that are essential to life on Earth, like water or carbon dioxide. The research of Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb and her team did not completely rule out the possibility of an atmosphere there, she said. But it did suggest that cool red dwarves — or, at least, this cool red dwarf — might be too volatile to support life. 'Maybe that tells us that it's going to be harder than we thought to find atmospheres on these rocky planets,' she added. Astronomers may need to turn their attention to planets that circle brighter stars, like our sun. Those planets are more difficult to observe and will probably require another telescope, said Jacob Bean, an astronomer at the University of Chicago who advises Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb but was not involved in the study. 'We still have this burning question: Can life develop elsewhere?' he said. Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb agreed that other planets might be better candidates for life than Trappist-1 d, but she was not ready to give up on the exoplanet just yet. 'There are different ways of figuring out whether these planets have atmospheres,' she said. 'Transmission spectroscopy is just one of them.' Based on the results of her study, she said, 'our job is going to be a little bit harder.' 'But it definitely doesn't kill our prospects,' she added. Dr. Bean called the Trappist-1 system 'a fantastic laboratory for studying terrestrial planets around other stars,' and said that the research so far had yielded plenty of interesting data despite the largely negative result of the latest study. 'If we go look, sometimes we come up disappointed,' Dr. Bean said. 'But if we hadn't looked, we wouldn't know. And it's always better to know.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Just Found 41,000 Turtles Hiding in Plain Sight
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: A new scientific approach to counting wildlife discovered 41,000 nesting turtles hidden in one area of the Amazon. A University of Florida team believes they've developed a more accurate way to monitor wildlife using drones and statistical modeling. Wildlife counting is wildly inaccurate with current methods, according to the researchers' study. Researchers from the University of Florida have crafted a new process for counting animals. A new research method pairing drones with smart modeling has counted more than 41,000 endangered Giant South American River turtles nesting along the Amazon's Guaporé River, according to the researchers behind a recent study. It's the world's largest known aggregation of freshwater turtles. This process—revealed in the study, which was published in the Journal of Applied Ecology—involves taking thousands of images to track and study animal behavior in order to remove the errors produced by other methods, such as on-the-ground counting. Lead study author Ismael Brack—a post-doctoral researcher within the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences' School of Forestry, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences—called the method 'novel,' and clarified in a statement that the method can count many more creatures than just turtles. The team partnered with the Wildlife Conservation Society in Brazil, Colombia, and Bolivia to test the method by essentially conduct a census of the endangered turtles. These elusive reptiles are exceptionally social animals, and the females congregate annually to nest in the sandbanks of the Guaporé River between Brazil and Bolivia during the summer months. In the past, scientist used drones and relied on what's known as the orthomosaic strategy (stitching together hundreds of overlapping aerial photographs) to count turtles, as it's a quicker and less-invasive approach than counting from the ground. While common, the study explains that the style is subject to detection errors that often get overlooked, and struggles to account for movement during observations. In the new research, the team used white paint to mark the shells of 1,187 turtles. A drone flew overhead via a planned path four times a day for 12 days to snap 1,500 photos on each pass. The scientists then stitched the photos together, recording the path of each marked turtle, showing where it nested and where it walked. That information allowed the researchers to create probability models to account for turtle movement, all based on seen behaviors. According to the study, traditional orthomosaic-based counts were shown to be wildly inaccurate, as were the counts taken only from the ground. The new behavior modeling revealed that only 45 percent of turtles using the sandbank were present during drone flights, and roughly 20 percent of those seen walking were counted multiple times (some were counted as many as seven times). The discrepancies led to observers on the ground estimating that the site contained 16,000 turtles, and observers using the the drone orthomosaic strategy (without modeling) counted 79,000 turtles. When applying the new modeling based on movement, the team estimated the presence of around 41,000 turtles. 'These number vary greatly, and that's a problem for conservationists,' Brack said. 'If scientists are unable to establish an accurate count of individuals of a species, how will they know if the population is in decline or whether efforts to protect it are successful?' For the plan to work, scientists must understand the movement patterns of animals, which could require clipping seals' fur, using high-visibility collars on elk, or marking mountain goats with paintball pellets, to name a few examples. The study stated that counting animals when populations are spatially aggregated—such as during breeding or nesting—enhances the accuracy and efficiency of surveying efforts. The team plans to refine the process, focusing on turtles in other South American countries. 'By combining information from multiple surveys,' Brack said, 'we can detect population trends, and the Wildlife Conservation Society will know where to invest in conservation actions.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword
