Budget Must Deliver For Burnt-Out St John Workforce
Last week, ambulance delegates from across Aotearoa gathered in Auckland for a Workers First conference (photo above) as the group prepares to enter bargaining again with the partially charity-funded ambulance provider. They also discussed their growing concerns about a workforce crisis that is being made worse by insufficient public health funding.
Faye McCann, Workers First National Ambulance Coordinator, said that this year's Budget marks the final year of a four-year ambulance funding agreement, and last year's negotiations had failed to substantially lift wages, address penal rates that are significantly lower than comparable health professions, or deliver the infrastructure needed to keep the service functioning successfully while meeting growing patient demand.
"We can't keep plugging holes with goodwill and expecting ambulance officers to carry the cost of a broken system," said Ms McCann.
"Ambulance staff are already burnt out, understaffed, and responding to more mental health and high-risk incidents than ever before. It's getting worse, especially in Auckland, where short staffing is at crisis levels even as the population grows and demand rises."
"Officers are leaving for Australia because the pay is better, the infrastructure is better, and the workload is safer. We're losing people we can't afford to lose."
Ms McCann said ambulance officers were dismayed that last year's Budget failed to fulfil the National Party and New Zealand First's coalition promise to increase the proportion of Government funding for the country's ambulance services.
"When it comes to the Treaty Principles Bill or other dodgy political priorities, the coalition agreement framework between parties is treated like it's enshrined in law - but when it comes to funding emergency services, that promise is suddenly a 'nice-to-have'," said Ms McCann.
She warned that unless this Budget delivers real improvements, ambulance officers could be forced back into the same impossible bargaining position as last year, when St John repeated that they couldn't improve wages and conditions without additional Government funding.
"Some funding eventually came, but only after a national strike and a drawn-out, behind-closed-doors process that no one wants to repeat," said Ms McCann.
"We're calling on the Government to fund ambulance services properly so that St John can offer decent wages, fair conditions, and a service that New Zealanders can actually rely on."
"Cuts to the broader health budget, or a failure to meet growing cost pressures and rising demand, will mean ambulance officers are the ones bearing the brunt of underfunding, and patients will be worse off for it."
"Ambulance services cannot be the casualty of another austerity Budget from this Government."
Ms McCann said that Workers First ambulance officers' ultimate goal remained the full operational funding of emergency health services, and she believed that services like St John and Wellington Free fully supported that aim.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Eye-Watering Break Fee For Botched Ferries
It has been revealed that the Government is paying a staggering $144 million to cancel the previous contract for the new Interislander ferries. 'Nicola Willis' terrible decision-making has now cost taxpayers more than half a billion dollars in total – $671 million – with no new ferries to show for it,' Labour transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. 'The $144 million break fee is on top of money already paid to Hyundai, which takes the amount of taxpayer money National has poured down the drain to $222 million. The rest is project management, landside infrastructure and paying to wind down the project – totalling more than half a billion. 'This proves Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis have absolutely no clue what they're doing and are just making things worse. 'The amount of taxpayer money they've wasted with absolutely nothing to show for it makes a mockery of every time they've said they can't afford something. 'They can find more than half a billion dollars to botch a ferry project, but can't find any money to build homes, create jobs or fund the health system properly. 'People are struggling with the cost of living while Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon's economic decisions run aground and sink,' Tangi Utikere said. Notes: Original estimates of $1.16 billion referenced in the Beehive PR includes the originally budgeted $300 million for the break fee plus the cost of ongoing maintenance of the current ferries. The contract was originally going to deliver the ferries next year, in 2026. The current projection for new ferries is at least three years later.
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
How much it cost to cancel iRex ferry contract: $671 million
KiwiRail has reached a settlement agreement with South Korean shipyard Hyundai Mipo Dockyard (HMD) following the coalition Government's cancellation of the iReX ferry project. Chief financial officer Jason Dale said the state-owned enterprise effected an agreement with Hyundai for a full and final settlement to exit the contracts for two rail-enabled ferries that were signed in 2021. "After constructive negotiations we have concluded a settlement agreement with HMD for a final amount of $144 million. Including previous payments, this brings the total paid to HMD to $222 million and the final cost for the entire iReX project to $671 million." Project iReX was launched to replace KiwiRail's ageing Interislander fleet with two large, rail-enabled ferries. The plan also included major upgrades to port infrastructure at Wellington and Picton. The ships were due to cost $551 million, with the delivery of the two ferries set to occur in 2025 and 2026. ADVERTISEMENT Approved in 2021, the contract was cancelled with Hyundai in December 2023 shortly after the coalition Government came into power, citing Treasury warnings of costs associated with the ferries and required port upgrades ballooning. Minister for Rail Winston Peters said the $144 million final settlement payment was to cover the costs incurred by Hyundai and its global suppliers. "That is only fair as the decision to cancel Project iReX was never a reflection on Hyundai." Around $300 million was originally provisioned to cover the potential cost of exiting the iReX commitments, Peters said, adding that more funding was now available for other Government projects as a result of the lower settlement cost. He also hit out at media reports and the Opposition for suggesting the final settlement could be more than $300 million. "Doomsayers said cancelling the contract would cost the taxpayer the full $551 million contract value, but these are some of the same people who accepted Project iReX ballooning from $1.45 billion when approved in 2021 to Treasury warning it was on course to $4 billion in 2023 thanks to eyes-bigger-than-their-mouths ambitions and absentee management." ADVERTISEMENT Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the settlement ended "yet another sorry chapter in the story of the previous government's mismanagement of the Crown's books". "It signed up to purchase two big new ferries without giving sufficient consideration to the port infrastructure needed to support ships of a much bigger size." She said the cost of the project "had almost quadrupled" by the time of its cancellation in December 2023. "No Government should be advised of billion-dollar blowouts in a major infrastructure programme upon being elected, as was the case after the 2023 general election. "I am pleased that a more pragmatic solution is now in place that will ensure a safe, reliable Cook Strait service at an affordable price." The Government set up a company, Ferry Holdings Ltd, to lead the procurement process of two new ferries by 2029. It is currently in talks with several shipyards to find a preferred build partner for the new ships. The new ferries will be approximately 200m long and 28m wide, with capacity for 1500 passengers and 2.4km of lanes for cars, trucks, and 40 rail wagons each. ADVERTISEMENT The final sailing for the Aratere, which is leaving service to allow for work on port infrastructure upgrades, is on Monday. Labour transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere. (Source: 1News) Cancellation of iReX 'terrible decision-making' - Labour Labour's transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere said the cancellation of the previous contract for the Interislander ferries was "terrible-decision-making" by Finance Minister Nicola Willis. "The $144 million break fee is on top of money already paid to Hyundai, which takes the amount of taxpayer money National has poured down the drain to $222 million. The rest is project management, landside infrastructure and paying to wind down the project – totalling more than half a billion." He accused the Prime Minister and Willis of having "absolutely no clue what they're doing and "just making things worse". "The amount of taxpayer money they've wasted with absolutely nothing to show for it makes a mockery of every time they've said they can't afford something. People are struggling with the cost of living while Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon's economic decisions run aground and sink." ADVERTISEMENT Green Party co-leader transport spokesperson Julie Anne Genter said the exit from the Hyundai ferry contract showed "wastefulness and short-term thinking" by the coalition Government. "We could have had new ferries by next year and millions of dollars left over to spend on critical infrastructure if it weren't for this irresponsible Government. This is a missed opportunity and a massive mark against this Government's credibility." Genter said the $550 million deal for the two new rail-enabled ferries was one of the best the country had ever signed up to. "This Coalition Government tore it up and will likely be forced into signing a deal that leaves us worse off in the short and long term. The Government must stop cutting corners and commit to funding a transport network that works for people and planet."
NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like is to change them or throw them away
The President's manipulation of government data threatens to erode public trust in facts that leaders of both parties have long relied on to guide policy decisions. A breakdown in official government statistics could also create economic instability, restrain lifesaving healthcare and limit forecasts of natural disasters. Trump has routinely spread misinformation since the start of his political career, but his efforts in his second term to bend data to support his agenda have invited comparisons to information control in autocratic countries. 'What he's trying to do is to present the best possible picture of what he's doing, even if that means he has to cook the numbers, even if that means he has to distort the data,' said Robert Cropf, a political science professor at St Louis University. 'It's basically a page from the authoritarian playbook.' Trump has also tried to use his social media megaphone to influence data produced by private companies. On Tuesday, he called for Goldman Sachs to replace a veteran economist who produced reports that warned that tariffs could cause inflation. But he may find himself in a game of whack-a-mole. Today, a benchmark that measures the prices producers get for goods and services showed hotter-than-expected inflation, partly because of tariffs. Trump has not commented yet on the report. Risk of undermining stats Other countries have demonstrated the risk of undermining statistics, which can erode citizens' trust in their government and nations' standing in the international community. China has been widely accused of inflating economic figures, prompting other countries to seek alternative data sources for a more trustworthy picture of the nation's financial situation. In Greece, the government produced false deficit numbers for years, and the government repeatedly sought to criminally prosecute the statistician who produced accurate budget figures. Argentina manipulated economic statistics for years to minimise the extent of inflation, even as consumers paid for significantly more expensive groceries and goods. The false deficit numbers in Greece contributed to the country's debt crisis. The cooked numbers in Argentina made it more difficult for the government to enact policies that could limit inflation, and citizens lost faith in the ability to trust the government data to inform major purchases. Need for accurate picture White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said that the President's actions are intended to 'restore' Americans' trust in data so they can make their own decisions. 'President Trump is preserving – not eroding – democracy by ensuring that the American people can rely on Government data that actually reflects reality,' Rogers said in a statement. Government statistics have traditionally been considered more reliable and comprehensive than those collected by private sector companies motivated by profits, said Paul Schroeder, the executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics. The data is needed to provide an accurate picture of what is happening. Without it, governments, corporations and individuals lack information that can inform decisions about everything from mortgage rates to weight loss. 'It's almost like an airline pilot losing his instrument panel when driving the plane,' Schroeder said of the erosion. Trump's decision to fire Bureau of Labour Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer was widely condemned by statisticians and economists, who warned that the move could have a chilling effect on the work of federal number crunchers who produce reports the President doesn't like. Trump claimed without evidence that the nation's job statistics were 'rigged', following a revision to the May and June jobs figures that showed the labour market was weaker than previously known. Revisions to job reports are common, but many economists have acknowledged falling response rates to government surveys, and long-standing budget strains have made it harder for economic agencies to collect and analyse reliable data. 'President Trump believes that businesses, households, and policymakers deserve accurate data to inform their decision-making, and he will restore America's trust in the BLS,' Rogers said. US President Donald Trump throws pens to the crowd after signing executive orders during the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena, in Washington, DC, on January 20, 2025. Photo / Jim Watson, AFP Plan to overhaul census Trump's attempts to change how the Government collects data have invited backlash, especially his proposal to overhaul the census amid a fight over redistricting. Civil liberties groups have said they would challenge any attempt to change the census, warning that the President's proposal to eliminate undocumented immigrants from the count could erode the political power and financial resources of diverse communities. The census is used not only to determine congressional seats but also to distribute federal funding and decide where to build schools. Washington DC crime Trump justified his decision to deploy federal law enforcement and the National Guard on DC streets with claims that crime is surging in Washington, but violent crime in DC has been on the decline since 2023. The White House has cast doubt on the accuracy of local statistics, citing a July NBC News report that said that the District suspended a police commander accused of manipulating crime numbers in his district. Rogers added that the data 'doesn't change the on-the-ground reality that many DC residents and visitors have experienced on our streets'. In other instances, the Administration has halted the collection of data that advocates and experts warn is essential for Americans' wellbeing and safety. Collection of health data At the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, scientists are now forbidden to collect gender data on any programmes. That includes abortion data and information for sexually transmitted disease prevention, violence prevention and mental health programmes. The lack of data could undermine efforts to prevent the spread of STDs and prevent school shootings and suicides. Federal collection of abortion data stopped on April 1 following widespread layoffs across the Department of Health and Human Services. Most states put out their own abortion data, but no other federal agency collects abortion data, according to a former CDC employee familiar with those programmes. The Government uses the data to predict birth rates, a crucial statistic that governments and businesses use to make decisions about the health system, education and the economy. CDC staff members are also no longer collecting concussion data for the creation of a concussion surveillance system, which has had strong bipartisan congressional support. The agency is also no longer analysing data to prevent drowning – the leading cause of death in children aged 1 to 4 – because all of those staff members were laid off. Tracking the drug crisis Researchers have warned about the diminishing of data programmes that are key to understanding the ever-evolving drug crisis in the US – and to building the best prevention and treatment programmes. In June, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration stopped updating the Drug Abuse Warning Network, a nationwide surveillance system of drug use trends and insights drawn from emergency department visits. The loss of that data will make it more difficult for researchers such as Daniel Ciccarone, a professor at the University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, to track street drugs and overdoses. Ciccarone studies trends in the fentanyl supply, which kills tens of thousands of Americans each year, as well as new synthetic drugs seeping into regional supplies. 'We need surveillance data at a historic time of an undulating drug supply – we don't know what's going to happen next,' Ciccarone said. Vaping might seem safer than smoking, but the long-term risks are starting to show. Photo / 123RF Stats on smoking, vaping Public health advocates have raised concerns about the future of the National Youth Tobacco Survey, an annual report that measures how young people are using nicotine products. The report helped alert the country to the epidemic of teen vaping and led to stricter controls on the industry. The programme has long been run through the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health, which was shut down in the northern spring. An HHS spokesperson did not respond when asked about the future of the survey, saying only that the CDC 'remains deeply committed to tobacco prevention and control and … continues to support this critical public health priority through a range of efforts, including outreach, education, and surveillance'. Research on climate The Trump Administration has also discontinued dozens of climate databases and government-funded studies, including efforts to quantify the damage caused by natural disasters and to understand how the heaviest rainfall will intensify as the planet warms. Officials have removed key climate data and reports from the internet. The Administration took down the website of the US Global Change Research Programme, which shared congressionally mandated reports about climate change impacts across the country. And it deleted a repository for research and forecasts, though it said such information would continue to be posted on a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. Trump's budget proposal for Noaa would eliminate nearly all of the agency's labs focused on climate, weather and oceans – institutions whose studies are key to weather and climate forecasting and improving our understanding of everything from summer thunderstorms to the El Nino climate pattern. Businesses rely on this data to inform plans for tourism, fisheries and shipping. Education staff cuts The changes reflect the Administration's commitment to 'eliminating bias and producing Gold Standard Science research driven by verifiable data,' Rogers said in a statement. As the Trump Administration attempts to shut the Education Department, its ability to publish accurate and timely data was thrown into question after deep cuts to the department's staff. Virtually the entire staff of the National Centre for Education Statistics was laid off, and while much of the work is done by contractors, researchers worry that there are no longer enough government workers to check and disseminate collected data. The centre's work is critical to researchers, policymakers and journalists, with a wide range of data including the demographics of students and schools, courses offered, crime on campuses, and school spending. Already, the Education Department missed its June deadline to publish the annual Condition of Education report, the authoritative source for education data from preschool through into university. The agency has continued to publish some data tables, but far fewer than in past years. Information on race The Trump Administration has also called for more information about the consideration of applicants' race in college admissions. 'Greater transparency is essential to exposing unlawful practices and ultimately ridding society of shameful, dangerous racial hierarchies,' Trump said in a memorandum issued last week, as he ordered the Education Department to begin collecting detailed data from all colleges that receive federal financial aid. That includes grades and test scores for both applicants and students, broken down by race. The White House has argued that a lack of data has hindered enforcement of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that the use of race-conscious admissions is unconstitutional. A higher education leader argued that the information requested won't provide good data: applicants don't disclose their race, and while colleges do survey students who enrol, participation is voluntary, and even those who respond may choose not to disclose their race. 'They're going to gather a bunch of information and try to make sense of it,' said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education. 'I worry that they're not going to be able to make much sense of it.' Legacy of changes The impact of these changes could affect the nation long after Trump leaves office, Cropf said. Even if the Government resumes collecting data, there will be gaps from the Trump era, and the public may view the figures as more politicised. 'It taints the waters,' he said. 'It seriously undermines faith in our institutions if we can't have any guarantees the institutions are providing us with reliable data or that they're making decisions based on reliable data.'
