States without protection for inter-faith, inter-caste couples in contempt of SC: Mihir Desai
Prominent human rights lawyer Mihir Desai has said that all States which have failed to put in place mechanisms for the protection of inter-faith and inter-caste couples are in contempt of the Supreme Court. He was referring to the apex court's 2018 Shaktivahini judgment, which directed all States to establish protective measures for such couples, including helplines, special cells, and safe houses.
In an interview with The Hindu, Mr. Desai emphasised the urgent need for a national law to protect the rights of individuals entering interfaith and intercaste marriages. 'An overwhelming majority of the States do not have the mechanism to protect such couples. In fact, by not having these mechanisms, they are in complete violation of the Supreme Court orders. They are in contempt,' he said.
Mr. Desai drew a parallel with the Vishakha guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, noting that codification into law could provide the much-needed legal framework. 'If a law is properly worded and drafted in the right spirit, it would be very welcome,' he added, while expressing doubt about the political will for such legislation.
The lawyer was speaking in the context of a recent order issued by the Maharashtra government, which laid out detailed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the protection of inter-faith and inter-caste couples. The order followed sustained monitoring by the Bombay High Court in response to a petition filed by Mr. Desai on behalf of a Hindu man and a Muslim woman who were forced to flee to Delhi in 2022 following threats over their decision to marry.
The couple approached the Bombay High Court in September 2023, seeking protection and safe housing. After nearly two years of court-monitored proceedings, the Maharashtra government submitted SOPs that satisfied the court, leading to the disposal of the petition.
Mr. Desai expressed gratitude to the High Court, stating that the State's response would not have materialised without judicial intervention. 'On its own, the State government would not have acted - especially in a political environment where there is hostility towards inter-faith marriages, and a focus on so-called 'freedom of religion' laws that are effectively aimed at curbing conversions, rather than safeguarding individual autonomy,' he said.
Systemic Patriarchy and Social Backlash
Reflecting on the broader societal landscape, Mr. Desai said, 'Even today, inter-caste marriages are shunned. Just look at the matrimonial columns. There is fierce resistance to inter-faith marriages not just from families, but also from communal forces across all religions.'
He noted that the threats and violence faced by such couples reflect deep-rooted patriarchal and regressive attitudes. 'The idea that an adult woman has the agency to choose her partner is still difficult for many to accept. That is how patriarchy operates in India,' he said.
Need for Proactive State Intervention
Mr. Desai also criticised the general reluctance of the State to proactively defend the individual's fundamental right to choose a life partner. 'The State needs to step in - even if it means confronting societal pressure - to uphold the rule of law and constitutional rights,' he said.
The Shaktivahini judgment, delivered in the context of caste-based violence and khap panchayats in Haryana, recognised that inter-faith couples also face significant threats across the country. The guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in 2018 called for: (1) helplines to report threats and seek immediate assistance, (2) special cells for lodging complaints, and (3) safe houses for couples at risk of violence.
This week, Maharashtra became one of the few States to formally implement all three components.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Beef being weaponised against Hindus: Assam CM Himanta Sarma after Eid incidents
Guwahati: Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday said that beef is being "weaponized" against Hindus in the state. He was referring to instances of pieces of the meat being thrown in public places after the Eid celebration last week. Talking to media persons in Guwahati he said, "In the past if some of Muslim families lived in a Hindu neighbourhood, they would be careful not to create any problems for the Hindus. If they wanted to have beef, they would go to their people living in Muslim-majority areas. Now they throw away the leftovers and waste around so that the Hindus in the neighbourhood have to eventually leave that place.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walgreens Hides This Cheap 87¢ Generic Viagra from Seniors – Here's Why fridayplans Learn More Undo Sarma pointed out that beef pieces were left in various places after Eid last week, including in front of Cotton University in Guwahati. 'Someone can have it at Eid, but it cannot be weaponized against other people.' Sarma added "Good Muslims oppose such acts. They do not post photos on Facebook holding beef. I received just three phone calls from Muslim persons after these incidents to say that they do not approve of it". Live Events The Chief Minister, " if things move as it is now, "in 20 years, beef will be thrown in front of Kamakhya temple". Authorities in western Assam's Dhubri district-imposed restrictions in Dhubri town, the district headquarters, following unrest over 'beef' found in a temple complex. Invoking Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, District Commissioner Dibakar Nath said there was a likelihood of breach of peace and public tranquillity in areas falling under the Dhubri police station due to communal tension and risks of riots and violent protests. Sarma claimed that all foreigners were sent away from Gujarat and not a single one went to the court, whereas in Assam, cases are filed daily against action on illegal migrants by Assamese petitioners and lawyers. Sarma said that Congress had opposed the push back of foreigners. ' Its legislative party leader Debabrata Saikia opposed the same in the state assembly on Monday. 'Saikia quoting in the assembly that then PM Jawaharlal Nehru had opposed the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950, which empowers district commissioners to identify foreigners and remove goes on to show that Nehru's pro-foreigner stance was from 1950 itself.' Talking about the National Register of Citizens (NRC), Sarma said that the state government, AASU and others are "not satisfied" with it. He said the state government has approached the Supreme Court for re-verification of 20-10 percent of the names in various categories, and though the apex court has not agreed to it yet, "we believe the court will accept it". Sarma on Monday said that over 330 illegal infiltrators were pushed back in the last few months, and this operation will be expedited in the coming days. Sarma on Monday informed the Assam Legislative Assembly that the government has pushed back almost 330 such illegal foreigners and none of them have returned. 'It is not possible for them to return, and we are firm on this. And this pushback will be intensified; it will be expedited. The way illegal immigrants have entered the state from Bangladesh and Pakistan, we must be more proactive to keep the state safe'.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
In shipwreck, best practice is to register case against ship owner, says ex-Shipping Secretary
Though the Kerala government has decided to look for insurance compensation instead of registering a case against the Mediterranean Shipping Company, the owner of the ship MSC Elsa 3 that sank off the coast of Kerala, the Maharashtra government had sued the company when its cargo vessel MSC Chitra collided with another vessel, MV Khalijia, off the Mumbai coast, spilling huge amounts of oil and hazardous chemicals into the Arabian Sea in 2010, causing serious environmental damage. K. Mohandas, who was the Shipping Secretary then, told The Hindu that soon after the incident the Maharashtra government registered a criminal case against the owner of the ship and the negotiation for insurance compensation progressed parallelly. 'We cannot compare the two cases. The best practice is to register a case against the shipping company and pursue the case both legally and also through negotiations. The case can be withdrawn later if there is mutual agreement on the compensation after a detailed scientific analysis,' he said. No legal compulsion However, he said, there was no legal compulsion to register a case. If the State government was confident of settling the case through negotiation, it could also be explored, especially since the company had a global reputation, he said. In the case of Maharashtra, the damage to the ecosystem was severe with huge oil spillage. Later, the owner of the ship sank the vessel along with the dangerous cargo onboard after around eight months of the accident as it was very difficult to retrieve the poisonous cargo from the ship. Even the shipbreakers refused to handle the cargo and shred the vessel. The owners sank the ship to the bottom of the sea around 350 nautical miles off the coast of Mumbai, as per reports. Criticism Experts have criticised the handling of the issue in Kerala, as the State government has decided to pursue negotiation instead of filing a case against the owner of the ship. The State was of the view that the MSC is a reputed company which patronises the Vizhinjam International Seaport and the company requires the goodwill of Kerala for its operations here. The State, which released the list of dangerous cargo manifest a day after a cargo vessel caught fire off the coast of Kannur on Monday, was dragging its feet on releasing the cargo manifest of MSC Elsa 3.


Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
MLC Ivan D'Souza questions Centre for 'selective' probe by NIA into murders in Dakshina Kannada
Referring to the Union Home Ministry handing over the probe into the murder of Hindu activist and rowdy sheeter Suhas Shetty to National Investigation Agency (NIA), MLC Ivan D'Souza asked why only one case was referred to NIA.