logo
States without protection for inter-faith, inter-caste couples in contempt of SC: Mihir Desai

States without protection for inter-faith, inter-caste couples in contempt of SC: Mihir Desai

The Hindu17-05-2025

Prominent human rights lawyer Mihir Desai has said that all States which have failed to put in place mechanisms for the protection of inter-faith and inter-caste couples are in contempt of the Supreme Court. He was referring to the apex court's 2018 Shaktivahini judgment, which directed all States to establish protective measures for such couples, including helplines, special cells, and safe houses.
In an interview with The Hindu, Mr. Desai emphasised the urgent need for a national law to protect the rights of individuals entering interfaith and intercaste marriages. 'An overwhelming majority of the States do not have the mechanism to protect such couples. In fact, by not having these mechanisms, they are in complete violation of the Supreme Court orders. They are in contempt,' he said.
Mr. Desai drew a parallel with the Vishakha guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, noting that codification into law could provide the much-needed legal framework. 'If a law is properly worded and drafted in the right spirit, it would be very welcome,' he added, while expressing doubt about the political will for such legislation.
The lawyer was speaking in the context of a recent order issued by the Maharashtra government, which laid out detailed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the protection of inter-faith and inter-caste couples. The order followed sustained monitoring by the Bombay High Court in response to a petition filed by Mr. Desai on behalf of a Hindu man and a Muslim woman who were forced to flee to Delhi in 2022 following threats over their decision to marry.
The couple approached the Bombay High Court in September 2023, seeking protection and safe housing. After nearly two years of court-monitored proceedings, the Maharashtra government submitted SOPs that satisfied the court, leading to the disposal of the petition.
Mr. Desai expressed gratitude to the High Court, stating that the State's response would not have materialised without judicial intervention. 'On its own, the State government would not have acted - especially in a political environment where there is hostility towards inter-faith marriages, and a focus on so-called 'freedom of religion' laws that are effectively aimed at curbing conversions, rather than safeguarding individual autonomy,' he said.
Systemic Patriarchy and Social Backlash
Reflecting on the broader societal landscape, Mr. Desai said, 'Even today, inter-caste marriages are shunned. Just look at the matrimonial columns. There is fierce resistance to inter-faith marriages not just from families, but also from communal forces across all religions.'
He noted that the threats and violence faced by such couples reflect deep-rooted patriarchal and regressive attitudes. 'The idea that an adult woman has the agency to choose her partner is still difficult for many to accept. That is how patriarchy operates in India,' he said.
Need for Proactive State Intervention
Mr. Desai also criticised the general reluctance of the State to proactively defend the individual's fundamental right to choose a life partner. 'The State needs to step in - even if it means confronting societal pressure - to uphold the rule of law and constitutional rights,' he said.
The Shaktivahini judgment, delivered in the context of caste-based violence and khap panchayats in Haryana, recognised that inter-faith couples also face significant threats across the country. The guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in 2018 called for: (1) helplines to report threats and seek immediate assistance, (2) special cells for lodging complaints, and (3) safe houses for couples at risk of violence.
This week, Maharashtra became one of the few States to formally implement all three components.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court Refuses To Reduce Lawyer's Sentence For Abusing Woman Judge, Says...
Supreme Court Refuses To Reduce Lawyer's Sentence For Abusing Woman Judge, Says...

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Supreme Court Refuses To Reduce Lawyer's Sentence For Abusing Woman Judge, Says...

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today rejected a petition by a lawyer convicted of abusing a woman judicial officer in a court in Delhi. The top court refused to reduce the imprisonment sentence to 6 months and said, "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench commented orally. The bench of Justice PK Mishra and Justice Manmohan was hearing a plea against the order of the Delhi High Court, which upheld the conviction of a lawyer who used abusive language towards a woman judge in a challan matter inside the trial court. The lawyer used abusive, vulgar expletives after the judge had adjourned the matter. While hearing the plea, Justice Manmohan verbally remarked, "Just see the inspection report, the language used, we cannot even say in the open court". Justice Manmohan further said that if a stern view is not taken against such behaviour, women judicial officers would not be ensured a safe work environment. "Today, the majority of our officers in Delhi are women. They will not be able to function like this- if somebody can get away like this. Think of their state," the bench said. The lawyer, Sanjay Rathore, was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for the offence under Section 509 (intending to outrage modesty of a woman) of the Indian Penal Code, 3 months under Section 189 (injury to public servant), and an additional three months under Section 353 (assault or criminal force against public servant to deter them from their duty). The trial court directed that the sentences would run consecutively, resulting in a total sentence of two years. Later, the High Court said that the sentence would run concurrently and not consecutively, reducing his sentence to 18 months from two years The counsel for the petitioner urged the Supreme Court bench to reduce his term of imprisonment to six months. He stressed several "mitigating factors" for this consideration, like his ageing parents and young children. He informed that the Bar Council has also acted against the lawyer.

Kerala ruling party slams Opposition for ‘communal' Welfare Party alliance
Kerala ruling party slams Opposition for ‘communal' Welfare Party alliance

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Kerala ruling party slams Opposition for ‘communal' Welfare Party alliance

The ruling CPI(M) in Kerala hit out at the United Democratic Front (UDF) over the support of the Jamaat-e-Islami-backed Welfare Party of India to the Congress-led candidate Aryadan Shoukath for the upcoming Nilambur bypolls. The CPI(M) called it an alliance with 'communal forces.'Meanwhile, the People's Democratic Party (PDP), led by Abdul Nasar Madani, has announced its support for the CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front (LDF) in the same the Welfare Party's support to the UDF an alliance with 'communal forces,' CPI(M) state secretary MV Govindan said, 'Jamaat-e-Islami is a communal force which is there worldwide. Their stand is that there should be a religious country. Like RSS says, they are a party which says the counterpart of that.' Justifying the CPI(M)'s acceptance of PDP support, Govindan claimed that PDP and Jamaat-e-Islami cannot be equated. 'PDP does not have such a stand,' he of Opposition VD Satheesan questioned the CPI(M)'s double standards.'When the Welfare Party gave support to the UDF in Nilambur, CPI(M) called the Jamaat-e-Islami communal. But in 2009, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan had said Jamaat-e-Islami was a Muslim organisation with a clear political stand and welcomed their support.'He accused the Left of hypocrisy, saying, 'When they [Welfare Party] gave support to CPI(M), they were secular. When they support UDF, they are communal. This is their stand.'advertisementSatheesan also questioned CPI(M)'s comfort with the support of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), whose leader Abdul Nasar Madani was arrested in connection with terror cases.'The Left government's own PRD release praised the arrest and handover of Madani to Tamil Nadu police. Yet they now accept support from his party,' he Nilambur assembly seat falls under the Wayanad parliamentary constituency and will be going to polls on June 19. Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi will be arriving in Nilambur later this week. IN THIS STORY#Kerala

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store